1
|
Muglia VF, Laschena L, Pecoraro M, de Lion Gouvea G, Colli LM, Panebianco V. Imaging assessment of prostate cancer recurrence: advances in detection of local and systemic relapse. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024:10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7. [PMID: 39254707 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04412-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2024] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) relapse, defined either by persistent PSA levels (after RP) or biochemical recurrence (BCR), is a common occurrence. The imaging evaluation of patients experiencing PCa relapse has undergone significant advancements in the past decade, notably with the introduction of new Positron Emission Tomography (PET) tracers such as Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and the progress in functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This article will explore the role of traditional imaging, the evolution of MRI towards the development of the Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) scoring system, and how next-generation imaging is enhancing diagnostic accuracy in the setting of PCa relapse, which is essential for adopting personalized strategies that may ultimately impact outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valdair Francisco Muglia
- Department of Medical Images, Oncology and Hematology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Hospital Clinicas Ribeirao Preto - Av. Bandeirantes 3900. Campus Monte Alegre -USP, Sao Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil.
| | - Ludovica Laschena
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Pecoraro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriel de Lion Gouvea
- Department of Medical Images, Oncology and Hematology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Hospital Clinicas Ribeirao Preto - Av. Bandeirantes 3900. Campus Monte Alegre -USP, Sao Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Leandro Machado Colli
- Department of Medical Images, Oncology and Hematology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Hospital Clinicas Ribeirao Preto - Av. Bandeirantes 3900. Campus Monte Alegre -USP, Sao Paulo, 14049-900, Brazil
| | - Valeria Panebianco
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Staal FHE, Janssen J, Oprea-Lager DE, Engelen AM, van Limbergen EJ, Smeenk RJ, de Jong MAA, Budiharto TCG, Jacobs I, Haverkort DMAD, Brouwer CL, Ng Wei Siang K, Langendijk JA, Verzijlbergen JF, de Jong IJ, Noordzij W, Aluwini S. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography-Based Clinical Target Volume Delineation Guideline for Postprostatectomy Salvage Radiation Therapy: The PERYTON Guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:688-696. [PMID: 37729971 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) scan is the standard imaging procedure for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer postprostatectomy because of its high detection rate at low serum prostate-specific antigen levels. However, existing guidelines for clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate bed salvage external beam radiation therapy (sEBRT) are primarily based on experience-based clinical consensus and have been validated using conventional imaging modalities. Therefore, this study aimed to optimize CTV definition in sEBRT by using PSMA PET/CT-detected local recurrences (LRs). METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients with suspected LR on PSMA PET/CT postprostatectomy were retrospectively enrolled in 9 Dutch centers. Anonymized scans were centrally reviewed by an expert nuclear medicine physician. Each boundary of the CTV guideline from the Groupe Francophone de Radiothérapie en Urologie (GFRU) was evaluated and adapted to improve the accuracy and coverage of the area at risk of LR (CTV) on PSMA PET/CT. The proposed CTV adaptation was discussed with the radiation oncologists of the participating centers, and final consensus was reached. To assess reproducibility, the participating centers were asked to delineate 3 new cases according to the new PERYTON-CTV, and the submitted contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). RESULTS After central review, 93 LRs were identified on 83 PSMA PET/CTs. The proposed CTV definition improved the coverage of PSMA PET/CT-detected LRs from 67% to 96% compared with the GFRU-CTV, while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%. The new CTV was highly reproducible, with a mean DSC of 0.82 (range, 0.81-0.83). CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the optimization of CTV definition in postprostatectomy sEBRT by using the pattern of LR detected on PSMA PET/CT. The PERYTON-CTV is highly reproducible across the participating centers and ensures coverage of 96% LRs while reducing the GFRU-CTV by 25%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor H E Staal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorinde Janssen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Evert J van Limbergen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MAASTRO Clinic, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert Jan Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Tom C G Budiharto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Jacobs
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Instituut, Vlissingen/Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Charlotte L Brouwer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kelvin Ng Wei Siang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J Fred Verzijlbergen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ingle Jan de Jong
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Awiwi MO, Gjoni M, Vikram R, Altinmakas E, Dogan H, Bathala TK, Naik S, Ravizzini G, Kandemirli SG, Elsayes KM, Salem UI. MRI and PSMA PET/CT of Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics 2023; 43:e230112. [PMID: 37999983 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer may recur several years after definitive treatment, such as prostatectomy or radiation therapy. A rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level is the first sign of disease recurrence, and this is termed biochemical recurrence. Patients with biochemical recurrence have worse survival outcomes. Radiologic localization of recurrent disease helps in directing patient management, which may vary from active surveillance to salvage radiation therapy, androgen-deprivation therapy, or other forms of systemic and local therapy. The likelihood of detecting the site of recurrence increases with higher serum PSA level. MRI provides optimal diagnostic performance for evaluation of the prostatectomy bed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET radiotracers currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration demonstrate physiologic urinary excretion, which can obscure recurrence at the vesicourethral junction. However, MRI and PSMA PET/CT have comparable diagnostic performance for evaluation of local recurrence after external-beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy. PSMA PET/CT outperforms MRI in identifying recurrence involving the lymph nodes and bones. Caveats for use of both PSMA PET/CT and MRI do exist and may cause false-positive or false-negative results. Hence, these techniques have complementary roles and should be interpreted in conjunction with each other, taking the patient history and results of any additional prior imaging studies into account. Novel PSMA agents at various stages of investigation are being developed, and preliminary data show promising results; these agents may revolutionize the landscape of prostate cancer recurrence imaging in the future. ©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available through the Online Learning Center. See the invited commentary by Turkbey in this issue. The slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad O Awiwi
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Migena Gjoni
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Raghunandan Vikram
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Emre Altinmakas
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Hakan Dogan
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Tharakeswara K Bathala
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sagar Naik
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Gregory Ravizzini
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Sedat Giray Kandemirli
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Khaled M Elsayes
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| | - Usama I Salem
- From the Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, MSB 2.132, Houston, TX 77030 (M.O.A.); Department of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey (M.G.); Departments of Abdominal Imaging (R.V., T.K.B., S.N., K.M.E., U.I.S.) and Nuclear Medicine (G.R.), Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Tex; Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (E.A.); Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey (E.A., H.D.); and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa (S.G.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koerber SA, Kroener RC, Dendl K, Kratochwil C, Fink CA, Ristau J, Winter E, Herfarth K, Hatiboglu G, Hohenfellner M, Haberkorn U, Debus J, Giesel FL. Detecting and Locating the Site of Local Relapse Using 18F-PSMA-1007 Imaging After Primary Treatment of 135 Prostate Cancer Patients-Potential Impact on PSMA-Guided Radiation Therapy. Mol Imaging Biol 2023; 25:375-383. [PMID: 35999425 PMCID: PMC10006015 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01766-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Due to limited imaging options, the visualization of a local relapse of prostate cancer used to pose a considerable challenge. However, since the integration of 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT into the clinic, a relapsed tumor can now easily be detected by hybrid imaging. The present study aimed to evaluate and map the allocate relapse in a large cohort of prostate cancer patients focusing on individual patient management conclusions for radiation therapy. PROCEDURES The current study included 135 men with prostate cancer after primary treatment who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT due to biochemical relapse detecting a local relapse. Imaging data were reassessed and analyzed with regard to relapse locations. For the correlation of tumor foci with clinical data, we used binary logistic regression models as well as the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS In total, 69.6% of all patients (mean age: 65 years) underwent prostatectomy while 30.4% underwent radiation therapy. PET imaging detected most frequently a unifocal relapse (72.6%). There was a statistically significantly higher rate of ipsilateral cases among the relapsed tumors. Comparing both treatment approaches, tumors relapsed most commonly within the posterior region after surgery and transition/peripheral zone after radiation therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The present study confirms that 18F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT is highly suitable for the localization and allocation of a local relapse in patients with prostate cancer. The data enable further optimizing dose prescriptions and target volume delineations of radiation therapy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. .,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - R C Kroener
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Dendl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Kratochwil
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C A Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Ristau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Winter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Hatiboglu
- Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Hohenfellner
- Department of Urology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim M, Hwang SI, Ahn H, Lee HJ, Byun SS, Hong SK, Lee S. Diagnostic yield of multiparametric MRI for local recurrence at biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Int 2022; 10:135-141. [PMID: 36225284 PMCID: PMC9520418 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To validate the diagnostic yield of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for local biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with biochemical recurrence using large consecutive patient data. Materials and methods Of 4632 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate adenocarcinoma, 748 patients with prostate-specific antigen > 0.2 ng/mL and second confirmatory level were retrospectively identified. Among them, 468 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were analyzed. The primary outcome measure was the diagnostic yield of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for local recurrence, and the secondary measure was its accuracy, using the response to salvage radiotherapy as reference. Results Only 33 patients (7.1%) showed positive imaging findings. The positive and negative predictive values were 84.8% (28/33) and 37.5% (45/120), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity were 27.2% (28/103) and 90% (45/50), respectively. The overall accuracy was 47.7% (73/153). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, prostate-specific antigen level at recurrence was found to be the only factor significantly higher in the positive image findings group. Conclusions The universal use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging resulted in a low-diagnostic yield for local recurrence in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. The results suggest that selective use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging should be considered in patients with a higher prostate-specific antigen threshold.
Collapse
|
6
|
Renard-Penna R, Zhang-Yin J, Montagne S, Aupin L, Bruguière E, Labidi M, Latorzeff I, Hennequin C. Targeting Local Recurrence After Surgery With MRI Imaging for Prostate Cancer in the Setting of Salvage Radiation Therapy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:775387. [PMID: 35242702 PMCID: PMC8887697 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.775387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is being increasingly used for imaging suspected recurrence in prostate cancer therapy. Functional MRI with diffusion and perfusion imaging has the potential to demonstrate local recurrence even at low PSA value. Detection of recurrence can modify the management of postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence. MRI scan acquired before salvage radiotherapy is useful for the localization of recurrent tumors and also in the delineation of the target volume. The objective of this review is to assess the role and potential impact of MRI in targeting local recurrence after surgery for prostate cancer in the setting of salvage radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaële Renard-Penna
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Jules Zhang-Yin
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - Sarah Montagne
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laurene Aupin
- Academic Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric Bruguière
- Department of Imaging, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Mouna Labidi
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Hennequin
- Department of Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Université de Paris, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Imaging assessment of local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:4073-4083. [PMID: 32248258 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02505-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Definitive therapy for prostate cancer includes radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Treatment is elected based on patient preference, biological tumor factors, and underlying health. Post prostatectomy, men are surveyed for disease recurrence with serial PSA measurements, digital rectal exam, and imaging studies depending on nomogram predicted risk of local disease recurrence and distant metastasis. In men with rising PSA levels, pathologically incomplete surgical margins or, if symptoms of metastasis develop, imaging may be obtained to localize disease. In cases of known biochemical recurrence, imaging is used to target biopsy, to contour in salvage radiation therapy and to assess disease response. For local disease recurrence, the most commonly performed exams are pelvic MRI and transrectal US. CT can evaluate for lymph node metastasis, but is suboptimal in the evaluation of the prostatectomy bed. PET/CT and PET/MRI have been used successfully to evaluate for local disease recurrence. The PI-RADSv2.1 manual provides a risk level and lexicon for use in description of prostate carcinoma prior to prostatectomy, but does not address imaging features post-surgery. A detailed description of nodal, bony, and visceral metastasis is given elsewhere. This manuscript outlines the context in which appropriate imaging exams may be obtained and focuses on imaging findings concerning for local disease recurrence after prostatectomy on various imaging modalities including CT, US, MRI, and PET.
Collapse
|
8
|
Nasser NJ, Chernyak V, Shankar V, Garg M, Bodner W, Kalnicki S, Klein J. Predictors of prostate bed recurrence on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 15:E22-E28. [PMID: 32701441 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a standard treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. Biochemical failure after RP is usually evaluated with whole-body imaging to exclude distant metastatic disease, and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect local recurrence in the prostatectomy bed. The goal of this study is to correlate disease characteristics and demographic data in patients with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after RP to determine association with MRI-detected cancer recurrence. METHODS Sixty-four patients who underwent pelvic MRI for rising PSA after RP and had complete clinical and pathological data available were included. Using Chi-squared testing, we analyzed PSA levels, pathological disease characteristics (prostate cancer risk group, Gleason score, extracapsular extension, positive surgical margin, seminal vesicle involvement, perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and PSA level before MRI), time from surgery to biochemical failure, and patient demographic characteristics as potential predictors of MRI-detected local recurrence. RESULTS Definite MRI-detected local recurrence was observed in 17/64 patients (27%). Eleven (17%) patients had a suspicious lesion with the differential of scarring, retained seminal vesicle, or recurrent cancer. Thirty-six (56%) patients had no evidence of tumor in the prostate bed or pelvis on MRI. Patient race was associated with likelihood of detecting a prostate nodule on MRI (p=0.04), with African American patients having 82% lower odds of MRI-detected tumor recurrence compared with white patients (p=0.045). No other tumor or patient characteristic was significantly associated with MRI-detected recurrence. CONCLUSIONS African American patients with biochemical failure after RP are less likely to have MRI-detectable recurrence in the prostate bed compared with white patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola J Nasser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Viswanathan Shankar
- Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Madhur Garg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - William Bodner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Shalom Kalnicki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| | - Jonathan Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the fifth leading cause of death worldwide. A variety of treatment options is available for localized prostate cancer and may range from active surveillance to focal therapy or whole gland treatment, that is, surgery or radiotherapy. Serum prostate-specific antigen levels are an important tool to monitor treatment success after whole gland treatment, unfortunately prostate-specific antigen is unreliable after focal therapy. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate is rapidly gaining field in the management of prostate cancer and may play a crucial role in the evaluation of recurrent prostate cancer. This article will focus on postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging after different forms of local therapy in patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
10
|
Francolini G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Di Cataldo V, Simontacchi G, Marvaso G, Zerella MA, Gentile P, Bianciardi F, Allegretta S, Detti B, Masi L, Lo Russo M, Livi L. Stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate bed recurrence after prostatectomy, a multicentric series. BJU Int 2019; 125:417-425. [PMID: 31608534 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the safety and effectiveness of stereotactic salvage radiotherapy (SSRT) in RT-naïve patients affected by macroscopic prostate bed recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients treated for prostate bed macroscopic recurrence in three different Italian institutes were reviewed. Patients were treated with SSRT, with a total dose of 30-40 Gy in five fractions, the mean pre-SSRT PSA level was 2.3 ng/mL. Two different PSA thresholds were defined and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) was reported, in order to better express outcome: BCRFS1 (a PSA level increase of >10% compared to the pre-SSRT value) and BCRFS2 (a PSA level increase of >0.2 ng/mL for patients with a PSA nadir of <0.2 ng/mL or two consecutive PSA level increases of >25% compared to nadir in patients with a PSA nadir of <0.2 ng/mL). RESULTS In all, 90 patients were treated, with a mean (range) follow-up of 21.2 (2-64) months, and 17 of these patients (19%) had concomitant androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) during SSRT. Complete biochemical response, defined as a PSA nadir of <0.2 ng/mL, was obtained in 39 of the 90 patients (43.3%). Considering BCRFS1, 25 patients (27.8%) had BCR, with an actuarial median BCRFS1 time of 36.4 months. For BCRFS2, BCR was reported in 32 patients (35.5%), with an actuarial median BCRFS2 time of 24.3 months. There was no Grade >2 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS SSRT was found to yield significant biochemical control and allowed ADT delay despite adverse features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, L'Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.,Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), L'Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,CyberKnife Center, L'Istituto Fiorentino di Cura e Assistenza (IFCA), Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), L'Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), L'Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Piercarlo Gentile
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) San Pietro Fatebenefratelli (FBF), Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Bianciardi
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) San Pietro Fatebenefratelli (FBF), Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Allegretta
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) San Pietro Fatebenefratelli (FBF), Rome, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Masi
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Oncology, IFCA, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Lo Russo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Biomedical, Experimental, and Clinical Sciences 'Mario Serio', University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Welch BT, Packard AT, Atwell TD, Johnson GB, Lowe VJ, Karnes RJ, Mynderse LA, Gunderson TM, Park SS, Stish BJ, Evans JD, Kwon ED, Davis BJ, Nathan MA. Percutaneous Image-Guided Nodal Biopsy After 11C-Choline PET/CT for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Imaging Predictors of Disease and Clinical Implications. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 4:79-89. [PMID: 30706014 PMCID: PMC6349661 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Management of recurrent prostate cancer necessitates timely diagnosis and accurate localization of the sites of recurrent disease. The purpose of this study was to assess predictors of histologic outcomes after 11C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CholPET) to increase the positive predictive value and specificity of CholPET in identifying imaging predictors of malignant and benign nodal disease to better inform clinical decision making regarding local therapy planning. Materials and Methods Retrospective review of patients undergoing CholPET followed by percutaneous core needle biopsy between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2016. A total of 153 patients were identified who underwent 166 biopsy procedures. Patient, CholPET, procedural, and pathologic characteristics were recorded. Results A total of 157 biopsies were technically successful, and 110 (70.1%; 95% confidence interval, 62.2-77.1) yielded histologic results abnormal for metastatic prostate cancer. Lesion location, lesion maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SUV ratio (calculated as the ratio of SUVmax to SUV mean in the right atrium), prostate-specific antigen, lesion short axis length, total Gleason score, and castration resistance were all associated with abnormal biopsy results (P values <.001, <.001, <.001, .02, .02, .02, and .015, respectively). External iliac, common iliac, and inguinal sites were associated with much lower rates of histologic positivity (mean [95% confidence interval], 51.2% [35.1-67.1], 46.2% [19.2-74.9], and 33.3% [7.5-70.1]), respectively. Conclusions In a cohort of patients in whom core needle biopsy was performed after CholPET, characteristics of choline localization including node location, SUVmax, lesion–to–blood pool SUV ratio, prostate-specific antigen, total Gleason score, and castration resistance were significantly associated with abnormal biopsy results for metastatic disease on CholPET. Relatively high false positive rates were found in common iliac, external iliac, and inguinal lymph node locations. Histologic confirmation of these sites should be strongly considered in the appropriate clinical scenario before designing additional local therapy plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian T Welch
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ann T Packard
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Val J Lowe
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jaden D Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Eugene D Kwon
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brian J Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark A Nathan
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Trump T, Luchey AM, Hogg J, Mattes MD. Intramedullary Reactive Fibrosis as Mimic of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis on 11C-Choline Positron Emission and Computed Tomography. Pract Radiat Oncol 2019; 9:e1-e3. [PMID: 30611465 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Trump
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Adam M Luchey
- Department of Urology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Jeffery Hogg
- Department of Radiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Eze C, Li M, Rogowski P, Schaefer C, Stief C, Buchner A, Zamboglou C, Fendler WP, Ganswindt U, Cyran C, Bartenstein P, Belka C, Ilhan H. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:963-970. [PMID: 30552203 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) offers unprecedented accuracy for staging of primary, persistent, or recurrent prostate cancer. Thus, we hypothesized that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy significantly affects the radiotherapeutic approach in comparison to the current standard, a CT-based approach. Methods: Between February 2014 and December 2017, 172 patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy and were included in this retrospective analysis. Twenty-two (13%) patients were referred for primary definitive radiotherapy, 51% (88/172) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence, and 36% (62/172) for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. An experienced radiation oncologist, masked to the CT and PET/CT results, decided on the radiation treatment management of all patients on the basis of the clinical and pathologic variables. The potential increase in diagnostic accuracy, and the subsequent change in radiotherapeutic approach, were documented separately for PET/CT versus CT. Results: The overall detection rate was 70% (120/172) for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Patients with a pre-PET/CT PSA level of more than 0.5 ng/mL (98/111; 88%) had PET-positive results significantly more often. Overall, PSMA PET/CT revealed 171 lesions, PET alone 156, and CT alone 85. For all patients, a continuous diagnostic increase in positive findings was observed for primary tumor/local recurrence (CT, 18%, vs. PET/CT, 37%), pelvic lymph nodes (CT, 21%, vs. PET/CT, 44%), and distant metastases (CT, 7%, vs. PET/CT, 19%) when comparing CT with PET/CT. Compared with CT, the combination of PET/CT information resulted in a change in treatment in 107 of 172 (62%) patients, that is, 8 of 22 (36%) patients before any treatment, 31 of 62 (50%) with PSA recurrence, and 68 of 88 (77%) with PSA persistence. Comparing the different radiotherapy indications with one another, there was a higher rate of change in management for postoperative patients than for patients before any treatment. Conclusion: Compared with conventional CT, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had a remarkable impact on radiotherapeutic approach, especially in postoperative patients. Thus, considering the growing amount of data on the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on postoperative patients, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has recently been endorsed by a few cancer guidelines as an imaging modality in patients with PSA persistence or recurrence (e.g., the German S3 guideline and the European Association of Urology guideline).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schaefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Clemens Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
15
|
Couñago F, Artigas C, Sancho G, Gómez-Iturriaga A, Gómez-Caamaño A, Maldonado A, Caballero B, López-Campos F, Recio M, Del Cerro E, Henríquez I. Importance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in hospital practice. View of the radiation oncologist. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2018; 37:302-314. [PMID: 30139594 DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a treatment with curative intent, both in patients with primary diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and in patients presenting with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Moreover, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy as a metastasis directed therapy in patients with oligometastatic PCa has significantly increased in the recent years. Conventional imaging techniques, including transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), morphologic magnetic resonance and bone scintigraphy have traditionally played a minor role in all those clinical scenarios due to its low diagnostic accuracy. The recent development of the positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer 68Ga-PSMA binding to the prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in PCa cells, has shown promising results. Detection rates for PCa lesions are higher than CT and higher than the best technique available, the PET/CT with choline. Its superiority has been demonstrated even at very low PSA levels (<1 ng/ml). This increase in diagnostic accuracy represents a potential impact on patient management, especially in radiotherapy. Even if this imaging technique is already available for routine clinical practice in some European countries, in Spain, unfortunately, there is very limited access. In this review, we analyze the main studies that investigate the usefulness of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with PCa and its potential impact on radiotherapy treatments. In addition, we compared the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, with the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and the PET/CT with choline, in the different clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Couñago
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España.
| | - C Artigas
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear y Terapias Metabólicas, Jules Bordet Institute, Bruselas, Bélgica
| | - G Sancho
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - A Gómez-Iturriaga
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, España
| | - A Gómez-Caamaño
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, España
| | - A Maldonado
- Departamento de Medicina Nuclear, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - B Caballero
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, España
| | - F López-Campos
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
| | - M Recio
- Departamento de Radiología, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud, Madrid, España
| | - E Del Cerro
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - I Henríquez
- Departamento de Oncología Radioterápica, Hospital Universitario de Sant Joan, Institute d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), Reus, España
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Fendler WP, Ilhan H, Herlemann A, Buchner A, Stief C, Eze C, Rogowski P, Li M, Bartenstein P, Ganswindt U, Belka C. Outcome after PSMA PET/CT based radiotherapy in patients with biochemical persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:37. [PMID: 29499730 PMCID: PMC5833127 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-0983-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PSMA PET/CT visualises prostate cancer residual disease or recurrence at lower PSA levels compared to conventional imaging and results in a change of treatment in a remarkable high number of patients. Radiotherapy with dose escalation to the former prostate bed has been associated with improved biochemical recurrence-free survival. Thus, it can be hypothesised that PSMA PET/CT-based radiotherapy might improve the prognosis of these patients. METHODS One hundred twenty-nine patients underwent PSMA PET/CT due to biochemical persistence (52%) or recurrence (48%) after radical prostatectomy without evidence of distant metastases (February 2014-May 2017) and received PSMA PET/CT-based radiotherapy. Biochemical recurrence free survival (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml) was defined as the study endpoint. RESULTS Patients with biochemical persistence were significantly more often high-risk patients with significantly shorter time interval before PSMA PET/CT than patients with biochemical recurrence. Patients with biochemical recurrence had significantly more often no evidence of disease or local recurrence only in PSMA PET/CT, whereas patients with biochemical persistence had significantly more often lymph node involvement. Seventy-three patients were started on antiandrogen therapy prior to radiotherapy due to macroscopic disease in PSMA PET/CT. Cumulatively, 70 (66-70.6) Gy was delivered to local macroscopic tumor, 66 (63-66) Gy to the prostate fossa, 61.6 (53.2-66) Gy to PET-positive lymph nodes and 50.4 (45-52.3) Gy to lymphatic pathways. Median PSA after radiotherapy was 0.07 ng/ml with 74% of patients having a PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml. After a median follow-up of 20 months, median PSA was 0.07 ng/ml with ongoing antiandrogen therapy in 30 patients. PET-positive patients without antiandrogen therapy at last follow-up (45 patients) had a median PSA of 0.05 ng/ml with 89% of all patients, 94% of patients with biochemical recurrence and 82% of patients with biochemical persistence having a PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml. Post-radiotherapy PSA ≤ 0.1 ng/ml and biochemical recurrence vs. persistence were significantly associated with a PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET/CT-based radiotherapy is an effective local salvage treatment option with significant PSA response in patients with biochemical recurrence or persistence after radical prostatectomy leading to deferral of long-term ADT or systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zumsteg ZS, Daskivich TJ, Sandler HM. Salvage Radiotherapy for Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 2017; 34:3829-3833. [PMID: 27573664 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.69.2509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice. A 67-year-old man had presented to his primary physician for routine health maintenance. A digital rectal examination was performed and revealed a suspicious nodule in the right lobe of the prostate without any extraprostatic extension. A serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was 12.4 ng/mL. He had no previous PSA tests. Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy showed Gleason 3 + 4 prostate adenocarcinoma in seven of 12 cores. Bone scan and computed tomography scan of the pelvis showed no evidence of metastatic disease, and the patient underwent a robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Pathology revealed Gleason 3 + 4 adenocarcinoma bilaterally, with extracapsular extension, no seminal vesicle invasion, a 2-mm positive margin at the right mid gland, and 0 of 15 lymph nodes containing adenocarcinoma. Two months after surgery, he had mild stress urinary incontinence and PSA of < 0.1 ng/mL. Adjuvant radiotherapy was discussed, but he elected to have careful follow-up. His PSA was monitored every 6 months and gradually increased from < 0.1 ng/mL to 0.4 ng/mL over the next 3 years. He was asymptomatic. He was referred to discuss the role of salvage radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Fendler WP, Buchner A, Stief C, Rogowski P, Niyazi M, Eze C, Li M, Bartenstein P, Belka C, Ganswindt U. Detection level and pattern of positive lesions using PSMA PET/CT for staging prior to radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:176. [PMID: 29126446 PMCID: PMC5681820 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0902-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To determine the potential role of 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in radiotherapy (RT) planning for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods One hundred twenty-nine patients (pts) with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were retrospectively analysed. Potentially influencing factors (androgen deprivation therapy, amount of 68Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC, PSA doubling time ≤/> 10 months, PSA before PET/CT, T−/N-category and Gleason score) were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. The detection rate of PSMA PET/CT was compared to contrast enhanced CT and its impact on RT management analysed. Results One hundred twenty-nine patients (pts) (20 at initial diagnosis, 49 with PSA relapse and 60 with PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy) received PSMA PET/CT prior to RT. The majority of pts. (71.3%) had PET-positive findings (55.1% of pts. with PSA recurrence, 75% of pts. with PSA persistence and 100% of newly diagnosed pts). Median PSA before PET/CT in pts. with pathological findings (n = 92) was 1.90 ng/ml and without (n = 37) 0.30 ng/ml. PSA level at time of PET/CT was the only factor associated with PET-positivity. In pts. with a PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml, the detection rate of any lesion was 33.3%, with a PSA of 0.21–0.5 ng/ml 41.2% and with a PSA of 0.51–1.0 ng/ml 69.2%, respectively. Regarding the anatomic distribution of lesions, 42.2% and 14.7% of pts. with relapse or persistence had pelvic lymph node and distant metastases. In pts. at initial diagnosis the detection rate of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases was 20% and 10%. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had a high detection rate of PCa recurrence outside the prostatic fossa in pts. being considered for salvage RT (22.4% PET-positive pelvic lymph nodes and 4.1% distant metastases). Compared to CT, PSMA PET/CT had a significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing rates of local recurrence/primary tumour (10.1% vs. 38%), lymph nodes (15.5% vs. 38.8%) and distant metastases (5.4% vs. 14.0%). This resulted in a modification of RT treatment in 56.6% of pts. Conclusions The detection of PCa is strongly associated with PSA level at time of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. PSMA PET/CT differentiates between local, regional and distant metastatic disease with implications for disease management. PSMA PET/CT allows for tumour detection in post-prostatectomy pts. with PSA ≤ 0.5 ng/ml considered for salvage RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstr. 35, A-6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Prostate cancer post-prostatectomy radiotherapy: CT vs MRI for vesico-urethral anastomosis target delineation. Radiother Oncol 2017; 125:113-117. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
20
|
Couñago F, Sancho G, Catalá V, Hernández D, Recio M, Montemuiño S, Hernández JA, Maldonado A, del Cerro E. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer before radical and salvage radiotherapy: What radiation oncologists need to know. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8:305-319. [PMID: 28848697 PMCID: PMC5554874 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Revised: 03/30/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is one of the principal curative treatments for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Risk group classification is based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and T-stage. After risk group determination, the treatment volume and dose are defined and androgen deprivation therapy is prescribed, if appropriate. Traditionally, imaging has played only a minor role in T-staging due to the low diagnostic accuracy of conventional imaging strategies such as transrectal ultrasound, computed tomography, and morphologic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). As a result, a notable percentage of tumours are understaged, leading to inappropriate and imprecise EBRT. The development of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), an imaging technique that combines morphologic studies with functional diffusion-weighted sequences and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of PCa. As a result, mpMRI is now used in staging PCa prior to EBRT, with possible implications for both risk group classification and treatment decision-making for EBRT. mpMRI is also being used in salvage radiotherapy (SRT), the treatment of choice for patients who develop biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. In the clinical context of biochemical relapse, it is essential to accurately determine the site of recurrence - pelvic (local, nodal, or bone) or distant - in order to select the optimal therapeutic management approach. Studies have demonstrated the value of mpMRI in detecting local recurrences - even in patients with low PSA levels (0.3-0.5 ng/mL) - and in diagnosing bone and nodal metastasis. The main objective of this review is to update the role of mpMRI prior to radical EBRT or SRT. We also consider future directions for the use and development of MRI in the field of radiation oncology.
Collapse
|
21
|
Latorzeff I, Sargos P, Loos G, Supiot S, Guerif S, Carrie C. Delineation of the Prostate Bed: The "Invisible Target" Is Still an Issue? Front Oncol 2017; 7:108. [PMID: 28620579 PMCID: PMC5449739 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 05/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
For pathological high-risk prostate cancer, adjuvant irradiation has shown a survival benefit. Phase III studies have highlighted that half men would face biochemical relapse and would be candidate for radiotherapy at adjuvant or salvage times. Despite at least four published international contouring guidelines from different collaborative groups, discrepancies remain for volumes, delineation, and margins to be considered in order to optimize radiotherapy planning. This article from “Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs UroGénitales (GETUG)” members will focus on controversies to help clinicians to create best volume delineation for adjuvant or salvage post prostatectomy radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Latorzeff
- Department of Oncology Radiotherapy, Bât Atrium, Clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - Geneviève Loos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Jean-Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Stéphane Supiot
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest René Gauducheau, Nantes, France
| | - Stéphane Guerif
- Department of Radiotherapy, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Couñago F, Recio M, Maldonado A, Del Cerro E, Díaz-Gavela AA, Thuissard IJ, Sanz-Rosa D, Marcos FJ, Olaciregui K, Mateo M, Cerezo L. Evaluation of tumor recurrences after radical prostatectomy using 18F-Choline PET/CT and 3T multiparametric MRI without endorectal coil: a single center experience. Cancer Imaging 2016; 16:42. [PMID: 27927229 PMCID: PMC5142428 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-016-0099-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate and compare the utility of 18F-fluorocholine (18F-CH) PET/CT versus 3-Tesla multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) without endorectal coil to detect tumor recurrences in patients with biochemical relapse following radical prostatectomy (RP). Secondarily, to identify possible prognostic variables associated with mpMRI and 18F-CH PET/CT findings. METHODS Retrospective study of 38 patients who developed biochemical recurrence after RP between the years 2011 and 2015 at our institution. PET/CT and mpMRI were both performed within 30 days of each other in all patients. The PET/CT was reviewed by a nuclear medicine specialist while the mpMRI was assessed by a radiologist, both of whom were blinded to outcomes. RESULTS The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value pre-MRI/PET-CT was 0.9 ng/mL (interquartile range 0.4-2.2 ng/mL). There were no differences in the detection rate between 18F-CH PET/CT and mpMRI for local recurrence (LR), lymph node recurrence (LNR) and bone metastases (BM). Separately, mpMRI and 18F-CH PET/CT were positive for recurrence in 55.2% and 52.6% of cases, respectively, and in 65.7% of cases when findings from both modalities were considered together. The detection of LR was better with combined mpMRI and choline PET/CT versus choline PET/CT alone (34.2% vs 18.4%, p = 0.04). Salvage treatment was modified in 22 patients (57.8%) based on the imaging findings. PSA values on the day of biochemical failure were significantly associated with mpMRI positivity (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 30.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5-635.8). Gleason score > 7 was significantly associated with PET/CT positivity (OR: 13.9; 95% CI: 1.5-125.6). A significant association was found between PSA doubling time (PSADT) (OR: 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0-1.7), T stage (OR: 21.1; 95% CI: 1.6-272.1), and LR. CONCLUSIONS Multiparametric MRI and 18F-CH PET/CT yield similar detection rates for LR, LNR and pelvic BM. The combination of both imaging techniques provides a better LR detection versus choline PET/CT alone. The initially planned salvage treatment was modified in 57.8% of patients due to imaging findings. In addition to PSA values, Gleason score, T stage, and PSADT may provide valuable data to identify those patients that are most likely to benefit from undergoing both imaging procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid, Calle Diego de Velazquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Manuel Recio
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Universitario Quiron, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Maldonado
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Quiron, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elia Del Cerro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid, Calle Diego de Velazquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid, Calle Diego de Velazquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Israel J Thuissard
- School of Doctoral Studies and Research, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz-Rosa
- School of Doctoral Studies and Research, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco José Marcos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quiron Madrid, Calle Diego de Velazquez, 1, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karmele Olaciregui
- Clinical Department, School of Biomedical Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Mateo
- Hospital Universitario Quiron, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Cerezo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Vargas HA, Martin-Malburet AG, Takeda T, Corradi RB, Eastham J, Wibmer A, Sala E, Zelefsky MJ, Weber WA, Hricak H. Localizing sites of disease in patients with rising serum prostate-specific antigen up to 1ng/ml following prostatectomy: How much information can conventional imaging provide? Urol Oncol 2016; 34:482.e5-482.e10. [PMID: 27346339 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.05.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 05/24/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate identification of the source of a detectable serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the postprostatectomy setting is a major challenge among the urologic community. The aim of this study was to assess positivity rates of imaging examinations performed in patients with early PSA rise after prostatectomy and to summarize the management strategies adopted in this clinical scenario. METHODS Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study of 142 postprostatectomy patients with PSA rise up to 1ng/ml who underwent evaluation with combination of multiparametric pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)±whole-body or bone MRI, bone scintigraphy, computed tomography (CT) chest-abdomen-pelvis, 18F-fludeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or 18F-sodium fluoride-PET/CT at a single tertiary cancer center. Imaging results were summarized per modality and compared with pathology findings. RESULTS Pelvic MRI was positive in 15/142 (11%) patients (14 patients with local recurrence in the surgical bed and 1 patient with pelvic osseous metastases). Of these 15, 10 patients underwent additional imaging examinations; none revealed positive findings. Of the 127 patients with negative pelvic MRI, 54 (43%) underwent additional imaging examinations; only 1/54 had positive findings (false-positive T8 lesion on bone scintigraphy and FDG-PET/CT; biopsy was negative for cancer). Overall, 12/16 patients with positive imaging findings and 75/126 (60%) patients with negative imaging received treatment (radiation, hormones or chemotherapy). CONCLUSION The conventional imaging identified sites of disease, almost always in the form of local recurrence, in a minority of patients with early PSA rise postprostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Renato B Corradi
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James Eastham
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andreas Wibmer
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hedvig Hricak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|