Comparison of content and psychometric properties for assessment tools used for brain tumor patients: a scoping review

Baseline factors relating to depressive symptoms at one year postoperative in patients with diffuse glioma

Background

Depressive symptoms are common in patients with diffuse glioma, potentially reducing their quality of life. Understanding baseline factors associated with the development of depressive symptoms is important for psychoeducation and early intervention. This study investigates the associations of baseline patient- and tumor-related characteristics and depressive symptoms 1 year after surgery.

Methods

We combined retrospective longitudinal datasets from Amsterdam UMC and Rigshospitalet Copenhagen. Several characteristics of patients and tumors were retrieved, in particular items of their mood and functioning status. Depression instruments were harmonized to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Depression scale through previously developed item response theory. Functioning items were harmonized to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) domains using linking methods published previously. We analyzed the associations of 25 baseline factors with depressive symptoms one year after surgery by multivariable stepwise backward linear regression models and verified model robustness using best subset selection.

Results

We included 118 patients with diffuse glioma with a mean age of 48 years and a glioblastoma in 29%. Baseline depressive symptoms, lower ICF energy, and impaired ICF language functioning were associated with more depressive symptoms at follow-up in the multivariable model (R-squared: 0.379).

Conclusions

We identified 3 key baseline factors associated with depressive symptoms one year after surgery. Clinically, our findings contribute to the comprehension of predictive factors for depressive symptoms, aiding healthcare providers and patients in understanding and possibly allowing for early intervention.

Methodological quality of 100 recent systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments: an overview of reviews

PURPOSE

Systematic reviews evaluating and comparing the measurement properties of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) play an important role in OMI selection. Earlier overviews of review quality (2007, 2014) evidenced substantial concerns with regards to alignment to scientific standards. This overview aimed to investigate whether the quality of recent systematic reviews of OMIs lives up to the current scientific standards.

METHODS

One hundred systematic reviews of OMIs published from June 1, 2021 onwards were randomly selected through a systematic literature search performed on March 17, 2022 in MEDLINE and EMBASE. The quality of systematic reviews was appraised by two independent reviewers. An updated data extraction form was informed by the earlier studies, and results were compared to these earlier studies' findings.

RESULTS

A quarter of the reviews had an unclear research question or aim, and in 22% of the reviews the search strategy did not match the aim. Half of the reviews had an incomprehensive search strategy, because relevant search terms were not included. In 63% of the reviews (compared to 41% in 2014 and 30% in 2007) a risk of bias assessment was conducted. In 73% of the reviews (some) measurement properties were evaluated (58% in 2014 and 55% in 2007). In 60% of the reviews the data were (partly) synthesized (42% in 2014 and 7% in 2007); evaluation of measurement properties and data syntheses was not conducted separately for subscales in the majority. Certainty assessments of the quality of the total body of evidence were conducted in only 33% of reviews (not assessed in 2014 and 2007). The majority (58%) did not make any recommendations on which OMI (not) to use.

CONCLUSION

Despite clear improvements in risk of bias assessments, measurement property evaluation and data synthesis, specifying the research question, conducting the search strategy and performing a certainty assessment remain poor. To ensure that systematic reviews of OMIs meet current scientific standards, more consistent conduct and reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs is needed.

Systematization of rehabilitation interventions for neuro-oncological patients using international classification of health interventions: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

To ensure equitable and effective rehabilitation for neuro-oncological patients the development of an effective treatment strategy is necessary.

OBJECTIVE

To identify evidence for interventions used in acute rehabilitation for patients with neuro-oncological conditions and to systematize them according to the International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI) classification Methods: A scoping review was conducted, comprising 3 parts: identification of interventions in publications; linking the interventions to ICHI classification; and identifying problems targeted by these interventions and linking them to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories.

RESULTS

The search strategy selected a total of 6,128 articles. Of these, 58 publications were included in the review. A total of 150 interventions were identified, 47 of which were unique interventions. Forty-three of the interventions were linked to the ICHI classification; 4 of these interventions were evidence level I, 18 evidence level II, 23 evidence level III, and 2 evidence level IV. Five interventions were linked to the ICF One-Level Classification, and the remaining 42 interventions were linked to the ICF Two-Level Classification. All interventions regarding the Body Systems and Functions were linked to the ICF Two-Level Classification. Only 5 interventions in the Activities and Participation domain, 3 interventions in the Health-related Behaviors domain, and 1 intervention in the Environment domain were linked to the ICF Two-Level Classification. Two identified problems (inpatient nursing and comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation) were not classified according to the ICF.

DISCUSSION

A total of 47 unique interventions were identified, revealing a significant focus on addressing issues related to bodily functions and structures. The study also highlighted the challenge of linking specific interventions to ICHI codes, particularly when the source documentation lacked adequate detail. While this review offers valuable insights into rehabilitation for neuro-oncological patients and lays the groundwork for standardized coding and data exchange, it also emphasizes the need for further refinement and validation of the ICHI classification to better align with the multifaceted interventions used in rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

 There is evidence in the literature of 47 interventions used by various rehabilitation professionals in the acute rehabilitation of neuro-oncological patients. However, most of these interventions are evidence level II and III. Four interventions (virtual reality, mirror therapy, robotic upper extremity training to improve function, and cognitive group therapy) are not included in the ICHI. The problems analysed in the literature that are targeted by interventions often do not coincide with the purpose of the specific intervention or are too broadly defined and not specific. These findings emphasize the need for greater precision in describing and documenting interventions, as well as the importance of aligning interventions more closely with ICF categories, particularly in the domains of Activities and Participation. This work highlights the heterogeneity in the reporting of rehabilitation interventions, and the challenges in mapping them to standardized classifications, emphasizing the ongoing need for refining and updating these classification systems.

The Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training on Quality of Life and Incidence of Chemotherapy Side Effects in Women With Breast Cancer

Women with breast cancer (BC) experience multiple symptoms related to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) treatment that impair their functioning and quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to explore the effect of high-intensity aerobic interval training (HIIT) on quality of life and NAC side effects in women with BC.

METHODS

56 patients (48.56 (7.84) years, range 35-64 years) diagnosed locally advanced (stage II-III) ER + BC receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based NAC were randomly assigned to the HIIT group and a control group (CG) for 6 months. The HIIT group performed 2 to 3 HIIT sessions per week according to the study protocol (4 × 4 minutes at 85%-95% peak heart rate (HR)). The CG followed the standard of care instructions by the oncologists. To assess the QoL participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 with the additional BC module of QLQ BR-23. Weekly self-reports on NAC side effects were collected through online survey.

RESULTS

Study data were analyzed for 37 participants (nHIIT = 17, nCON = 20) who reported at least 14 (60%) weeks. HIIT was effective to reduce BC symptom scale outcomes (ES = 0.113, P = .048), and alleviate systemic therapy side effects (ES = 0.154, P = .020) and cancer related symptoms (ES = 0.124, P = .038). The most common side effect participants experienced at least 1 to 4 days/week was pain (average 50.9% and 56.8% for HIIT and CG, respectively), followed by sleep disturbances (average 50.9% and 49.9%, respectively). About 31% in both groups experienced sleep disturbances 5 to 7 days/week. The NAC induced physical, social and fatigue side effects had significantly lower incidence in HIIT group, while psychological side effects were significantly more common in training group.

CONCLUSIONS

HIIT is an effective physical exercise program to maintain higher quality of life and help to reduce some of NAC induced side effects for women with BC.

Functional State and Rehabilitation of Patients after Primary Brain Tumor Surgery for Malignant and Nonmalignant Tumors: A Prospective Observational Study

The aim of this study was to compare the pre- and postoperative function of patients qualifying for resection of malignant and nonmalignant primary brain tumors to determine the relationship among tumor type, function, and the course of rehabilitation after surgery. This single-center, prospective, observational study recruited 92 patients requiring prolonged postoperative rehabilitation during their inpatient stay, who were divided into a nonmalignant tumor group (n = 66) and a malignant tumor group (n = 26). Functional status and gait efficiency were assessed using a battery of instruments. Motor skills, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were recorded and compared between groups. The frequency and severity of postoperative complications, the time needed to attain individual motor skills, and the proportion of patients losing independent gait (~30%) were similar between groups. However, paralysis and paresis were more frequent in the malignant tumor group before surgery (p < 0.001). While nonmalignant tumor patients deteriorated more according to all scales after surgery, patients with malignant tumors were still characterized by worse ADL, independence, and performance at discharge. Worse functional outcomes in the malignant tumor group did not affect LoS or rehabilitation. Patients with malignant and nonmalignant tumors have similar rehabilitation needs, and patient expectation-especially those with nonmalignant tumors-should be appropriately managed.

Neuropsychological monitoring of cognitive function and ICF-based mental components in patients with malignant brain tumours

BACKGROUND

Cognitive deficits are one of the important clinical features of patients with brain tumours, which can affect up to 30-90% of patients before treatment. The consequence is a significant and rapid degradation of the patient's intellectual functioning, seizures, paralysis and other symptoms that prevent independent functioning. This results in a reduced quality of life and a psychological crisis not only for the patient but also for their relatives. Maintaining the patient's function at the highest level for as long as possible is particularly important, given that long-term remission or a cure is unlikely or accompanied by significant disability.

PURPOSE

This paper aims to provide a narrative review to the neuropsychological procedure for monitoring cognitive function in patients with brain tumours, which may be helpful in developing adequate clinical practice and appropriate management procedures.

METHODS

A narrative review was applied to search broadly across disciplines, retrieving literature from several databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost).

RESULTS

(1) discussing the methodological aspects of neuropsychological tools for monitoring cognitive function in brain tumour patients, (2) identifying the most commonly used tools and (3) their practical applicability according to the cognitive function components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

CONCLUSION

This article points to the need to systematise research tools or develop new ones, adapted to diagnostic needs with high psychometric characteristics, with particular attention to memory processes and learning effect. Rehabilitation of patients is also an important issue, which requires the use of adequate tools to assess functional disability. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) seems to be useful in this respect. The ICF has the advantage of targeting actions to improve the condition of the individual and to keep them as long as possible in a state of well-being that allows them to function effectively in society or to return to work. This is particularly important in view of the ageing population and the increasing number of diagnoses related to brain tumours.

The need to consider return to work as a main outcome in patients undergoing surgery for diffuse low-grade glioma: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

For a long time, return to work (RTW) has been neglected in patients harboring a diffuse low-grade glioma (LGG). However, a majority of LGG patients worked at time of diagnosis. Moreover, these patients now live longer given current treatment paradigms, especially thanks to early maximal surgery.

METHODS

We systematically searched available medical databases for studies that reported data on RTW in patients who underwent resection for LGG.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies were selected: 19 considered RTW (especially rate and timing) as an outcome and 11 used scales of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) which included work-related aspects. Series that considered RTW as a main endpoint were composed of 1014 patients, with postoperative RTW rates ranging from 31 to 97.1% (mean 73.1%). Timing to RTW ranged from 15 days to 22 months (mean 6.3 months). Factors related to an increased proportion of RTW were: younger age, better neurologic status, having a white-collar occupation, working pre-operatively, being the sole breadwinner, the use of awake surgery, and greater extent of resection. Female sex, older age, poor neurologic status, pre-operative history of work absences, slow lexical access speed, and postoperative seizures were negatively related to RTW. No studies that used HRQoL scales directly investigated RTW rate or timing.

CONCLUSIONS

RTW was scarcely analyzed in LGG patients who underwent resection. However, because they are usually young, with no or only mild functional deficits and have a longer life expectancy, postoperative RTW should be assessed more systematically and accurately as a main outcome. As majority (61.5-100%) of LGG patients were working at time of surgery, the responsibility of neurosurgeons is to bring these patients back to their previous activities according to his/her wishes. RTW might also be included as a critical endpoint for future prospective studies and randomized control trials on LGGs.

Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with brain tumor undergoing rehabilitation treatment: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The number of diagnosed brain tumors (BT) has increased in recent years. The results of treatment of patients with surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are also improving and their survival rate has increased significantly. Symptoms of the disease and side effects of oncological treatment may reduce the functional performance of patients. It is so important to conduct rehabilitation in this group of patients. The aim of this systematic review is to identify predictors of effective rehabilitation in aspects of physical functioning of BT patients. The study was registered with health and social care, welfare, public health, education, crime, justice and international development departments, where there is a health-related interest outcome PROSPERO. We have received registration number is: CRD42021269398.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

To find relevant publications, the algorithm of keywords ("brain tumor") AND (rehabilitation OR "physical activity" OR exercise OR "physical therapy") was used. The search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Library. Information was extracted using the PICO format (i.e., participants, intervention, comparison, outcomes).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

the initial search identified a total of 1122 results, and 21 articles met the criteria and were selected for analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results present that rehabilitation is an important and safe cancer encouraging therapy, brings functional benefits. The type of rehabilitation program, especially in BT patients, depends on many factors such as time and type of oncological treatment, general conditions which is strongly related to the general functioning of the patient. It still is a need for clinical research into the safety and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions already during radio or chemotherapy in this group of cancer patients.

Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Motor Deficits after Initial and Repeat Brain Tumor Surgery

Repeat surgery is often required to treat brain tumor recurrences. Here, we compared the functional state and rehabilitation of patients undergoing initial and repeat surgery for brain tumors to establish their individual risks that might impact management. In total, 835 patients underwent operations, and 139 (16.6%) required rehabilitation during the inpatient stay. The Karnofsky performance status, Barthel index, and the modified Rankin scale were used to assess functional status, and the gait index was used to assess gait efficiency. Motor skills, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Patients were classified into two groups: first surgery (n = 103) and repeat surgery (n = 30). Eighteen percent of patients required reoperations, and these patients required prolonged postoperative rehabilitation as often as those operated on for the first time. Rehabilitation was more often complicated in the repeat surgery group (p = 0.047), and the complications were more severe and persistent. Reoperated patients had significantly worse motor function and independence in activities of daily living before surgery and at discharge, but the deterioration after surgery affected patients in the first surgery group to a greater extent according to all metrics (p < 0.001). The length of hospital stay was similar in both groups. These results will be useful for tailoring postoperative rehabilitation during a hospital stay on the neurosurgical ward as well as planning discharge requirements after leaving the hospital.

Comparison of the Functional State and Motor Skills of Patients after Cerebral Hemisphere, Ventricular System, and Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Surgery

Brain tumor location is an important factor determining the functional state after brain tumor surgery. We assessed the functional state and course of rehabilitation of patients undergoing surgery for brain tumors and assessed the location-dependent risk of loss of basic motor skills and the time needed for improvement after surgery. There were 835 patients who underwent operations, and 139 (16.6%) required rehabilitation during the inpatient stay. Karnofsky Performance Scale, Barthel Index, and the modified Rankin scale were used to assess functional status, whereas Gait Index was used to assess gait efficiency. Motor skills, overall length of stay (LOS) in hospital, and LOS after surgery were recorded. Patients were classified into four groups: cerebral hemisphere (CH), ventricular system (VS), and cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors; and a control group not requiring rehabilitation. VS tumor patients had the lowest scores in all domains compared with the other groups before surgery (p < 0.001). Their performance further deteriorated after surgery and by the day of discharge. They most often required long-lasting postoperative rehabilitation and had the longest LOS (35 days). Operation was most often required for CH tumors (77.7%), and all metrics and LOS parameters were better in these patients (p < 0.001). Patients with CPA tumors had the best outcomes (p < 0.001). Most patients (83.4%) with brain tumors did not require specialized rehabilitation, and LOS after surgery in the control group was on average 5.1 days after surgery. VS tumor patients represent a rehabilitation challenge. Postoperative rehabilitation planning must take the tumor site and preoperative condition into account.