Li Y, Li YW, Gao Y. Effect of Entecavir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Tenofovir Alafenamideantiviral Therapy on Renal Function in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Real-World Retrospective Study.
Int J Gen Med 2025;
18:1143-1153. [PMID:
40034830 PMCID:
PMC11874758 DOI:
10.2147/ijgm.s497550]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Background
Entecavir (ETV), tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), and tenofovir alafenamide(TAF) are first-line nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs) with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to assess the renal safety profile in NUC-experienced CHB patients who received ETV, TDF or TAF therapy.
Methods
This retrospective observational cohort study investigated factors related to renal function in 154 patients with NUC-experienced CHB who received ETV, TDF, and TAF therapy for 48 weeks. Changes in UREA, uric acid (UA), creatinine (Cr), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance. A linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures was used to evaluate the correlation between baseline information and eGFR changes 48 weeks following treatment initiation. The model considered sex, baseline age, viral load, aminotransferases, renal function, and treatment group as fixed effects, and incorporated random effects for individual subjects.
Results
There were no significant differences in UA or Cr levels during therapy over time. The eGFR level was elevated in ETV-treated patients (117.5 ± 16.65 mL/min/1.7m2 vs 109.8 ± 15.69 mL/min/1.7m2, P=0.027), whereas it did not change significantly in TDF- (123.6 ± 28.54 mL/min/1.7m2 vs 115.5 ± 20.44 mL/min/1.7m2, P=0.070) and TAF-treated (121.6 ± 23.44 mL/min/1.7m2 vs 113.4 ± 16.90 mL/min/1.7m2, P=0.053) patients. Younger patients (<30 years) and those with higher HBV DNA (> 7 log10IU/mL) and lower alanine aminotransferase levels (<5 × upper limit of normal) showed a significant improvement in eGFR elevation during NUCs therapy. The linear mixed-effects model showed that the baseline HBV DNA level was an important positive predictor of eGFR elevation at 48 weeks following treatment initiation (estimate was 1.437 and 2.449, P<0.001).
Conclusion
In real-life experience, ETV, TDF, and TAF therapy may not be associated with eGFR changes in NUC-experienced CHB patients without baseline renal impairment.
Collapse