Endoscopic ultrasonography compared with multidetector computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Advances in Diagnostic, Staging, and Restaging Evaluation of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer

The initial endoscopic and staging evaluation of esophagogastric cancers must be accurate and comprehensive in order to select the optimal therapeutic plan for the patient. Esophageal and gastric cancers (and treatment paradigms) are delineated by their proximity to the cardia (within 2 cm). The most frequent and important symptom that informs the initial staging evaluation is dysphagia, which is associated with at least cT3 or locally advanced disease. Endoscopic ultrasound is often needed if earlier stage disease is suspected, preferably in combination with endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection or fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes to enhance staging accuracy.

Adjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer: an Asian perspective

Standard adjuvant treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is regionally different. Whereas perioperative chemotherapy is the standard in Western populations, D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard in East Asia. Recently, the pivotal phase 3 PRODIGY and RESOLVE studies have demonstrated survival benefits of adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy over up-front surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in Asian patients. Based on these results, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is considered one of the viable options for patients with LAGC. In this review, various aspects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be discussed for its optimal application in Asia. Candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be carefully chosen in consideration of the inaccurate aspects of radiological clinical staging and its potential benefit over up-front surgery followed by a decision on adjuvant chemotherapy according to the pathological stage. Efforts should continuously be made to optimally apply neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients with LAGC, considering various factors, including a more accurate radiological assessment of the tumor burden and the optimization of post-operative chemotherapy. Future neoadjuvant trials involving novel agents for Asian patients should be designed based on proven Asian regimens rather than adopting Western regimens.

A β-Galactosidase-Activated Fluorogenic Reporter for the Detection of Gastric Cancer In Vivo and in Urine

Although gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most frequent malignant tumors in the digestive tract with high morbidity and mortality, it remains a diagnostic dilemma due to its reliance on invasive biopsy or insensitive assays. Herein, we report a fluorescent gastric cancer reporter (FGCR) with activatable near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) signals and high renal-clearance efficiency for the detection of orthotopic GC in a murine model via real-time imaging and remote urinalysis. In the presence of gastric-tumor-associated β-galactosidase (β-Gal), FGCR can be fluorescently activated for in vivo NIRF imaging. Relying on its high renal-clearance efficiency (∼95% ID), it can be rapidly excreted through kidneys to urine for the ultrasensitive detection of tumors with a diameter down to ∼2.1 mm and for assessing the prognosis of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. This study not only provides a new approach for noninvasive auxiliary diagnosis and prognosis of GC but also provides guidelines for the development of fluorescence probes for cancer diagnosis.

Chinese national clinical practice guidelines on the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in the digestive system in China. Few comprehensive practice guidelines for early gastric cancer in China are currently available. Therefore, we created the Chinese national clinical practice guideline for the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of early gastric cancer.

METHODS

This clinical practice guideline (CPG) was developed in accordance with the World Health Organization's recommended process and with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) in assessing evidence quality. We used the Evidence to Decision framework to formulate clinical recommendations to minimize bias and increase transparency in the CPG development process. We used the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) statement and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) as reporting and conduct guidelines to ensure completeness and transparency of the CPG.

RESULTS

This CPG contains 40 recommendations regarding the prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of early gastric cancer based on available clinical studies and guidelines. We provide recommendations for the timing of Helicobacter pylori eradication, screening populations for early gastric cancer, indications for endoscopic resection and surgical gastrectomy, follow-up interval after treatment, and other recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

This CPG can lead to optimum care for patients and populations by providing up-to-date medical information. We intend this CPG for widespread adoption to increase the standard of prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of early gastric cancer; thereby, contributing to improving national health care and patient quality of life.

Development of a deep learning model for early gastric cancer diagnosis using preoperative computed tomography images

Background

Gastric cancer is a highly prevalent and fatal disease. Accurate differentiation between early gastric cancer (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is essential for personalized treatment. Currently, the diagnostic accuracy of computerized tomography (CT) for gastric cancer staging is insufficient to meet clinical requirements. Many studies rely on manual marking of lesion areas, which is not suitable for clinical diagnosis.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively collected data from 341 patients with gastric cancer at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The dataset was randomly divided into a training set (n=273) and a validation set (n=68) using an 8:2 ratio. We developed a two-stage deep learning model that enables fully automated EGC screening based on CT images. In the first stage, an unsupervised domain adaptive segmentation model was employed to automatically segment the stomach on unlabeled portal phase CT images. Subsequently, based on the results of the stomach segmentation model, the image was cropped out of the stomach area and scaled to a uniform size, and then the EGC and AGC classification models were built based on these images. The segmentation accuracy of the model was evaluated using the dice index, while the classification performance was assessed using metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score.

Results

The segmentation model achieved an average dice accuracy of 0.94 on the hand-segmented validation set. On the training set, the EGC screening model demonstrated an AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score of 0.98, 0.93, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, respectively. On the validation set, these metrics were 0.96, 0.92, 0.90, 0.89, and 0.93, respectively. After three rounds of data regrouping, the model consistently achieved an AUC above 0.9 on both the validation set and the validation set.

Conclusion

The results of this study demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively screen for EGC in portal venous CT images. Furthermore, the model exhibits stability and holds promise for future clinical applications.

Prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations for different T-stages in gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrectomy with lymph node dissection is the cornerstone of curative treatment of gastric cancer. Extent of lymphadenectomy may differ depending on T-stage, as the rate of lymph node metastases may differ. The objective of this systematic review is to investigate and compare the prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages.

METHODS

Data reporting and structure of this systematic review follows the PRISMA checklist. The Medline and PubMed databases were systematically searched. The search included the following Mesh terms: "Stomach Neoplasms", "Lymphatic Metastasis" and "Lymph Node Excision". The primary outcome was the highest prevalence of nodal metastases per T-stage.

RESULTS

The initial search resulted in 175 eligible articles. Five articles met the inclusion criteria and were accordingly analyzed. Concerning the lymph node stations 1 to 7, the lymph nodes along the lesser gastric curvature (station 3) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 5.5%, T2: 21.9%, T3: 41.9%, T4: 71.0%). Concerning the lymph node stations 8 to 20, the lymph nodes around the common hepatic artery (station 8) show the highest metastases rate (T1: 0.8%, T2: 7.9%, T3: 14.0%, T4: 28.2%).

CONCLUSION

An overall low prevalence of nodal metastases in the individual lymph node stations in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas endorse a more tailored approach based on the different gastric T-stages. In addition, a less extensive lymphadenectomy seems justified in early T1 carcinoma.

SYNOPSIS

This systematic review provides an overview of the prevalence of nodal metastases for the individual lymph node stations between different T-stages, showing an overall low prevalence in early, T1 gastric carcinomas and an overall high prevalence in the more advanced, T3 and T4 gastric carcinomas.

Clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumors according to their WHO grade: A single-institutional retrospective analysis

The management of gastroduodenal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) has been controversial between radical surgical resection and local excision including endoscopic resection. A gastroduodenal NET grade (G), measured by their mitotic rate and Ki67 proliferation index, is important to predict prognosis. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal NET according to grades in order to identify poor prognostic factors of gastroduodenal NETs. Fifty-four gastroduodenal NETs diagnosed between December 2008 and December 2020 in a tertiary referral hospital were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcomes of gastroduodenal NETs, according to tumor grades and factors associated with NET G2-3, were analyzed. A total of 52 gastroduodenal NET patients was enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 56.2 ± 40.1 months. The mean size of gastric and duodenal NET was 7.9 ± 11.0 mm and 9.8 ± 7.6 mm, respectively. During the study period, 72.7% (16/22) of gastric NETs and 83.3% (25/30) of duodenal NETS were G1. All G1 gastroduodenal NETs showed no lymph node or distant metastasis during the study periods. All G3 gastroduodenal NETs showed metastasis (one lymph node metastasis and 3 hepatic metastases). Among metastatic NETs, the smallest tumor size was a 13 mm gastric G3 NET. Factors associated with G2-3 NETs were larger tumor size, mucosal ulceration, proper muscle or deeper invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. A small-sized gastroduodenal NET confined to submucosa without surface ulceration may be suitable for endoscopic resection. After local resection of a gastroduodenal NET (G1) without lymphovascular and muscle proper invasion, follow-up examination without radical surgical resection can be recommended. G3 NETs may be treated by radical surgical resection, regardless of tumor size.

Gastric hydrodistension CT versus CT without gastric distension in preoperative TN staging of gastric carcinoma: analysis of single-center cancer registry

Accurate staging of gastric cancer is essential for the selection and optimization of therapy. Hydrodistension of the stomach is recommended to improve the accuracy of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). This study compares the performance of contrast-enhanced gastric water distension versus a nondistension MDCT protocol for T and N staging and serosal invasion in comparison to surgical histopathology. After propensity score matching, 86 patients in each group were included for analysis. The overall accuracy of distension versus nondistension group in T staging was 45% (95% CI 35-56) and 55% (95% CI 44-65), respectively (p = 0.29). There was no difference in the sensitivity and specificity in individual T staging and assessment of serosal invasion (all p > 0.41). Individual stage concordance with pathology was not significantly different (all p > 0.41). The overall accuracy of N staging was the same for distension and nondistension groups (51% [95% CI 40-62]). The majority of N0 staging (78-81%) were correctly staged, whereas N3 staging cases (63-68%) were predominantly understaged. In summary, there was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of individual TN staging and assessment of serosal invasion using MDCT with or without gastric water distension.

Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Brief Review and Pictorial Essay

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly becoming a mainstay in diagnosis and management of many malignant disorders. However, its role in the assessment of gastro-intestinal lesions is still evolving. The aim of this review was to demonstrate the areas, where PET/CT is impactful and where it has limitations. This will allow for us to reduce unnecessary investigations and develop methods to overcome the limitations.

PET-CT in Clinical Adult Oncology: III. Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET), typically combined with computed tomography (CT), has become a critical advanced imaging technique in oncology. With PET-CT, a radioactive molecule (radiotracer) is injected in the bloodstream and localizes to sites of tumor because of specific cellular features of the tumor that accumulate the targeting radiotracer. The CT scan, performed at the same time, provides information to facilitate the characterization of radioactivity from deep or dense structures, and to provide detailed anatomic information. PET-CT has a variety of applications in oncology, including staging, therapeutic response assessment, restaging and surveillance. This series of six review articles provides an overview of the value, applications, and imaging interpretive strategies of PET-CT in the more common adult malignancies. The third report in this series provides a review of PET-CT imaging in gastrointestinal malignancies.

Abstract

PET-CT is an advanced imaging modality with many oncologic applications, including staging, assessment of response to therapy, restaging and longitudinal surveillance for recurrence. The goal of this series of six review articles is to provide practical information to providers and imaging professionals regarding the best use of PET-CT for specific oncologic indications, and the potential pitfalls and nuances that characterize these applications. In the third of these review articles, key tumor-specific clinical information and representative PET-CT images are provided to outline the role that PET-CT plays in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The focus is on the use of ¹⁸F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), rather than on research radiopharmaceuticals under development. Many different types of gastrointestinal tumors exist, both pediatric and adult. A discussion of the role of FDG PET-CT for all of these is beyond the scope of this review. Rather, this article focuses on the most common adult gastrointestinal malignancies that may be encountered in clinical practice. The information provided here will provide information outlining the appropriate role of PET-CT in the clinical management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for healthcare professionals caring for adult cancer patients. It also addresses the nuances and provides interpretive guidance related to PET-CT for imaging providers, including radiologists, nuclear medicine physicians and their trainees.

Current and future imaging modalities in gastric cancer

Gastric adenocarcinoma treatment can include endoscopic mucosal resection, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, and palliative measures depending on staging. Both invasive and noninvasive staging techniques have been used to dictate the best treatment pathway. Here, we review the current imaging modalities used in gastric cancer as well as novel techniques to accurately stage and screen these patients.

Diagnostic Efficacy and Decision-Making Role of Preoperative Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Early Gastric Cancer

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most commonly used method for T staging of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, the studies pertaining to EUS for staging EGC reported widely varied sensitivities and specificities. This study aimed to estimate the overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS for staging the depth of EGCs and to explore the influential factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 208 consecutive patients with EGC, and all patients underwent EUS for estimating tumor invasion depth, followed by either curative surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The diagnostic accuracy of EUS was evaluated by comparing the final histologic results of resected specimens. The correlation between accuracy of EUS and characteristics of EGC lesion was analyzed. Results: A total of 211 EGC lesions in 208 patients were included. The overall diagnostic accuracy of EUS in assessing the tumor invasion depth of EGC was 55.9%. Multivariate analysis showed that submucosal invasion (OR 2.615; 95% CI 1.203-5.684, P = 0.015) was independently associated with misdiagnosis of the depth of EGC and 0-III type lesions (OR 31.495; 95% CI 2.083-476.256, P = 0.013) were an independent risk factor for over-diagnosis of invasion depth by EUS. However, EUS was only suitable for lesions within absolute indications for endoscopic resection. Conclusions: The overall accuracy of EUS in diagnosing invasion depth of EGC was relatively low. Thus, EUS is not necessary routinely for determining the therapeutic strategy for EGC.

Construction and Validation of a Risk-Scoring Model that Preoperatively Predicts Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to create a risk-scoring model to preoperatively predict the incidence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients to guide treatment.

METHODS

To construct the risk-scoring model, we retrospectively analyzed a primary cohort of 548 EGC patients. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were performed. A risk-scoring model for predicting LNM in EGC patients was developed based on preoperative factors, and another cohort of 73 patients was then analyzed to validate the model.

RESULTS

In the primary cohort, LNM was pathologically confirmed in 72 (13.1%) patients. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of ulceration and tumor size on gastroscopy, undifferentiated histological type, and presence of enlarged lymph nodes on computed tomography or endoscopic ultrasonography were independent risk factors for LNM. A 17-point risk-scoring model was developed to predict LNM risk. The cut-off score of the model was 8, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the model was 0.835 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.784-0.886]. In the validation cohort, the AUC of the model was 0.829 (95% CI 0.699-0.959).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and validated an effective 17-point risk-scoring model that could preoperatively predict LNM for EGC patients.

Opportunities in cancer imaging: a review of oesophageal, gastric and colorectal malignancies

The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy is increasing worldwide. In particular, there is a concerning rise in incidence of GI cancer in younger adults. Direct endoscopic visualisation of luminal tumour sites requires invasive procedures, which are associated with certain risks, but remain necessary because of limitations in current imaging techniques and the continuing need to obtain tissue for diagnosis and genetic analysis; however, management of GI cancer is increasingly reliant on non-invasive, radiological imaging to diagnose, stage, and treat these malignancies. Oesophageal, gastric, and colorectal malignancies require specialist investigation and treatment due to the complex nature of the anatomy, biology, and subsequent treatment strategies. As cancer imaging techniques develop, many opportunities to improve tumour detection, diagnostic accuracy and treatment monitoring present themselves. This review article aims to report current imaging practice, advances in various radiological modalities in relation to GI luminal tumour sites and describes opportunities for GI radiologists to improve patient outcomes.

Endoscopic Ultrasound vs. Computed Tomography for Gastric Cancer Staging: A Network Meta-Analysis

Gastric cancer preoperative staging is of outmost importance to assure proper management of the disease. Providing a relevant clinical stage relies on different imaging methods such as computed tomography (CT) or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). We aimed to perform a network meta-analysis for gastric cancer clinical stage diagnostic tests, thus comparing the diagnostic accuracy of EUS vs. multidetector CT (MDCT) and EUS vs. EUS + MDCT. We plotted study estimates of pooled sensitivity and specificity on forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic space to explore between-study variation in the performance of EUS, MDCT and EUS + MDCT for T1–T4, N0–N3, M0–M1 when data were available. Exploratory analyses were undertaken in RevMan 5. We included twelve studies with 2047 patients. Our results suggest that EUS was superior to MDCT in preoperative T1 and N staging. MDCT is more specific for the M stage but no significant difference in sensitivity was obtained. When comparing EUS vs. EUS + MDCT for T1 both sensitivity and specificity were not relevant. No significant differences were observed in T2–T4 stages. Even though EUS helped differentiate between the presence of invaded nodules, N stages should be carefully assessed by both methods since there is not sufficient data.

Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging

BACKGROUND

The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), the quantitative parameter of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), is a measure for this restricted diffusion, and its role in gastric cancer (GC) including distinguishing malignant segments from healthy gastric wall, metastatic perigastric lymph nodes from benign nodes and evaluating response of GC to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been investigated in previous studies. Evidence suggests that ADC may also be of help in assessment of aggressiveness and preoperative staging of gastric cancer, which needs to be explored in further studies.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of DW-MRI and its quantitative parameter, ADC in staging of gastric cancer.

METHODS

Forty-six patients (28 male, 18 female, mean age 62 years) with non-metastatic biopsy- proven GC who underwent abdominal DW-MRI before surgery were included in this retrospective study. Tumor invasion depth (T-stage) and nodal involvement (N-stage) were evaluated using signal increase on DW-MRI, and tumor ADC was measured. Diagnostic performance of these results was assessed by comparing them with postsurgical histopathology based on 8th TNM classification.

RESULTS

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in T-staging were 92.1%, 75%, 89.1% for ≤T2 vs. ≥T3; and 75%, 88.5%, 82.6% for ≤T3 vs. T4. However, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of DW-MRI in N-staging were 89.3%, 88.9%, 89.1% for ≤N1 vs. ≥N2; and 73.7%, 96.3%, 86.9% for ≤N2 vs. N3, respectively. Relative preoperative ADC values correlated with pT staging (r=-0.397, p=0.006). There was also a statistically significant difference of relative ADC values between ≤T3 and T4 stages, and a cut-off of 0.64 s/mm2 could differentiate these stages with an odds ratio of 7.714 (95% confidence interval, 1.479-40.243). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for differentiating ≤T3 and T4 stages was 0.725.

CONCLUSION

DW-MRI may contribute to the clinical staging of non-metastatic GC. In particular, relative ADC of DW-MRI can distinguish T4 gastric cancer from less advanced T-stages.

Clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing invasion depth of early gastric cancer prior to endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Endoscopic ultrasonography is a reliable diagnostic modality for determining indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. We aimed to clarify the clinical significance of endoscopic ultrasonography in the invasion depth diagnosis of early gastric cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 1598 consecutive patients with 2001 early gastric cancers who underwent EUS before ESD or surgery between October 2010 and April 2019 at our institution. Lesions were classified according to endoscopic ultrasonography-determined invasion depth as EUS-M/SM1 (lesions confined to sonographic layers 1 and 2 or lesions with changes in sonographic layer 3; depth, < 1 mm) and EUS-SM2 (lesions with changes in sonographic layer 3; depth, ≥ 1 mm). We evaluated the invasion depth determination accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography and analyzed the clinicopathological features of misdiagnosed early gastric cancer cases.

RESULTS

The invasion depth determination accuracy was as follows: EUS-M/SM1: pathological T1a/T1b1 early gastric cancer, 97%; EUS-SM2: pathological T1b2 early gastric cancer, 79%. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 95%, 98%, 69%, 97%, and 79%, respectively. In EUS-M/SM1 early gastric cancer, tumor size of ≥ 15 mm, presence of ulceration, and undifferentiated histological type were significantly associated with endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy. In EUS-SM2 early gastric cancer, tumor size of ≥ 30 mm was significantly associated with endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic ultrasonography is a useful modality in accurately determining the invasion depth of early gastric cancer before endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Controversies in EUS: Do we need miniprobes?

This is the fifth in a series of papers entitled "Controversies in EUS." In the current paper, we deal with high-resolution catheter probes, otherwise known as EUS miniprobes (EUS-MPs). The application of miniprobes for early carcinomas in the entire intestinal tract, for subepithelial lesions, and for findings in the bile duct and pancreatic duct as well as endobronchial use is critically discussed. Submucous lesions, especially in the colon, but also early carcinomas in special cases are considered the most important indications. The argument is illustrated by numerous examples.

Diagnostic accuracy of the gastric cancer T-category with respect to tumor localization

Purpose

Diagnosing early gastric cancer (EGC) or advanced gastric cancer (AGC) according to T-category is important for optimal GC treatment; however, the clinical and pathological diagnosis of tumor depths can sometimes vary. This study investigated the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of the tumor depth from the viewpoint of tumor localization and prognosis of patients with GC with discordance between clinical and pathological findings.

Methods

This study enrolled 741 patients with primary GC who underwent curative gastrectomy. Based on the clinical and pathological diagnosis of T-category, the patients were classified into four groups: Early-look EGC, Early-look AGC, Advanced-look EGC, and Advanced-look AGC. Tumor localization was classified longitudinally (the upper [U], middle [M], and lower [L] parts and cross-sectionally (the anterior [Ant] and posterior [Post] walls, and the lesser [Less] and greater [Gre] curvatures).

Results

Of the 462 clinical EGC cases, 52 were Early-look AGC cases that exhibited a significant association of tumor localization with the Post and Less in the U and M locations (UM-PL; p = 0.037). An Advanced-look EGC (p = 0.031) and Advanced-look AGC (p = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for relapse-free survival each in pathological EGC and AGC, respectively.

Conclusions

Patients with clinically diagnosed EGC but with pathologically diagnosed AGC more frequently presented tumor in the UM-PL than in any other location. Selection of therapeutic strategy according to the clinical diagnosis might be critical; however, it should be also considered that the accuracy of preoperative assessments varies with tumor localization.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00423-020-01971-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Imaging strategies in the management of gastric cancer: current role and future potential of MRI

Accurate preoperative staging of gastric cancer and the assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant treatment is of importance for treatment and prognosis. Current imaging techniques, mainly endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET), have their limitations. Historically, the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in gastric cancer has been limited, but with the continuous technical improvements, MRI has become a more potent imaging technique for gastrointestinal malignancies. The accuracy of MRI for T- and N-staging of gastric cancer is similar to EUS and CT, making MRI a suitable alternative to other imaging strategies. There is limited evidence on the performance of MRI for M-staging of gastric cancer specifically, but MRI is widely used for diagnosing liver metastases and shows potential for diagnosing peritoneal seeding. Recent pilot studies showed that treatment response assessment as well as detection of lymph node metastases and systemic disease might benefit from functional MRI (e.g. diffusion weighted imaging and dynamic contrast enhancement). Regarding treatment guidance, additional value of MRI might be expected from its role in better defining clinical target volumes and setup verification with MR-guided radiation treatment.

T and N Staging of Gastric Cancer Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography

Aim

This study is aimed at comparing gastric cancer T and N staging between virtual monochromatic energy images and fusion images generated by dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) dual-energy mode data acquisition prospectively while measuring the iodine concentration of gastric cancer and lymph nodes at different T and N stages from iodine map retrospectively.

Methods

A total of 71 patients (50 males and 21 females; mean age: 59 ± 11 years) confirmed with gastric cancer by endoscopic biopsy with no neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled for the CT examination before surgeries. The preoperative T and N staging results were compared between groups with pathological results as the gold standard. The iodine concentrations of the gastric lesions and LNs were measured on the iodine-based material decomposition images. All iodine concentration values were normalized against those in the abdominal aorta and defined as normalized iodine concentration (nIC) values. The short axis length of LNs and nIC values were statistically analyzed.

Results

Group A was better than group B for T3 and T4 staging. No statistically significant difference in the overall accuracies for N staging was found between groups. For the late arterial and delayed phases, T3 and T4 nIC values of the extraserosal adipose tissue showed statistically significant differences. The nIC values between N0 and Nm (N1-N3) showed statistically significant differences in the portal phase only.

Conclusions

T3 and T4 nIC values of the extraserosal adipose tissue showed statistically significant differences. Hence, dual-source CT may be helpful in the differential diagnosis between T3 and T4.

Clinical efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for decision of treatment strategy of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate preoperative tumor staging of gastric cancer is indispensable with expansion of indications for laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic resection. It is important to distinguish mucosal cancer (T1a) in smaller lesion and differentiate early gastric cancer (EGC) in larger lesion considering endoscopic resection indication and laparoscopic surgery indication. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the decision of treatment strategy of gastric cancer compared with pathological staging.

METHODS

The patients who underwent EUS and surgical or endoscopic resection for gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed between September 2005 and February 2016. The depth of tumor invasion (T staging) by EUS was compared with the pathological staging after endoscopic or surgical resection.

RESULTS

A total of 6084 patients were finally analyzed. The accuracy rates for T1a and EGC were 75.0 and 89.4%, respectively. The overall accuracy of T staging by EUS was 66.3% when divided by T1a, T1b, and over T2. The accuracy of EUS prior to endoscopic resection was 75.1% in absolute indication and 73.1% in expanded criteria, respectively. The accuracy rates for T1a with lesion ≤ 2 cm in miniprobe EUS and EGC with lesion > 2 cm in conventional EUS were 84.6 and 83.2%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, presence of ulcer, large tumor size, and radial EUS were associated with overestimation, and small tumor size and miniprobe were associated with underestimation in T staging.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS showed the high accuracy of 84.6% for T1a in lesion ≤ 2 cm in miniprobe EUS and 83.2% for EGC in lesion > 2 cm in conventional EUS, respectively. EUS can be a complementary diagnostic method to determine endoscopic or surgical treatment modality.