Esophageal granular cell tumor and eosinophils: a multicenter experience

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

Esophageal Granular Cell Tumor: An Uncommon Cause of Dysphagia

Granular cell tumors (GCTs) are rare, typically benign, solitary neoplasms that can arise throughout the body, with reports of cases in the tongue, esophagus, colon, skin, vulva, and skeletal muscle, among others. Although GCTs are usually asymptomatic, esophageal GCTs can grow large enough to cause dysphagia. When developing the differential diagnosis for dysphagia, a broad consideration includes routine etiologies such as esophageal strictures, eosinophilic esophagitis, carcinoma, webs and rings, achalasia, and motility disorders, but GCTs may not readily come to mind. Due to their scarcity, this case report is presented to raise awareness of esophageal GCTs and emphasize key goals for diagnosing and managing this uncommon yet treatable cause of dysphagia. This case report details the clinical course of a patient presenting with a chief complaint of difficulty swallowing that was found to be caused by a subepithelial esophageal tumor discovered with esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Histopathological studies paired with immunohistochemical investigations of a tissue biopsy confirmed the etiology of the offending esophageal mass to be a GCT. The patient's dysphagia resolved after endoscopic mucosal resection of the GCT, and follow-up evaluations have remained negative for recurrence. This case highlights the esophageal GCT as an uncommon source of dysphagia and the need for EGD and EUS evaluations of subepithelial esophageal lesions accompanied by histopathological analysis for a definitive diagnosis of GCT.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal granular cell tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diagnosis and complete resection of esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs) is an area of concern. However, articles on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic resection of esophageal granular cell tumors are few. To evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal granular cell tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 15 patients with esophageal granular cell tumors who underwent endoscopic ultrasound examination and endoscopic resection in our hospital was conducted. The clinical data, endoscopic ultrasound images, endoscopic treatment, pathological characteristics, postoperative complications and follow-up status of all patients were evaluated. Ten board-certified endoscopists independently evaluated the white light endoscopic images of the 15 patients (Test 1) and the endoscopic ultrasound images together with white light endoscopic images of the same patient set (Test 2).

RESULT

Female patients accounted for 53.4% of the participants. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 49.13 ± 9.31 years old. Ten lesions (66.67%) showed hypoechoic signal, four lesions (26.67%) showed hyperechoic signal and one lesion showed medium signal. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with Test 2(65.3% vs. 92.0%, p < .001). Complete endoscopic resection was performed in all the patients. No complications occurred in any of the patients. No esophageal stenosis, recurrence, or metastases was found in all patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic ultrasound images of esophageal granular cell tumors have certain characteristics that help diagnose esophageal granular cell tumors. Endoscopic resection of esophageal granular cell tumors is an effective, safe and feasible treatment method.