Prognostic and diagnostic validity of p16/Ki-67, HPV E6/E7 mRNA, and HPV DNA in women with ASCUS: a follow-up study

REBACIN® inhibits E6/E7 oncogenes in clearance of human papillomavirus infection

Previous studies have demonstrated that REBACIN^® intervention eliminates persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection. The initial establishment and subsequent progression of cervical cancer mainly depends on two major oncogenes, E6/E7, and previous studies have proposed E6/E7 oncogenes as a target for therapeutic drug development. The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro and in vivo whether REBACIN^® inhibits E6/E7 oncogenes for elucidating the mechanism of REBACIN^® in the clearance of persistent hrHPV infection. In vitro, after REBACIN^® treatment, the growth of both Ca Ski and HeLa cervical cancer cells containing the E6/E7 oncogenes was prevented. In line with this finding is that E6/E7 expression was inhibited, which can be counteracted by the co-application of anti-REBACIN^® antibody. These studies demonstrated that REBACIN^® can effectively inhibit the growth of cervical cancer cells via targeting HPV E6/E7 expression. To further verify this finding in clinic, 108 volunteer patients with persistent hrHPV infections were randomly divided into REBACIN^®, recombinant human interferon alpha-2b (Immunological drug control), or no-treatment blank control groups, received intravaginal administration of REBACIN^®, interferon or no-treatment every other day for three months, and then followed up for E6/E7 mRNA assay. In REBACIN^® group, 68.57% of patients showed complete clearance of HPV E6/E7 mRNA, which was significantly higher compared to 25.00% in the interferon immunological drug control group and 20.00% in blank control group, confirming that REBACIN^® is potently efficacious on clearing persistent hrHPV infections via inhibition of HPV E6/E7 oncogenes.

Clinical trial registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/historyversionpuben.aspx?regno=ChiCTR2100045911, identifier ChiCTR2100045911.

Clinical value of the ThinPrep cytologic test with E6/E7 mRNA detection for cervical cancer screening in disease diagnosis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical value of the ThinPrep cytologic test (TCT) with the E6/E7 mRNA test for cervical cancer screening in disease diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 405 samples from Dazhou Central Hospital from April 2017 to July 2020 were collected, and we conducted a comparative analysis of the diagnostic performance of several test methods both individually andcombination.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) were compared by single TCT, E6/E7 mRNA test, and combination methods. The TCT+E6/E7mRNA test was confirmed to have a relatively higher specificity of 80.32% (95% CI: 75.40%-84.48%, both P < 0.001), and AUC value (0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.83, and P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The relative diagnostic value may be further improved by the combined detection of TCT and E6/E7 mRNA test. The combined detection of TCT and the E6/E7 mRNA test is expected to become a potential indicator for cervical lesions.

Comparison of CINtec PLUS cytology and cobas HPV test for triaging Canadian patients with LSIL cytology referred to colposcopy: A two-year prospective study

OBJECTIVES & METHODS:

CINtec PLUS and cobas HPV tests were compared for triaging patients referred to colposcopy with a history of LSIL cytology in a 2-year prospective study. Cervical specimens were tested once at enrollment, and test positivity rates determined. Test performance was ascertained with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and CIN3 or worse (CIN3+) serving as clinical endpoints.

RESULTS:

In all ages, (19–76 years, n= 598), 44.3% tested CINtec PLUS positive vs. 55.4% HPV positive (p< 0.001). To detect CIN2+ (n= 99), CINtec PLUS was 81.8% sensitive vs. 93.9% for HPV testing (p= 0.009); genotype 16/18-specific sensitivity was 46.5%. Specificity was 52.9% vs. 36.6%, respectively (p< 0.001). In all ages, to detect CIN3+ (n= 44), sensitivity was 93.2% for both tests; genotype 16/18-specific sensitivity was 52.3%. Specificity was 48.4% for CINtec PLUS vs. 31.1% for HPV testing (p< 0.001). In patients < 30 years, CINtec was 91.7% sensitive vs 95.8% for HPV testing (p= 0.549).

CONCLUSIONS:

CINtec PLUS or cobas HPV test could serve as a predictor of CIN3+ with high sensitivity in patients referred to colposcopy with a history of LSIL regardless of age while significantly reducing the number of LSIL referral patients requiring further investigations and follow-up in colposcopy clinics.

Preliminary study of the use of E6/E7mRNA detection in screening and triage management of HR-HPV infection during pregnancy

Background

Detection of E6 and E7 mRNA load of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection during pregnancy was compared with conventional cytopathology and DNA detection by pathological examination as colposcopy to evaluate the application of E6 and E7 mRNA detection in the diagnosis and management in HR-HPV infection for high -grade cervical lesions during pregnancy.

Methods

From January 2014 to June 2019, 1,058 pregnant women of childbearing age who were filed for regular obstetrics in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, were separately assessed using cervical liquid-based cytology and HPV DNA detection. If the results were abnormal, colposcopy was performed as a follow-up. The presence of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA fragments was detected through the HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test, and monitored at the same time as colposcopy. The diagnostic efficacy of the HR-HPV DNA test versus the HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA test for high-grade cervical lesions during pregnancy was compared.

Results

The positive rate of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection in the overall cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and above during pregnancy was lower than that with HR-HPV DNA detection, and there was a significant statistical difference between the two methods. In CIN I and normal or inflammatory results, the positive rate of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection was lower than that of HR-HPV DNA detection, while in the results of CIN II and CIN III, the positive rate of the two was not significantly different. HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection is the same as HR-HPV DNA detection, both of which increased with the severity of cervical lesions, and the positive rate increased. In cases of maintenance or progression of cervical lesions, the positive rate of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection during pregnancy can reach 81.8%. High-grade cervical lesions during pregnancy had a higher rate of reversal to a lower level after delivery.

Conclusions

The results suggested that the use of HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection in cases of positive HR-HPV DNA detection can significantly improve the diagnostic specificity of CIN II and above high-grade cervical lesions.

HIV-Associated Cancer Biomarkers: A Requirement for Early Diagnosis

Globally, HIV/AIDS and cancer are increasingly public health problems and continue to exist as comorbidities. The sub-Saharan African region has the largest number of HIV infections. Malignancies previously associated with HIV/AIDS, also known as the AIDS-defining cancers (ADCs) have been documented to decrease, while the non-AIDS defining cancer (NADCs) are on the rise. On the other hand, cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and precision oncology as the most effective cancer therapy is gaining attraction. Among HIV-infected individuals, the increased risk for developing cancer is due to the immune system of the patient being suppressed, frequent coinfection with oncogenic viruses and an increase in risky behavior such as poor lifestyle. The core of personalised medicine for cancer depends on the discovery and the development of biomarkers. Biomarkers are specific and highly sensitive markers that reveal information that aid in leading to the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of the disease. This review focuses mainly on the risk assessment, diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic role of various cancer biomarkers in HIV-positive patients. A careful selection of sensitive and specific HIV-associated cancer biomarkers is required to identify patients at most risk of tumour development, thus improving the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.

Co-expression of SOX2 and HR-HPV RISH predicts poor prognosis in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix

BACKGROUND

Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix (SCNEC) is a rare cancer involving the human papilloma virus (HPV), and has few available treatments. The present work aimed to assess the feasibility of SOX2 and HPV statuses as predictive indicators of SCNEC prognosis.

METHODS

The associations of SOX2 and/or high-risk (HR)-HPV RNA in situ hybridization (RISH) levels with clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic outcomes for 88 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) cases were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among these patients with SCNEC, SOX2, P16INK4A and HR-HPV RISH expression and SOX2/HR-HPV RISH co-expression were detected in 68(77.3%), 76(86.4%), 73(83.0%), and 48(54.5%), respectively. SOX2-positive and HR-HPV RISH-positive SCNEC cases were associated with poorer overall survival (OS, P = 0.0170, P = 0.0451) and disease-free survival (DFS, P = 0.0334, P = 0.0309) compared with those expressing low SOX2 and negative HR-HPV RISH. Alternatively, univariate analysis revealed that SOX2 and HR-HPV RISH expression, either separately or in combination, predicted the poor prognosis of SCNEC patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that the co-expression of SOX2 with HR-HPV RISH may be an independent factor of OS [hazard ratio = 3.597; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.085-11.928; P = 0.036] and DFS [hazard ratio = 2.880; 95% CI: 1.199-6.919; P = 0.018] prediction in SCNEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results of the present study suggest that the co-expression of SOX2 with HR-HPV RISH in SCNEC may represent a specific subgroup exhibiting remarkably poorer prognostic outcomes compared with the expression of any one marker alone.

Novel biomarkers with promising benefits for diagnosis of cervical neoplasia: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer screening is slowly transitioning from Pappanicolaou cytologic screening to primary Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) or HPV testing as an effort to enhance early detection and treatment. However, an effective triage tests needed to decide who among the VIA or HPV positive women should receive further diagnostic evaluation to avoid unnecessary colposcopy referrals is still lacking. Evidence from experimental studies have shown potential usefulness of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCC Ag), Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), MicroRNA, p16INKa / ki-67, HPV E6/E7/mRNA, and DNA methylation biomarkers in detecting premalignant cervical neoplasia. Given the variation in performance, and scanty review studies in this field, this systematic review described the diagnostic performance of some selected assays to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) with histology as gold standard.

METHODS

We systematically searched articles published in English between 2012 and 2020 using key words from PubMed/Medline and SCOPUS with two reviewers assessing study eligibility, and risk of bias. We performed a descriptive presentation of the performance of each of the selected assays for the detection of CIN2 + .

RESULTS

Out of 298 citations retrieved, 58 articles were included. Participants with cervical histology yielded CIN2+ proportion range of 13.7-88.4%. The diagnostic performance of the assays to detect CIN2+ was; 1) SCC-Ag: range sensitivity of 78.6-81.2%, specificity 74-100%. 2) M-CSF: sensitivity of 68-87.7%, specificity 64.7-94% 3) VEGF: sensitivity of 56-83.5%, specificity 74.6-96%. 4) MicroRNA: sensitivity of 52.9-67.3%, specificity 76.4-94.4%. 5) p16INKa / ki-67: sensitivity of 50-100%, specificity 39-90.4%. 6) HPV E6/E7/mRNA: sensitivity of 65-100%, specificity 42.7-90.2%, and 7) DNA methylation: sensitivity of 59.7-92.9%, specificity 67-98%.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the reported test performance and the receiving operating characteristics curves implies that implementation of p16ink4a/ki-67 assay as a triage for HPV positive women to be used at one visit with subsequent cryotherapy treatment is feasible. For the rest of assays, more robust clinical translation studies with larger consecutive cohorts of women participants is recommended.

The value of HPV E6/E7 mRNA quantitative analysis in distinguishing high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions from low-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions

A quantitative assay for HPV E6/E7 mRNA may be a valuable tool for cervical cancer screening. The purpose of this study is to compare the expression levels of HPV E6/E7 mRNA in high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and to determine a new method that can be used to distinguish cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Routine cytology, HR-HPV E6/E7 mRNA, histology, and p16 immunohistochemistry were performed in tissues from 142 patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. Significant differences were observed between the E6/E7 mRNA copy number values between the LSIL and HSIL cases (Mann-Whitney U-test, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value (≥9,222.00 copies/mL) was determined using the receiver operating characteristic curve to predict diagnostic performance. Out of the 161 samples tested in this study, four cases were classified cytologically as HSIL but had normal histology. The E6/E7 copy numbers in these cases were all higher than 9,222 copies/mL. Therefore, a quantitative assay for HPV E6/E7 mRNA may be a valuable tool that can be used to distinguish HSIL and LSIL, especially for those with HSIL, for which samples are not obtained by biopsy, or when HSIL is difficult to distinguish by morphology and p16 immunohistochemistry.