Overcoming barriers to evidence-based patient blood management: a restricted review

How do we leverage implementation science to support and accelerate uptake of clinical practice guidelines in transfusion medicine

BACKGROUND

Developing and disseminating clinical practice guidelines is a common strategy used to inform practice and address evidence-to-practice gaps that are prominent in transfusion medicine. Despite a highly systematic method for synthesizing evidence into guideline recommendations, comparatively little attention is paid to the real-world implementation of the recommendations in routine practice. A more scientific approach drawing on learnings from the field of implementation science is therefore warranted.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

In this article, we propose a methodological roadmap to embed implementation science principles, frameworks, and methods to facilitate the development and uptake of transfusion medicine guidelines. We draw upon research undertaken in partnership with the International Collaboration of Transfusion Medicine Guidelines (ICTMG) to illustrate the roadmap in action.

RESULTS

The methodological roadmap constitutes five steps which have been matched to existing processes for developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines: (1) environmental scan; (2) detailing who needs to do what differently, per guideline recommendation; (3) barriers and enablers assessment; (4) tailoring implementation strategies to identified barriers and enablers; and (5) implementation and evaluation of implementation strategies. For each step, we define the key concepts and methods involved, and share examples from work done with ICTMG to support transfusion medicine guideline implementation.

DISCUSSION

We intend this methodological roadmap for clinicians, researchers, and organizations involved in supporting clinical practice guideline use. Informed by principles, frameworks, and methods from implementation science, the roadmap can provide a more structured, transparent, and replicable approach to improve the implementation of guideline recommendations in transfusion medicine.

Design and Staged Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Preoperative Anemia Clinic at a Tertiary Care Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anemia is common and associated with adverse outcomes in surgical patients. There is limited information to guide the design and implementation of preoperative anemia clinics (PAC), which represents a critical barrier to entry for many practices.

METHODS

This is a descriptive observational study highlighting the design and implementation of a multidisciplinary PAC, including key steps in planning, stakeholder engagement, organizational structure, identification of target populations, establishing anemia treatments, information technology and electronic health record integration, provider training, and data infrastructure. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and anemia treatments for individuals evaluated in the PAC from November 4, 2019 through September 15, 2023 are enumerated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessing changes in anemia symptoms and well-being after surgery are evaluated for 2 subsets of patients (one before PAC implementation [pre-PAC], another after PAC implementation [post-PAC]), without formal statistical comparison given limited sample sizes.

RESULTS

The PAC was initiated as a multidisciplinary effort under support from a Mayo Clinic Practice Transformation Award in 2019, including broad representation from anesthesiology, surgery, and medical practices, along with institutional project management support (eg, project manager, information technologists, systems engineers). While initially limited to cardiac surgery patients, the PAC underwent planned incremental expansion to include other surgical services. Over the study period, 1188 PAC consultations across 1159 unique patients met eligibility criteria, with a median age of 66 (57-73) years and 58.1% women. The most common etiology of anemia was iron deficiency (69.1%) followed by anemia related to cancer (17.3%). Anemia-directed therapies were recommended in 1038 (87.4%) encounters, with 730 (70.3%) of those receiving recommended treatment preoperatively. Seven hundred nine (97.1%) treatments included intravenous iron and 146 (20.0%) included erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Fifteen pre-PAC and 38 post-PAC implementation patients completed PROs. PAC implementation was accompanied by earlier resolution of anemia symptoms and less pronounced declines in postoperative well-being scores.

CONCLUSIONS

This report highlights the key steps for successful PAC implementation. Treatment is possible for most patients and may be accompanied by improvements in patient-important outcomes.

Quality of registration and adherence to guidelines for blood management in CABG surgeries: a case study

In many hospitals, patients undergoing cardiac surgery receive a higher amount of blood products transfusions compared to other disciplines. Blood transfusion comes with risks and drawbacks, such as increased morbidity and mortality across different patient groups, and specifically patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and high costs. Patient Blood Management (PBM) practices focus on the application of evidence based medical and surgical concepts in order to preserve the patient's own blood. Unfortunately, studies suggest that only a small fraction of published guidelines are implemented and followed into daily clinical practicedue to clear guidance, concerns about risks, and lack of knowledge, interdisciplinary commitment or resources. The widespread adoption of electronic health record (EHR) offers the opportunity to improve clinical outcomes through use of decision support system to guide the healthcare providers through best practices and guidelines. Decision support systems can be active, data-based, patient-specific and act timely, and can be more useful that adding new clinical practice guidelines. This case study quantifies the quality of the data registration and provides the results for adherence to perioperative PBM guidelines for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures during a three-year period (2018 to 2020), in the St. Antonius hospital, a single heart center that performs over 10% of the total number of heart operations in the Netherlands. With this case study we identify some of the possible improvement factors for PBM in our center. We also quantify the impact of the quality of the registration in the EHR on the analysis results and on possible implementation of decision support systems.

Constructing a predictive model for high intraoperative excessive bleeding in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation surgery during outpatient visits

OBJECTIVE

1. Construct a risk prediction model to predict the factors of high intraoperative bleeding in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation surgery during outpatient visits. 2. Implement pre-hospital blood management for surgery patients, to improve clinical outcomes.

DESIGN & METHODS

We collected patients who underwent two-segment and three-segment posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation surgery in our hospital from 2016 to 2021. A total of 24 preoperative indicators were analyzed, covering medical history, demographic characteristics, segment, operator and laboratory test results. We used a logistic regression model to optimize the model's feature selection. The predictive model was constructed using the multivariable logistic regression method with all included methods, and a nomogram was created to display the model. Activated partial thromboplastin time, surgeon volume, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, body mass index, and the number of fusion and fixation lumbar segments were used to construct the predictive model. The predictive model's discrimination, calibration, clinical applicability, and rationality were evaluated.

RESULTS

The predictive model's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve is 0.723, with a 95% confidence interval of (0.685-0.760). The training set's decision curve analysis demonstrates that applying this diagnostic curve will increase the net benefit when the threshold probability is between 5% and 40%.

CONCLUSION

This study developed a novel nomogram with relatively good accuracy to assist clinical doctors in assessing the high intraoperative bleeding risk in patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation surgery during outpatient visits. By evaluating individual risk, surgeons can develop an individualized treatment plan to reduce the risk of intraoperative bleeding for each patient.

Perceptions of the Conditions and Barriers in Implementing the Patient Blood Management Standard by Anesthesiologists and Surgeons

Patient Blood Management (PBM) as a multidisciplinary practice and a standard of care for the anemic surgical patient is playing an increasingly important role in reducing transfusions and optimizing both clinical outcomes and costs. The success of PBM implementation depends on staff awareness and involvement in this approach. The main objective of our study was to explore physicians' perceptions of the conditions for implementing PBM in hospitals and the main obstacles they face in detecting and treating anemic patients undergoing elective surgery. This cross-sectional descriptive study includes 113 Romanian health units, representing 23% of health units with surgical wards nationwide. A 12-item questionnaire was distributed to the participants in electronic format. A total of 413 questionnaires representing the perceptions of 347 surgeons and 66 anesthesia and intensive-care specialists were analyzed. Although a lack of human resources was indicated by 23.70% of respondents as the main reason for not adhering the guidelines, the receptiveness of medical staff to implementing the PBM standard was almost 90%. In order to increase adherence to the standard, additional involvement of anesthesia and intensive-care physicians would be necessary from the perception of 35.70% of the responders: 23.60% of surgeons and 18.40% of hematologists.

Evaluating patient blood management practices using PBM metrics in a tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

PBM metrics play a crucial role in assessing and monitoring the effectiveness of PBM programs in healthcare settings. The present study aimed to assess the indicators to achieve effective enforcement of PBM at a tertiary care referral hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

A prospective observational study was conducted on patients admitted for elective surgery at a tertiary care referral centre. PBM metrics were developed and assessed for various parameters, including documentation, patient evaluation, blood ordering schedule, and appropriateness. Experts in transfusion medicine and haematology checked content validity. Eleven different parameters were analysed, and a score was assigned based on the performance. The outcome was categorized as poor, satisfactory, or good.

RESULTS

The study included 612 patients meeting the inclusion criteria and recruited from Orthopaedics, General Surgery, OBG, Urology, and ENT departments. All departments completed pre-operative anaemia tests, with General Surgery and Orthopaedics conducting the most red cell transfusions. During the study, all of the blood units were used, and there was no waste. The C/T ratio was greater in the Departments of General Surgery, Urology, and Otorhinolaryngology. Pre-operative anaemia was found in 44.12% of patients, 44 patients had red cell transfusions, with 65% getting single-unit PRBC transfusions. All departments received a PBM score between 17-19, showing adequate PBM but with room for improvement.

CONCLUSION

The current study utilized Patient Blood Management (PBM) metrics to critically assess the existing practices and identify the key gaps and areas for improvement in a tertiary care centre.

Harnessing the potential of data-driven strategies to optimise transfusion practice

No one doubts the significant variation in the practice of transfusion medicine. Common examples are the variability in transfusion thresholds and the use of tranexamic acid for surgery with likely high blood loss despite evidence-based standards. There is a long history of applying different strategies to address this variation, including education, clinical guidelines, audit and feedback, but the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these initiatives remains unclear. Advances in computerised decision support systems and the application of novel electronic capabilities offer alternative approaches to improving transfusion practice. In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Research funded a Blood and Transplant Research Unit (BTRU) programme focussing on 'A data-enabled programme of research to improve transfusion practices'. The overarching aim of the BTRU is to accelerate the development of data-driven methods to optimise the use of blood and transfusion alternatives, and to integrate them within routine practice to improve patient outcomes. One particular area of focus is implementation science to address variation in practice.

Haemoglobin thresholds for transfusion: how are we doing in the era of Choosing Wisely? A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

 Clinical practice guidelines and the Choosing Wisely initiative launched in 2012 recommend a haemoglobin (Hb) threshold of 70-80 g/lfor red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in stable hospitalised patients. Data on transfusion practices and their trends in medical inpatients are limited. To address this gap, we investigated transfusion practices and their trends in general internal medicine and other clinics.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analysed data from all hospitalisations with RBC transfusions at a Swiss university hospital between 2012 and 2019. We included all first transfusion episodes if pretransfusion Hb was available. The primary endpoint was mean pretransfusion Hb; secondary endpoints included potentially inadequate transfusions (i.e., transfusions at Hb ≥80 g/l) and receipt of a single RBC unit. Trends in mean pretransfusion Hb over time were estimated using generalised estimating equations, and risk factors for potentially inadequate transfusions were identified using multivariable adjusted generalised estimating equations models.

RESULTS

 Of 14,598 hospitalisations with RBC transfusions, 1980 (13.6%) were discharged from general internal medicine. From 2012 to 2019, mean pretransfusion Hb decreased from 74.0 g/l to 68.8 g/l in general internal medicine (mean annual decrease -0.76 g/l, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.51 to -1.02) and from 78.2 g/l to 72.7 g/l in other clinics (mean annual decrease -0.69, 95% CI -0.62 to -0.77; p for interaction 0.53). The overall proportion of potentially inadequate transfusions was 17.8% in general internal medicine and 24.1% in other clinics (p <0.001) and decreased over the study period from 26.9% to 5.5% in general internal medicine and from 37.0% to 15.2% in other clinics. In contrast, the proportion of cases receiving a single RBC unit increased (39.5% to 81.4% in general internal medicine, 42.7% to 66.1% in other clinics). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.45, 95% CI 1.32-1.58 for ≥65 vs <65 years), having surgery (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.14-1.36), acute haemorrhage (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33), chronic heart failure (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.04-1.32), ischaemic heart diseases (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15-1.41), chronic pulmonary diseases (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.42), malignancy (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.21), and rheumatic disease (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.59) were risk factors for potentially inadequate transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

 More restrictive transfusion practices were adopted in general internal medicine and other clinics over time, suggesting that guideline recommendations and the Choosing Wisely initiative may have been increasingly followed. Interventions to reduce potentially inadequate transfusions should target providers who care for older patients and those with surgery or chronic cardiac and pulmonary diseases.

A Potential Indicator for Assessing Patient Blood Management Standard Implementation

(1) Background: Patient blood management (PBM) program as a multidisciplinary practice and a standard of care for the anemic surgical patient has an increasingly important role in reducing transfusions and optimizing both clinical outcomes and costs. Documented success of PBM implementation is not sufficient for implementation of recommendations and correct use at hospital level. The primary objective of our study was to define a composite patient blood management process safety index-Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM)-that measures the impact of screening and treating anemic patients on the efficiency and effectiveness of the patient care process undergoing elective surgery. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study in a tertiary hospital by collecting data and analyzing the Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM) in patients undergoing major elective surgical procedures. (3) Results: The percentage of patients from the total of 354 patients (178 in 2019 and 176 in 2022) included in the study who benefited from preoperative iron treatment increased in 2022 compared to 2019 from 27.40% to 36.71%. The median value of the SIPBM was 1.00 in both periods analyzed, although there is a significant difference between the two periods (p < 0.005), in favor of 2022. (4) Conclusions: Measuring the effectiveness of PBM implementation and providing ongoing feedback through the Safety Index in PBM (SIPBM) increases the degree to which opportunities to improve the PBM process are identified. The study represents a first step for future actions and baselines to develop tools to measure the safety and impact of the patient blood management process in the surgical field.

Results from a type two hybrid-effectiveness study to implement a preoperative anemia and iron deficiency screening, evaluation, and management pathway

BACKGROUND

Implementation of pathways to screen surgical patients for preoperative anemia and iron deficiency remains limited. This study sought to measure the impact of a theoretically informed, bespoke change package on improving the uptake of a Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation, and Management Pathway.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Pre-post interventional study using a type two hybrid-effectiveness design evaluated implementation. Four hundred (400) patient medical record reviews provided the dataset (200 pre- and 200-post implementation). The primary outcome measure was compliance with the pathway. Secondary outcome measures (clinical outcomes) were anemia on day of surgery, exposure to a red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and hospital length of stay. Validated surveys facilitated data collection of implementation measures. Propensity score-adjusted analyses determined the effect of the intervention on clinical outcomes, and a cost analysis determined the economic impact.

RESULTS

For the primary outcome, compliance improved significantly post-implementation (Odds Ratio 10.6 [95% CI 4.4-25.5] p < .000). In secondary outcomes, adjusted analyses point estimates showed clinical outcomes were slightly improved for anemia on day of surgery (Odds Ratio 0.792 [95% CI 0.5-1.3] p = .32), RBC transfusion (Odds Ratio 0.86 [95% CI 0.41-1.78] p = .69) and hospital length of stay (Hazard Ratio 0.96 [95% CI 0.77-1.18] p = .67), although these were not statistically significant. Cost savings of $13,340 per patient were realized. Implementation outcomes were favorable for acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility.

CONCLUSION

The change package significantly improved compliance. The absence of a statistically significant change in clinical outcomes may be because the study was powered to detect an improvement in compliance only. Further prospective studies with larger samples are needed. Cost savings of $13,340 per patient were achieved and the change package was viewed favorably.

Improving Patient Blood Management Programs: An Implementation Science Approach

Organized patient blood management (PBM) programs function in numerous hospitals and health systems around the world contributing to improved patient outcomes as well as increased patient engagement, decreased resource use, and reductions in health care costs. PBM "programming" ranges from the implementation of single strategies/initiatives to comprehensive programs led by dedicated clinicians and PBM committees, employing the use of multiple PBM strategies. Frontline health care professionals play an important role in leading, implementing, operationalizing, measuring, and sustaining successful PBM programs. In this article, we provide practical implementation guidance to support key clinical, administrative, leadership, and structural elements required for the safe and comprehensive delivery of care in PBM programs at the local level.

Perioperative Trajectory of Haemoglobin, Predictors of Blood Transfusion and Tailoring Targets for Patient Blood Management Interventions: A Single-centre, Retrospective Study of Non-emergent Cardiac Surgery Patients

Background

Anaemia and blood transfusion are two independent contributing factors to perioperative morbidity in cardiac surgery. While preoperative treatment of anaemia has been shown to improve outcomes, in real life, logistical difficulties remain substantial, even in high-income countries. The adequate trigger for transfusion in this population remains controversial, and there is a wide variability in transfusion rates among centres.

Objectives

To assess the impact of preoperative anaemia on perioperative transfusion in elective cardiac surgery,todescribe the perioperative trajectory of haemoglobin (Hb), to stratify outcomes based on preoperative presence of anaemia and to identify predictors of perioperative blood transfusion.

Materials

and Methods: We included a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in a tertiary centre of cardiovascular surgery. Recorded outcomes included hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), surgical re-exploration due to bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion pre-, intra- and postoperatively. Other record perioperative variables were preoperative chronic kidney disease, duration of surgery, use of rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and cell saver, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelet (PLT) transfusion. Hb values were recorded at four distinct time points: Hb1 - at hospital admission, Hb2 - last Hb recorded preoperatively, Hb3 - first Hb recorded postoperatively and Hb4 - at hospital discharge. We compared the outcomes between anaemic and non-anaemic patients. Transfusion was decided by the attending physician on a case-by-case basis. Results: Of the 856 patients operated during the selected period, 716 underwent non-emergent surgery and 710 were included in the analysis. Also, 40.5% (n = 288) of patients were anaemic preoperatively (Hb <13 g/dl); 369 patients (52%) were transfused PRBCs, with differences found between anaemic and non-anaemic patients regarding the percentage of transfused patients perioperatively (71.5% vs 38.6%, p < 0.001) and in the total median number of units transfused (2 [IQR 0-2] vs 0 [IQR 0-1], p <0.001). We built a multivariate model, and logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative Hb <13 g/dl (odds ratio [OR] 3.462 [95% CI 1.766-6.787]), female sex (OR 3.224 [95% CI 1.648-6.306]), age (1.024 per year [95% CI 1.0008-1.049]), hospital LOS (OR 1.093 per day of hospitalisation [95% CI 1.037-1.151]) and FFP transfusion (OR 5.110 [95% CI 1.997-13.071]) are associated with PRBC transfusion.

Conclusions

Untreated preoperative anaemia leads to more transfusion in elective cardiac surgery patients, both as a ratio of transfused patients and as the number of units of PRBCs per patient, and this is associated with an increased use in FFP.

Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery-Cardiac Society Consensus Statement on the Management of Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients

Preoperative anemia is common in patients presenting for cardiac surgery, with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 4, and has been associated with worse outcomes including increased risk of blood transfusion, kidney injury, stroke, infection, and death. Iron deficiency, a major cause of anemia, has also been shown to have an association with worse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, even in the absence of anemia. Although recent guidelines have supported diagnosing and treating anemia and iron deficiency before elective surgery, details on when and how to screen and treat remain unclear. The Eighth Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI 8) consensus conference, in conjunction with the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery-Cardiac Surgery Society, brought together an international, multidisciplinary team of experts to review and evaluate the literature on screening, diagnosing, and managing preoperative anemia and iron deficiency in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and to provide evidence-based recommendations in accordance with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria for evaluating biomedical literature.

Anemia tolerance versus blood transfusion on long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis

Background

Perioperative anemia and transfusion are intertwined with each other, and both have adverse impacts on the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. But the treatment of anemia still relies on transfusion in several countries, which leads us to question the effects of anemia tolerance and transfusion on the long-term outcomes of CRC patients. We investigated the combined effect of preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia and of preoperative anemia and blood transfusion, which imposes a greater risk to survival, to compare the effects of anemia tolerance and transfusion on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients undergoing CRC surgery.

Methods

A retrospective propensity-score-matched analysis included patients with CRC undergoing elective surgery between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. After propensity-score matching, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the prognostic factors for survivals. In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis, two novel models were built.

Results

Of the 8,121 patients with CRC, 1,975 (24.3%) and 6,146 (75.7%) patients presented with and without preoperative anemia, respectively. After matching, 1,690 patients remained in each group. In the preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia model, preoperative anemia and postoperative anemia was independent risk factor for OS (HR, 1.202; 95% CI, 1.043–1.385; P=0.011) and DFS (HR, 1.210; 95% CI, 1.050–1.395; P=0.008). In the preoperative anemia and transfusion model, preoperative anemia and transfused was the most dangerous independent prognostic factor for OS (HR, 1.791; 95% CI, 1.339–2.397; P<0.001) and DFS (HR, 1.857; 95% CI, 1.389–2.483; P<0.001). In patients with preoperative anemia, the OS and DFS of patients with transfusion were worse than those of patients without transfusion (P=0.026 in OS; P=0.037 in DFS).

Conclusions

Preoperative anemia and blood transfusion imposed a greater risk to OS and DFS in patients undergoing CRC surgery, indicating that the harm associated with blood transfusion was greater than that associated with postoperative anemia. These findings should encourage clinicians to be vigilant for the timely prevention and treatment of anemia, by appropriately promoting toleration of anemia and restricting the use of blood transfusion in patients with CRC.

Scaling up Quality Improvement for Surgical Teams (QIST)—avoiding surgical site infection and anaemia at the time of surgery: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to introduce change in the NHS

Background

The aim of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to implement large-scale change in the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK, specifically for improving outcomes in patients undergoing primary, elective total hip or knee replacement.

Methods

We undertook a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the roll-out of two preoperative pathways: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) decolonisation (infection arm) and anaemia screening and treatment (anaemia arm). NHS Trusts are public sector organisations that provide healthcare within a geographical area. NHS Trusts (n = 41) in England providing primary, elective total hip and knee replacements, but that did not have a preoperative anaemia screening or MSSA decolonisation pathway in place, were randomised to one of the two parallel collaboratives. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. Twenty-seven Trusts completed the trial (11 anaemia, 16 infection). Outcome data were collected for procedures performed between November 2018 and November 2019.

Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infection (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days post-surgery) for the anaemia and infection trial arms, respectively. Secondary outcomes were deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of hospital stay, critical care admissions and unplanned readmissions. Process measures included the proportion of eligible patients receiving each preoperative initiative.

Results

There were 19,254 procedures from 27 NHS Trusts included in the results (6324 from 11 Trusts in the anaemia arm, 12,930 from 16 Trusts in the infection arm). There were no improvements observed for blood transfusion (anaemia arm 183 (2.9%); infection arm 302 (2.3%) transfusions; adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.52–2.75, p = 0.67) or MSSA deep SSI (anaemia arm 8 (0.13%); infection arm 18 (0.14%); adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.42–2.46, p = 0.98). There were no significant improvements in any secondary outcome. This is despite process measures showing the preoperative pathways were implemented for 73.7% and 61.1% of eligible procedures in the infection and anaemia arms, respectively.

Conclusions

Quality improvement collaboratives did not result in improved patient outcomes in this trial; however, there was some evidence they may support successful implementation of new preoperative pathways in the NHS.

Trial registration

Prospectively registered on 15 February 2018, ISRCTN11085475

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-022-01193-9.

[Peri- and Postoperative Anaemia Management]

Patient Blood Management (PBM) aims to diagnose and treat preoperative anaemia, avoid unnecessary blood loss, and enable rational use of blood products. Due to various limitations, treatment of preoperative anaemia has been successful in only a few German hospitals to date. Thus, the peri- and postoperative phase is increasingly becoming important for implementing various preventive and therapeutic measures for the treatment of (postoperative) anaemia. These will be comprehensively presented in the following.

Anaemia: A risk factor for death and adverse outcomes following surgery for acute lower limb ischaemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute limb ischaemia (ALI) forms a significant part of the vascular surgery workload and carries with it high rates of morbidity and mortality. Anaemia is also common amongst vascular surgical patients and has been linked with poor outcomes in some subgroups. We aimed to assess the frequency of anaemia in patients with ALI and its impact on survival and complications following revascularisation to help direct future efforts to optimise outcomes in this patient group.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected departmental data on patients undergoing surgical intervention for ALI between 2014 and 2018 was performed. Anaemia was defined as a pre-operative haemoglobin (Hb) of <120 g/L for women and <130 g/L for men. The primary outcome was overall survival, assessed with the Kaplan-Meier estimator, with application of Cox proportional hazard modelling to adjust for confounding covariates.

RESULTS

There were 158 patients who underwent treatment for ALI: 89 (56.3%) of these were non-anaemic with a mean Hb of 146 (SD = 18.4), and 69 (43.7%) were anaemic with a mean Hb of 106 (SD = 13.4). Anaemic patients had a significantly higher risk of death than their non-anaemic counterparts on univariate analysis (HR = 2.11, 95% CIs, 1.28-3.5, p = 0.0036). There was ongoing divergence in survival up to around 6 months between anaemic and non-anaemic groups. Under the Cox model, anaemia was similarly significant as a predictor of death (HR = 2.15, 95% CIs, 1.17-3.95, p = 0.013), accounting for recorded comorbidities, medication use and blood transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Anaemia is a significant and independent risk factor for death following revascularisation for ALI and can be potentially be modified. Vascular surgical centres should ensure they have robust pathways in place to identify and consider treating anaemia. There is scope for further work to assess how to best optimise a patient's levels of circulating haemoglobin.

Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence based bleeding management in Australian Cardiac Surgery Units: a qualitative interview study analysed with the theoretical domains framework and COM-B model

Background

Bleeding during cardiac surgery is a common complication that often requires the transfusion of blood products. The combination of bleeding and blood product transfusion incrementally increases adverse outcomes including infection and mortality. Following bleeding management guideline recommendations could assist with minimising risk but adherence is not high, and the cause for lack of adherence is not well understood. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to practicing and implementing evidenced-based intra-operative, bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgery units.

Methods

We used a qualitative descriptive design to conduct semi-structured interviews with Australian cardiac surgeons, anaesthetists and perfusionists. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was utilised to guide interviews and thematically analyse the data. Categorised data were then linked with the three key domains of the COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation - behaviour) to explore and understand behaviour.

Results

Seventeen interviews were completed. Nine of the 14 TDF domains emerged as significant. Analysis revealed key themes to improving capability included, standardisation, monitoring, auditing and feedback of data and cross discipline training. Opportunity for change was improved with interpersonal and interdepartmental collaboration through shared goals, and more efficient and supportive processes allowing clinicians to navigate unfamiliar business and financial models of health care. Results suggest as individuals, clinicians had the motivation to make change and healthcare organisations have an obligation and a responsibility to partner with clinicians to support change and improve goal directed best practice.

Conclusion

Using a theory-based approach it was possible to identify factors which may be positively or negatively influence clinicians ability to implement best practice bleeding management in Australian cardiac surgical units.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06269-8.

A Theoretically Informed Approach to Support the Implementation of Pre-Operative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation, and Management Pathways: Protocol for a Type Two Hybrid-Effectiveness Study

Introduction

Blood transfusions are a risk factor for increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. Patient blood management guidelines provide guidance to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes. They outline steps to help prevent transfusions and considerations for when deciding to transfuse. One recommendation to prevent unnecessary transfusion is to optimize patients using Pre-operative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P). The uptake of these recommendations is highly variable, and an effective approach to implementing them in a tailored and context-specific manner remains elusive.

Method and Design

A mixed-methods, interventional study, using a type two-hybrid effectiveness-implementation design, will evaluate the impact of a change package to improve the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. The change package consists of the intervention (PAIDSEM-P) supported by theoretically informed implementation strategies. Pre- and post-implementation, retrospective health record reviews will determine the effect of the change package on provider outcomes, including compliance with guideline recommendations as measured by the proportion of patients who have the appropriate tests performed, and, if required, appropriate treatment and/or referrals. Patient outcomes will be measured by checking for any difference in the proportion of patients with anemia on the day of surgery and the proportion of patients who receive a blood transfusion during the peri-operative period. An economic evaluation will be conducted to compare health outcomes and costs. The feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of the PAIDSEM-P will be assessed using a quantitative, validated survey to measure implementation outcomes.

Discussion

Testing of implementation theory is required to advance understanding of what works, in what context, and the impact on implementation success. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a theoretically informed change package on improving the uptake of PAIDSEM-P. If successful, it will also provide a framework for health care facilities to follow when addressing other evidence-practice gaps.

Strategies for facilitating the delivery of cluster randomized trials in hospitals: A study informed by the CFIR-ERIC matching tool

BACKGROUND

Recruitment and engagement of clusters in a cluster randomized controlled trial can sometimes prove challenging. Identification of successful or unsuccessful strategies may be beneficial in guiding future researchers in conducting their cluster randomized controlled trial. This study aimed to identify strategies that could be used to facilitate the delivery of cluster randomized controlled trials in hospitals.

METHODS

The study employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool. The barriers and enablers to cluster randomized controlled trial conduct identified in our previously conducted studies served as a means of determinant identification for the conduct of cluster randomized controlled trials. These determinants were mapped to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs and then matched to Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation strategies using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change matching tool.

RESULTS

The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies matched to at least one determinant Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research construct were as follows: (1) 'Identify and prepare champions', (2) 'Conduct local needs assessment', (3) 'Conduct educational meetings', (4) 'Inform local opinion leaders', (5) 'Build a coalition', (6) 'Promote adaptability', (7) 'Develop a formal implementation blueprint', (8) 'Involve patients/consumers and family members', (9) 'Obtain and use patients/consumers and family feedback', (10) 'Develop educational materials', (11) 'Promote network weaving', (12) 'Distribute educational materials', (13) 'Access new funding' and (14) 'Develop academic partnerships'.

CONCLUSION

This study was intended as a step in the research agenda aimed at facilitating cluster randomized controlled trial delivery in hospitals and can act as a resource for future researchers when planning their cluster randomized controlled trial, with the expectation that the strategies identified here will be tailored to each context.

Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management: Barrier Identification and Implementation Strategy Mapping

Introduction and aims

Patients undergoing major surgery risk significant blood loss and transfusion, which increases substantially if they have pre-existing anemia. Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency Screening, Evaluation and Management Pathways (PAIDSEM-P) outline recommended blood tests and treatment to optimize patients before surgery. Documented success using PAIDSEM-P to reduce transfusions and improve patient outcomes exists, but the reporting quality of such studies is suboptimal. It remains unclear what implementation strategies best support the implementation of PAIDSEM-P.

Method

Maximum variation, purposive sampling was used to recruit a total of 15 participants, including a range of health professionals and patients for semi-structured interviews. Data analysis utilized a deductive approach informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) for barrier identification and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) for reporting recommended implementation strategies. A modified version of the Action, Actor, Context, Target and Time (AACTT) framework assisted with conceptualisation and targeted strategy selection.

Results

The analysis revealed five barriers: access to knowledge and information, patient needs and resources, knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, available resources, and networks and communications, which had strong ERIC recommendations, including conduct educational meetings, develop educational materials, distribute educational materials, obtain and use patients/consumers family feedback, involve patients/consumers/family members, conduct a local needs assessment, access new funding, promote network weaving, and organize clinician implementation team meetings.

Conclusions

Mapping the barriers and strategies using the ERIC framework on the basis of individual actor categories proved to be useful in identifying a pragmatic number of implementation strategies that may help in supporting the utilisation of the PAIDSEM-P and other evidence-based healthcare implementation problems more broadly.

Preoperative Anemia Screening and Treatment Practices in Patients Having Total Joint Replacement Surgery: A Retrospective, Observational Audit

Background

Surgical patients with preoperative anemia are more likely to experience adverse outcomes. Patient blood management (PBM) guidelines recommend screening and treating patients for anemia preoperatively to enable optimisation before surgery. This study investigates compliance with PBM guidelines and reports the association between length of stay and transfusion risk in patients with preoperative anemia.

Study Design and Methods

A retrospective, observational, chart audit that included all patients having primary, total hip and knee replacement surgery between July-December 2018 at a tertiary, metropolitan healthcare facility.

Results

Six hundred and seven patients patients were included, 96% (n = 583) patients had blood tests available (full blood count), and 8.1% (n = 49) had iron studies. Most patients 53% (n = 324) were screened between 2 and 6 days before surgery; 14.6% (n = 85) were anaemic preoperatively and only 5.9% (n = 5) of anaemic patients received treatment. Patients who had anemia preoperatively were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (odds ratio 8.65 [95% CI 3.98-18.76]) and stayed longer in hospital (median difference = 1, χ² _LR = 17.2, df=1, p<0.007).

Conclusion

Tests ordered for patients having major surgery should include iron studies, renal function, CRP and full blood count to enable detection and classification of preoperative anemia. Timing of screening relative to surgery needs to be sufficient to allow patient optimisation to occur. Appropriate treatment should be provided to anaemic patients to prevent unnecessary blood transfusions and reduce the length of stay. A standardised preoperative anemia pathway may assist in improving practice.