Successful treatment of multiple bilateral impactions - a case report

The position and morphology characteristics of multiple impacted anterior teeth in the unilateral maxillary area: A retrospective study based on cone-beam computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated the position and morphologic characteristics of multiple impacted anterior teeth in the unilateral maxillary area.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography images of 21 patients (11 males and 10 females; median age 9.42 years [9.08-11.29]) with multiple teeth impacted were collected and imported into Dolphin Imaging software (Dolphin Imaging and Management Solutions, Chatsworth, Calif). The vertical height, crown orientation, twist direction, and root curvature of each impacted tooth were described. The crown length, root length, and root canal width of impacted and homonym teeth were measured.

RESULTS

The positions of the impacted lateral incisors are lower than that of the other 2 anterior teeth. Most crowns of impacted central incisors are positioned distally, labial surfaces in mesial torsion, with most roots, bent toward the distal and labial. Crowns of impacted lateral incisors are positioned mesiolabially, with labial surfaces mostly in distal torsion, and most roots bent toward the mesial and labial. Crowns of impacted canines are mostly positioned mesiolabially, with labial surfaces in mesial torsion. The crowns and roots of the impacted central and lateral incisors were shorter than those of the homonym (P <0.05); however, the difference in crown length is clinically negligible, and there was no difference in root canal widths. There was no difference in the comparison of parameters for the canine group.

CONCLUSIONS

There are certain rules in the vertical height, crown orientation, twist direction, and root curvature of multiple impacted anterior teeth in the unilateral maxillary area. Root development of impacted central and lateral incisors was restricted.

Effects of the Highly COX-2-Selective Analgesic NSAID Etoricoxib on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts during Compressive Orthodontic Mechanical Strain

Human periodontal ligament (hPDL) fibroblasts play a major role during periodontitis and orthodontic tooth movement, mediating periodontal inflammation, osteoclastogenesis, and collagen synthesis. The highly COX-2-selective NSAID etoricoxib has a favorable systemic side effect profile and high analgesic efficacy, particularly for orthodontic pain. In this in vitro study, we investigated possible side effects of two clinically relevant etoricoxib concentrations on the expression pattern of mechanically strained hPDL fibroblasts and associated osteoclastogenesis in a model of simulated orthodontic compressive strain occurring during orthodontic tooth movement. hPDL fibroblasts were incubated for 72 h under physiological conditions with etoricoxib at 0 μM, 3.29 μM, and 5.49 μM, corresponding to clinically normal and subtoxic dosages, with and without mechanical strain by compression (2 g/cm²) for the final 48 h, simulating conditions during orthodontic tooth movement in compressive areas of the periodontal ligament. We then determined gene and/or protein expression of COX-2, IL-6, PG-E₂, RANK-L, OPG, ALPL, VEGF-A, P4HA1, COL1A2, and FN1 via RT-qPCR, ELISA, and Western blot analyses as well as apoptosis, necrosis, cell viability, and cytotoxicity via FACS, MTT, and LDH assays. In addition, hPDL fibroblast-mediated osteoclastogenesis was assessed by TRAP staining in coculture with RAW267.4 cells for another 72 h. Gene and protein expression of all evaluated factors was significantly induced by the mechanical compressive strain applied. Etoricoxib at 3.29 μM and 5.49 μM significantly inhibited PG-E₂ synthesis, but not COX-2 and IL-6 gene expression nor RANK-L-/OPG-mediated osteoclastogenesis or angiogenesis (VEGF-A). Extracellular matrix remodeling (COL1A2, FN1) and bone anabolism (ALPL), by contrast, were significantly stimulated particularly at 5.49 μM. In general, no adverse etoricoxib effects on hPDL fibroblasts regarding apoptosis, necrosis, cell viability, or cytotoxicity were detected. Clinically dosed etoricoxib, that is, a highly selective COX-2 inhibition, did not have substantial effects on hPDL fibroblast-mediated periodontal inflammation, extracellular matrix remodeling, RANK-L/OPG expression, and osteoclastogenesis during simulated orthodontic compressive strain.

Effects of the highly COX-2-selective analgesic NSAID etoricoxib on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and cranial growth

BACKGROUND

NSAID analgesics have found widespread use in the treatment of pain, inflammation and fever. The highly COX-2-selective NSAID etoricoxib has shown a favorable side effect profile and excellent analgesic efficacy, particularly for dental and orthodontic pain, surpassing the current standard analgesic in orthodontics, acetaminophen. However, potential side effects on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and cranial growth, relevant for clinical usability during orthodontic treatment, have not yet been investigated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

40 male Fischer344 rats were randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=10) - controls receiving only 1.5ml tap water per day by oral gavage for a total of 5 weeks (1) as well as rats receiving an additional daily normal etoricoxib dosage of 7.8mg/kg for 3d (2) and 7d/week (3) and a high dosage of 13.1mg/kg for 7d/week (4) with serum bioavailability assessed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. After one week of premedication, the first upper left molars (M1) were moved orthodontically in anterior direction for 4 weeks using a closed NiTi coil spring (0.25N) and OTM as well as sagittal cranial growth were quantified cephalometrically by CBCT imaging at the start and end of OTM.

RESULTS

OTM, quantified as anterior metric tipping of M1, was significantly inhibited by about 33% only in rats receiving high-dose etoricoxib 7d/week (p=0.046) with a respective, but insignificant tendency also detectable for the normal dosages, whereas sagittal cranial growth was by tendency slightly increased with rising etoricoxib dosages, reflected by corresponding steady-state serum concentrations, confirming etoricoxib bioavailability.

CONCLUSIONS

An etoricoxib-induced clinically relevant deceleration of OTM is not to be expected at dosage regimens used in clinical practice to treat dental or orthodontic pain in contrast to a continuously administered high dosage. Due to its favorable side effect profile and higher analgesic efficiency regarding dental and orthodontic pain, etoricoxib should be a clinically valid alternative to the current standard orthodontic analgesic acetaminophen with its associated higher risk profile.