A molecular approach integrating genomic and DNA methylation profiling for tissue of origin identification in lung-specific cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary and the «seed and soil» hypothesis

The worldwide incidence rate of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) reaches 5% (Kang et al, 2021; Lee, Sanoff, 2020; Yang et al, 2022). CUP has an alarmingly high mortality rate, with 84% of patients succumbing within the first year following diagnosis (Registration and Service, 2018). Under normal circumstances, tumor cell metastasis follows the «seed and soil» hypothesis, displaying a tissue-specific pattern of cancer cell homing behavior based on the microenvironment composition of secondary organs. In this study, we questioned whether seed and soil concept applies to CUP, and whether the pattern of tumor and metastasis manifestations for cancer of known primary (CKP) can be used to inform diagnostic strategies for CUP. We compared data from metastatic and primary CUP foci to the metastasis patterns observed in CKP. Furthermore, we evaluated several techniques for identifying the tissue-of-origin (TOO) in CUP profiling, including DNA, RNA, and epigenetic TOO techniques.

A platform-independent AI tumor lineage and site (ATLAS) classifier

Histopathologic diagnosis and classification of cancer plays a critical role in guiding treatment. Advances in next-generation sequencing have ushered in new complementary molecular frameworks. However, existing approaches do not independently assess both site-of-origin (e.g. prostate) and lineage (e.g. adenocarcinoma) and have minimal validation in metastatic disease, where classification is more difficult. Utilizing gradient-boosted machine learning, we developed ATLAS, a pair of separate AI Tumor Lineage and Site-of-origin models from RNA expression data on 8249 tumor samples. We assessed performance independently in 10,376 total tumor samples, including 1490 metastatic samples, achieving an accuracy of 91.4% for cancer site-of-origin and 97.1% for cancer lineage. High confidence predictions (encompassing the majority of cases) were accurate 98-99% of the time in both localized and remarkably even in metastatic samples. We also identified emergent properties of our lineage scores for tumor types on which the model was never trained (zero-shot learning). Adenocarcinoma/sarcoma lineage scores differentiated epithelioid from biphasic/sarcomatoid mesothelioma. Also, predicted lineage de-differentiation identified neuroendocrine/small cell tumors and was associated with poor outcomes across tumor types. Our platform-independent single-sample approach can be easily translated to existing RNA-seq platforms. ATLAS can complement and guide traditional histopathologic assessment in challenging situations and tumors of unknown primary.

Biomarkers for Early Cancer Detection: A Landscape View of Recent Advancements, Spotlighting Pancreatic and Liver Cancers

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Early cancer detection is critical because it can significantly improve treatment outcomes, thus saving lives, reducing suffering, and lessening psychological and economic burdens. Cancer biomarkers provide varied information about cancer, from early detection of malignancy to decisions on treatment and subsequent monitoring. A large variety of molecular, histologic, radiographic, or physiological entities or features are among the common types of cancer biomarkers. Sizeable recent methodological progress and insights have promoted significant developments in the field of early cancer detection biomarkers. Here we provide an overview of recent advances in the knowledge related to biomolecules and cellular entities used for early cancer detection. We examine data from the CAS Content Collection, the largest human-curated collection of published scientific information, as well as from the biomarker datasets at Excelra, and analyze the publication landscape of recent research. We also discuss the evolution of key concepts and cancer biomarkers development pipelines, with a particular focus on pancreatic and liver cancers, which are known to be remarkably difficult to detect early and to have particularly high morbidity and mortality. The objective of the paper is to provide a broad overview of the evolving landscape of current knowledge on cancer biomarkers and to outline challenges and evaluate growth opportunities, in order to further efforts in solving the problems that remain. The merit of this review stems from the extensive, wide-ranging coverage of the most up-to-date scientific information, allowing unique, unmatched breadth of landscape analysis and in-depth insights.

New techniques to identify the tissue of origin for cancer of unknown primary in the era of precision medicine: progress and challenges

Despite a standardized diagnostic examination, cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a rare metastatic malignancy with an unidentified tissue of origin (TOO). Patients diagnosed with CUP are typically treated with empiric chemotherapy, although their prognosis is worse than those with metastatic cancer of a known origin. TOO identification of CUP has been employed in precision medicine, and subsequent site-specific therapy is clinically helpful. For example, molecular profiling, including genomic profiling, gene expression profiling, epigenetics and proteins, has facilitated TOO identification. Moreover, machine learning has improved identification accuracy, and non-invasive methods, such as liquid biopsy and image omics, are gaining momentum. However, the heterogeneity in prediction accuracy, sample requirements and technical fundamentals among the various techniques is noteworthy. Accordingly, we systematically reviewed the development and limitations of novel TOO identification methods, compared their pros and cons and assessed their potential clinical usefulness. Our study may help patients shift from empirical to customized care and improve their prognoses.

Accurate prediction of pan-cancer types using machine learning with minimal number of DNA methylation sites

DNA methylation analysis has been applied to determine the primary site of cancer; however, robust and accurate prediction of cancer types with a minimum number of sites is still a significant scientific challenge. To build an accurate and robust cancer type prediction tool with a minimum number of DNA methylation sites, we internally benchmarked different DNA methylation site selection and ranking procedures, as well as different classification models. We used The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset (26 cancer types with 8296 samples) to train and test models and used an independent dataset (17 cancer types with 2738 samples) for model validation. A deep neural network model using a combined feature selection procedure (named MethyDeep) can predict 26 cancer types using 30 methylation sites with superior performance compared with the known methods for both primary and metastatic cancers in independent validation datasets. In conclusion, MethyDeep is an accurate and robust cancer type predictor with the minimum number of DNA methylation sites; it could help the cost-effective clarification of cancer of unknown primary patients and the liquid biopsy-based early screening of cancers.

The diagnosis and treatment for a patient with cancer of unknown primary: A case report

Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a class of metastatic malignant tumors whose primary location cannot be determined. The diagnosis and treatment of CUP are a considerable challenge for clinicians. Herein, we report a CUP case whose corresponding primary tumor sites were successfully identified, and the patient received proper treatment. Case report: In February 2022, a 74-year-old woman was admitted to the Medical Oncology Department at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital for new lung and intestinal tumors after more than 9 years of breast cancer surgery. After laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy, pathology revealed mucinous adenocarcinoma; the pathological stage was pT2N0M0. Results from needle biopsies of lung masses suggested poorly differentiated cancer, ER (-), PR (-), and HER2 (-), which combined with the clinical history, did not rule out metastatic breast cancer. A surgical pathology sample was needed to determine the origin of the tumor tissue, but the patient's chest structure showed no indications for surgery. Analysis of the tumor's traceable gene expression profile prompted breast cancer, and analysis of next-generation amplification sequencing (NGS) did not obtain a potential drug target. We developed a treatment plan based on comprehensive immunohistochemistry, a gene expression profile, and NGS analysis. The treatment plan was formulated using paclitaxel albumin and capecitabine in combination with radiotherapy. The efficacy evaluation was the partial response (PR) after four cycles of chemotherapy and two cycles combined with radiotherapy. Conclusion: This case highlighted the importance of identifying accurate primary tumor location for patients to benefit from treatment, which will provide a reference for the treatment decisions of CUP tumors in the future.