A case of pulmonary thromboembolism due to coagulation factor V Leiden in Japan ~ usefulness of next generation sequencing~

Validation of the Khorana Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score in Japanese Cancer Patients

Background

Although the Khorana venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score (KRS) is well recognized as a simple VTE risk assessment method in patients with cancer, whether it is suitable for Asian populations is unclear.

Objectives

This study validated KRS for the prediction of VTE and investigated the value of the KRS in predicting mortality in Japanese patients with cancer.

Methods

A body mass index value of 25 kg/m² or more was defined as obesity according to World Health Organization consensus. A total of 27,687 patients with cancer were subdivided into low- (0), intermediate- (1-2), and high-score (3) groups by the KRS. The primary and secondary endpoints were VTE and all-cause mortality, respectively.

Results

The prevalence of VTE was 1.7%, 7.3%, and 11.0% for low-, intermediate-, and high-score patients, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the KRS significantly predicted VTE (area under the curve, 0.679; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.666-0.692; P < 0.001). The cutoff value for the KRS was 1.0. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the KRS was an independent predictor of VTE (odds ratio 1.766; 95% CI 1.673-1.865; P < 0.01). The cutoff value of the KRS for all-cause mortality determined by ROC analysis was 2.0. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of mortality in the KRS ≥2 group than in the KRS 0-1 group (log-rank: P < 0.01).

Conclusions

The KRS was useful in Japanese patients with cancer and might be a potentially useful marker for the prediction of mortality. Establishing optimal scores for Japanese subjects is mandatory because of its low diagnostic ability. (KUMAMON Cancer registry; UMIN000047554)

MTHFR C677T, Prothrombin G20210A, and Factor V Leiden (G1691A) Polymorphism and Beta-Thalassemia Risk: A Meta-Analysis

Background Beta (β)-thalassemia major patients frequently suffer from many vascular problems. Thrombophilia is a blood disorder that comprises imbalances in the blood coagulating factor due to ecological and hereditary components. Previous evidence shows that thrombosis is the commonest risk in beta-thalassemia patients. Several studies have examined that MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G20210A (PT G20210A), and Factor V Leiden G1691A (FVL G1691A) polymorphism play a crucial role in the development of β-thalassemia major, yet the result was questionable and uncertain. Therefore, in this study, we executed the correlation between these gene polymorphisms with β-thalassemia major patients. Methods Suitable keywords were used to search related articles in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science. In this random-effects meta-analysis, we analyzed the odds ratio (OR) for the estimation of risk. Results A total of nine research articles with 645 β-thalassemia major patients and 989 healthy controls were incorporated in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR was assessed in MTHFR C677T, PT G20210A, and FVL G1691A polymorphism. This random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated that MTHFR C677T, PT G20210A, and FVL G1691A gene polymorphism did not significantly associate with β-thalassemia major. Moreover, the heterogeneity was significantly found in genotype CC vs CT+TT C677T (I²=61%) and allele C vs T (I²=71%) of MTHFR and genotype GG vs GA (I²=95%), GG vs GA+AA (I²=95%), GA vs GG+AA (I²=95%), and allele G vs A (I²=93%) of FVL G1691A. Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis show that MTHFR C677T, prothrombin G20210A, and Factor V Leiden (G1691A) gene polymorphism are not a risk factor for β-thalassemia major.