1
|
Sunkara SK, Schwarze JE, Orvieto R, Fischer R, Dahan MH, Esteves SC, Lispi M, D'Hooghe T, Alviggi C. Expert opinion on refined and extended key performance indicators for individualized ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2025; 123:653-664. [PMID: 39369933 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2024] [Revised: 10/01/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the adequate ovarian follicular development and oocyte recovery between ovarian potential (antral follicle count [AFC]) before the start of ovarian stimulation (OS) and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. A holistic overview of the current key performance indicators (KPIs) was applied to identify the complementary strengths and identify where the current repertoire can be expanded. DESIGN Expert opinion. INTERVENTION None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES To formulate a proposal for a refined and expanded repertoire of KPIs for individualized OS for assisted reproductive technology. RESULTS The performance and outcomes of OS on ovarian follicular development can be evaluated through the application of defined KPIs. Current KPIs for OS are the ovarian sensitivity index, follicular output rate (FORT), oocyte retrieval rate, and follicle-to-oocyte index (FOI). Notably, there are no specific KPIs dedicated to the assessment of follicular development (i.e., recruitment, selection, growth, and dominance). In light of this, we recommend expanding the current KPIs for OS to include "early FORT" (accounting for the number of follicles measuring ≥10 to 11 mm on day 5/6 of OS relative to AFC) and "modified FORT" (the ratio between the number of follicles measuring ≥12 mm at the time of oocyte maturation triggering and AFC); the extension of oocyte retrieval rate to include two discrete categories at oocyte retrieval-follicles measuring ≥12 mm and ≥16 mm-to ensure that all responsive follicles are accounted for; and FOI to be measured at oocyte maturation triggering and oocyte retrieval ("advanced FOI"). CONCLUSION Once validated and adopted in clinical practice, we envisage that the proposed expanded KPIs measuring the effect of OS on follicular development (recruitment, selection, growth, and dominance) will increase the understanding of the relationship between ovarian reserve, measured by AFC, and oocyte quantity and quality at oocyte retrieval. This understanding will enable physicians to better evaluate the direct effect of different gonadotropins and doses on ovarian response, leading to a more personalized approach to OS in the context of assisted reproductive technology treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sesh K Sunkara
- King's Fertility, London, King's College London, United Kingdom.
| | - Juan-Enrique Schwarze
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | | | - Michael H Dahan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sandro C Esteves
- ANDROFERT - Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil; Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Monica Lispi
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orvieto R, Gleicher N. A simple and practical approach to elective egg freezing to control costs and expand access to care. J Ovarian Res 2024; 17:213. [PMID: 39487533 PMCID: PMC11529452 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01543-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Social elective egg freezing (EEF) is now widely used globally but in many countries is unaffordable to many women because of high costs and lacking insurance coverage. Efforts to reduce costs, therefore, are of importance. Surprisingly, a simple, well-defined and practical approach ensuring optimal outcomes for EEF has, however, so-far not been published. We, therefore, conducted a narrative review of the literature for relevant articles regarding the different steps of ovarian stimulation (OS) in the EEF process, in order to define such a standard protocol. This review revealed that in order to maximize oocyte yields with minimal number of OS cycles - while ensuring patient safety - a multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol with a daily gonadotropin dose of 300 IU appears best, unless patients demonstrate a polycystic ovarian phenotype, suggestive of likely high responses. The initial gonadotropin should be recFSH, while LH supplementation should be co-administered with the addition of GnRH antagonist. Final follicular maturation should be triggered by GnRH agonist trigger, with a dual trigger (1000-1500 IU hCG) considered for suboptimal responders to GnRH agonist trigger, optionally with Cabergoline to mitigate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
- The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
| | - Norbert Gleicher
- Center for Human Reproduction (CHR), New York, NY, USA
- Foundation for Reproductive Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Laboratory of Synthetic Embryology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ubaldi F, Alviggi C, Garcia-Velasco JA, Glujovsky D, Orvieto R, Cedars MI. DuoStim: Do we have enough evidence to use it? Fertil Steril 2024; 122:587-594. [PMID: 39254611 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Ubaldi
- IVI RMA Global Research Alliance, Genera - Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Dipartimento Sanità Pubblica, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Raoul Orvieto
- Infertility and IVF Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Marcelle I Cedars
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herzberger EH, Semo M, Soifer K, Miller N, Gepstein NG, Rahav R, Levi M, Wiser A. Oocyte retrieval in social fertility preservation: challenging traditional beliefs on gonadotropin dosing and follicular size. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1863-1870. [PMID: 38763992 PMCID: PMC11263317 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03138-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate treatment approaches for fertility preservation patients, with a focus on timing of oocyte retrieval, and to determine whether their characteristics differ from those of other IVF patients. Additionally, to evaluate the significance of follicle size on triggering day in the context of fertility preservation. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary, university-affiliated medical center. It compared 140 matched patients undergoing social fertility preservation to 140 patients undergoing IVF treatment due to male factor infertility. RESULTS Patients undergoing fertility preservation received a higher initial gonadotropin dose and had more oocytes retrieved than the control group. Within the fertility preservation cohort, a negative correlation was observed between the rate of large follicles and the number of retrieved oocytes. While there was no significant association between rate of large follicles and oocyte maturation rate in the entire group, age-stratified analysis revealed a negative relationship. Analysis revealed that although traditional treatment determinants such as follicular size and gonadotropin dosing were considered, peak estradiol levels were consistently identified as significant predictors of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Physicians may modify treatments for fertility preservation, emphasizing a higher gonadotropin dosage to maximize oocyte retrieval. Elevated estradiol levels can serve as a real-time predictive marker for the number of mature oocytes. While treatment strategies can influence outcomes, intrinsic patient factors, particularly baseline ovarian function, remain crucial. These results challenge beliefs regarding the importance of larger follicles and suggest the need for a tailored approach, considering patient age and specific fertility preservation objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Einat Haikin Herzberger
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel.
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Mor Semo
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Kim Soifer
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Netanella Miller
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Nitzan Goren Gepstein
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roni Rahav
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mattan Levi
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Wiser
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 44281, Kfar Saba, Israel
- Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Orvieto R, Kadmon AS, Morag N, Segev-Zahav A, Nahum R. Determining the optimal daily gonadotropin dose to maximize the oocyte yield in elective egg freezing cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2024; 22:64. [PMID: 38844947 PMCID: PMC11155010 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01236-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ovarian stimulation (OS) with high daily gonadotropin doses are commonly offered to patients attempting social/elective egg freezing. However, the optimal daily gonadotropin dose that would allow a higher oocyte yield in the successive IVF cycle attempt was not settled and should be determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from all women admitted to our IVF unit for social/EEF, who underwent two consecutive IVF cycle attempts, with only those who used in the first attempt a starting daily gonadotropin dose of 300IU were analyzed. Patients characteristics and OS variables were used in an attempt to build a logistic model, helping in determining the daily gonadotropin dose that should be offered to patient during their second EEF attempt, aiming to further increase their oocyte yield. RESULTS Three hundred and thirteen consecutive women undergoing two successive IVF cycle attempts were evaluated. Using logistic regression model, two equations were developed using individual patient-level data that determine the daily gonadotropin dose needed aiming to increase the oocyte yield in the successive cycle. (a): X=-0.514 + 2.87*A1 + 1.733*A2-0.194* (E2/1000) and (b): P = EXP(X) / [1 + EXP(X)]. CONCLUSIONS Using the aforementioned equations succeeded in determining the daily gonadotropin dose that might result in increasing oocyte yield, with an AUC of 0.85. Any additional oocyte retrieved to these EEF patients might get them closer to fulfil their desire to parenthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul Orvieto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
- Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
- The Tarnesby-Tarnowski Chair for Family Planning and Fertility Regulation, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Anouk Savir Kadmon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Arrow Program for Medical Education, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Nira Morag
- Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Aliza Segev-Zahav
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Ravit Nahum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
- Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ranit H, Shmuel H, Ahlad A, Shirley G, Meny H, Tal I, Assaf BM, Chana AL, Yaakov B, Efrat EB, Anat HK. Is there a preferred time interval between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles? A retrospective cohort of planned fertility preservation cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1531-1538. [PMID: 38492156 PMCID: PMC11224053 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03083-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The ideal time frame between gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (GnRHa) trigger administration and oocyte retrieval in GnRH antagonist cycles has not been well studied. Our goal was to evaluate the effect of this time interval on oocyte yield and oocyte maturation rate in GnRH antagonist cycles designated for non-medical ("planned") oocyte cryopreservation. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent elective fertility preservation, using the GnRH antagonist protocol and exclusively triggered by GnRH-agonist. We focused on the effect of the trigger-to-retrieval time interval on oocyte yield and maturation rate, while also incorporating age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, basal Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) levels, as well as the type and dosage of gonadotropin FSH medication. RESULTS 438 cycles were included. Trigger-to-retrieval time interval ranged from 32.03 to 39.92 h. The mean oocyte yield showed no statistically significant difference when comparing retrievals < 36 h (n = 240, 11.86 ± 8.6) to those triggered at ≥ 36 h (n = 198, 12.24 ± 7.73) (P = 0.6). Upon dividing the cohort into four-time quartiles, no significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes were observed (P = 0.54). Multivariate regression analysis failed to reveal any significant associations between the interval and the aforementioned variables. CONCLUSIONS The GnRHa trigger to oocyte retrieval interval range in our cohort did not significantly affect oocyte yield and maturation rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hizkiyahu Ranit
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel.
| | - Herzberg Shmuel
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Ein Kerem-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Athavale Ahlad
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
| | - Greenbaum Shirley
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
| | - Harari Meny
- Faculty of medicine, Hebrew university of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Imbar Tal
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Ein Kerem-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebrew university of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ben-Meir Assaf
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Ein Kerem-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- Faculty of medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebrew university of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Adler Lazarovits Chana
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
| | - Bentov Yaakov
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
| | - Esh-Broder Efrat
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
- Faculty of medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebrew university of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Hershko Klement Anat
- The IVF unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah Mount Scopus-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, 9112001, Israel
- Faculty of medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hebrew university of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|