1
|
Dada S, Aivalli P, De Brún A, Barreix M, Chelwa N, Mutunga Z, Vwalika B, Gilmore B. Understanding communication in community engagement for maternal and newborn health programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a realist review. Health Policy Plan 2023; 38:1079-1098. [PMID: 37650702 PMCID: PMC10566325 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As community engagement (CE) is implemented for sustainable maternal and newborn health (MNH) programming, it is important to determine how these approaches work. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have become a particular focus for MNH CE activities due to their high burden of maternal and neonatal deaths. MNH messaging and communication to engage communities are likely to differ by context, but how these approaches are actually developed and implemented within CE is not well understood. Understanding how communications in CE actually work is vital in the translation of learnings across programmes and to inform future projects. The purpose of this realist review is to describe how, why, to what extent and for whom communications in CE contribute to MNH programming in LMICs. After searching academic databases, grey literature and literature suggested by the expert advisory committee, documents were included if they described the CE communication processes/activities used for MNH programming in an LMIC. Relevant documents were assessed for richness (depth of insight) and rigor (trustworthiness and coherence of data/theories). Data were extracted as context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and synthesized into demi-regularities to contribute to theory refinement. After screening 416 records, 45 CMOCs were extracted from 11 documents. This informed five programme theories explaining that communications in CE for an MNH programme work when: communities are actively involved throughout the programme, the messaging and programme are acceptable, communication sources are trusted, the community has a reciprocal relationship with the programme and the community sees value in the programme. While these findings reflect what is often anecdotally known in CE or acknowledged in communications theory, they have implications for policy, practice and research by highlighting the importance of centring the community's needs and priorities throughout the stages of developing and implementing communications for CE in MNH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Dada
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Praveenkumar Aivalli
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Aoife De Brún
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Maria Barreix
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, 1211, Geneva 27, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Bellington Vwalika
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Brynne Gilmore
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), University College Dublin, School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems , Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
- School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laberge M, Brundisini FK, Zomahoun HTV, Sawadogo J, Massougbodji J, Gogovor A, David G, Légaré F. Knowledge exchange sessions on primary health care research findings in public libraries: A qualitative study with citizens in Quebec. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0289153. [PMID: 37490456 PMCID: PMC10368291 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Little is known about knowledge transfer with the public. We explored how citizens, physicians, and communication specialists understand knowledge transfer in public spaces such as libraries. The initial study aimed at evaluating the scaling up of a program on disseminating research findings on potentially inappropriate medication. Twenty-two citizen workshops were offered by 16 physicians and facilitated by 6 communication specialists to 322 citizens in libraries during spring 2019. We did secondary analysis using the recorded workshop discussions to explore the type of knowledge participants used. Participants described four kinds of knowledge: biomedical, sociocultural beliefs, value-based reasoning, and institutional knowledge. Biomedical knowledge included scientific evidence, research methods, clinical guidelines, and access to research outcomes. Participants discussed beliefs in scientific progress, innovative clinical practices, and doctors' behaviours. Participants discussed values related to reliability, transparency, respect for patient autonomy and participation in decision-making. All categories of participants used these four kinds of knowledge. However, their descriptions varied particularly for biomedical knowledge which was described by physician-speakers and communication specialists-facilitators as scientific evidence, epidemiological and clinical practice guidelines, and pathophysiological theories. Communication specialists-facilitators also described scientific journalistic sources and scientific journalistic reports as proxies of scientific evidence. Citizens described biomedical knowledge in terms of knowledge to make informed decisions. These findings offer insights for future scientific knowledge exchange interventions with the public.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maude Laberge
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM Centre de Recherche sur la Santé Durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
| | - Francesca Katherine Brundisini
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
- VITAM Centre de Recherche sur la Santé Durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada
| | - Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun
- VITAM Centre de Recherche sur la Santé Durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jasmine Sawadogo
- First Nations of Quebec and Labrador Health and Social Services Commission, Quebec, Canada
| | - José Massougbodji
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM Centre de Recherche sur la Santé Durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada
| | - Geneviève David
- Centre d'excellence sur le Partenariat avec les Patients et le Public, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Québec, Canada
- École Nationale d'administration Publique, Québec, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM Centre de Recherche sur la Santé Durable, CIUSSS de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Quebec SPOR-SUPPORT Unit, Quebec, Canada
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Quebec, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dada S, Dalkin S, Gilmore B, Hunter R, Mukumbang FC. Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews. Res Synth Methods 2023; 14:504-514. [PMID: 36872619 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
The realist review/synthesis has become an increasingly prominent methodological approach to evidence synthesis that can inform policy and practice. While there are publication standards and guidelines for the conduct of realist reviews, published reviews often provide minimal detail regarding how they have conducted some methodological steps. This includes selecting and appraising evidence sources, which are often considered for their 'relevance, richness and rigour.' In contrast to other review approaches, for example, narrative reviews and meta-analyses, the inclusion criteria and appraisal of evidence within realist reviews depend less on the study's methodological quality and more on its contribution to our understanding of generative causation, uncovered through the process of retroductive theorising. This research brief aims to discuss the current challenges and practices for appraising documents' relevance, richness and rigour and to provide pragmatic suggestions for how realist reviewers can put this into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Dada
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sonia Dalkin
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.,Fuse (The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health), Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Brynne Gilmore
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research Education and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS Centre), School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.,School of Nursing Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Rebecca Hunter
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin RA, Baker AP, Smiler K, Middleton L, Hay-Smith J, Kayes N, Grace C, Apiata TAM, Nunnerley JL, Brown AE. Flourishing together: research protocol for developing methods to better include disabled people's knowledge in health policy development. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1252. [PMID: 36253852 PMCID: PMC9575235 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08655-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To positively impact the social determinants of health, disabled people need to contribute to policy planning and programme development. However, they report barriers to engaging meaningfully in consultation processes. Additionally, their recommendations may not be articulated in ways that policy planners can readily use. This gap contributes to health outcome inequities. Participatory co-production methods have the potential to improve policy responsiveness. This research will use innovative methods to generate tools for co-producing knowledge in health-related policy areas, empowering disabled people to articulate experience, expertise and insights promoting equitable health policy and programme development within Aotearoa New Zealand. To develop these methods, as an exemplar, we will partner with both tāngata whaikaha Māori and disabled people to co-produce policy recommendations around housing and home (kāinga)-developing a nuanced understanding of the contexts in which disabled people can access and maintain kāinga meeting their needs and aspirations. METHODS Participatory co-production methods with disabled people, embedded within a realist methodological approach, will develop theories on how best to co-produce and effectively articulate knowledge to address equitable health-related policy and programme development-considering what works for whom under what conditions. Theory-building workshops (Phase 1) and qualitative surveys (Phase 2) will explore contexts and resources (i.e., at individual, social and environmental levels) supporting them to access and maintain kāinga that best meets their needs and aspirations. In Phase 3, a realist review with embedded co-production workshops will synthesise evidence and co-produce knowledge from published literature and non-published reports. Finally, in Phase 4, co-produced knowledge from all phases will be synthesised to develop two key research outputs: housing policy recommendations and innovative co-production methods and tools empowering disabled people to create, synthesise and articulate knowledge to planners of health-related policy. DISCUSSION This research will develop participatory co-production methods and tools to support future creation, synthesis and articulation of the knowledge and experiences of disabled people, contributing to policies that positively impact their social determinants of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachelle A Martin
- Department of Medicine, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit (RTRU)
- Te Whare Whakamātūtū, University of Otago, Wellington South, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand. .,Hā-i-mano
- Burwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - Angelo P Baker
- Hā-i-mano
- Burwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Kirsten Smiler
- Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Lesley Middleton
- Health Services Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jean Hay-Smith
- Department of Medicine, Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit (RTRU)
- Te Whare Whakamātūtū, University of Otago, Wellington South, PO Box 7343, Wellington, 6242, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Kayes
- Centre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Grace
- Hā-i-mano
- Burwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Whānau Whanake, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | | | - Joanne L Nunnerley
- Hā-i-mano
- Burwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Anna E Brown
- Toi Āria
- Design for Public Good, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen DTK, McLaren L, Oelke ND, McIntyre L. Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature. Glob Health Res Policy 2020; 5:18. [PMID: 32368619 PMCID: PMC7189598 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-020-00141-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Population health interventions (PHIs) have the potential to improve the health of large populations by systematically addressing underlying conditions of poor health outcomes (i.e., social determinants of health) and reducing health inequities. Scaling-up may be one means of enhancing the impact of effective PHIs. However, not all scale-up attempts have been successful. In an attempt to help guide the process of successful scale-up of a PHI, we look to the organizational readiness for change theory for a new perspective on how we may better understand the scale-up pathway. Using the change theory, our goal was to develop the foundations of an evidence-based, theory-informed framework for a PHI, through a critical examination of various PHI scale-up experiences documented in the literature. Methods We conducted a multi-step, critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) to gather and examine insights from scale-up experiences detailed in peer-reviewed and grey literatures, with a focus on PHIs from a variety of global settings. The CIS included iterative cycles of systematic searching, sampling, data extraction, critiquing, interpreting, coding, reflecting, and synthesizing. Theories relevant to innovations, complexity, and organizational readiness guided our analysis and synthesis. Results We retained and examined twenty different PHI scale-up experiences, which were extracted from 77 documents (47 peer-reviewed, 30 grey literature) published between 1995 and 2013. Overall, we identified three phases (i.e., Groundwork, Implementing Scale-up, and Sustaining Scale-up), 11 actions, and four key components (i.e., PHI, context, capacity, stakeholders) pertinent to the scale-up process. Our guiding theories provided explanatory power to various aspects of the scale-up process and to scale-up success, and an alternative perspective to the assessment of scale-up readiness for a PHI. Conclusion Our synthesis provided the foundations of the Scale-up Readiness Assessment Framework. Our theoretically-informed and rigorous synthesis methodology permitted identification of disparate processes involved in the successful scale-up of a PHI. Our findings complement the guidance and resources currently available, and offer an added perspective to assessing scale-up readiness for a PHI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duyen Thi Kim Nguyen
- Department of Economics, Faculty of Business, University of New Brunswick, 100 Tucker Park Road, P.O. Box 5050, Saint John, New Brunswick E2L 4L5 Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 600 Peter Morand Crescent, Ottawa, Ontario K1G 5Z3 Canada
- New Brunswick Health Research Foundation, 10 Knowledge Park Drive, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3C 2M7 Canada
| | - Lindsay McLaren
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
- O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
| | - Nelly D. Oelke
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
- O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Kelowna, British Columbia V1V 1V7 Canada
| | - Lynn McIntyre
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
- O’Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, TRW3, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Making Smarter Decisions Faster: Systems Engineering to Improve the Global Public Health Response to HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2020; 16:279-291. [PMID: 31197648 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-019-00449-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review offers an operational definition of systems engineering (SE) as applied to public health, reviews applications of SE in the field of HIV, and identifies opportunities and challenges of broader application of SE in global health. RECENT FINDINGS SE involves the deliberate sequencing of three steps: diagnosing a problem, evaluating options using modeling or optimization, and providing actionable recommendations. SE includes diverse tools (from process improvement to mathematical modeling) applied to decisions at various levels (from local staffing decisions to planning national-level roll-out of new interventions). Contextual factors are crucial to effective decision-making, but there are gaps in understanding global decision-making processes. Integrating SE into pre-service training and translating SE tools to be more accessible could increase utilization of SE approaches in global health. SE is a promising, but under-recognized approach to improve public health response to HIV globally.
Collapse
|
7
|
Freebairn L, Atkinson JA, Osgood ND, Kelly PM, McDonnell G, Rychetnik L. Turning conceptual systems maps into dynamic simulation models: An Australian case study for diabetes in pregnancy. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0218875. [PMID: 31247006 PMCID: PMC6597234 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND System science approaches are increasingly used to explore complex public health problems. Quantitative methods, such as participatory dynamic simulation modelling, can mobilise knowledge to inform health policy decisions. However, the analytic and practical steps required to turn collaboratively developed, qualitative system maps into rigorous and policy-relevant quantified dynamic simulation models are not well described. This paper reports on the processes, interactions and decisions that occurred at the interface between modellers and end-user participants in an applied health sector case study focusing on diabetes in pregnancy. METHODS An analysis was conducted using qualitative data from a participatory dynamic simulation modelling case study in an Australian health policy setting. Recordings of participatory model development workshops and subsequent meetings were analysed and triangulated with field notes and other written records of discussions and decisions. Case study vignettes were collated to illustrate the deliberations and decisions made throughout the model development process. RESULTS The key analytic objectives and decision-making processes included: defining the model scope; analysing and refining the model structure to maximise local relevance and utility; reviewing and incorporating evidence to inform model parameters and assumptions; focusing the model on priority policy questions; communicating results and applying the models to policy processes. These stages did not occur sequentially; the model development was cyclical and iterative with decisions being re-visited and refined throughout the process. Storytelling was an effective strategy to both communicate and resolve concerns about the model logic and structure, and to communicate the outputs of the model to a broader audience. CONCLUSION The in-depth analysis reported here examined the application of participatory modelling methods to move beyond qualitative conceptual mapping to the development of a rigorously quantified and policy relevant, complex dynamic simulation model. The analytic objectives and decision-making themes identified provide guidance for interpreting, understanding and reporting future participatory modelling projects and methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Freebairn
- ACT Health, Canberra, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Jo-An Atkinson
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Decision Analytics, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nathaniel D. Osgood
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
- Department of Community Health … Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
| | - Paul M. Kelly
- ACT Health, Canberra, Australia
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- Medical School, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | | | - Lucie Rychetnik
- The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia
- University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|