Early reoperation following pancreaticoduodenectomy: impact on morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival

Endovascular treatment of postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatectomy: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Ruptured aneurysm is a serious complication of distal pancreatectomy (DP) or pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) that can be life-threatening if not treated promptly. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of a Viabahn stent graft for stopping bleeding after pancreatectomy.

METHODS

Between April 2016 and June 2022, we performed 245 pancreatectomies in our institution. Six patients experienced postoperative bleeding and underwent endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

All six cases of bleeding occurred post-PD (3.7%). The bleeding was from gastroduodenal artery (GDA) pseudoaneurysms in three patients, and Viabahn stent grafts were inserted. All three patients did not show liver function abnormalities or hepatic blood flow disorders. One patient with a Viabahn stent graft experienced rebleeding, which required further management to obtain hemostasis. Of the six cases in which there was hemorrhage, one case of bleeding from the native hepatic artery could not be managed.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Viabahn stent graft is an effective treatment option for postoperative bleeding from GDA pseudoaneurysms following PD. In most cases, using this device resulted in successful hemostasis, without observed abnormalities in hepatic function or blood flow.

Endoscopic management of postoperative bleeding

Postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare but serious complication that can lead to prolonged hospitalization and significant morbidity and mortality. It can be managed by reoperation, endoscopy, or radiological intervention. Although reoperation carries risks, particularly in critically ill postoperative patients, minimally invasive interventions, such as endoscopy or radiological intervention, confer advantages. Endoscopy allows localization of the bleeding focus and hemostatic management at the same time. Although there have been concerns regarding the potential risk of creating an anastomotic disruption or perforation during early postoperative endoscopy, endoscopic management has become more popular over time. However, there is currently no consensus on the best endoscopic management for postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding because most practices are based on retrospective case series. Furthermore, there is a wide range of individual complexities in anatomical and clinical settings after surgery. This review focused on the safety and effectiveness of endoscopic management in various surgical settings.

The impact of intra- and postoperative fluid balance in pancreatic surgery - A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of perioperative fluid administration in pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatic resections were identified from our institution's prospectively maintained database. Fluid balances were recorded intraoperatively and at 24hr postoperatively. Patients were stratified into tertiles of fluid administration (low, medium, high). Adjusted multivariable analysis was performed and outcome measures were postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients were included from 2012 to 2017. Complication rates were POPF(B/C) 19.4%, DGE(B/C) 14.7%, PPH(C) 10.0% and CDC ≥ IIIb 26.1%. In multivariable analysis, high perioperative fluid balance was an independent risk factor associated with POPF (OR = 10.5, 95%CI 2.7-40.7, p = .001), CDC (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.3, p < .002), DGE (OR = 2.3, 95%CI 1.0-5.2, p = .017), PPH (OR = 6.7 95%CI 2.2-20.0, p = .038) and reoperation (OR = 3.1, 95%CI 1.6-6.2, p = .006). In multivariable analysis with intraoperative and postoperative fluid balances as separate predictors, intraoperative (OR = 2,5, 95%CI 1.2-5.5, p = .04) and postoperative fluid balance (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-5.5, p = .02) were predictors of POPF. Postoperative fluid balance was the only predictor for mortality (OR = 4.5, 95%CI 1.0-18.9, p = .041) and predictor for CDC (OR = 2.0, 95%CI 1.0-4.0, p = .043) and OHS days (OR = 6.9, 95%CI 0.03-13.7, p = .038).

CONCLUSIONS

High postoperative fluid balance in particular is associated with postoperative morbidity. Maintaining a fluid-restrictive strategy postoperatively should be recommended for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery.

Five-year follow-up after pancreatoduodenectomy performed for malignancy: A single-centre study

Backgrounds/Aims

The aim of this study was to describe short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) at a typical United Kingdom hepatopancreatobiliary unit.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of all PD patients with histologically-confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA), or distal cholangiocarcinoma (CC) from September 1st, 2006 to May 31st, 2015 was carried out. The following information was obtained: demographics, comorbidities, preoperative investigations, neoadjuvant treatment, operative details, postoperative management, complications, adjuvant treatment, five-year recurrence, and five-year survival. Effects of selected preoperative variables on short- and long-term outcomes were investigated.

Results

Of 271 included patients, 57.9% had PDAC, 25.8% had AA, and 16.2% had CC. In total, 67.9% experienced morbidity and 17.3% developed a Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complication. The 90-day mortality was 3.3%. Clinically-relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, bile leak, gastrojejunal leak, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage and delayed gastric emptying affected 8.1%, 4.1%, 0.0%, 9.2%, and 19.9% of patients, respectively. American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III-VI correlated with overall morbidity (p = 0.002) and major morbidity (p = 0.009), but not 90-day mortality or five-year survival. The same pattern was observed in patients with a preoperative serum bilirubin > 29 μmol/L and/or a neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 3.1. Five-year cancer recurrence and five-year survival were 68.3% and 22.5%, respectively. PDAC patients had higher five-year recurrence but lower five-year survival rates (both p = 0.001).

Conclusions

In our series, the majority of patients experienced a complication. However, few patients experienced major morbidity. Surgical risk factors did not affect five-year survival.

Outcome of combined pancreatic and biliary fistulas after pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) as well as postoperative biliary fistula (POBF) are considered the main source of postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, little is known about the incidence and complications of combined POPF/POBF compared to isolated POPF or POBF.

METHODS

This single-center study investigated retrospectively the incidence and postoperative outcome of combined POPF/POBF compared to isolated fistulas following PD in a tertiary German pancreatic center between 2009 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 678 patients underwent PD for benign and malignant periampullary lesions. Combined fistulas occurred in 6%, isolated POPF in 16%, and isolated POBF in 2%. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis had a protective effect on the occurrence of combined fistulas, whereas serous cystadenoma and pancreatic metastasis were risk factors. Morbidity (Grade C fistula, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, revisional surgery) and mortality was significantly higher in patients with combined fistulas than in those with isolated fistula. Moreover, the duration of ICU stay was longer.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined POPF/POBF is associated with a significant increase of morbidity and mortality compared to isolated fistulas after PD. Early surgical revision in these patients may improve the postoperative survival rate.

Operative Re-Intervention following Pancreatoduodenectomy: What Has Changed over the Last Decades

Background: To investigate changes over the last decades in the management of postoperative complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with special emphasis on reoperations, their indications, and outcomes. Methods: 409 patients who underwent PD between 2008 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed with respect to their need for reoperations (reoperation, n = 81, 19.8% vs. no reoperation, n = 328, 80.2%). The cohort was then compared to a second cohort comprising patients who underwent PD between 1989 and 2007 (n = 285). Results: 81 patients (19.8%) underwent reoperation. The main cause of reoperation was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy (22.2%). Reoperation was associated with a longer duration of the index operation, more blood loss, and more erythrocyte concentrates being transfused. Patients who underwent reoperation showed more postoperative complications and a higher mortality rate (25% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). Compared to the earlier cohort, the observed increase in reoperations did not lead to increased mortality (5% vs. 6%, p = 353). Conclusions: The main cause for reoperation has changed over the last decades and was the dehiscence of pancreatogastrostomy. Associated with a leakage of pancreatic fluid and clinically relevant PF, it remains the most devastating complication following PD. Strategies for prevention and treatment, e.g., by endoscopic vacuum-assisted-closure therapy are of utmost importance.

The role of interventional radiology in the management of refractory bile leaks

Refractory bile leaks represent a damaging sequela of hepatobiliary surgery and direct trauma. Management of bile leaks represents a challenging clinical problem. Despite advances in endoscopic techniques, interventional radiology continues to play a vital role in the diagnosis and management of refractory bile leaks. This article reviews strategies for optimizing the diagnosis and management of bile leaks and provides an overview of management strategies, including the management of complicated biliary leaks.

Prospective Study Correlating External Biliary Stenting and Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most common complication of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Sometimes POPF is associated with biliary fistula (BF) or "mixed" fistula. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the severity of the fistulae, when present, is decreased with an external biliary stent in place.

METHODS

In this single-center study, we assessed patients who underwent elective PD from January 2014 to December 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: standard PD (ST-PD) vs. PD with external biliary stent (PD-BS). Demographic, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were analyzed, including complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and those specific to pancreatic surgeries, and mortality rates within 90 days of operation.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included (65 in ST-PD group and 63 in PD-BS group). Postoperative complications occurred in 61.7% of patients (32.8%, Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) and were more common among patients in the PD-BS group (44.4% vs. 23.1%; p = 0.03). POPF was also more common among patients in the PD-BS group (39.7% vs. 18.5%; p = 0.008). No statistically significant differences were found for any other complications.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our study, placement of a transanastomotic external biliary stent does not reduce the rate of pancreatic or biliary fistulae, or their severity; in fact, POPF is more likely when biliary exteriorization is present.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04654299.

Racial Disparities in Failure to Rescue Following Unplanned Reoperation in Pediatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

Failure to rescue (FTR) and unplanned reoperation following an index surgical procedure are key indicators of the quality of surgical care. Given that differences in unplanned reoperation and FTR rates among racial groups may contribute to persistent disparities in postsurgical outcomes, we sought to determine whether racial differences exist in the risk of FTR among children who required unplanned reoperation following inpatient surgical procedures.

METHODS

We used the National Surgical Quality Improvement database (2012-2017) to assemble a cohort of children (<18 years), who underwent inpatient surgery and subsequently returned to the operating room within 30 days of the index surgery. We used logistic regression models to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of FTR, comparing African American (AA) to White children. We estimated the risk-adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for FTR by controlling the analyses for demographic characteristics, surgical profile, and preoperative comorbidities. We further evaluated the racial differences in FTR by stratifying the analyses by the timing of unplanned reoperation.

RESULTS

Of 276,917 children who underwent various inpatient surgical procedures, 10,425 (3.8%) required an unplanned reoperation, of whom 2016 (19.3%) were AA and 8409 (80.7%) were White. Being AA relative to being White was associated with a 2-fold increase in the odds of FTR (aOR: 2.03; 95% CI, 1.5-2.74; P < .001). Among children requiring early unplanned reoperation, AAs were 2.38 times more likely to die compared to their White peers (8.9% vs 3.4%; aOR: 2.38; 95% CI, 1.54-3.66; P < .001). In children with intermediate timing of return to the operating room, the risk of FTR was 80% greater for AA children compared to their White peers (2.2% vs 1.1%; aOR: 1.80; 95% CI, 1.07-3.02; P = .026). Typically, AA children die within 5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-16) of reoperation while their White counterparts die within 9 days following reoperation (IQR: 2-26).

CONCLUSIONS

Among children requiring unplanned reoperation, AA patients were more likely to die than their White peers. This racial difference in FTR rate was most noticeable among children requiring early unplanned reoperation. Time to mortality following unplanned reoperation was shorter for AA than for White children. Race appears to be an important determinant of FTR following unplanned reoperation in children and it should be considered when designing interventions to optimize unplanned reoperation outcomes.

Endovascular Hepatic Artery Stents in the Modern Management of Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage

Background

Postoperative hemorrhage is a potentially lethal complication of pancreatoduodenectomy. This study reports on the use of endovascular hepatic artery stents in the management of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained, consecutive dataset of 440 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy over 68 months. Data are presented on bleeding events and outcomes, and contextualized by the clinical course of the denominator population. International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery terminology was used to define postpancreatectomy hemorrhage.

Results

Sixty-seven (15%) had postoperative hemorrhage. Fifty (75%) were male and this gender difference was significant (P = 0.001; 2 proportions test). Postoperative pancreatic fistulas were more frequent in the postoperative hemorrhage group (P = 0.029; 2 proportions test). The median (interquartile range [IQR]) delay between surgery and postoperative hemorrhage was 5 days (2-14 days). Twenty-six (39%) required intervention comprising reoperation alone in 12, embolization alone in 5, and endovascular hepatic artery stent deployment in 5. Four further patients underwent more than 1 intervention with 2 of these having stents. Endovascular stent placement achieved initial hemostasis in 5 of 7 (72%). Follow-up was for a median (IQR) of 199 days (145-400 days) poststent placement. In 2 patients, the stent remained patent at last follow-up. The remaining 5 stents occluded with a median (IQR) period of proven patency of 10 days (8-22 days).

Conclusions

This study shows that in the specific setting of postpancreatoduodenectomy hemorrhage with either a short remnant gastroduodenal artery bleed or a direct bleed from the hepatic artery, where embolization risks occlusion with compromise of liver arterial inflow, endovascular hepatic artery stent is an important hemostatic option but is associated with a high risk of subsequent graft occlusion.

Emergency endovascular treatments for delayed hemorrhage after pancreaticobiliary surgery: indications, outcomes, and follow-up of a retrospective cohort

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of emergency endovascular treatments for delayed bleeding after pancreaticobiliary surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 21 patients (M:F = 13:8, median age = 64 years) undergoing 23 endovascular treatments, performed from 2010 to 2017 in a single center. Data collected were patient characteristics; surgery; pathology; incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPF); bleeding signs on CT and angiography; damaged artery; endovascular tools used; technical and clinical success; intervals between surgery, endovascular treatment, and discharge; survival rates.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had pancreatoduodenectomy, three hepaticojejunostomy, two distal pancreatectomy. Indications for surgery were mainly biliary (33%), pancreatic (19%), or duodenal (10%) malignancies. Seventeen patients had "grade C" POPF, three suffered a biliary leak, one had no POPF. Active bleeding was present in 17/23 CTs and in 22/23 angiographies, mostly from hepatic (43%), gastroduodenal (22%), and splenic (13%) arteries. The endovascular treatments were performed with coils (26%), glue (22%), stent-graft (22%), and their combinations (30%). Sixteen patients had a single endovascular treatment, one underwent a second embolization, three had subsequent surgery, one had repeat embolization followed by surgery. Relaparotomy rate was 19%. Median hospital stay was 37 days (range 12-75); median intervals among pancreaticobiliary surgery, endovascular treatment, and discharge were 21 (2-36) and 12 (8-47) days, respectively. We observed 4/21 intrahospital deaths (median: 31 days from endovascular treatment, 4-53); 1-year survival rate of discharged patients was 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular treatment using embolization and/or stent-graft placement is a useful first-line intervention to halt postoperative hemorrhage after pancreaticobiliary surgery and decreases the need for urgent relaparotomy.

Palliative bypass surgery for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: experience from a tertiary center

Background

As advances in oncological treatment continue to prolong the survival of patients with non-resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), decision-making regarding palliative surgical bypass in patients with a heavy disease burden turns challenging. Here we present the results of a pancreatic surgery referral center.

Methods

Patients that underwent palliative gastrojejunostomy and/or hepaticojejunostomy for advanced, non-resectable PDAC between January 2010 and November 2018 were retrospectively assessed. All patients were taken to a purely palliative surgery with no curative intent. The postoperative course as well as short and long-term outcomes was evaluated in relation to preoperative parameters.

Results

Forty-two patients (19 females) underwent palliative bypass. Thirty-one underwent only gastrojejunostomy (22 laparoscopic) and 11 underwent both gastrojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy (all by an open approach). Although 34 patients (80.9%) were able to return temporarily to oral intake during the index admission, 15 (35.7%) suffered from a major postoperative complication. Seven patients (16.6%) died from surgery and another seven within the following month. Nine patients (21.4%) never left the hospital following the surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 18 ± 17 days (range 3–88 days). Mean overall survival was 172.8 ± 179.2 and median survival was 94.5 days. Age, preoperative hypoalbuminemia, sarcopenia, and disseminated disease were associated with palliation failure, defined as inability to regain oral intake, leave the hospital, or early mortality.

Conclusions

Although palliative gastrojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy may be beneficial for specific patients, severe postoperative morbidity and high mortality rates are still common. Patient selection remains crucial for achieving acceptable outcomes.

Pancreatogastrostomy vs pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of RCTs and our experience

BACKGROUND

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most important operations in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery.

AIM

To evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG).

METHODS

This meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. All clinical randomized controlled trials, in which patients underwent PD with pancreatico-digestive tract reconstruction via PJ or PG, were included.

RESULTS

The search of PubMed, Wanfang Data, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library provided 125 citations. After further analysis, 11 trials were included from nine counties. In all, 909 patients underwent PG and 856 underwent PJ. Meta-analysis showed that pancreatic fistula (PF) was a significantly lower morbidity in the PG group than in the PJ group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.86, P = 0.002); however, grades B and C PF was not significantly different between the two groups (OR = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.34-1.09, P = 0.09). Postoperative hemorrhage showed a significantly lower morbidity in the PJ group than in the PG group (OR = 1.47, 95%CI: 1.05-2.06, P = 0.03). Delayed gastric emptying was not significantly different between the two groups (OR = 1.09, 95%CI: 0.83-1.41, P = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference in the incidence of grades B and C PF between the two groups. However, postoperative bleeding is significantly higher in PG than in PJ. Binding PJ or binding PG is a safe and secure technique according to our decades of experience.