Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study

Pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination without ovarian stimulation in couples affected by unilateral tubal occlusion and male infertility

BACKGROUND

Information available to date regarding the pregnancy outcomes of intrauterine insemination (IUI) without ovarian stimulation (OS) in infertile patients with unilateral tubal occlusion remains scarce. The objectives of this study were to investigate for couples affected by unilateral tubal occlusion (diagnosed via hysterosalpingography (HSG)/transvaginal real-time three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (TVS RT-3D-HyCoSy)) and male infertility: (1) whether significant differences exist in pregnancy outcomes between IUI with or without OS cycles, and (2) whether the pregnancy outcomes of IUI without OS in women with unilateral tubal occlusion were similar to those of women with bilateral patent tubes.

METHODS

258 couples affected by male infertility completed 399 IUI cycles. The cycles were divided into three groups: group A, IUI without OS in women with unilateral tubal occlusion; group B, IUI with OS in women with unilateral tubal occlusion; and group C, IUI without OS in women with bilateral patent tubes. The main outcome measures, including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), and first trimester miscarriage rate, were compared between either groups A and B or groups A and C.

RESULTS

Although the number of dominant follicles > 16 mm were significantly higher in group B than that in group A (group B vs. group A: 1.6 ± 0.6 vs. 1.0 ± 0.2, P < 0.001), the CPR, LBR, and first trimester miscarriage rate were comparable between these two groups. When comparing group C to group A, the duration of infertility was significantly longer in group C than that in group A (group A vs. group C: 2.3 ± 1.2 (year) vs. 2.9 ± 2.1 (year), P = 0.017). Except for the first trimester miscarriage rate, which was significantly higher in group A (42.9%, 3/7) than that in group C (7.1%, 2/28) (P = 0.044), no significant differences were observed in the CPR and LBR in these two groups. After adjusting for female age, body mass index, and the duration of infertility, similar results were obtained between groups A and C.

CONCLUSIONS

In couples affected by unilateral tubal occlusion (diagnosed via HSG/TVS RT-3D-HyCoSy) and male infertility, IUI without OS might be an alternative treatment strategy. However, when compared to patients with bilateral patent tubes, the patients with unilateral tubal occlusion showed a higher first trimester miscarriage rate following IUI without OS cycles. Further studies are warranted to clarify this relationship.

Evaluating the efficacy of ovulation stimulation with intrauterine insemination in women with diminished ovarian reserve compared to women with normal ovarian reserve

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination (IUI) in couples with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR).

METHODS

Women aged 20-39 years and men younger than 50 years were included. Four "ovarian reserve groups" were created according to anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and the partner's age. Gestational sac finding on ultrasound examination was the primary outcome measure.

RESULTS

The study was carried out on a total of 770 cycles of 362 women in an infertility cohort that consisted of 75 women with DOR treated by 153 cycles and 287 women without DOR treated by 617 cycles. The pregnancy rate was similar in the four ovarian reserve groups in terms of first, second, third plus fourth, and total attempts of IUI cycles. Moreover, the pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and multiple pregnancy rate were similar. We found no difference in the cumulative pregnancy rate among the groups after four IUI cycles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the entire cohort revealed that infertility duration, post-wash sperm count, and follicle number greater than 11 mm on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin trigger were independent predictors of pregnancy (P < 0.001). Neither age nor AMH predicted pregnancy after ovulation stimulation and IUI.

CONCLUSIONS

Ovulation stimulation and IUI are equally effective in women with DOR and in women with normal ovarian reserve in terms of pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate per IUI cycle or cumulative pregnancy rate after four cycles of IUI.

Factors Affecting Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Outcome

Objective

The aim of the present study was to explore related clinical pregnancy outcome factors in intrauterine insemination (IUI).

Materials and Methods

The clinical data of 3984 IUI cycles in 1862 couples experiencing infertility who attended the Reproductive Center of Binzhou Medical University Hospital between July 2006 and July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Female and male patient age, endometrial thickness (EMT), the post-wash total motile sperm count (PTMC), artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols were compared between the study’s pregnant group and non-pregnant group in order to explore any correlation.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in female and male age, EMT, artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols between the two groups (p < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in ovarian stimulation cycles than in natural cycles (21.2% and 11.6%, respectively; p < 0.01), the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in double IUI than in single IUI (17.8% and 12.1%, respectively; p < 0.01), and EMT was significantly greater in the pregnant group than in the control group (p < 0.05). However, the differences in clinical pregnancy rates among the PTMC groups were not statistically significant (14.8%, 14.4%, 17.3%, and 17.3%, respectively; p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate that the clinical IUI pregnancy rate is correlated with the factors of female age, male age, EMT, artificial insemination timing, insemination frequency, and ovarian stimulation protocols; the ovarian stimulation protocol can noticeably improve the patient pregnancy outcome. Furthermore, compared with single IUI, double IUI can significantly increase the clinical pregnancy rate.