1
|
Lubanga AF, Bwanali AN, Kangoma M, Matola Y, Moyo C, Kaonga B, Ssebibubbu S, Makole TJ, Kambili F, Chumbi GD, Munthali L, Mwale A, Kaphesi F, Simfukwe R, Mphepo M, Kapatsa T, Harawa G, Mpinganjira SL. Addressing the re-emergence and resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases in Africa: A health equity perspective. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2375081. [PMID: 38982713 PMCID: PMC11238914 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2375081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century, with a tremendous impact in the prevention and control of diseases. However, the recent reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases calls for a need to evaluate current vaccination practices and disparities in vaccination between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries. There are massive deficits in vaccine availability and coverage in resource-constrained settings. Therefore, this perspective seeks to highlight the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases in Africa within the lens of health equity and offer recommendations on how the continent should be prepared to deal with the myriad of its health systems challenges. Among the notable factors contributing to the reemergence, stand health inequities affecting vaccine availability and the dynamic vaccine hesitancy. Strengthening health systems and addressing health inequities could prove useful in halting the reemergence of vaccine-preventable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriano Focus Lubanga
- Education and Research, Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS), Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Akim Nelson Bwanali
- Education and Research, Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS), Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Clinical Services, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Melina Kangoma
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Yankho Matola
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Chitemwa Moyo
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Byenala Kaonga
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Stuart Ssebibubbu
- Department of Evidence Generation, Afya na Haki Institute, Nakwero, Uganda
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Society of Uganda (PSU), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Tumaini John Makole
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Council of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Frank Kambili
- Education and Research, Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Leonard Munthali
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Atupele Mwale
- Department of Clinical Services, Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Frank Kaphesi
- Education and Research, Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Reuben Simfukwe
- Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHES), Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Mzati Mphepo
- Department of Clinical Services, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Thandizo Kapatsa
- Education and Research, Clinical Research Education and Management Services (CREAMS), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Gracian Harawa
- Antimicrobial Resistance Champion, Public Health Institute of Malawi (PHIM), Lilongwe, Malawi
- Society of Medical Doctors (SMD), Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Samuel L. Mpinganjira
- Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (KUHES), Blantyre, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dougherty L, Mathur S, Gul X, Spielman K, Tripathi V, Wakefield C, Silva M. Methods and Measures to Assess Health Care Provider Behavior and Behavioral Determinants in Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health: A Rapid Review. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2023; 11:e2200407. [PMID: 38035722 PMCID: PMC10698233 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care provider behavior is the outcome of a complex set of factors that are both internal and external to the provider. Social and behavior change (SBC) programs are increasingly engaging providers and introducing strategies to improve their service delivery. However, there is limited understanding of methods and measures applied to assess provider behavioral outcomes and strengthen provider behavior change programming. METHODS Using PubMed, we conducted a rapid review of published research on behaviors of health workers providing reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health services in low- and middle-income countries (2010-2021). Information on study identifiers (e.g., type of provider), select domains from Green and Kreuter's PRECEDE-PROCEED framework (e.g., predisposing factors such as attitudes), study characteristics (e.g., study type and design), and evidence of theory-driven research were extracted from a final sample of articles (N=89) and summarized. RESULTS More than 80% of articles were descriptive/formative and examined knowledge, attitudes, and practice, mostly related to family planning. Among the few evaluation studies, training-focused interventions to increase provider knowledge or improve competency in providing a health service were dominant. Research driven by behavioral theory was observed in only 3 studies. Most articles (75%) focused on the quality of client-provider interaction, though topics and modes of measurement varied widely. Very few studies incorporated a validated scale to measure underlying constructs, such as attitudes and beliefs, and how these may be associated with provider behaviors. CONCLUSION A need exists for (1) theory-driven approaches to designing and measuring provider behavior change interventions and (2) measurement that addresses important internal and structural factors related to a provider's behavior (beyond knowledge-enhancing training approaches). Additional investment in implementation research is also needed to better understand which SBC approaches are shifting provider behavior and improving client-provider interactions. Finally, theory-driven approaches could help develop empirically measurable and comparable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Xaher Gul
- Pathfinder International, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neill R, Zia N, Ashraf L, Khan Z, Pryor W, Bachani AM. Integration measurement and its applications in low- and middle-income country health systems: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1876. [PMID: 37770887 PMCID: PMC10537146 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16724-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite growing interest in and commitment to integration, or integrated care, the concept is ill-defined and the resulting evidence base fragmented, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Underlying this challenge is a lack of coherent approaches to measure the extent of integration and how this influences desired outcomes. The aim of this scoping review is to identify measurement approaches for integration in LMICs and map them for future use. METHODS Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews was followed. We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed literature measuring integration in LMICs across three databases and screened identified papers by predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A modified version of the Rainbow Model for Integrated Care guided charting and analysis of the data. RESULTS We included 99 studies. Studies were concentrated in the Africa region and most frequently focused on the integration of HIV care with other services. A range of definitions and methods were identified, with no single approach for the measurement of integration dominating the literature. Measurement of clinical integration was the most common, with indicators focused on measuring receipt of two or more services provided at a single point of time. Organizational and professional integration indicators were focused on inter- and intra-organizational communication, collaboration, coordination, and continuity of care, while functional integration measured common information systems or patient records. Gaps were identified in measuring systems and normative integration. Few tools were validated or publicly available for future use. CONCLUSION We identified a wide range of recent approaches used to measure integration in LMICs. Our findings underscore continued challenges with lack of conceptual cohesion and fragmentation which limits how integration is understood in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Neill
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
| | - Nukhba Zia
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Lamisa Ashraf
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Zainab Khan
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| | - Wesley Pryor
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, 3010, Australia
| | - Abdulgafoor M Bachani
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins International Injury Research Unit, Health Systems Program, 615 N. Wolfe Street Suite E8527, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Patel C, Rendell N, Sargent GM, Ali A, Morgan C, Fields R, Sheel M. Measuring National Immunization System Performance: A Systematic Assessment of Available Resources. GLOBAL HEALTH, SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2023; 11:e220055. [PMID: 37348935 PMCID: PMC10285727 DOI: 10.9745/ghsp-d-22-00555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination coverage is widely used to assess immunization performance but, on its own, provides insufficient information to drive improvements. Assessing the performance of underlying components of immunization systems is less clear, with several monitoring and evaluation (M&E) resources available for use in different operational settings and for different purposes. We studied these resources to understand how immunization system performance is measured. METHODS We reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature published since 2000 to identify M&E resources that include national-level indicators measuring the performance of immunization systems or their components (governance, financing, regulation, information systems, vaccine logistics, workforce, service delivery, and demand generation). We summarize indicators by the system components or outcomes measured and describe findings narratively. RESULTS We identified 20 resources to monitor immunization program objectives and guide national strategic decision-making, encompassing 631 distinct indicators. Indicators for immunization program outcomes comprised the majority (124/631 [19.7%]), largely vaccination coverage (110/124 [88.7%]). Almost all resources (19/20 [95%]) included indicators for vaccine logistics (83/631 [13.2%]), and those for regulation (19/631 [3.0%]) and demand generation (28/631 [4.4%]) were least common. There was heterogeneity in how information systems (92/563 [14.6%]) and workforce (47/631 [7.4%]) were assessed across resources. Indicators for vaccination coverage in adults, data use in decision-making, equity and diversity, effectiveness of safety surveillance, and availability of a public health workforce were notably lacking. CONCLUSIONS Between the resources identified in this review, we identified considerable variability and gaps in indicators assessing the performance of some immunization system components. Given the multitude of indicators, policymakers may be better served by tailoring evaluation resources to their specific context to gain useful insight into health system performance and improve data use in decision-making for immunization programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyra Patel
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australia.
| | - Nicole Rendell
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Ginny M Sargent
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australia
| | - Akeem Ali
- World Health Organization, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Christopher Morgan
- Jhpiego, Baltimore, MD, USA
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rebecca Fields
- JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Meru Sheel
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sheahan KL, Speizer I, Curtis S, Weinberger M, Paul J, Bennett AV. Influence of family planning and immunization services integration on contraceptive use and family planning information and knowledge among clients: A cross-sectional analysis in urban Nigeria. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3:859832. [PMID: 36204256 PMCID: PMC9530057 DOI: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.859832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Reproductive autonomy necessitates that women have access to high quality family planning information and services. Additionally, closely spaced pregnancies increase maternal and infant morbidity and mortality. Although integrating family planning into child immunization services may increase access to information and services and postpartum contraceptive use, evidence on how integration affects service delivery and health outcomes is scarce. One limitation of previous studies is the use of binary integration measures. To address this limitation, this study applied Provider and Facility Integration Index scores to estimate associations between integration and contraceptive use, receipt of family planning information, and knowledge of family planning services availability. This study leveraged pooled cross-sectional health facility client exit interview data collected from 2,535 women in Nigeria. Provider and Facility Integration Index scores were calculated (0–10, 0 = low, 10 = high) for each facility (N = 94). The Provider Integration Index score measures provider skills and practices that support integrated service delivery; the Facility Integration Index score measures facility norms that support integrated service delivery. Logistic regression models identified associations between Provider and Facility Integration Index scores and (a) contraceptive use among postpartum women, (b) receipt of family planning information during immunization visits, and (c) correct identification of family planning service availability. Overall, 46% of women were using any method of contraception, 51% received family planning information during the immunization appointment, and 83% correctly identified family planning service availability at the facility. Mean Provider and Facility Integration Index scores were 6.46 (SD = 0.21) and 7.27 (SD = 0.18), respectively. Provider and Facility Integration Index scores were not significantly associated with postpartum contraceptive use. Facility Integration Index scores were negatively associated with receipt of family planning information. Provider Integration Index scores were positively associated with correct identification of family planning service availability. Our results challenge the position that integration provides a clear path to improved outcomes. The presence of facility and provider attributes that support integration may not result in the delivery of integrated care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate L. Sheahan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: Kate L. Sheahan
| | - Ilene Speizer
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Siân Curtis
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - John Paul
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Antonia V. Bennett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morgan C, Giattas MR, Holroyd T, Pfitzer A, Engel D, Sidibe A, Holloway M, Bloem P, Fields R, Shimp L, Kumar S. Integration of other services with human papillomavirus vaccination; lessons from earlier in the life course highlight the need for new policy and implementation evidence. Vaccine 2022; 40 Suppl 1:A94-A99. [PMID: 35105493 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.12.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Integration of vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) with other essential health services for adolescents has been proposed in global strategies and tested in demonstration projects in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Published experiences, global guidance, and one key example, the implementation of "HPV Plus" in Tanzania, all demonstrate the need for greater operational evidence to guide future implementation and policy. Review of experiences earlier in the life course, integrating post-partum family planning with infant immunization, show lessons from 13 LMICs that can apply to provision of adolescent health information and services alongside HPV vaccination. Three distinct models of integration emerge from this review comprising: 1) multiple tasks and functions by health staff providing vaccination and other care, or 2) secondary tasks added to the main function of vaccination, or 3) co-location of matched services provided by different staff. These models, with strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in family planning and immunization experiences, apply in different ways to the three main platforms used for HPV vaccination: school, facility or community. For HPV vaccination policy and programming, an initial need is to combine the existing evidence on vaccine service delivery - including coverage, efficiency, cost, and cost-effectiveness information - with what is known on how integration works in practice; the operational detail and models employed. This synthesis may enable assessment which models best suit the different service delivery platforms. An additional need is to link this with more tailored local assessments of the adolescent burden of disease and other determinants of their well-being to develop new thinking on what can and cannot be done to integrate other services alongside HPV vaccination. New approaches placing adolescents at the center are needed to design services tailored to their preferences and needs. The potential synergies with cervical cancer screening and treatment for older generations of women, also require further exploration. Coordinated action aligning HPV vaccination with broader adolescent health and wellbeing will generate social, economic and demographic benefits, which in themselves are sufficient justification to devote more attention to integrated approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Morgan
- Jhpiego, a Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia; Burnet Institute, 85 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | | | - Taylor Holroyd
- International Vaccine Access Center, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 415 N Washington St, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Pfitzer
- Jhpiego, a Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| | - Danielle Engel
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Branch, Technical Division, United Nations Population Fund, NY, USA
| | - Anissa Sidibe
- Vaccine Programmes, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Megan Holloway
- Vaccine Programmes, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Chemin du Pommier 40, 1218 Grand-Saconnex, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Paul Bloem
- Life Course and Integration/ EPI, Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Fields
- JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 2733 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | - Lora Shimp
- JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc., 2733 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
| | - Somesh Kumar
- Jhpiego, a Johns Hopkins University Affiliate, 1615 Thames St, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sheahan KL, Speizer IS, Orgill-Meyer J, Curtis S, Weinberger M, Paul J, Bennett AV. Facility-level characteristics associated with family planning and child immunization services integration in urban areas of Nigeria: a longitudinal analysis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1379. [PMID: 34247607 PMCID: PMC8274034 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11436-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Unmet need for postpartum contraception is high. Integration of family planning with routine child immunization services may help to satisfy unmet need. However, evidence about the determinants and effects of integration has been inconsistent, and more evidence is required to ascertain whether and how to invest in integration. In this study, facility-level family planning and immunization integration index scores are used to: (1) determine whether integration changes over time and (2) identify whether facility-level characteristics, including exposure to the Nigerian Urban Reproductive Health Initiative (NURHI), are associated with integration across facilities in six urban areas of Nigeria. Methods This study utilizes health facility data collected at baseline (n = 400) and endline (n = 385) for the NURHI impact evaluation. Difference-in-differences models estimate the associations between facility-level characteristics, including exposure to NURHI, and Provider and Facility Integration Index scores. The two outcome measures, Provider and Facility Integration Index scores, reflect attributes that support integrated service delivery. These indexes, which range from 0 (low) to 10 (high), were constructed using principal component analysis. Scores were calculated for each facility. Independent variables are (1) time period, (2) whether the facility received the NURHI intervention, and (3) additional facility-level characteristics. Results Within intervention facilities, mean Provider Integration Index scores were 6.46 at baseline and 6.79 at endline; mean Facility Integration Index scores were 7.16 (baseline) and 7.36 (endline). Within non-intervention facilities, mean Provider Integration Index scores were 5.01 at baseline and 6.25 at endline; mean Facility Integration Index scores were 5.83 (baseline) and 6.12 (endline). Provider Integration Index scores increased significantly (p = 0.00) among non-intervention facilities. Facility Integration Index scores did not increase significantly in either group. Results identify facility-level characteristics associated with higher levels of integration, including smaller family planning client load, family planning training among providers, and public facility ownership. Exposure to NURHI was not associated with integration index scores. Conclusion Programs aiming to increase integration of family planning and immunization services should monitor and provide targeted support for the implementation of a well-defined integration strategy that considers the influence of facility characteristics and concurrent initiatives. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11436-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate L Sheahan
- Supported by the Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), (CIN 13-410) at the Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, USA.
| | - Ilene S Speizer
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Jennifer Orgill-Meyer
- Department of Government and Public Health, Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster, USA
| | - Siân Curtis
- Department of Maternal and Child Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - John Paul
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Antonia V Bennett
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| |
Collapse
|