Primary mediastinal clear cell sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature

Clear cell sarcoma in the post-molar area: Report of an ultra-rare case and literature review of oral clear cell sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Clear cell sarcoma of soft tissue is an exceptionally rare sarcoma. It is even rarer in the oral cavity. To our knowledge, this case is the first reported clear cell sarcoma involving the post-molar area. Pathologically, clear cell sarcoma has low mitotic activity, rare nuclear pleomorphism, and necrosis. Its biological behavior is often underestimated by morphology. It is a highly aggressive tumor.

CASE REPORT

A 39-year-old female presented with an asymptomatic mass in the post-molar area. It was mistaken for a benign or low-grade malignant tumor based on frozen incisional biopsy samples. The surgical resection sample was tested by NGS, which detected a rare EWSR1::CREB1 in clear cell sarcoma. The final diagnosis was made by combining morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular test results. The patient did not receive any adjuvant therapy after surgery and no recurrence of the disease was detected at 8 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights that mild histological manifestation in the oral cavity should be considered the possibility of CCS affecting young patients. Careful histological investigation, sufficient immunohistochemical staining, and molecular tests are essential to the diagnosis.

Clear cell sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract and malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumour: distinct or related entities? A review

Clear cell sarcoma is an uncommon sarcoma which rarely occurs as a primary tumour in the gastrointestinal tract (CCS-GIT). It shares common molecular genetic abnormalities with the more recently described entity, malignant gastrointestinal neuroectodermal tumour (GNET) but is distinguished by its morphological and immunohistochemical findings. The exact nosological relationship between these tumours continues to be debated. In this review, we present two cases of these rare neoplasms from our files and perform a statistical comparison of all published cases to determine if significant differences exist in their clinicopathological features and biological behaviour. Thirteen cases of CCS-GIT and 58 of GNET were included. CCS-GIT occurred more commonly in males (84.6% vs 46.6%, p = 0.01) and in an older age group (median 57 vs 33 years, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in their location in the gastrointestinal tract, median tumour size and proportion of cases with an EWSR1-ATF1 vs EWSR1-CREB1 fusion. Median survival for CCS-GIT was 13.5 months and for GNET, 9.5 months (p = 0.78). There was no significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier survival curves for either time to first metastasis (p = 0.88) or overall survival (p = 0.18), including after controlling for tumour size using regression models. Our analysis confirms that aside from morphological variations between these tumours, they also exhibit epidemiological and clinical differences. Despite the prevalent perception that GNET is associated with a more aggressive clinical course, our findings indicate that there is no significant difference in their biological behaviour, although both clearly share a bleak prognosis. Further experience is awaited to determine optimal treatment strategies and whether CCS-GIT and GNET would differ in their response to various therapies.

Complete response of mediastinal clear cell sarcoma to pembrolizumab with radiotherapy

Background

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue sarcoma thought to derive from neural crest and characterized by a 12;22 translocation. The resulting fusion protein directly activates expression of the melanocyte master transcription factor and drives the same down-stream pathways in CCS and melanoma leading to significant clinical parallels between these malignancies. Striking success of immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma has promoted interest in immunotherapy of CCS.

Case presentation

We report the first complete clinical response of a bulky chest wall recurrence of mediastinal CCS in a young woman to anti-PD1 checkpoint blockade with pembrolizumab combined with standard fractionation radiotherapy to enhance regional control and potentially boost the systemic immune response. The treatment was well tolerated with grade 2 skin toxicity within the range expected with radiation alone. Significant reduction in tumor bulk occurred after only 2 radiation fractions and complete response was achieved at 50 Gray.

Conclusion

The complete clinical response observed in our patient suggests synergy between concurrent radiotherapy and PD1 blockade in CCS. This case and the striking parallels between CCS and melanoma indicate the need for prospective trials of immune checkpoint blockade combined with radiotherapy in this rare malignancy.