The comparison of two different protocols ultra-long versus medroxyprogesterone acetate in women with ovarian endometriosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Efficacy of hormone pre-treatment before ART to improve reproductive outcomes in infertile women with endometriosis: Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Hormone pre-treatment is still used before assisted reproductive technique (ART) in endometriotic women, but evidence supporting this recommendation is conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether hormone pre-treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or progestogens could improve fertility in women with endometriosis undergoing ART.

SEARCH STRATEGY

MEDLINE, LILACS, EMBASE, Scielo.br, PROSPERO, Cochrane at the CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and international controlled trials registries were searched without temporal, geographic, and language limitations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials that enrolled infertile women with endometriosis undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after the application of a stimulation protocol with hormone pre-treatment were selected and included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We conducted a network meta-analysis based on the random-effects model for mixed multiple treatment comparisons to rank the available hormone pre-treatment by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve area (SUCRA) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension statement for network meta-analyses. Quality assessment was carried out using the criteria outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Egger test and funnel plot analysis were used for publication bias assessment. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate (PLR), and implantation rate (IR).

MAIN RESULTS

Nine studies with 2087 women were included. Ultralong (3 months GnRH agonist) (SUCRA 24.5%) and long protocols (1 month GnRH agonist) (SUCRA 24.9%) as well as progestins (SUCRA 28.8%) showed similar results to no treatment (SUCRA 21.8%) in terms of post-ART CPR. Regarding the LBR, no treatment (SUCRA 50.0%) showed highest rates relative to progestins (SUCRA 7.0%), and long (SUCRA 36.6%) and ultralong (SUCRA 6.4%) protocols. For PLR, no treatment (SUCRA 57.9%), followed by long protocol (SUCRA 18.4%), ultralong protocol (SUCRA 12.3%), and progestins (SUCRA 11.4%) showed the greatest degree of reduction. The long (SUCRA 45.0%) and ultralong (SUCRA 39.5%) protocols seemed more effective in increasing IR than did than progestins (SUCRA 15.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The increased number of implanted pregnancies using a GnRH agonist protocol does not lead to higher clinical pregnancies or live births. Currently, there is no indication for hormone pre-treatment before ART in women with endometriosis as it does not increase fertility chances.

Effects of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common gynecological condition in women of childbearing age that causes symptoms such as menstrual changes and dysmenorrhea, and is also a major cause of infertility. Therefore, women with endometriosis usually need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), such as in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, to increase their chances of conceiving. Numerous clinical observations and studies have indicated that endometriosis can affect the success of ART, such that women with endometriosis who use ART have a lower live-birth rate than those without endometriosis who use ART. Therefore, this article reviews the impact of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on the pregnancy outcomes of women with endometriosis using ART to explore the selection of individualized treatment.

Hormonal Therapies before in vitro fertilization in women with endometriosis: The Minotaur's Labyrinth and the Ariadne's Thread

Endometriosis-related infertility is one of the most debated topics in reproductive medicine. In recent years, prolonged pre-cycle hormonal regimens gained attention as a mean of improving the assisted reproduction technologies (ART) success rates in endometriosis patients. GnRH agonists, dienogest, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and aromatase inhibitors are the most studied medications. Conflicting results and a high risk of bias exist in almost all of the conducted studies in the field. However, current evidence suggests that pre-cycle treatment with GnRH agonists may be beneficial for patients with stage III/IV endometriosis. Dienogest and medroxyprogesterone acetate-based progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol was shown to be comparable to the prolonged GnRH agonists protocol. Finally, aromatase inhibitors seem to be of limited benefit to the assisted reproductive outcomes of endometriosis patients. Although it is challenging to draw any clinical conclusions, pre-cycle hormonal treatments seem to be best indicated in endometriosis patients who had previously failed ART treatment.

Coexistence of Endometriosis and Thyroid Autoimmunity in Infertile Women: Impact on in vitro Fertilization and Reproductive Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence and impact of impaired thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels on the reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization patients diagnosed with endometriosis and compared to controls without endometriosis.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study on prospectively collected data.

SETTING

The study was conducted at tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were infertile women with histopathological diagnosis of endometriosis.

METHODS

For 12 months (January 2018 to January 2019), women were deemed suitable and subsequently divided according to serum TSH levels above or below 2.5 mIU/L and compared to patients without endometriosis. Needed sample size was at least 41 patients for each cohort of women. Co-primary outcomes were the live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and pregnancy loss rate (PLR).

RESULTS

Overall, 226 women (45 with endometriosis and 181 controls without endometriosis) were included. Diagnoses of Hashimoto thyroiditis were significantly more frequent in women with rather than without endometriosis (14/45 [31.1%] vs. 27/181 [14.9%]; p = 0.012). Similarly, in women with endometriosis, Hashimoto diagnosis rates were higher with TSH ≥2.5 mIU/L compared to TSH <2.5 mIU/L (9/15 [60%] vs.5/30 [16.6%]; p = 0.001) so were the Hashimoto diagnosis rates in control group (women without endometriosis) with TSH ≥2.5 mIU/L compared to TSH <2.5 mIU/L (17/48 [35.4%] vs. 10/133 [7.5%], respectively; p = 0.001). Effect size analysis confirmed an increased risk of Hashimoto thyroiditis in women with endometriosis and TSH ≥2.5 mIU/L compared to women with endometriosis and TSH <2.5 mIU/L (risk ratio [RR] 3.60 [95% CI 1.46-8.86]) and in women with endometriosis and TSH ≥2.5 mIU/L compared to non-endometriotic euthyroid patients (RR 7.98 [95% CI 3.86-16.48]). Dysmenorrhea risk was higher in endometriotic euthyroid women compared to euthyroid patients with no endometriosis (RR 1.87 [95% CI 1.21-2.87]). The risk was still increased in euthyroid women with endometriosis relative to dysthyroid women with no endometriosis (RR 1.97 [95% CI 1.11-3.50]). There were no significant differences between the four groups for CPR, LBR, PLR and retrieved oocytes, immature oocytes, degenerated and unfertilized oocytes, cultured blastocysts, embryos and transferred embryos.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of the study were retrospective design, limited sample size, and use of different ovarian stimulation protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Thyroid autoimmunity seems more common in women with endometriosis and TSH over 2.5 mIU/L. However, there was no significant impact on in vitro fertilization and reproductive outcomes related to the coexistence of endometriosis, Hashimoto disease, and higher TSH levels. Due to limitations of the study, additional evidence is required to validate the abovementioned findings.

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of adjuvant gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis following conservative surgery

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis frequently results in pain and infertility. While conservative surgery offers some relief, it often falls short of ensuring satisfactory pregnancy outcomes. Adjuvant GnRH-a is administered post-surgery to mitigate recurrence; however, its impact on pregnancy outcomes remains debated. This study endeavors to assess the efficacy of adjuvant GnRH-a in enhancing pregnancy outcomes post-conservative surgery in endometriosis patients.

METHODS

Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Medline (Ovid), Web of Science, and Scopus were rigorously searched up to 02 August 2023, without linguistic constraints. Identified articles were screened using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Evaluated outcomes encompassed pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, mean postoperative pregnancy interval, recurrence rate, and adverse reaction rate. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad score evaluated the included studies' quality. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were implemented to analyze the pooled results. A meta-analysis model expressed results as standardized mean difference (SMD) and Risk ratio (RR).

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies about 2485 patients were assimilated. Meta-analysis revealed that post-surgery, the GnRH-a cohort experienced a marginally elevated pregnancy rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.02-1.41; P = 0.03) and a reduced mean time to conceive (RR = -1.17, 95% CI = -1.70- -0.64; P < 0.0001). Contrarily, other evaluated outcomes did not exhibit notable statistical differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating adjuvant GnRH-a following conservative surgery may be deemed beneficial for women with endometriosis, especially before Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). Nonetheless, owing to pronounced heterogeneity, subsequent research is warranted to substantiate these potential advantages conclusively.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023448280.

Novel WEE2 homozygous mutations c.1346C>T and c.949A>T identified in primary infertile women due to unexplained fertilization failure

The occurrence of unexplained fertilization failure can have profound psychological and financial consequences for couples struggling with infertility, and its pathogenesis remains unclear. Increasing evidence highlights genetic basis of unexplained fertilization failure occurrence. Here, we identified one novel homozygous nonsense mutation (c.949A>T), one novel homozygous missense mutation (c.1346C>T), and three reported homozygous mutations (c.585G>C, c.1006_1007insTA, c.1221G>A) in six unrelated probands, showing similar manifestations of unexplained fertilization failure. This finding expands the spectrum of WEE2 mutations, highlighting the critical role of WEE2 in fertilization process, and provides a basis for the prognostic value of testing for WEE2 mutations in primary infertile couples with unexplained fertilization failure.

Metabolomics analysis of follicular fluid in ovarian endometriosis women receiving progestin-primed ovary stimulation protocol for in vitro fertilization

This study aimed to investigate the metabolite profile and inflammatory state of follicular fluid (FF) in women with stage III-IV ovarian endometriosis (OE) who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). A cohort of 20 consecutive patients with OE were recruited and received progestin-primed ovary stimulation (PPOS) protocol (study group), while another 20 OE patients received one-month ultra-long term protocol (control group) for IVF in this prospective, nonrandomized study. FF samples were obtained from dominant follicles during oocyte retrieval, and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to investigate the metabolites profile of FF. Results showed that significant increases in the levels of proline, arginine, threonine, and glycine in patients who received PPOS protocol compared to the control group (P < 0.05). A panel of three metabolites (proline, arginine, and threonine) was identified as specific biomarkers of OE patients using PPOS protocol. Additionally, levels of interleukin-1β, regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted, and tumor necrosis factor-α markedly decreased in women who received PPOS protocol compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, PPOS protocol regulates the metabolism of several amino acids in the FF, which may play critical roles in the oocyte development and blastocyst formation, and their specific mechanism should be further elucidated.