Uncemented, curved, short endoprosthesis stem for distal femoral reconstruction: early follow-up outcomes

Classification and reconstruction of femoral bone defect in the revision of aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses: a 10-year multicenter retrospective analysis

Objective

This study proposes a system for classifying the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discusses reconstruction methods for revision surgery, based on different classification types.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received revision surgery for aseptic loosening in distal femoral tumor endoprosthesis from January 2008 to December 2020 at 3 bone tumor treatment centers in China. Based on the patient imaging data, we proposed a classification system for the aseptic loosening of distal femoral endoprostheses and discussed its revision surgery strategy for various bone defects.

Results

A total of 31 patients were included in this study, including 21 males and 10 females aged 15–75 y (average: 44.3 y). First-revision surgery was performed on 24 patients, whereas second-revision surgery was conducted on 7 patients. The 31 patients were classified into different types based on the degree of aseptic loosening: Type I, 12 patients (38.7%); Type IIa, 7 patients (22.5%); Type IIb, 7 patients (22.5%); Type III, 4 patient (12.9%); and Type IV, 1 patient (3.2%). For type I, 11 patients underwent revisions with standard longer-stem prostheses (one with the original prosthesis), and one patient had the original prosthesis plus cortical allograft strut. For type II (a and b), 10 patients underwent revisions with original prosthesis or longer-stem prosthesis and 4 patients combined with cortical allograft strut. For type III, one patient underwent revision with a longer-stem prosthesis and the other 3 patients with a custom short-stem prosthesis. For type IV, only one patient underwent revision with a custom short-stem prosthesis.

Conclusions

Aseptic loosening of the distal femoral prosthesis can be divided into 4 types: type I, type II (a, b), type III and type IV. The reconstruction methods of our centers for different types of bone defects can offer some reference value in the revision of aseptic loosening.

Hip reconstruction using a customized intercalary prosthesis with the rhino horn-designed uncemented stem for ultrashort proximal femur segments following tumor resection: a combined biomechanical and clinical study

Background

Hip-preserved reconstruction for patients with ultrashort proximal femur segments following extensive femoral diaphyseal tumor resection is a formidable undertaking. A customized intercalary prosthesis with a rhino horn-designed uncemented stem was developed for the reconstruction of these extensive skeletal defects.

Methods

This study was designed to analyze and compare the differences in the biomechanical behavior between the normal femur and the femur with diaphyseal defects reconstructed by an intercalary prosthesis with different stems. The biomechanical behavior under physiological loading conditions is analyzed using the healthy femur as the reference. Five three-dimensional finite element models (healthy, customized intercalary prosthesis with four different stems implemented, respectively) were developed, together with a clinical follow-up of 12 patients who underwent intercalary femoral replacement.

Results

The biomechanical results showed that normal-like stress and displacement distribution patterns were observed in the remaining proximal femur segments after reconstructions with the rhino horn-designed uncemented stems, compared with the straight stem. Stem A showed better biomechanical performance, whereas the fixation system with Stem B was relatively unstable. The clinical results were consistent with the FEA results. After a mean follow-up period of 32.33 ± 9.12 months, osteointegration and satisfactory clinical outcomes were observed in all patients. Aseptic loosening (asymptomatic) occurred in one patient reconstructed by Stem B; there were no other postoperative complications in the remaining 11 patients.

Conclusion

The rhino horn-designed uncemented stem is outstanding in precise shape matching and osseointegration. This novel prosthesis design may be beneficial in decreasing the risk of mechanical failure and aseptic loosening, especially when Stem A is used. Therefore, the customized intercalary prosthesis with this rhino horn-designed uncemented stem might be a reasonable alternative for the reconstruction of SSPF following extensive tumor resection.

A comparison of cemented and cementless intra-neck curved stem use during hip-preserving reconstruction following massive femoral malignant tumor removal

Background

Patients who undergo massive femoral malignant tumor (MFMT) resection often exhibit shortened femoral metaphyseal juxta-articular segments. The use of a customized femoral endoprosthesis (CFE) with an intra-neck curved stem (INCS) has emerged as a viable reconstructive surgical strategy for these individuals. Relative to a cemented INCS, it remains unclear as to whether cementless INCS use is associated with improvements in functionality or reconstructive longevity. As such, the present study was conducted to compare functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and endoprosthesis-related complication rates in patients undergoing cemented and cementless INCS implantation.

Methods

A total of 24 patients undergoing lower limb salvage and reconstructive surgical procedures utilizing cemented or cementless INCS endoprostheses were retrospectively included. Patient-functional outcomes, endoprosthetic survival, and complication rates were compared as a function of age; diagnosis; the length of femoral resection; residual proximal femur length; Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores; visual analog scale (VAS) scores; and the rates of implant breakage, periprosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures, and aseptic loosening.

Results

The mean follow-up was 56 months. Significant differences in the length of femoral resection (p<0.001) and residual proximal femur length were observed (p<0.001) between the cemented and cementless INCS groups. There were no differences in overall patient survival and aseptic loosening-associated endoprosthesis survival in the cemented and cementless groups. None of the included patients experienced periprosthetic fractures, infections, or implant breakage. Average respective MSTS and VAS scores did not differ between groups.

Conclusion

For patients undergoing treatment for MFMTs, the use of a CFE with an INCS has emerged as a viable approach to hip-preserving reconstructive surgery. With appropriately designed individualized rehabilitative programs, good functional outcomes can be achieved for these endoprostheses, which are associated with low complication rates. Moreover, the selection between cemented or cementless INCS in the clinic should be made based on patient-specific factors, with cementless INCS implementation being preferable in younger patients with good-quality bone, the potential for long-term survival, and the osteotomy site near the lesser trochanter, whereas cemented INCS use should be favored for individuals who are older, have a shorter life expectancy, or have poor bone quality.

Radiographic Assessment of Aseptic Loosening of Tumor-Type Knee Prosthesis in Distal Femur

OBJECTIVE

To measure the full-length anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of lower limbs after the resection of a tumor in the distal femur and tumor-type knee prosthesis replacement and to analyze the factors leading to aseptic loosening of the prosthesis.

METHODS

A total of 26 cases of tumor-type knee prosthesis replacement or revision due to the distal femoral tumor at our hospital from January 2007 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into the loosening and unloosening groups depending on whether aseptic loosening occurred after surgery. Full-length anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of lower limbs were used to measure bone resection length, length of prosthesis, distance of proximal apex of the medullary stem of the femoral prosthesis from the maximum arc of the anterior femoral arch, diameter of the medullary stem, etc. Data were analyzed, and the risk factors for aseptic loosening of the prosthesis were explored.

RESULTS

The ratio of the prosthetic length to the femoral length (63.72 ± 5.21) and the ratio of the femoral medullary stem diameter to the femoral diameter (26.03 ± 8.45) were smaller in the loosening group than in the unloosening group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The distance between the apex of the medullary stem and the maximum arc of the anterior femoral arch was significantly shorter in the loosening group (3.47 ± 2.96) than in the unloosening group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The measurement of the lower limb alignment showed significant differences between the loosening and unloosening groups in terms of HKAA, mLDFA, and distance between the lower limb alignment and the center of the knee joint (p < 0.05). The logistic regression analysis showed that less than 30% ratio between the medullary stem diameter and the femoral diameter, less than 3 cm distance between the apex of the medullary stem and the maximum curvature of the anterior arch of the femur, distance between the lower limb alignment and the center of the knee joint, and presence of varus knee and valgus knee after the surgery were the risk factors for aseptic loosening of the prosthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The diameter of the femoral medullary stem of the prosthesis, the apex position of the prosthetic stem, and the lower limb alignment are the risk factors for aseptic loosening of the prosthesis.

Management of Primary Aggressive Tumors of the Knee

Primary bone sarcomas and aggressive benign bone tumors are relatively rare. It is essential to recognize features that are concerning for these aggressive tumors based on a patient's history, physical exam, and radiographs. Physicians and other health care providers should have a high suspicion for these tumors and promptly refer these patients to orthopaedic oncologists. A multidisciplinary, team-based approach is required to obtain an accurate diagnosis and provide comprehensive care. This review discussed the appropriate work-up, biopsy principles, relevant peri-operative medical management, and surgical treatment options for patients with aggressive primary bone tumors around the knee. Primary bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma) and aggressive benign bone tumors (giant cell tumor, chondroblastoma, and chondromyxoid fibroma) that have a predilection to the distal femur and proximal tibia are the focus of this review.

Hip-Preserved Reconstruction Using a Customized Cementless Intercalary Endoprosthesis With an Intra-Neck Curved Stem in Patients With an Ultrashort Proximal Femur: Midterm Follow-Up Outcomes

Background: Hemiarthroplasty is widely used for proximal femoral reconstruction after tumor resection. However, complications of hemiarthroplasty include infection, hip dislocation, and acetabular wear. This study aimed to: (1) evaluate the reliability and validity of a customized cementless intercalary endoprosthesis (CCIE) with an intra-neck curved stem (INCS) to reconstruct femoral diaphyseal defects with an ultrashort proximal femur (UPF); (2) assess the lower extremity function after reconstruction with this endoprosthesis; and (3) identify the postoperative complications associated with the use of this endoprosthesis.

Methods: Between October 2015 and May 2019, 13 patients underwent reconstruction with a CCIE with an INCS. The distance from the center of the femoral head to the midline of the body and the apex of the acetabulum was measured preoperatively. Additionally, the distance from the tip of the INCS to the midline of the body and the apex of the acetabulum was measured postoperatively. The femoral neck–shaft angle was also measured pre- and postoperatively. After an average follow-up duration of 46 months, the radiological outcomes of the CCIE with an INCS were analyzed. Function was evaluated with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Pain was measured using a paper visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively, and complications were recorded.

Results: Compared with our preoperative design, we found no significant difference in the postoperative distance from the tip of the INCS to the body midline (p = 0.187) and the apex of the acetabulum (p = 0.159), or in the postoperative femoral neck–shaft angle (p = 0.793). Thus, the INCS positions were deemed accurate. The average MSTS score was 26 (range: 24–28), and the VAS score was significantly decreased postoperatively compared with preoperatively (p < 0.0001). No patients developed aseptic loosening, infection, periprosthetic fracture, or prosthetic fracture as of the last follow-up.

Conclusion: The CCIE with an INCS was a valid and reliable method for reconstructing femoral diaphyseal defects with a UPF following malignant tumor resection. Postoperative lower extremity function was acceptable, with an appropriate individualized rehabilitation program, and the incidence of complications was low.

Rotating Hinge Distal Femur Replacement: A Turn for the Worse

Preoperatively periprosthetic joint infection with a postoperative complication of 180° rotation of the press-fit femoral component is a rare event, and knowledge of this possible complication is important for arthroplasty surgeons.

Long-term outcomes and improved risk of revision following tumor endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur: Single institutional results

Purpose

This study assessed revision characteristics following distal femur tumor endoprosthetic replacement.

Methods

Fifty-seven procedures were performed between 2005 and 2019. The cumulative incidence of implant revision was calculated with death as a competing risk.

Results

The all-cause revision rate was 21.1% (n = 12) at a mean 65.3 ± 47.3 months. Competing risk analysis revealed a cumulative revision incidence of 12.0% (95% CI, 3.6-25.9%) at five years and 36.5% (95% CI, 12.8-61.0%) at ten years.

Conclusions

We provide an accurate assessment of revision risk which is slightly lower than historical controls, with identification of failure modes to reliably inform patient expectations.

Level of evidence

III. Retrospective Study.

Distal femoral replacement - Cemented or cementless? Current concepts and review of the literature

Distal femoral endoprosthetic replacement has been successfully used to reconstruct distal femoral defects after tumor resection for over four decades. Despite continued advances, aseptic loosening continues to be the most common failure mode after infection. Debate still exists about a variety of design features and the optimal fixation method remains controversial. To date, no large-scale study or meta-analysis has demonstrated the superiority of one fixation technique over another. While the classic dichotomy of cemented versus cementless stems is well-known, the contemporary surgeon needs to fully understand the optimal clinical setting for each type of fixation technique and additional strategies to maximize implant stability. In clinical practice, the choice of fixation must be tailored to the individual patient. The surgeon must consider whether the operation is being performed for primary sarcoma or metastatic carcinoma, the presence of distant metastases, age, comorbidities, and whether radiotherapy has been previously given or will be required at the site of fixation. The best strategy for each patient optimizes tumor control and appropriately weighs risks of fixation failure versus the expected patient survival. This review will explore cemented and uncemented distal femoral replacement and highlight modern concepts to optimize each technique.

Influence of a metaphyseal sleeve on the stress-strain state of a bone-tumor implant system in the distal femur: an experimental and finite element analysis

Background

Aseptic loosening of distal femoral tumor implants significantly correlates with the resection length. We designed a new “sleeve” that is specially engaged in the metaphysis at least 5 cm proximal to the knee joint line to preserve as much bone stock as possible. This study investigates the influence of a metaphyseal sleeve on the stress-strain state of a bone tumor implant system in the distal femur.

Methods

Cortex strains in intact and implanted femurs were predicted with finite element (FE) models. Moreover strains were experimentally measured in a cadaveric femur with and without a sleeve and stem under an axial compressive load of 1000 N. The FE models, which were validated by linear regression, were used to investigate the maximal von Mises stress and the implanted-to-intact (ITI) ratios of strain in the femur with single-legged stance loading under immediate postoperative and osseointegration conditions.

Results

Good agreement was noted between the experimental measurements and numerical predictions of the femoral strains (coefficient of determination (R²) ≥ 0.95; root-mean-square error (RMSE%) ≈ 10%). The ITI ratios for the metaphysis were between 13 and 28% and between 10 and 21% under the immediate postoperative and osseointegration conditions, respectively, while the ITI ratios for the posterior and lateral cortices around the tip of the stem were 110% and 119% under the immediate-postoperative condition, respectively, and 114% and 101% under the osseointegration condition, respectively. The maximal von Mises stresses for the implanted femur were 113.8 MPa and 43.41 MPa under the immediate postoperative and osseointegration conditions, which were 284% and 47% higher than those in the intact femur (29.6 MPa), respectively.

Conclusions

This study reveals that a metaphyseal sleeve may cause stress shielding relative to the intact femur, especially in the distal metaphysis. Stress concentrations might mainly occur in the posterior cortex around the tip of the stem. However, stress concentrations may not be accompanied by periprosthetic fracture under the single-legged stance condition.

Intercalary Reconstruction of the "Ultra-Critical Sized Bone Defect" by 3D-Printed Porous Prosthesis After Resection of Tibial Malignant Tumor

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the early stability, limb function, and mechanical complications of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following intercalary tibial tumor resections.

Methods

This study defined an "ultra-critical sized bone defect" in the tibia when the length of segmental defect in the tibia was >15.0 cm or >60% of the full tibia and the length of the residual fragment in proximal or distal tibia was between 0.5 cm and 4.0 cm. Thus, five patients with "ultra-critical sized bone defects" following an intercalary tibial malignant tumor resection treated with 3D-printed porous prosthesis between June 2014 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient information, implants design and fabrication, surgical procedures, and early clinical outcome data were collected and evaluated.

Results

Among the five patients, three were male and two were female, with an average age of 30.2 years. Pathological diagnoses were two osteosarcomas, one Ewing sarcoma, one pseudo-myogenic hemangioendothelioma, and one undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma . The average length of the bone defects following tumor resection was 22.8cm, and the average length of ultra-short residual bone was 2.65cm (range=0.6cm-3.8cm). The mean follow-up time was 27.6 months (range=14.0-62.0 months). Early biological fixation was achieved in all five patients. The average time of clinical osseointegration at the bone-porous interface was 3.2 months. All patients were reported to be pain free and have no limitations in their walking distance. No prosthetic mechanical complications were observed.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the "ultra-critical sized bone defect" after an intercalary tibial tumor resection using 3D-printed porous prosthesis achieved satisfactory overall early biological fixation and limb function. Excellent primary stability and the following rigid biological fixation were key factors for success. The outcomes of this study were supposed to support further clinical application and evaluation of 3D-printed porous prosthetic reconstruction for "ultra-critical sized bone defects" in the tibia.