Quality of life instruments in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of measurement properties

Validation of the Danish translation of the atrial fibrillation severity scale: a study on linguistic and cultural adaptation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) stands as the most common cardiac arrhythmia on a global scale with a substantial symptom burden impacting the quality of life (QoL) of patients with AF. Consequently, assessing and monitoring symptoms in patients with AF has gained increased interest, leading to a rise in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs provide valuable insights into the patient's perspective, allowing for a more patient-centric approach to care. One of these PROMs is the Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS), a convenient and straightforward instrument for assessing symptom severity in patients with AF, potentially enabling healthcare professionals to tailor interventions accordingly. However, no Danish version of AFSS exists. This study aims to translate and linguistically validate the AFSS in accordance with MAPI Research Trust Guidelines.

METHODS

The translation of AFSS from English to Danish was conducted using forward and backward translation, yielding versions 1 and 2, respectively. Afterwards, the translated AFSS was linguistically validated in patients with AF by cognitive interviews producing a third version. The third version was then proofread, finalizing the Danish version of AFSS.

RESULTS

Derived from the cognitive interviews, the Danish version of AFSS demonstrated comprehensibility and readability among all included patients with AF. No revisions were deemed necessary based on the patient testing, culminating in the submission of the final version of AFSS for approval.

CONCLUSION

A certified and linguistically validated Danish version of the AFSS has been established and is accessible through MAPI Trust Research.

Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical studies for cardiovascular diseases of Traditional Chinese medicine worldwide: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) represent a major global health challenge. Clinical research is increasingly leveraging patient perspectives to evaluate the efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) in treating these conditions. This study reviews and summarizes the application and characteristics of Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in TCM for CVD, the overarching goal is to provide a resource that can guide potential research directions for PROs endpoints in future TCM CVD clinical research.

METHODS

We searched clinical studies of TCM for CVD from the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform registered between January 1, 2010, and February 22, 2025. The outcome types, whether PRO measures (PROMs) explicitly mentioned, study design, clinical study phases,age, gender, and geographic region were analyzed. We classified the studies that explicitly specified PROs into 15 categories based on the International Classification of Diseases-11 (ICD-11),and compared their PROMs with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET).

RESULTS

A total of 636 TCM CVD studies were included, of which 394 employed PROs. However, 103 studies did not specify the PROMs utilized, including 33 that involved TCM syndrome scores. None of the most frequently used PROMs were TCM-specific. The most frequently studied disease categories - chronic coronary heart diseases and heart failure - employed PROMs that were basically aligned with COMET recommendations. In contrast, other disease categories were not aligned with COMET.

CONCLUSION

In TCM clinical research on CVD, PROs have been commonly adopted as outcome measures, with usage steadily increasing. However, the application of TCM-specific PROMs remains limited, revealing a significant gap. PROMs recommended by COMET should be further investigated across a broader range of CVD categories. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for patient-centered research on TCM syndrome scores, highlighting the importance of developing robust, standardized TCM-specific PROMs tailored to this field.

Expert opinion on design and endpoints for studies on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently studied in randomized trials, observational and registry studies. The aim of this expert opinion is to provide guidance for clinicians and industry regarding the development of future clinical studies on catheter ablation of AF, implement lessons learned from previous studies, and promote a higher degree of consistency across studies.

BACKGROUND

Studies on catheter ablation of AF may benefit from well-described definitions of endpoints and consistent methodology and documentation of outcomes related to efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. The availably of new, innovative technologies warrants further consideration about their application and impact on study design and the choice of endpoints. Moreover, recent insights gained from AF ablation studies suggest a reconsideration of some methodological aspects.

METHODS

A panel of clinical experts on catheter ablation of AF and designing and conducting clinical studies developed an expert opinion on the design and endpoints for studies on catheter ablation of AF. Discussions within the expert panel with the aim to reach consensus on predefined topics were based on outcomes reported in the literature and experiences from recent clinical trials.

RESULTS

A comprehensive set of recommendations is presented. Key elements include the documentation of clinical AF, medication during the study, repeated ablations and their effect on endpoint assessments, postablation blanking and the choice of rhythm-related and other endpoints.

CONCLUSION

This expert opinion provides guidance and promotes consistency regarding design of AF catheter ablation studies and identified aspects requiring further research to optimize study design and methodology.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

Recent insights from studies on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and the availability of new innovative technologies warrant reconsideration of methodological aspects related to study design and the choice and assessment of endpoints. This expert opinion, developed by clinical experts on catheter ablation of AF provides a comprehensive set of recommendations related to these methodological aspects. The aim of this expert opinion is to provide guidance for clinicians and industry regarding the development of clinical studies, implement lessons learned from previous studies, and promote a higher degree of consistency across studies.

Factors Associated with Quality of Life among People with Atrial Fibrillation: Jordan Atrial Fibrillation Registry Study

Background and Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that may adversely affect the quality of life (QoL). Several factors could be associated with the QoL among patients with AF; however, evidence regarding these factors is still limited and controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the level of QoL and its associated factors among Jordanian patients with AF. Subjects and methods: A case study design was implemented. A sample of 620 participants were recruited from 28 outpatient clinics registered in the Jordan atrial fibrillation registry AF (JoFIB). Data on QoL were gathered through the self-reported Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life tool (AFEQT). A QoL questionnaire was validated in this population before starting this study. The cardiac nurse then provided the research assistant with data relating to patients' characteristics and associated comorbidities. Results: The overall AFEQT scores were positively skewed (median 21.3, IQR: 14.4-31.9). This pattern was reflected for the AFEQT sub-scales 'Symptoms' (20.8, 8.3-33.3), 'Daily activities' (16.7, 10.4-27.1), and 'Treatment concerns' (27.8, 19.4-41.7), whereas 'Treatment satisfaction' was negatively skewed (91.7, 83.3-91.7). Patients in the higher quartiles, indicating a better QoL, tended to be younger and were less likely to experience dyslipidemia, stroke, pulmonary hypertension, or other comorbidities. Over 90% of patients were currently experiencing AF, and patients with a better QoL tended to be less likely to be currently experiencing AF and more likely to have had their latest episode of AF more than a month ago (compared to less than a month ago). Age, BMI, dyslipidemia, heart failure, COPD, CAD, history of ablation, and the use of anticoagulants were significantly associated with the overall AFEQT score (R2 = 0.278). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that AF Jordanian patients had low levels of QoL. Patients in higher quartiles for the overall AFEQT score were younger, with fewer disease comorbidities and less experience of current AF episodes. Several modifiable and non-modifiable factors were associated with QoL in AF patients. Age, BMI, dyslipidemia, heart failure, COPD, CAD, history of ablation, and the use of oral anticoagulants were significantly associated with the overall AFEQT score. Healthcare providers should target these factors as indicators or interventions for which QoL is continuously monitored.

Assessing the impact of atrial fibrillation on symptoms and quality of life in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

In hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), atrial fibrillation (AF) has historically been regarded to have a deleterious impact on clinical course, strongly associated with progressive heart failure (HF) symptoms. However, there is a paucity of information regarding the impact of AF on HCM employing validated quality of life (QoL) surveys. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of AF on QoL utilizing patient reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

218 consecutive HCM patients with or without AF at the Lahey HCM center in 2022 completed PROMs at their most recent visit evaluating HF (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ]) and AF symptoms (AF Effect on QoL [AFEQT]).

RESULTS

Among the 218 patients, 50 (23%) had a history of AF and comprise the primary study cohort. AF was diagnosed at 55 ± 10 years of age, median of 5.5 years before PROM, with 66% of patients treated with a rhythm control strategy with antiarrhythmic drug and/or AF ablation. AFEQT indicated that 52% of patients experienced no or minimal AF-related disability, mild to moderate in 22%, and severe in 26%. There was no substantial difference in HCM phenotype in patients with no or minimal AF disability compared to those with severe disability. HF symptoms for most HCM patients with prior AF history was consistent with no or minimal (59%) or only mild (27%) disability as measured by KCCQ overall summary scores. In addition, with multivariate analysis, AF history was associated with less HF symptoms and improved QoL (OR 0.4, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In contrast to prior perceptions, HCM patients with prior AF history were less likely to incur HF symptoms impairing QoL compared to HCM patients without AF. After treatment, prior history of AF did not substantially impact current QoL. These data provide a realistic appraisal for the impact that AF has on HCM patients and also offers a measure of reassurance for this patient subgroup.

Feasibility study of Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues for the optimization of Outcomes in obese patients undergoing AbLation for Atrial Fibrillation (GOAL-AF) protocol

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is recommended for symptomatic patients after failed medical therapy. Ablation has a higher failure rate in obese patients, and both the prevalence of atrial fibrillation and obesity are increasingly globally. The outcome of ablation can be improved if obese patients can achieve goal-oriented weight reduction prior to ablation. Conventional weight loss strategies, however, can be difficult to access and can delay ablation, thereby risking a lower chance of maintaining sinus rhythm. Effective weight-loss medications, such as the glucagon-like peptide inhibitor-1 drugs, offer the potential for incremental impact on weight loss over a shorter period of time as a bridging therapy. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of using liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide inhibitor-1, in producing weight loss in obese patients before catheter ablation.

METHODS

The study is an open-label, uncontrolled, prospective single-centre feasibility study of daily liraglutide injections in the treatment of obese patients for at least 13 weeks before and 52 weeks after AF ablation. Adult patients with symptomatic AF whose body mass index ≥ 30 will be recruited from those planning to undergo ablation. Feasibility will be determined based on the recruitment rate, adherence to the medication, and the amount of weight loss achieved over the study period. Exploratory outcomes include changes in atrial structure, function, and fibrosis with weight loss evaluated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, electroanatomic mapping, and patient-reported outcome measure.

DISCUSSION

This study will allow us to determine whether the use of liraglutide in obese patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing ablation is feasible with adequate recruitment. The additional information on adherence and average weight loss over the study period will inform the design of a future definitive randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05221229 ). Registered on 2 February 2022.

TRIAL FUNDING

Metchley Park Medical Society and University of Birmingham Starter Fellowship, British Heart Foundation Accelerator Grant, Abbott Investigator-Initiated Study Grant.

The importance, consequences and treatment of psychosocial risk factors in heart disease: less conversation, more action!

Psychosocial factors play a significant role in the incidence and prognosis of cardiovascular disease with a rapidly increasing body of knowledge, as acknowledged by their inclusion in the European Society of Cardiology cardiovascular prevention guideline since 2012. Nevertheless, psychosocial risk is not consistently assessed, acknowledged and treated in daily clinical practice. Therefore, adopting a multidimensional approach that encompasses biological, psychological, and social factors is crucial for understanding the dynamic nature of cardiovascular health and disease, delivering patient-centred care, and developing effective interventions to ultimately enhance health and satisfaction with contemporary medicine and care. The current review summarises the state-of-the-art evidence for screening and treating psychological risk factors in coronary heart disease, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation in the context of cardiac rehabilitation, along with accompanying recommendations. The limited adoption of routine screening, despite longstanding recommendations, highlights the importance of prioritising the implementation and expansion of routine screening in primary and secondary prevention. To advance psychosocial treatment, a standardised and personalised approach including comprehensive education, physical exercise, and psychosocial support with a focus on patient-reported outcomes is crucial. Treating heart and mind together has the potential to decrease psychosocial risk while enhancing the prognosis and quality of life, therefore delivering true patient-centred care.

Evaluate the Quality of Life in Patients With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Introduction Globally, coronary heart disease is the most imperative cause of premature death. However, timely management with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) can improve the quality of life (QoL) and reduce mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the QoL between the patients who received PCI and CABG for the treatment of coronary heart disease. Materials and methods This was a retrospective observational study. Patients who underwent PCI or CABG at least three months before or more at enrollment were purposefully selected. Results A total of 156 patients were enrolled, 78 in each group. Health-related QoL was assessed by using the SF-36 scale for PCI or CABG procedures. The mean ± SD scores of QoL for PCI and CABG were 78.95 ±10.14 and 78.17 ± 10.92, respectively. Of the patients, 72.43% felt better after treatment, 17.95% felt the same as before treatment, and 9.62% felt worse than before treatment in both groups. Among CABG patients, 38.46% felt significantly better after treatment compared to PCI (33.97%) (p=0.048). Moreover, more CABG patients (6.41%) felt significantly worse than PCI patients (3.21%) after treatment (p=0.048). Male patients were significantly more in the CABG group (89.74%) compared to the PCI group (75.64%). In contrast, female patients had more PCI (24.36%) compared to CABG patients (10.26%) (p=0.020). Conclusion Subjective perceptions of physical and mental well-being improved significantly from before treatment to at least three months after treatment, and an enhanced health-related QoL was noticed for medical intervention (PCI) and surgical approach (CABG).

Managing With Atrial Fibrillation: An Exploratory Model-Based Cluster Analysis of Clinical and Personal Patient Characteristics

Background

Examining characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has the potential to help in identifying groups of patients who might benefit from different management approaches.

Methods

Secondary analysis of online survey data was combined with clinic referral data abstraction from 196 patients with AF attending an AF specialty clinic. Cluster analyses were performed to identify distinct, homogeneous clusters of AF patients defined by 11 relevant variables: CHA2DS2-VASc score, age, AF symptoms, overall health, mental health, AF knowledge, perceived stress, household and recreation activity, overall AF quality of life, and AF symptom treatment satisfaction. Follow-up analyses examined differences between the cluster groups in additional clinical variables.

Results

Evidence emerged for both 2- and 4-cluster solutions. The 2-cluster solution involved a contrast between patients who were doing well on all variables (n = 129; 66%) vs those doing less well (n = 67; 34%). The 4-cluster solution provided a closer-up view of the data, showing that the group doing less well was split into 3 meaningfully different subgroups of patients who were managing in different ways. The final 4 clusters produced were as follows: (i) doing well; (ii) stressed and discontented; (iii) struggling and dissatisfied; and (iv) satisfied and complacent.

Conclusions

Patients with AF can be accurately classified into distinct, natural groupings that vary in clinically important ways. Among the patients who were not managing well with AF, we found 3 distinct subgroups of patients who may benefit from tailored approaches to AF management and support. The tailoring of treatment approaches to specific personal and/or behavioural patterns, alongside clinical patterns, holds potential to improve patient outcomes (eg, treatment satisfaction).

Placing patient-reported outcomes at the centre of cardiovascular clinical practice: implications for quality of care and management

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important insights into patients' own perspectives about their health and medical condition, and there is evidence that their use can lead to improvements in the quality of care and to better-informed clinical decisions. Their application in cardiovascular populations has grown over the past decades. This statement describes what PROs are, and it provides an inventory of disease-specific and domain-specific PROs that have been developed for cardiovascular populations. International standards and quality indices have been published, which can guide the selection of PROs for clinical practice and in clinical trials and research; patients as well as experts in psychometrics should be involved in choosing which are most appropriate. Collaborations are needed to define criteria for using PROs to guide regulatory decisions, and the utility of PROs for comparing and monitoring the quality of care and for allocating resources should be evaluated. New sources for recording PROs include wearable digital health devices, medical registries, and electronic health record. Advice is given for the optimal use of PROs in shared clinical decision-making in cardiovascular medicine, and concerning future directions for their wider application.

Characteristics associated with poor atrial fibrillation-related quality of life in adults with atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Few studies have examined the relationship between poor atrial fibrillation-related quality of life (AFQoL) and a battery of geriatric factors. The objective of this study is to describe factors associated with poor AFQoL in older adults with atrial fibrillation (AF) with a focus on sociodemographic and clinical factors and a battery of geriatric factors.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort study of participants aged 65+ with high stroke risk and AF. AFQoL was measured using the validated Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (score 0-100) and categorized as poor (<80) or good (80-100). Chi-square and t -tests evaluated differences in factors across poor AFQoL and significant characteristics ( P  < 0.05) were entered into a logistic regression model to identify variables related to poor AFQoL.

RESULTS

Of 1244 participants (mean age 75.5), 42% reported poor AFQoL. Falls in the past 6 months, pre/frail and frailty, depression, anxiety, social isolation, vision impairment, oral anticoagulant therapy, rhythm control, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and polypharmacy were associated with higher odds of poor AFQoL. Marriage and college education were associated with a lower odds of poor AFQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 4 out of 10 older adults with AF reported poor AFQoL. Geriatric factors associated with higher odds of reporting poor AFQoL include recent falls, frailty, depression, anxiety, social isolation and vision impairment. Findings from this study may help clinicians screen for patients with poor AFQoL who could benefit from tailored management to ensure the delivery of patient-centered care and improved well being among older adults with AF.