The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

'They did not care for me. I was alone on bed like a dead person': A qualitative study on mistreatment, dignity and power during childbirth in Nepal

Mistreatment during institutional childbirth is multifactorial and can have a detrimental effect on women's health and future care-seeking behaviour. Understanding its determinants is essential for improving respectful maternity care. This study aimed to explore women's experiences of mistreatment during childbirth in Nepal. Sixteen in-depth interviews were conducted with women who had recently given birth in a tertiary health facility (between 5 and 16 weeks postpartum). Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure a heterogenous sample. Data were analysed using Nvivo12, following Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach. Four themes were identified: (1) mistreatment and undignified care, (2) health system constraints, (3) adverse hospital culture, (4) power and territorial display. Mistreatment and undignified care included abuse, threats, neglect, inadequate communication, painful medical procedures and lack of autonomy. Health system constraints included inadequate resources and overcrowding. Adverse hospital culture was characterised by work stress among health professionals, a rigid hierarchical structure and the normalisation of mistreatment practices. Power and territoriality were evident in an atmosphere of fear for women with restricted companionship during birth. Favorable institutional strategies and tailored interventions are needed to eliminate solitary births and to provide women-centered respectful care by motivated and competent health professionals.

"First do no harm": Fundal pressure during labor-How safe is it?

OBJECTIVE

Fundal pressure (FP), a controversial obstetric maneuver due to its potential benefits and risks, lacks robust evidence concerning its effects. This study aimed to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with the application of FP during the second stage of labor.

METHODS

Following our departmental protocol, FP is applied by obstetricians trained under the supervision of the head of the labor ward. Its implementation requires patient consent and documentation. This case-control study encompassed vaginal deliveries (VDs) involving FP (FP group) during the second stage of labor. The control group included subsequent deliveries matched 1:1 for gestational age, parity, and mode of delivery (vacuum extraction [VE] or VD). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Composite adverse outcomes included the presence of at least one of the following: grade 3-4 perineal tear, shoulder dystocia, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hospitalization exceeding 4 days, or postpartum use of analgesics exceeding five doses.

RESULTS

Among 12 048 deliveries during the 3-year study period, 325 (2.7%) involved FP. There were no significant differences in maternal age, body mass index, or gestational age between the FP (n = 325) and control groups (n = 325). However, the FP group exhibited higher rates of labor induction (41.5% vs. 19.3%, P < 0.0001), oxytocin augmentation (52% vs. 23.6%, P < 0.0001), and prolonged duration of the second stage of labor (1.88 ± 1.2 vs. 1.57 ± 1.3 h, P = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the rate of postpartum hemorrhage, composite adverse maternal outcomes, or early neonatal outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Fundal pressure, when administered by trained obstetricians, was not associated with adverse obstetric, maternal, or neonatal outcomes.

Gentle fundal pressure to facilitate vaginal delivery: A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Fundal pressure during the second stage of labor is widely practiced but understudied. Violent fundal pressure can cause maternal and fetal injuries. Many providers believe the maneuver is effective. Administrative efforts to ban fundal pressure are unsuccessful and only drive the procedure to an underground practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this single-center, open-label, randomized trial, nulliparous women with term singleton cephalic pregnancy under epidural analgesia were assigned to receive gentle manual fundal pressure (GMFP) or routine labor care. The GMFP was designed not to exceed a maximum of 120 mmHg. Women were randomized after 30 min of pushing in the second stage of labor. The primary outcome was the time from randomization to delivery. Secondary outcomes were mode of delivery, episiotomy, perineal laceration, cord blood pH, and other maternal and fetal outcomes.

RESULTS

Between July 2023 and January 2024, 164 women were randomized to GMFP (n = 82) or to routine care (n = 82). The time from randomization to vaginal delivery did not show statistical significance between the fundal pressure group and the control group (mean [SD], 46.3 [33.3] vs. 55.9 [45.8] min; p = 0.13). Significantly fewer women in the fundal pressure group had operative vaginal deliveries (4 of 82 [4.9%]) than women in the control group (13 of 82 [15.9%]; relative risk [RR] 0.308, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.105-0.904; p = 0.021). Similarly, mediolateral episiotomy was performed in fewer women in the fundal pressure group (6 of 82 [7.32%]) than in the control group (16 of 82 [19.51%], RR 0.375, 95% CI 0.154-0.910; p = 0.022). Other maternal and fetal outcomes were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

GMFP resulted in a nonsignificant reduction in the second stage of labor and a significant reduction in operative vaginal delivery and episiotomy without an increase in adverse outcomes. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labor deserves further investigation.

Knowledge, attitude and practice of healthcare providers on mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth: A cross-sectional study in Tehran, Iran, 2021

BACKGROUND

Mistreatment of women during childbirth is a global health challenge. Maternity healthcare providers play a key role in influencing women's birth experience. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare providers regarding mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in public hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was part of an implementation research project that was conducted from October to December 2021 at five public teaching hospitals in Tehran. All eligible maternity healthcare providers (obstetricians and midwives) and students were invited to participate in this study. Data were collected using a questionnaire consisting of four sections: socio-demographic characteristics (11 items), knowledge (11 items), attitudes (13 items), and practices (14 items) about mistreatment. Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were determined using Bloom's cut-off points. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify the socio-demographic characteristics associated with knowledge and attitudes. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 270 participants, 255 (94.5%) participated in the study. Majority of the participants (82.7%) had poor knowledge regarding mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth. Poor knowledge was more apparent in the categories of physical abuse, verbal abuse, poor rapport between women and providers, and failure to meet professional standards of care. Most participants (69.4%) had poor attitudes towards mistreatment; they were alright with physical abuse, verbal abuse, and discrimination. Only 3.1% of the participants reported moderate mistreatment practices towards birthing women. Verbal and physical abuse were the most prevalent categories used by the participants. The number of night shifts was associated with attitudes regarding mistreatment (AOR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22-0.89, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The knowledge and attitude of our participants regarding maternity mistreatment were poor. A small percentage of the participants reported mistreatment practices. The findings of our study have important implications for program planners and decision-makers in developing effective interventions to reduce mistreatment of women during labour and childbirth in Iran.

Evidence-based intrapartum care during vaginal births: Direct observations in a tertiary care hospital in Central Sri Lanka

Background

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an effective approach to improve maternal and newborn outcomes at birth.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the current intrapartum practices of a tertiary care hospital in Central Province, Sri Lanka, during vaginal births. The benchmark for this assessment was the World Health Organisation's (WHO) recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience.

Methods

An observational study was conducted at the delivery room of Teaching Hospital, Peradeniya with the participation of 196 labouring women who were selected using systematic random sampling. A non-participant observation checklist covering labour room admission procedures, management of the first, second, and third stages of labour, and immediate care of the newborn and postpartum mother was used for the data collection. The care interventions implemented throughout labour and childbirth were observed and recorded. The data analysis was done using SPSS version 22.

Results

WHO-recommended practices such as providing privacy (33.2%), offering oral fluids (39.3%), and opioids for pain relief (48.5%) were found to be infrequent. Encouraging correct pushing techniques (77.6%), early breastfeeding (83.2%), regular assessment of vaginal bleeding (91.3%), skin-to-skin contact (93.4%), and using prophylactic uterotonics (100.0%) were found to be frequent. However, labour companionship, use of upright positions during labour, women's choice of birth position, and use of manual or relaxation techniques for pain relief were not observed in hospital intrapartum care.

Conclusion

The findings of the study indicate that additional attention and monitoring are required to align the current intrapartum care practices with the WHO recommendations. Moreover, the adoption of evidence-based intrapartum care should be encouraged by conveying the standard evidence-based intrapartum care guidelines to the grassroots level healthcare workers to avoid intrapartum interventions.

The prevalence of obstetric violence experienced by women during childbirth care and its associated factors in Türkiye: A cross-sectional study

Objective This study determined the prevalence of obstetric violence experienced by women during childbirth and related factors in Türkiye. Design Cross-sectional study Setting This study was conducted in the mother-child health and gynecology outpatient clinics of the training and research hospital in Türkiye. Participants The study was completed with 513 women who gave birth in the last two years between January and May 2022. Methods Data were collected using a questionnaire prepared by the researchers. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyzed the relationship between obstetric violence and socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics. Findings Obstetric violence was reported by 76.4% of the women: 44.4% physical abuse, 44.4% abandonment of care, 26.5% non-consented care, 25.1% non-dignified care, 3.3% non-confidential care, and 0.4% discrimination. Low income (OR=1.98), physician-attended birth (OR=2.91), vaginal birth (OR=6.04), and newborn admission to the neonatal care unit (OR=2.99) were associated with higher reporting of obstetric violence. Primiparous women (OR=0.51), whose pain was controlled by non-pharmacological methods (OR=0.34) and who received companion support (OR=0.24) were less likely to report experiencing obstetric violence (p < 0.05). Key conclusions Approximately three out of four Turkish women report that they have been exposed to obstetric violence during childbirth. In Türkiye, vaginal birth is the type of childbirth with the highest rate of obstetric violence reporting. Women who are low-income and multiparous, who are deprived of midwife, companion, and pain control support during childbirth, are more likely to experience obstetric violence. Implications for practice Supporting low-income women, protecting women from traumatic acts and unnecessary interventions in a vaginal birth, increasing births under the attendance of midwives, and providing pain control with non-pharmacological methods, and companion support during labor may be protective factors against obstetric violence.

The clinical presentation and detection of tuberculosis during pregnancy and in the postpartum period in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

For women infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of developing or worsening TB disease. TB in pregnancy increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, however the detection of TB in pregnancy is challenging. We aimed to identify and summarise the findings of studies regarding the clinical presentation and diagnosis of TB during pregnancy and the postpartum period (within 6 months of birth) in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). A systematic review was conducted searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Global Index Medicus databases. We included any primary research study of women diagnosed with TB during pregnancy or the postpartum period in LMICs that described the clinical presentation or method of diagnosis. Meta-analysis was used to determine pooled prevalence of TB clinical features and health outcomes, as well as detection method yield. Eighty-seven studies of 2,965 women from 27 countries were included. 70.4% of women were from South Africa or India and 44.7% were known to be HIV positive. For 1,833 women where TB type was reported, pulmonary TB was most common (79.6%). Most studies did not report the prevalence of presenting clinical features. Where reported, the most common were sputum production (73%) and cough (68%). Having a recent TB contact was found in 45% of women. Only six studies screened for TB using diagnostic testing for asymptomatic antenatal women and included mainly HIV-positive women ‒ 58% of women with bacteriologically confirmed TB did not report symptoms and only two were in HIV-negative women. Chest X-ray had the highest screening yield; 60% abnormal results of 3036 women tested. Screening pregnant women for TB-related symptoms and risk factors is important but detection yields are limited. Chest radiography and bacteriological detection methods can improve this, but procedures for optimal utilisation remain uncertain in this at-risk population. Trial registration: Prospero registration number: CRD42020202493.

Comparing observed occurrence of mistreatment during childbirth with women's self-report: a validation study in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria

BACKGROUND

There has been substantial progress in developing approaches to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth. However, less is known about the differences in measurement approaches. In this study, we compare measures of mistreatment obtained from the same women using labour observations and community-based surveys in Ghana, Guinea and Nigeria.

METHODS

Experiences of mistreatment during childbirth are person-centred quality measures. As such, we assessed individual-level and population-level accuracy of labour observation relative to women's self-report for different types of mistreatment. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, percent agreement and population-level inflation factor (IF), assessing prevalence of mistreatment in labour observation divided by 'true' prevalence in women's self-report. We report the IF degree of bias as: low (0.75

RESULTS

1536 women across Ghana (n=779), Guinea (n=425) and Nigeria (n=332) were included. Most mistreatment items demonstrated better specificity than sensitivity: observation of any physical abuse (44% sensitive, 89% specific), any verbal abuse (61% sensitive, 73% specific) and presence of a labour companion (19% sensitive, 93% specific). Items for stigma (IF 0.16), pain relief requested (IF 0.38), companion present (IF 0.32) and lack of easy access to fluids (IF 0.46) showed high risk of bias, meaning labour observations would substantially underestimate true prevalence. Other items showed low or moderate bias.

CONCLUSION

Using self-report as the reference standard, labour observations demonstrated moderate-to-high specificity (accurately identifying lack of mistreatment) but low-to-moderate sensitivity (accurately identifying presence of mistreatment) among women. For overall prevalence, either women's self-report or observations can be used with low-moderate bias for most mistreatment items. However, given the dynamicity, complexity, and limitations in 'objectivity', some experiences of mistreatment (stigma, pain relief, labour companionship, easy access to fluids) require measurement via women's self-report. More work is needed to understand how subjectivity influences how well a measure represents individual's experiences.

Collapse

Key Words

• cross-sectional survey
• maternal health
• public health

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Female
• Humans
• Pregnancy
• Self Report
• Ghana
• Guinea/epidemiology
• Nigeria
• Parturition
• Pain

Collapse

Grants

• 001 World Health Organization
• UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training
• United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Hedieh Mehrtash Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA
Meghan A Bohren Gender and Women's Health Unit, Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Kwame Adu-Bonsaffoh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ghana Medical School, Accra, Ghana
Theresa Azonima Irinyenikan Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital, Akure, Nigeria
Blair O Berger Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Ernest Maya Department of Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana
Mamadou Dioulde Balde Cellulle de Recherche en Sante de la Reproduction en Guinee (CERREGUI), Conakry, Guinea
Thae Maung Maung Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar
Adeniyi Kolade Aderoba National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mother and Child Hospital Akure, Akure, Nigeria
Özge Tuncalp Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
Hannah H Leslie Division of Prevention Science, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Collapse

Collaborators Collapse

Addressing the high prevalence of uterine fundal pressure in low-middle income country during vaginal delivery through a quality improvement initiative: Road to respectful maternity care

BACKGROUND

Intrapartum care is of paramount importance in overall respectful maternity care (RMC). Uterine fundal pressure maneuver (UFPM) is the most controversial obstetric maneuver considered obsolete in many countries. UFPM is associated with adverse life threatening maternal and fetal effects. The baseline prevalence of UFPM in our tertiary care teaching hospital with a heavy patient load was 78.4% which was quite high. Our aim was to reduce the prevalence of UFPM by 75% from baseline over a period of 10 months.

METHODS

After root cause analysis, we formulated the departmental Standard Operating Procedures on safe vaginal delivery and birth practices and initiated the Labour Room Quality Improvement Initiative. We sensitized and created awareness among the resident doctors and nursing staff regarding the high prevalence of UFPM through dedicated lectures, intercommunication via WhatsApp groups and strict vigilance in the labor wards. The point of care quality improvement (QI) methodology was used. The primary outcome was decrease in the prevalence of UFPM.

RESULTS

The prevalence of UFPM reduced from the baseline value of 78.4%-4% over the period of 7 months. Post intervention it gradually increased and sustained at 21.2% over a follow-up period of 3 months.

CONCLUSION

QI methods can effectively and rapidly improve the acceptance and adherence to newer initiatives in a busy tertiary care health facility to reduce the prevalence of UFPM and eventually improve the overall RMC.

The condemned fundal pressure maneuver: time to reconsider?

Due to a concern of severe adverse neonatal and maternal complications, fundal pressure (FP) maneuver has been discouraged by several national obstetric guidelines as well as the World Health Organization. In this manuscript, we argue that previously published evidence pointing to unfavorable effects of FP might not be relevant to the common practice. Our main concern is that the inherent limitations of published studies undermining the association of FP with various obstetric complications, in conjunction with fear of medical-legal implications, might lead to an absolute avoidance of this procedure, with a potential subsequent increase in vacuum-assisted and cesarean deliveries. We suggest establishing standardized guidelines for FP application, intend to prevent application of uncontrollable and aggressive pressure, assist the obstetricians in case of legal claims, and yet to preserve the use of gentle and respectful FP application to benefit the delivery.

Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth: Multilevel analyses of IMAgiNE EURO data from 15 countries in the WHO European region

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential associations between individual and country-level factors and medicalization of birth in 15 European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Online anonymous survey of women who gave birth in 2020-2021. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression models estimating associations between indicators of medicalization (cesarean, instrumental vaginal birth [IVB], episiotomy, fundal pressure) and proxy variables related to care culture and contextual factors at the individual and country level.

RESULTS

Among 27 173 women, 24.4% (n = 6650) had a cesarean and 8.8% (n = 2380) an IVB. Among women with IVB, 41.9% (n = 998) reported receiving fundal pressure. Among women with spontaneous vaginal births, 22.3% (n = 4048) had an episiotomy. Less respectful care, as perceived by the women, was associated with higher levels of medicalization. For example, women who reported having a cesarean, IVB, or episiotomy reported not feeling treated with dignity more frequently than women who did not have those interventions (odds ratio [OR] 1.37; OR 1.61; OR 1.51, respectively; all: P < 0.001). Country-level variables contributed to explaining some of the variance between countries.

CONCLUSION

We recommend a greater emphasis in health policies on promotion of respectful and patient-centered care approaches to birth to enhance women's experiences of care, and the development of a European-level indicator to monitor medicalization of reproductive care.

Quality aspects relating to giving birth in Switzerland: An analysis of quality indicators in inpatient obstetrics from 2013 to 2017

Quality transparency supports the reduction of information asymmetries in the health care system and enables the targeted regulation of health care. This study examines quality variation in inpatient obstetric care using the official Federal Office of Public Health Inpatient Quality Indicators (CH-IQI; vaginal births with 3rd- and 4th-degree perineal tears, vaginal births with episiotomy, and Caesarean section for low-risk births). It includes 101 maternity hospitals and 425,810 births between 2013 and 2017. For births with perineal laceration of 3rd and 4th degree, Switzerland performs 0.9% poorer in comparison to Germany (D-IQI) and Austria (A-IQI). For births with episiotomy, Switzerland is 1.1% above Germany. The Caesarean section rate for low-risk births was 26.8% in Switzerland in 2017 (Germany: 25.9%). When comparing Swiss clinics, private clinic locations in particular stand out. One possible reason for this may be the density of care, patient demands or the system of affiliated physicians at these clinics.

Fundal pressure to shorten the second stage of labor: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Systematically review the evidence on fundal pressure to expedite vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Literature search in electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials of fundal pressure to expedite delivery were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage.

RESULTS

We identified 10 randomized controlled trials. Fundal pressure was associated with a shorter length of the second stage of labor (mean difference (MD) -20.33 min, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -28.55, -12.11). Sub-group analysis with only manual pressure or a belt confirmed the association. There was no significant difference in the rate of vaginal delivery (relative risk (RR) 1.00, 95%, CI 0.98, 1.02), one and five minute Apgar scores (MD 0.10, 95%, confidence intervals -0.05, 0.24; and MD 0.02, 95%, CI -0.12, 0.15), neonatal trauma (RR 0.33, 95%, CI 0.01, 7.90), vaginal/perineal laceration (RR 0.83, 95%, CI 0.57, 1.22), cervical laceration (RR 1.30, 95%, CI 0.21, 8.02), episiotomy (RR 1.08, 95%, CI 0.96, 1.21), cesarean section rate (RR 0.72; 95%, CI 0.34, 1.51), operative vaginal deliveries (RR 0.79; 95%, CI 0.55, 1.13) and neonatal intensive care admissions (RR 0.33, 95%, CI 0.01, 7.90). However, patients receiving fundal pressure had a lower umbilical cord arterial pH (MD -0.03, 95%, CI -0.04, -0.01), and a 3.5 non-significantly higher incidence of Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min (4.9% vs 0.7%, RR 3.48, 95%, CI 0.57, 21.32).

CONCLUSIONS

Fundal pressure in the second stage is associated with a 20-minute decrease in the length of labor and a small decrease in neonatal umbilical artery pH.

Association between placental location and neonatal outcomes in manual fundal pressure-assisted vaginal deliveries: A retrospective single-center study in Japan

AIM

Manual fundal pressure (MFP) is still used to assist vaginal deliveries during the second stage of labor in predominantly lower-middle income countries; however, there is insufficient evidence on the risk factors in MFP-assisted vaginal deliveries for adverse neonatal outcomes. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between placental location and neonatal outcomes in MFP-assisted vaginal deliveries.

METHODS

The present study was a single-center retrospective cohort study in patients with all MFP-assisted vaginal singleton deliveries from January 2016 to December 2020. Placental location was divided into two categories: posterior-lateral and anterior-fundal. The primary outcome was a neonatal adverse composite including umbilical artery blood pH <7.2, Apgar score <7 at 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal resuscitation. We used multivariable logistic regression models to investigate the association between placental location and neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

We extracted 522 MFP-assisted deliveries among 5053 vaginal deliveries. The proportion of posterior-lateral and anterior-fundal placentation was 239 (45.8%) and 283 (54.2%), respectively. The crude prevalence of neonatal composite outcome in the anterior-fundal group was significantly higher than that in the posterior-lateral group (39.6% vs. 28.9%; p = 0.013). Multivariable logistic regression analysis found that the prevalence of neonatal adverse outcome in the anterior-fundal group was significantly higher compared with the posterior-lateral group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-2.23).

CONCLUSION

Anterior-fundal placentation was significantly associated with an increased risk of neonatal adverse outcomes compared to posterior-lateral placentation in MFP-assisted vaginal deliveries.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, September 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes an assessment of safety of birth centers in the United States and commentaries on reviews focused on aspirin prophylaxis in pregnancy and the new gestational weight gain evidence summary from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.