Kidney function and daily emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV: results from the real-life multicentric demonstrative project PrEP Brazil

Drug-Associated Acute Kidney Disease: Data From a World Pharmacovigilance Database

Background Drugs are a frequent cause of nephrotoxicity, especially in the context of acute kidney disease (AKD), with a significant number of cases being drug-associated. The WHO's VigiBase is a powerful tool for identifying drugs described and associated with the development of AKD. Methods We retrieved data from the period 1968 to 2022 regarding notifications of adverse drug reactions (ADR). The extracted medications were evaluated for their nephrotoxicity based on the bibliographic score (BS) developed through pre-selected references. The main medications involved were classified as 'non-nephrotoxic', 'potentially nephrotoxic', and 'nephrotoxic'. We utilized the IC025 and reporting odds ratio (ROR) disproportionality indexes to study the relationship between medications and the odds of being included in an AKD notification. Results During the period, a total of 33,932,051 notifications were obtained, revealing 435,677 cases related to drug-associated AKD following MedDRA term filtering, predominantly affecting males aged 45-64. We identified 8,991 active ingredients or suspected combinations associated with AKD development, with the ATC class A - Alimentary Tract and Metabolism being the most frequently described. Among the medications most strongly associated with this phenotype, classes J and N stood out. Among the most notable medications collected, 8.3% were classified as "non-nephrotoxic," 16.7% as "potentially nephrotoxic," and 75% as "known nephrotoxic." Notable active ingredients included cobicistat + elvitegravir + emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 8.7; ROR 786.96), inotersen (IC025 7.7; ROR 604.57), emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil (IC025 7.9; ROR 432.36), esomeprazole (IC025 6.8; ROR 184.23), and pantoprazole (IC025 6.3; ROR 109.86), with proton pump inhibitors dominating the top four positions among the most frequently involved medications. Conclusion AKD is a frequent adverse reaction in VigiBase, with a significantly high reported mortality rate. Evaluation of the notifications revealed medications with a high disproportionality index and a strong association with AKD. We also highlight the potential nephrotoxic role of less suspected medications. This study emphasizes the need to consider AKD as a condition potentially associated with iatrogenic etiology, highlighting various medications and their respective involvement in the various possible manifestations of AKD.

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Dried Biofluid Microsampling in Patients With Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease is fairly unique due to the lack of symptoms associated with disease activity, and it is therefore dependent on biological monitoring. Dried biofluids, particularly dried capillary blood spots, are an accessible, easy-to-use technology that have seen increased utility in basic science research over the past decade. However, their use is yet to reach the kidney patient population clinically or in large-scale discovery science initiatives. The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the existing literature surrounding the use of dried biofluids in kidney research.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using three search engines and a predefined search term strategy. Results were summarised according to the collection method, type of biofluid, application to kidney disease, cost, sample stability and patient acceptability.

RESULTS

In total, 404 studies were identified and 67 were eligible. In total, 34,739 patients were recruited to these studies with a skew towards male participants (> 73%). The majority of samples were blood, which was used either for monitoring anti-rejection immunosuppressive drug concentrations or for kidney function. Dried biofluids offered significant cost savings to the patient and healthcare service. The majority of patients preferred home microsampling when compared to conventional monitoring.

CONCLUSION

There is an unmet need in bringing dried microsampling technology to advance kidney disease despite its advantages. This technology provides an opportunity to upscale patient recruitment and longitudinal sampling, enhance vein preservation and overcome participation bias in research.

Impact on renal function of daily and on-demand HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in the ANRS-PREVENIR study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact on the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of different tenofovir disoproxil/emtricitabine dosing regimens for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included in the study individuals with baseline eGFR > 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 who initiated PrEP in the ongoing ANRS-PREVENIR PrEP cohort. We retrospectively classified PrEP users in three groups: 'on-demand' (reported at ≥75% of study visits), 'daily' (≥75% of study visits) or 'switches'. We compared the area under curve (AUC) of the eGFR variation from baseline (ΔeGFR) between groups using analysis of covariance, and assessed factors associated with a negative AUC of ΔeGFR.

RESULTS

From May 2017 to October 2020, 1253 PrEP-naïve participants (98% of MSM) were included in the study with a median follow-up of 22 months. 499 (40%), 494 (39%) and 260 (21%) users were in the group daily, on-demand and switches, respectively, for a median number of pills taken per week of 6, 1.7 and 4. The mean AUC of the ΔeGFR was -1.09 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the daily PrEP group, -0.69 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the switches group and +0.18 mL/min/1.73 m2 with on-demand PrEP. In a model adjusted on baseline age and eGFR, the AUC of the ΔeGFR was significantly higher with on-demand PrEP compared to daily PrEP (P = 0.037). Independent factors associated with a negative AUC of ΔeGFR were a daily PrEP regimen, a switches regimen, an age > 40 years and a baseline eGFR≥90 mL/min/1.73 m².

CONCLUSIONS

On-demand PrEP dosing had a smaller impact on eGFR evolution than daily PrEP, but the difference was not clinically relevant.