Use of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonists in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer - a randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil

Duration of α-1 adrenergic antagonist administration after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Urinary dysfunction is an adverse event of low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) in patients with prostate cancer. We aimed to examine the time to α-1 adrenergic antagonist withdrawal after LDR-BT initiation.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 1663 patients who underwent LDR-BT at our hospital during 2004-2022.

RESULTS

Overall, 1485/1663 (89.3%) patients were able to stop using α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 1111 (66.8%) of them within 1 year of LDR-BT. Risk factors for prolonged time to withdrawal were age ≥70 years, taking agents for lower urinary tract symptoms prior to LDR-BT, an International Prostate Symptom Score ≥8, an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score ≥3 and a residual urine volume ≥20 ml. Of the patients who were able to stop taking α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 357/1485 (24.0%) required resumption, 218 (61.1%) of whom did so between 1 and 3 years after LDR-BT. This period matched the period of transient worsening of the urinary symptom score. Finally, multivariable analysis identified supplemental external beam radiotherapy and an Overactive Bladder Symptom Score ≥3 as independent risk factors for α-1 adrenergic antagonist resumption.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal of α-1 adrenergic antagonists was possible in 66.8% of patients within 1 year of LDR-BT. Our results suggest that patients who are older or have pre-treatment LUTS may have prolonged deterioration of urinary dysfunction after treatment. Resumption of α-1 adrenergic antagonists 1-3 years after treatment may be associated with urinary symptom flares, and close attention is necessary for patients with supplemental external beam radiotherapy and a high pretreatment Overactive Bladder Symptom Score.

Neurobiology of cancer: Adrenergic signaling and drug repurposing

Cancer neuroscience, as an emerging converging discipline, provides us with new perspectives on the interactions between the nervous system and cancer progression. As the sympathetic nervous system, in particular adrenergic signaling, plays an important role in the regulation of tumor activity at every hierarchical level of life, from the tumor cell to the tumor microenvironment, and to the tumor macroenvironment, it is highly desirable to dissect its effects. Considering the far-reaching implications of drug repurposing for antitumor drug development, such a large number of adrenergic receptor antagonists on the market has great potential as one of the means of antitumor therapy, either as primary or adjuvant therapy. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the impact of adrenergic signaling on cancer development and to assess the status and prospects of intervening in adrenergic signaling as a therapeutic tool against tumors.

Oral 5-aminolevulinic Acid for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Undergoing Low-dose-rate Brachytherapy: AMBER Trial

BACKGROUND/AIM

Radiotherapy is one of the most frequently used options for prostate cancer (PCa). However, adverse effects related to irradiation of surrounding normal organs are significant clinical concerns. Specifically, genitourinary toxicity can dramatically reduce the quality of life. This clinical trial investigated the efficacy of oral 5-aminolevulinic acid phosphate combined with sodium ferrous citrate (ALA-SFC) in patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using an iodine-125 seed source.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The AMBER study was a prospective single-center trial involving patients with localized PCa who underwent LDR-BT without external-beam radiotherapy (jRCTs051190077). Fifty patients were included and instructed to take capsules of ALA-SFC twice a day (200 mg phosphate salt and 229.42 mg per day) for six months from the day of seed implantation (prescribed radiation dose of 160 Gy). Patient data were collected before implantation, during ALA-SFC treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-LDR-BT. The primary endpoint of this trial was urinary frequency at three months. Other patient-reported outcomes, investigator-reported adverse events, and oncological outcomes were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 50 enrolled cases (45 in the per-protocol analysis, 49 in the safety analysis), urinary frequency and its increase from baseline did not differ from 141 historical controls at any time point, including at three months post-LDR-BT. Propensity score matched analysis confirmed no time-course differences in frequency, volume, or urinary symptom scores between groups. Biochemical failure-free and metastasis-free survival also remained similar.

CONCLUSION

Oral supplementation of ALA-SFC to LDR-BT did not alleviate radiation-induced toxicity or improve oncological outcomes.

Evolving Role of Silodosin for the Treatment of Urological Disorders – A Narrative Review

Use of α-androgenic receptor blockers remains a mainstay therapeutic approach for the treatment of urological diseases. Silodosin is recommended over other α-blockers for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), due to its high α_1A uroselectivity. Current research data suggest that silodosin is efficacious in the management of various urological diseases. Thus, we herein review the current evidence of silodosin related to its efficacy and tolerability and appraise the available literature that might ultimately aid in management of various urological conditions at routine clinical practice. Literature reveals that silodosin is beneficial in improving nocturia events related to LUTS/BPH. Silodosin exerts effect on relaxing muscles involved in detrusor obstruction, therefore prolonging the need for patients undergoing invasive surgery. Silodosin treatment, either as a monotherapy or combination, significantly improves International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) including both storage and voiding symptoms in patients with BPH/LUTS. Patients on other treatment therapies such as phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors or other α-blockers are well managed with this drug. Steadily, silodosin has proved beneficial in the treatment of other urological disorders such as chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS), overactive bladder/acute urinary retention (AUR), premature ejaculation (PE), and prostate cancer post brachytherapy-induced progression. In patients with distal ureteral stones, silodosin treatment is beneficial in decreasing stone expulsion time without affecting stone expulsion rate or analgesic need. Moreover, there were significant improvements in intravaginal ejaculation latency time, quality of life scores, and decrease in PE profile among patients with PE. Silodosin has also demonstrated promising results in increasing the likelihood of successful trial without catheter in patients with AUR and those taking antihypertensive drugs. Reports from Phase II studies have shown promising role of silodosin in the treatment of CP/CPPS as well as facilitating ureteral stone passage. From the robust data in this review, further silodosin treatment strategies in the management of different urological conditions need to be focused on.

Clinical outcomes of iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution review in Japan

Purpose

To evaluate the oncological outcomes and genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events in acute and late-phases of iodine-125 low-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Material and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 334 patients treated for localized prostate cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy. Bio-chemical relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Incidence of adverse events was calculated using National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 5. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of acute and late-phase genitourinary and gastrointestinal adverse events.

Results

National Comprehensive Cancer Network's low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups included 133 (39.8%), 163 (48.8%), and 38 (11.3%) patients, respectively. The 5-year cause-specific survival rate was 100%. The 5-year bio-chemical relapse-free survival rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 98.3%, 95.8%, and 100%, respectively. One patient had a ≥ grade 3 acute adverse event. The 5-year cumulative ≥ grade 1, ≥ grade 2, and ≥ grade 3 genitourinary adverse event rates were 27.9%, 14.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative ≥ grade 1, ≥ grade 2, and ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal adverse event rates were 3.1%, 1.5%, and 0.5%, respectively. A high pre-treatment international prostate symptom score and non-use of α1-blockers were associated with an increased risk of acute genitourinary adverse events.

Conclusions

Low-dose-rate brachytherapy had good oncological outcomes, with acceptable adverse event rates. Pre-treatment urinary function and use of α1-blockers may be useful in predicting and preventing acute genitourinary adverse events.

Mirabegron Reduces Urinary Frequency and Improves Overactive Bladder Symptoms at 3 Months After 125I-brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer: An Open-Labeled, Randomized, Non-Placebo-Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the additional effects of mirabegron to alpha-1 adrenergic antagonist on lower urinary tract symptoms of patients who underwent 125I-brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent 125I-brachytherapy for prostate cancer (cT1-cT3aN0M0) in a single institute between September 2016 and October 2018 were enrolled in the randomized, non-placebo, open-labeled, paralleled study. Patients were randomly distributed (1:1) to combination group (tamsulosin (0.2 mg/day) plus mirabegron (50 mg/day)) or tamsulosin-alone group after 125I -brachytherapy by envelope method. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean voided volume per micturition 3 months after 125I brachytherapy. The secondary endpoints included the changes from baseline of International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite scores and 24 hours urinary frequency after 3 months after 125I brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The mean changes in volume voided per micturition in the combination (n = 108) and tamsulosin-alone (n = 110) groups were -62.5 (standard deviation, ±53.8) and -68.0 (standard deviation, ±52.7), respectively (P = .17). The change in Overactive Bladder Symptom Score in combination group (P = .02) was more moderate than in tamsulosin-alone group; and 24 hour urinary frequency in combination group was lower (P = .03) than in tamsulosin-alone group. Retention rates within 3 months after 125I-brachytherapy in the mirabegron and tamsulosin-alone groups were 7.3% (9/122) and 6.0% (7/118), respectively (P = .80).

CONCLUSION

Tamsulosin and mirabegron combination therapy after 125I-brachytherapy did not improve voided volume per micturition compared to tamsulosin-only treatment. However, it could improve frequent urination and overactive bladder symptoms.

Comparison of disease-specific quality of life in prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy: A randomized controlled trial of silodosin versus naftopidil

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effects of naftopidil and silodosin administration on the quality of life of patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

METHODS

In total, 141 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who were treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized (1:1) to the naftopidil (75 mg/day, n = 63) or silodosin group (8 mg/day, n = 64). Naftopidil and silodosin were administered 1 day after low-dose-rate brachytherapy, and were continued for at least 3 months. Using the University of California at Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index and Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores, the mean changes and rates of deterioration from baseline were compared. The deterioration rates in the quality of life of patients at 1 and 3 months after low-dose-rate brachytherapy were evaluated based on the minimal important difference.

RESULTS

The rates of deterioration from baseline to 1 and 3 months after low-dose-rate brachytherapy were not significantly different between the two groups in terms of urinary function, urinary bother, bowel bother, sexual function or Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores. In contrast, there were significant differences in bowel function (naftopidil 1 month, 52%; 3 months, 52%; silodosin 1 month, 28%; 3 months, 34%; 1 month, P < 0.01; 3 months, P = 0.048) and sexual bother (naftopidil 3 months, 11%; silodosin 3 months, 29%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Naftopidil and silodosin provide different disease-specific quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing, especially in terms of bowel function and sexual bother. These findings can help in the selection of α-1 adrenoceptor antagonists after low-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Factors affecting urinary frequency after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

Lower urinary tract symptoms are transiently exacerbated by low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for prostate cancer and recover to pretreatment levels 1 year thereafter. Generally, these symptoms are influenced by temperature. We aimed to search for factors affecting the lower urinary tract symptoms after seed implant including seasons.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled 812 patients who underwent LDR-BT at Nara Medical University Hospital from January 2010 to December 2018 and for whom the International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and frequency volume charts were available. We investigated the relationships between lower urinary tract symptoms, 24-hours urinary frequency, 24-hours urinary volume before and after seed implant, radiation dose, and season of seed implant.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69.5 years. The mean prostate volume was 24.2 mL. The International Prostate Symptom Score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, and 24-hours urinary frequency increased until 3 months and gradually decreased over 6 months after seed implant. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that 24-hours urinary frequency at 3 months after seed implant was significantly influenced by external beam radiotherapy, larger prostate volume before implant, higher 24-hours urinary frequency at baseline, larger 24-hours urinary volume at 3 months after implant, and performance of implant in summer.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower urinary tract symptoms worsened 3 months after seed implant of LDR-BT regardless of the season of implant. The urinary frequency 3 months after seed implant was slightly lower when seed implant was performed in the summer.

Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms after Prostate Radiation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present urologists with guidance on how to approach and manage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients who have undergone radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are few studies that specifically examine treatment approaches for LUTS in patients who have undergone prostate cancer RT. LUTS after prostate RT are unique when compared to de novo LUTS. Understanding these distinctions is important for urologists' practice as well as patients' quality of life. Discussion of the risks and management of post-RT LUTS should be included in the shared decision-making process when counseling patients on various treatment options for prostate cancer. Further studies evaluating treatments for storage and voiding symptoms after RT are needed to help guide future care.

Acute and late side-effects after low dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer; incidence, management and technical considerations

PURPOSE

To review common reported side effects and complications after primary LDR-BT (monotherapy) and discuss some of the technical aspects that could impact the treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was undertaken using medical subject headings (MeSH) complemented by the authors' personal and institutional expertise.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of acute and late grade 2 or above urinary, bowel and sexual side effects is very variable across the literature. The learning curve and the implant quality have a clear impact on the toxicity outcomes. Being aware of some of the technical challenges encountered during the procedure and ways to mitigate them could decrease the incidence of side effects. Careful planning of seed placement and seed deposition allow sparing of the organs at risk and a lower incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose-rate brachytherapy remains a standard monotherapy treatment in the setting of favorable-risk prostate cancer. High disease control and low long-term toxicities are achievable in expert hands with a good technique.

[Male non-neurogenic overactive bladder]

INTRODUCTION

Male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and in particular overactive bladder (OAB) are a frequent reason for consultation in urology and have a significant functional impact in patients.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize current knowledge on non-neurogenic OAB in male patients.

METHOD

A systematic literature review based on Pubmed, Embase, Google Scholar was conducted in June 2020.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OAB and benign prostatic hyperplasia increases with age. Symptoms of OAB, on the one hand, and symptoms of prostatic bladder outlet obstruction, on the other hand, can be concomitant and the causal link between the two types of symptoms is difficult to establish. In case of mixed symptoms, it is recommended to treat the most troublesome type of symptoms first and to inform the patient of the risks of failure or deterioration. Indeed, many patients remain symptomatic after prostate surgery and the predictive factors for failure remain to be defined. Thus, preoperative urodynamics is not routinely performed even in case of OAB. De novo detrusor overactivity after radical prostatectomy can reach 77% and persists in the majority of cases. The overall relative risk of storage symptoms after radiotherapy and brachytherapy is higher than that after prostatectomy. The etiology of OAB after prostate surgery is multifactorial. While drug treatments have proven to be effective, little data exists on second-line treatments for OAB after prostate surgery.

CONCLUSION

OAB in men is often linked to a prostatic bladder outlet obstruction. It is essential to inform patients about the possibility of persistence, deterioration, or occurrence of OAB after prostate surgery while the predictors of surgical failure are not clearly defined.

A prospective study of oral 5-aminolevulinic acid to prevent adverse events in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing low-dose-rate brachytherapy: Protocol of the AMBER study

Background

Radiotherapy is one of the most frequently selected treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. However, adverse effects related to the irradiated surrounding normal organs are significant clinical concerns. Specifically, genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities can lead to a dramatically reduced quality of life. The aim of this clinical trial is to determine the efficacy of oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) phosphate with sodium ferrous citrate (SFC) in patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) using an iodine-125 seed source.

Methods

The AMBER study is a prospective, single-center trial in patients with localized prostate cancer undergoing LDR-BT. Patients who undergo supplementary extra-beam radiotherapy are excluded, whereas those who undergo pre-implantation short-term (4–6 months) androgen deprivation therapy to decrease the prostate volume and/or improve oncological outcomes are included. After the screening and registration, the patients will be instructed to take capsules of ALA-SFC twice a day (200 mg and 229.42 mg per day) for 6 months from the day of seed implantation (prescribed radiation dose of 160 Gy). Patient data will be collected before the implantation; during oral ALA-SFC treatment; and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 month(s) after seed implantation. The primary endpoint of this trial is the urinary frequency 3 months after seed implantation. At each visit, the 24-h urinary frequency, total voided volume, and mean voided volume on a frequency volume chart and other patient-reported outcomes are recorded. The data of the trial cases will be compared with those of historical controls, who are consecutive patients undergoing LDR-BT without supplementary extra-beam radiotherapy between January 2016 and January 2019. The number of subjects has been set to be 50 for trial cases and 150 for the historical control cases. Pre- and post-treatment clinicopathologic factors are compared between two groups.

Discussion

The goal of this trial is to determine the potential benefit of ALA-SFC in patients who undergo LDR-BT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the potential clinical benefit of oral ALA-SFC after radiotherapy. More evidence from a further randomized controlled trial is needed to change the standard of care and lead to better post-radiotherapy management.

Trial registration

This clinical trial was prospectively registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 5 December 2019. The reference number is jRCTs051190077, nara0013 (Certified Review Board of Nara Medical University).

Analysis of quality of life after randomized controlled trial of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist alone and in combination with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors on quality of life (QoL) of patients undergoing low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy.

Material and methods

A total of 310 patients with prostate cancer who had undergone LDR brachytherapy were enrolled. The patients were randomized (1 : 1) to the monotherapy group (tamsulosin alone: 0.2 mg/day, n = 156) and the combination group (tamsulosin: 0.2 mg/day plus celecoxib: 200 mg/day, n = 154) without placebo. Using the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) and medical outcomes study 8-item short form health survey (SF-8) questionnaire, QoL was evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after seed implantation.

Results

The mean changes in scores from baseline to 1 and 3 months after seed implantation for the urinary (1M: –10.5, 3M: –10.9) and bowel (1M: –2.4, 3M: –4.2) domains of EPIC in the combination group were not significantly different from those (urinary 1M: –11.0, 3M: –11.4, bowel 1M: –2.3, 3M: –4.6) in the monotherapy group. The mean changes in scores from baseline to 1 and 3 months after seed implantation for the physical component summary (1M: 0.009, 3M: –0.32) and mental component summary (1M: 0.41, 3M: 0.36) of SF-8 in the combination group were not significantly different from those (physical component 1M: –0.89, 3M: –0.22, mental component 1M: 1.3, 3M: 1.1) in the monotherapy group.

Conclusions

Combination treatment with celecoxib and tamsulosin during the peri-operative period is not warranted for improving QoL in patients undergoing LDR brachytherapy.

Efficacy of tadalafil against lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy in prostate cancer patients

Objectives:

This study was performed to evaluate the effects of addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin in the treatment of brachytherapy patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Methods:

Localized prostate cancer patients who developed LUTS after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) were first treated with alpha-1 blockers (tamsulosin, 0.2 mg per day). Those still suffering from LUTS were additionally treated with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (tadalafil, 5 mg/day). LUTS was evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS Quality of Life (QOL) score, Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), and the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF5) score before brachytherapy, before treatment with tadalafil, and after three months of treatment with tadalafil.

Results:

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in the study. Each subscore of the IPSS (storage symptom, voiding symptom, and postvoiding symptom) and the QOL score improved, but OABSS and IIEF5 did not show significant recovery after addition of tadalafil treatment. When patient characteristics and each question score were surveyed, time from seed implantation until treatment with tadalafil showed the strongest correlation with recovery.

Conclusions:

Addition of tadalafil to tamsulosin treatment was effective against LUTS in localised prostate cancer patients after brachytherapy.

Evidence level:

2b

Quality of life in patients who underwent 125I brachytherapy, 125I brachytherapy combined with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, or intensity-modulated radiation therapy, for prostate cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate quality of life (QOL) in prostate cancer patients treated with 125I brachytherapy (BT), 125I brachytherapy combined with 3D conformal radiation therapy (BT+3D-CRT), or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We evaluated disease-related QOL in patients who underwent BT, BT+3D-CRT, or IMRT, using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaire before treatment and at 3 and 24 months post-treatment. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with a minimum important difference (MID) in urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormone domain scores at 3 and 24 months post-treatment. Of 558 enrolled patients (IMRT, 123; BT, 230; and BT+3D-CRT, 205), urinary domain scores showed a MID after BT, BT+3D-CRT and IMRT at 3 months in 69%, 84% and 25% of patients, respectively, and at 24 months in 43%, 54% and 28% of patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, BT+3D-CRT [3 months: odds ratio (OR) = 12.7; P < 0.001; 24 months: OR = 3.29; P = 0.001] and BT (3 months: OR = 6.28; P < 0.001 and 24 months: OR = 2.22; P = 0.027) were associated with more severely worsened urinary QOL than IMRT. Bowel domain scores showed a MID at 3 months after BT, BT+3D-CRT, and IMRT in 37%, 68% and 41% of patients, respectively, and at 24 months in 29%, 46% and 43% of patients, respectively. On multivariate analysis, BT+3D-CRT (3 months: OR = 4.20; P < 0.001 and 24 months: OR = 2.63; P < 0.001) and IMRT (24 months: OR = 1.98; P = 0.029) were associated with more severely worsened bowel QOL than was BT. Information about the changes in QOL outcomes associated with radiotherapy modalities could guide treatment decisions.

Quality of life worsened the most severely in patients immediately after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the chronological changes in lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs), disease-related quality of life (QOL), and health-related QOL (HR-QOL) of patients who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Patients and methods

In 121 patients who had received IMRT and were followed up for >2 years, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), and 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) were used before IMRT, at the halfway point in IMRT, immediately after IMRT, and 1–24 months after the completion of IMRT.

Results

The IPSS and OABSS and the urinary and bowel domains of the EPIC indicated that QOL worsened at the halfway point in IMRT, further worsened more severely immediately after IMRT, and then improved. The sexual domain of the EPIC significantly decreased at the halfway point in IMRT, which significantly lowered until 24 months. The scores of physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, and role emotional domains in the SF-8 significantly decreased and reached their lowest points immediately after IMRT.

Conclusion

QOL worsened the most severely in patients immediately after IMRT for prostate cancer. This knowledge can influence treatment recommendations and enable patients to make better informed decisions.

Comparison of chronological changes in urinary function in patients who underwent low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer-A randomized controlled trial of alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist alone versus combination with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor

PURPOSE

To evaluate the add-on efficacy of a cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor on the chronological changes in urinary function in patients who underwent low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 310 patients with prostate cancer who underwent low-dose-rate-brachytherapy were enrolled. Patients were randomized and allocated to the monotherapy group (tamsulosin alone: 0.2 mg/d) and the combination group (tamsulosin 0.2 mg/d plus celecoxib: 200 mg/d). We compared the chronological change in the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS), uroflowmetric parameters, and the frequency volume chart.

RESULTS

There was not a significant difference between the two groups in the chronological changes in IPSS and OABSS for 12 months after implantation. Regarding the frequency volume chart assessment, the mean daytime urinary frequency in the combination group at 3 and 6 months after implantation was significantly lower than that in the monotherapy group. Regarding IPSS recovery at 3 months after implantation, higher baseline IPSS and nonuse of external beam radiation therapy were independent factors, while smaller prostate volume and higher baseline IPSS were independent factors of IPSS recovery at 12 months after implantation based on multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

There was not an additional effect of a COX-2 inhibitor to the action of an alpha-1 adrenoceptor antagonist on concerning the chronological changes in IPSS and OABSS. The use of a COX-2 inhibitor reduced the daytime urinary frequency and postvoid residual after seed implantation.

Oncological outcome, complications, lower urinary tract symptoms, and health-related quality of life after low-dose-rate salvage brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer following primary radiotherapy: a report of 8 cases

Purpose

We evaluated our experience with low-dose-rate salvage brachytherapy for local recurrence after primary prostate radiotherapy, and described the changes in lower urinary tract symptoms and health-related quality of life.

Material and methods

Between 2011 and 2016, eight men with local recurrence after primary prostate radiotherapy underwent iodine-125 salvage brachytherapy with a prescribed dose of 110 or 145 Gy. Recurrence-free survival was evaluated with a post-treatment prostate-specific antigen profile. The toxicity and changes in lower urinary tract symptoms and health-related quality of life during the follow-up were evaluated on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, International Prostate Symptom Score, Short Form-8, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite, respectively.

Results

The median follow-up was 12.2 months (range, 8.3-71.9) after salvage brachytherapy. Of all eight patients, two (25%) experienced treatment failure, one of whom developed left seminal vesicle recurrence 36 months after salvage brachytherapy for the right seminal vesicle recurrence, while the other developed bone metastases after 6 months. The International Prostate Symptom Scores peaked at 3 months, and returned to baseline by 6 months. The scores of all domains of health-related quality of life remained unchanged during the 12-month follow-up after salvage brachytherapy. Early grade ≤ 2 genitourinary toxicity was observed in five patients (63%), and late grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity in one patient (13%) having persistent diarrhea. No patient required intermittent catheterization and no grade 3 or greater toxicity occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions

The present study is our experiment of eight patients undergoing salvage brachytherapy, suggesting that this modality is noninvasive, safe, and an effective salvage local treatment in selected patients. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate lower urinary tract symptoms and health-related quality of life in the post-treatment period in prostate cancer patients.

Assessment of lower urinary symptom flare with overactive bladder symptom score and International Prostate Symptom Score in patients treated with iodine-125 implant brachytherapy: long-term follow-up experience at a single institute

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the combined use of the overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) as an assessment tool for urinary symptom flare after iodine-125 (¹²⁵I) implant brachytherapy. The association between urinary symptom flare and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce was investigated.

Methods

Changes in the IPSS and OABSS were prospectively recorded in 355 patients who underwent seed implantation. The percentage distribution of patients according to the difference between the flare peak and post-implant nadir was plotted to define significant increases in the scores. The clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment parameters, and post-implant dosimetric parameters were compared between the non-flare and flare groups. PSA bounce was defined as an elevation of ≥0.1 ng/mL or ≥0.4 ng/mL compared to the previous lowest value, followed by a decrease to a level at or below the pre-bounce value.

Results

A clinically significant increase required an IPSS increase of at least 12 points and an OABSS increase of at least 6 points based on a time-course analysis of total scores and the QOL index. Assessment only by IPSS failed to detect 40 patients (11%) who had urinary symptom flare according to the OABSS. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that patients treated with higher biologically effective doses and those without diabetes mellitus had higher risks of urinary flare. There was no statistical correlation between the incidence and time of urinary symptom flare onset and that of a PSA bounce.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report to prove the clinical potential of the OABSS as an assessment tool for urinary symptom flare after seed implantation. Our findings showed that persistent lower urinary tract symptoms after seed implantation were attributed to storage rather than to voiding issues. We believe that assessment with the OABSS combined with the IPSS would aid in decision-making in terms of timing, selection of a treatment intervention, and assessment of the outcome.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12894-017-0251-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Predictive Factors for Prolonged Urination Disorder After Permanent 125I Brachytherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

We assessed the change in LUTS after prostate brachytherapy to reveal factors for prolonged urination disorder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four hundred and four patients received prostate brachytherapy at our institution and were followed-up for at least 2 years. We evaluated the correlation of mean IPSS changes and clinical factors. Using multivariate analysis, we also evaluated clinical factors with potential to delay IPSS resolution.

RESULTS

In cases with prostate volume more than 30 cm³, radiation dose to 90% of prostate volume (D90) more than 160 Gy, and radiation dose to 30% of the urethral volume (UD30) more than 240 Gy, mean IPSS levels were significantly higher, even 30 months after treatment. On multivariate analysis, baseline IPSS more than 8 points and D90 more than 160 Gy were significant predictors for delayed IPSS resolution.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that higher baseline IPSS and higher D90 were predictors for prolonged urination disorder.