Proteome-defined changes in cellular pathways for decidua and trophoblast tissues associated with location and viability of early-stage pregnancy

Evaluation of novel biomarkers for early pregnancy outcome prediction†

OBJECTIVE

To assess performance and discriminatory capacity of commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of biomarkers for predicting first trimester pregnancy outcome in a multi-center cohort.

DESIGN

In a case-control study at three academic centers of women with pain and bleeding in early pregnancy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of biomarkers were screened for assay performance. Performance was assessed via functional sensitivity, assay reportable range, recovery/linearity, and intra-assay precision (%Coefficient of Variation). Top candidates were analyzed for discriminatory capacity for viability and location among 210 women with tubal ectopic pregnancy, viable intrauterine pregnancy, or miscarriage. Assay discrimination was assessed by visual plots, area under the curve with 95% confidence intervals, and measures of central tendency with two-sample t-tests.

RESULTS

Of 25 biomarkers evaluated, 22 demonstrated good or acceptable assay performance. Transgelin-2, oviductal glycoprotein, and integrin-linked kinase were rejected due to poor performance. The best biomarkers for discrimination of pregnancy location were pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 9, pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, kisspeptin (KISS1), pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 3, and beta parvin (PARVB). The best biomarkers for discrimination of pregnancy viability were pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 9, pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 3, EH domain-containing protein 3, KISS1, WAP four-disulfide core domain protein 2 (HE4), quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 2, and pregnancy-specific beta-1-glycoprotein 1.

CONCLUSION

Performance of commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays was acceptable for a panel of novel biomarkers to predict early pregnancy outcome. Of these, six and seven candidates demonstrated good discriminatory capacity of pregnancy location and viability, respectively, when validated in a distinct external population. Four markers demonstrated good discrimination for both location and viability.

A prospective study to evaluate whether serum kisspeptin is a marker predictive of the first-trimester miscarriage of women who conceive in IVF

PURPOSE

Kisspeptin is an emerging biomarker for the discrimination of viable pregnancy. The aim of the study is to determine whether serum kisspeptin can predict the first-trimester miscarriage and compare it with serum HCG in the prediction of the first-trimester miscarriage.

METHODS

This study is a prospective case-control design including 178 women who had experienced early miscarriage (n = 21) and viable single pregnancy (n = 157), following frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) from May to December 2019. Serum samples on 14 days, 21 days, and 28 days after FET were collected for kisspeptin and HCG detection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03940495.

RESULTS

On day 21 after FET, serum kisspeptin levels were significantly lower in the early miscarriage group [0.260 (0.185-0.375)] vs in the viable single-pregnancy group [0.370 (0.280-0.495)] (p = 0.005). Similar results were shown on day 28 after FET, the serum kisspeptin levels were significantly lower in the early miscarriage group [0.270 (0.200-0.330)] vs in the viable single pregnancy group [0.670 (0.455-1.235)] (p < 0.001). But on day 14 after FET, serum kisspeptin levels were comparable in the early miscarriage group [0.260 (0.210-0.325)] and in the viable single-pregnancy group [0.280 (0.215-0.340)] (p = 0.551). Serum kisspeptin levels on days 21 and 28 have a poor predictive value of miscarriage compared with serum HCG levels. [Day 21: AUC = 0.687 (kisspeptin) and 0.816 (HCG); Day 28: AUC = 0.896 (kisspeptin) and 0.909 (HCG)].

CONCLUSIONS

Serum kisspeptin on day 14 failed to discriminate between miscarriage and ongoing pregnancies, and days 21 and 28 had poor predictive values of miscarriage.