1
|
Mazzone E, Thomson A, Chen DC, Cannoletta D, Quarta L, Pellegrino A, Gandaglia G, Moon D, Eapen R, Lawrentschuk N, Montorsi F, Siva S, Hofman MS, Chiti A, Briganti A, Perera ML, Murphy DG. The Role of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Assessment of Local Recurrence and Distant Metastases in Patients with Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Definitive Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2025:S0302-2838(25)00285-4. [PMID: 40393864 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2025] [Revised: 04/21/2025] [Accepted: 05/06/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Positron emission tomography (PET) with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligands has an established role in the assessment of recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) after primary treatment. However, an updated understanding of its diagnostic utility is warranted, particularly in the context of emerging targeted and systemic treatment options for recurrent PC. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSMA PET for staging and detection of local or metastatic disease in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following definitive treatment for PC. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (Web of Science/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from inception to April 25, 2024) and meta-analysis. Eligible retrospective and prospective studies had extractable data on PSMA PET for patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation therapy (RT). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Random-effects models were used to evaluate PSMA PET positivity rates across clinical subgroups stratified by PSA, primary treatment, PSMA PET radioligand, and anatomic lesion sites. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 43 studies (8119 patients) were included. PSMA PET positivity rates varied substantially among patients with BCR after primary definitive treatment, with significant study heterogeneity (τ2 = 0.6; p < 0.001), which was mitigated in part after stratification by PSA category. Positivity rates were significantly higher after RT (92%) than after RP (60%; p < 0.001). PSMA PET positivity by anatomic location was 23% for local recurrence, 32% for pelvic nodes, 14% for extrapelvic nodes, 16% for bone metastases, and just 1% for visceral metastases. The positivity rate increased with PSA, from 48% at PSA 0.2-0.5 ng/ml to >90% at PSA >2 ng/ml. Gleason score (GS) at RP did not significantly influence the positivity rate (50% for GS ≤7 vs 62% for GS 8-10; p = 0.08). Heterogeneity limits the generalisability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS We observed substantial variability in PSMA PET positivity rates in BCR because of significant study heterogeneity, mostly related to differences in treatment type, PSA, and anatomic sites. In post-RP BCR, approximately half of patients undergoing PSMA PET had positive findings, even at low PSA (0.2-0.5 ng/ml). In the post-RT setting, PSMA PET use was generally aligned with the Phoenix criterion for BCR, with most studies performing PSMA PET at PSA ≥2 ng/ml. Further research is needed to refine PSA thresholds for PSMA PET, particularly in the post-RT setting, and to assess its role in guiding salvage treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio Mazzone
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alice Thomson
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David C Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Quarta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Antony Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Moon
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Royal Melbourne Clinical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marlon L Perera
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Urology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Giorgio A, Siepe G, Serani F, Di Franco M, Malizia C, Castellucci P, Fanti S, Farolfi A. Long-term outcomes of PSMA PET/CT-guided radiotherapy in biochemical failure patients post-radical prostatectomy: a 5-year follow-up analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2025:10.1007/s00259-025-07255-6. [PMID: 40186765 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07255-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2025] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT-guided salvage radiotherapy (sRT) in improving long-term biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) or PSA persistence (PERS) after radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. METHODS This single-center retrospective study included 100 patients with BCR or PERS after RP who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and sRT according to EAU guidelines. The primary endpoint was bRFS (PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/ml). RESULTS Sixty-three patients had BCR and 37 had PERS. Fifteen patients had PSA pre-RT < 0.5 ng/ml, while 75 had PSA pre-RT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml. [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was positive in 52 patients, with BCR patients more frequently exhibiting local recurrence while PERS patients showed more nodal involvement. Patients with PERS received sRT and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in 57% of cases. The hazard ratio (HR) of treatment failure for patients with PSA pre-RT ≥ 0.5 ng/ml vs. < 0.5 ng/ml was 2.2 (p < 0.039). With a median follow-up of 59 months, treatment failure occurred in 36% of patients, with no difference between BCR and PERS groups. Among those with treatment failure, 64% were [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT positive at recurrence, and 39% received a new PSMA PET/CT-based RT. All patients were alive at the last analysis. CONCLUSION [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-guided sRT demonstrates significant long-term efficacy in patients with BCR or PERS after RP, leading to durable PSA response and guiding further treatment decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION 244/2016/O/Oss8 November 2016 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Giorgio
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy.
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Francesca Serani
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine DIMED, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Martina Di Franco
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy
| | - Claudio Malizia
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, Bologna, 40138, Italy
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maldonado X, Boladeras A, Gaya JM, Muñoz J, Planas J, Sancho G, Suárez JF. Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel. Clin Transl Oncol 2025:10.1007/s12094-024-03833-6. [PMID: 39747804 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03833-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2024] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diagnosing and managing biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) following primary radical treatment remain a challenge. Implementing next-generation imaging (NGI) techniques has improved metastases detection. However, access to these techniques is heterogeneous, and controversies surround their use and subsequent treatment decisions. In November 2023, a multidisciplinary expert meeting was organized to discuss these aspects. This information was further reviewed in November 2024. AREAS COVERED NGI-specific tracers' selection, evidence supporting patient selection for NGI after BRC, current treatment strategies in patients with BRC, and the role of NGIs in current and future therapeutic approaches. EXPERT OPINION Despite improved detection performance compared to conventional imaging techniques, the application of NGIs to treatment decision-making and the impact on patient outcomes are yet to be proven. Given the lack of guidance, opinions and recommendations from multidisciplinary expert panels are valuable for diagnosing and adequately treating patients with BRC after radical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Maldonado
- Radiation Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Anna Boladeras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia. L'Hospitalet del Llobregat University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José María Gaya
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jesús Muñoz
- Urology Department, Consorci Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jacques Planas
- Urology Department, Barcelona Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gemma Sancho
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Francisco Suárez
- Urology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet del Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wegen S, Nestle U, Zamboglou C, Spohn SKB, Nicolay NH, Unterrainer LM, Koerber SA, La Fougère C, Fokas E, Kobe C, Eze C, Grosu AL, Fendler WP, Holzgreve A, Werner R, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. Implementation of PET/CT in radiation oncology-a patterns-of-care analysis of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine and the German Society of Radiation Oncology. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:931-941. [PMID: 39120747 PMCID: PMC11527913 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02260-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 06/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in radiation therapy (RT) has increased. Radiation oncologists (RadOncs) have access to PET/CT with a variety of tracers for different tumor entities and use it for target volume definition. The German Society of Nuclear Medicine (DGN) and the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) aimed to identify current patterns of care in order to improve interdisciplinary collaboration. METHODS We created an online survey on participating RadOncs' use of PET tracers for different tumor entities and how they affect RT indication, dose prescription, and target volume definition. Further topics were reimbursement of PET/CT and organizational information (fixed timeslots and use of PET with an immobilization device [planning/RT-PET]). The survey contained 31 questions in German language (yes/no questions, multiple choice [MC] questions, multiple select [MS] questions, and free-text entry options). The survey was distributed twice via the DEGRO member mailing list. RESULTS During the survey period (May 22-August 7, 2023) a total of 156 RadOncs (13% of respondents) answered the survey. Among these, 59% reported access to diagnostic PET/CT within their organization/clinic and 24% have fixed timeslots for their patients. 37% of survey participants can perform RT-PET and 29% have the option of providing a dedicated RT technician for planning PET. Besides [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG; mainly used in lung cancer: 95%), diagnostic prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT for RT of prostate cancer is routinely used by 44% of participants (by 64% in salvage RT). Use of amino acid PET in brain tumors and somatostatin receptor PET in meningioma is low (19 and 25%, respectively). Scans are reimbursed through private (75%) or compulsory (55%) health insurance or as part of indications approved by the German Joint Federal Committee (Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss; 59%). 98% of RadOncs agree that PET impacts target volume definition and 62% think that it impacts RT dose prescription. DISCUSSION This is the first nationwide survey on the role of PET/CT for RT planning among RadOncs in Germany. We find high acceptance of PET results for treatment decisions and target volume definition. Planning PET comes with logistic challenges for different healthcare settings (e.g., private practices vs. university hospitals). The decision to request PET/CT is often based on the possibility of reimbursement. CONCLUSION PET/CT has become an important tool for RadOncs, with several indications. However, access is still limited at several sites, especially for dedicated RT-PET. This study aims to improve interdisciplinary cooperation and adequate implementation of current guidelines for the treatment of various tumor entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Wegen
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Simon K B Spohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils Henrik Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan A Koerber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Barmherzige Brüder Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Christian La Fougère
- Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Emmanouil Fokas
- Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- PET committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, (DGN), Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, (DGN), Germany
| | - Adrien Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- PET committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, (DGN), Germany
| | - Rudolf Werner
- Divison of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Brunckhorst O, Darraugh J, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M, Farolfi A, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Henry AM, Lardas M, van Leenders GJLH, Liew M, Linares Espinos E, Oldenburg J, van Oort IM, Oprea-Lager DE, Ploussard G, Roberts MJ, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Schouten N, Smith EJ, Stranne J, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Tilki D. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2024; 86:148-163. [PMID: 38614820 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa. METHODS The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Cornford
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julie Darraugh
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Gert De Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, USI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Nikolaos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Jan Oldenburg
- Akershus University Hospital (Ahus), Lørenskog, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge M van Oort
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Department of Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, UFR Lyon-Est, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emma J Smith
- European Association of Urology, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - Johan Stranne
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bock F, Frerker B, Schubert L, Rennau H, Kurth J, Krause BJ, Hildebrandt G, Schwarzenböck SM. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on radiation treatment planning of prostate cancer patients. Nuklearmedizin 2024; 63:199-206. [PMID: 38580313 DOI: 10.1055/a-2284-0593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to assess the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on radiation treatment (RT) planning in prostate cancer patients with salvage (sRT) or definitive (dRT) radiotherapy. METHODS 38 patients (27 sRT, median PSA 0.79 ng/ml (range 0.06-12.1); 11 dRT, median PSA 4.35 ng/ml (range 1.55-55.5) underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before RT. Influence of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the extent of planning target volume (PTV) and addition of PET-based boosts were assessed. Median follow up was 12 months (range 3-24). RESULTS 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT showed positive findings in 23/38 patients (8/23: local recurrence (LR), 11/23: nodal metastasis, 1/23: LR and nodal, 2/23: solitary bone metastasis, 1/23: oligometastatic nodal/ bone metastases). In sRT primary PTV was changed in 16/27 patients extending the PTV to the lymphatic drainage (10/16), PSMA-positive LR (3/16), bone metastases (2/16) and both nodal/bone metastases (1/16). PET-based increase of primary PTV was 116%. PET-based boosts were administered in 19/27 patients (8/19: local, 10/19: nodal, 1/19: both), median boost volume was 31.3 cm3 (range 17.2-80.2) (local) and 19.7 cm3 (range 3.0-109.3) (nodal). PTV was changed in 1/11 (9%) of dRT patients (extension of primary PTV to the lymphatic drainage (RT volume of 644.5 cm3), additional nodal boost (volume of 2.7 cm3, 23.1 Gy)). All patients showed biochemical response (mean PSA decrease 88.8 +/- 14.0%). Nadir PSA was reached 10 months (range 1-17) after end of RT (median 0.07 ng/ml, range 0.002-3.96). Within a median 12 months follow-up (range 3-22/8-24 in sRT/dRT), median PSA was 0.05 ng/ml (range 0.002-8.5) (sRT) and 0.26 ng/ml (range 0.02-2.68) (dRT). CONCLUSIONS 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT influenced sRT planning in almost 63% and dRT in 9% of patients by change of PTV and additional boosts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Bock
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd Frerker
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Laura Schubert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hannes Rennau
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Guido Hildebrandt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Khanna Y, Chinni V, Gnanasambantham K, O'Sullivan R, Ballok ZE, Ryan A, Ramdave S, Sivaratnam D, Bowden P, Guerrieri M, Ranasinghe WKB, Frydenberg M. Can 68 Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography and multiparametric MRI guide treatment for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy? BJU Int 2023; 132:321-328. [PMID: 37190993 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and Gallium-68 (68 Ga)-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in guiding salvage therapy for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) post-radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were evaluated with paired mpMRI and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans for BCR (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >0.2 ng/mL). Patient, tumour, PSA and imaging characteristics were analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 117 patients underwent paired scans to investigate BCR, of whom 53.0% (62/117) had detectable lesions on initial scans and 47.0% (55/117) did not. Of those without detectable lesions, 8/55 patients proceeded to immediate salvage radiotherapy (sRT) and 47/55 were observed. Of patients with negative imaging who were initially observed, 46.8% (22/47) did not reach threshold for repeat imaging, while 53.2% were rescanned due to rising PSA levels. Of these rescanned patients, 31.9% (15/47) were spared sRT due to proven distant disease, or due to absence of disease on repeat imaging. Of the original 117 patients, 53 (45.3%) were spared early sRT due to absence of disease on imaging or presence of distant disease, while those undergoing delayed sRT still maintained good PSA responses. Of note, patients with high-risk features who underwent sRT despite negative imaging demonstrated satisfactory PSA responses to sRT. Study limitations include the observational design and absence of cause-specific or overall survival data. CONCLUSION Our findings support the use of mpMRI and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in guiding timing and necessity of salvage therapy tailored to detected lesions, with potential to reduce unnecessary sRT-related morbidity. Larger or randomized trials are warranted to validate this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yash Khanna
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Monash Health, Clayton, Vic., Australia
| | - Vidyasagar Chinni
- Australian Urology Associates, Malvern, Vic., Australia
- Northern Health, Epping, Vic., Australia
| | - Kavitha Gnanasambantham
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Weranja K B Ranasinghe
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Monash Health, Clayton, Vic., Australia
- Austin Health, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Australian Urology Associates, Malvern, Vic., Australia
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia
- Cabrini Institute, Cabrini Health, Malvern, Vic., Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yap SZL, Armstrong S, Aherne N, Shakespeare TP. PSMA-PET-guided dose-escalated volumetric arc therapy for newly diagnosed lymph node-positive prostate cancer: 5 Year outcomes following the FROGG and EviQ node-positive guidelines. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023. [PMID: 37186452 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) Faculty of Radiation Oncology Genitourinary Group (FROGG) guidelines and online EviQ protocols incorporate prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)-guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT) for newly diagnosed lymph node (LN) positive prostate cancer. We evaluated late toxicity and efficacy outcomes following the FROGG and EviQ approach. METHODS Patients with LN-positive-only metastases on PSMA-PET imaging were offered curative therapy with 3 months neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by DE-IMRT and 3 years adjuvant ADT. IMRT was delivered via volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). We aimed to deliver 81 Gy in 45 fractions (Fx) to the prostate and PET-positive LNs, and 60 Gy in 45 Fx to elective pelvic nodes, contoured using the PIVOTAL guidelines. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included. The median number of PET-positive nodes boosted was 2 (range 1-6) and median boost volume 1.16 cc (range 0.15-4.14). Seventeen (38%) patients had PET-positive nodes outside of PIVOTAL contouring guidelines. With 60 months median follow-up, disease-free, metastasis-free, prostate cancer-specific and overall survival were 88.1%, 95.3%, 100% and 91.5%. There were no in-field nodal failures. Late grade 1, 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 4%, 2% and 0% of patients, and genitourinary toxicity in 18%, 18% and 4%. Lower limb grade 2 lymphoedema occurred in three patients (7%). CONCLUSION Outcomes following FROGG guidelines and EviQ are promising, with high long-term disease control and low toxicity. Contouring guidelines require modification due to the high rate of PET-positive nodes demonstrated beyond recommended coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaun Zheng Liang Yap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shreya Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, North Coast Cancer Institute, Lismore Base Hospital, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Noel Aherne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas Philip Shakespeare
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:128-136. [PMID: 36804735 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) had a substantial impact on the management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients with a stage migration phenomenon and consequent treatment changes. OBJECTIVE To summarise the role of PSMA-PET to define the burden of disease through an accurate location of metastatic site(s) in PCa patients, describing the most common locations at PSMA-PET in the primary staging and recurrence setting, and to assess the clinical impact in the decision-making process. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A comprehensive nonsystematic literature review was performed in April 2022. Literature search was updated until March 2022. The most relevant studies have been summarised, giving priority to registered clinical trials and multicentre collaborations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSMA-PET showed higher diagnostic accuracy than conventional imaging both in newly diagnosed PCa and in recurrent disease. This greater accuracy led to a migration of a higher proportion of patients identified with metastatic disease. Bone metastases were reported as the most frequent site of metastatic spread in staging (up to 17%) and restaging (up to 18%). In staging, considering the suboptimal sensitivity in lymph node metastasis detection prior to radical surgery, PSMA-PET should be performed in patients with high risk or unfavourable intermediate risk only, and it is not recommended to routinely avoid pelvic lymph node dissection in case of a negative scan. In case of prostate-specific antigen relapse, PSMA-PET had higher diagnostic accuracy than other diagnostic procedures in the early detection of the sites of recurrence, thus influencing the therapy decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS PSMA-PET detects a higher number of lesions than conventional imaging or other PET radiotracers, especially metastatic lesions unseen with other modalities. The high diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET leads to a significant patient upstage and thus an impact in clinical management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) identifies metastatic lesions with higher accuracy than conventional imaging, both in primary prostate cancer and during disease recurrence. Skeletal metastasis and extrapelvic lymph nodes are the most common sites of metastatic spread. The high accuracy of PSMA-PET in the detection of metastatic disease led to a significant impact on patient management, even if the overall impact on cancer mortality is still to be assessed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Perera M, Lebdai S, Tin AL, Sjoberg DD, Benfante N, Beech BB, Alvim RG, Touijer AS, Jenjitranant P, Ehdaie B, Laudone VP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Touijer KA. Oncologic outcomes of patients with lymph node invasion at prostatectomy and post-prostatectomy biochemical persistence. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:105.e19-105.e23. [PMID: 36435708 PMCID: PMC10391319 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathologic nodal invasion at prostatectomy is frequently associated with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and with increased risk of disease recurrence. Management strategies for these patients are poorly defined. We aimed to explore the long-term oncologic outcomes and patterns of disease progression. METHODS We included men treated between 2000 and 2017 who had lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy and persistently detectable prostate-specific antigen post-prostatectomy. Postoperative imaging and management strategies were collated. Patterns of recurrence and probability of metastasis-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS Among our cohort of 253 patients, 126 developed metastasis. Twenty-five had a positive scan within 6 months of surgery; of these, 15 (60%) had a nodal metastasis, 10 (40%) had a bone metastasis, and 4 (16%) had local recurrence. For metastasis-free survival, 5- and 10-year probabilities were 52% (95% CI 45%, 58%) and 37% (95% CI 28%, 46%), respectively. For prostate cancer-specific survival, 5- and 10-year probabilities were 89% (95% CI 84%, 93%) and 67% (95% CI 57%, 76%), respectively. A total of 221 patients proceeded to hormonal deprivation treatment alone. Ten patients received postoperative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Biochemical persistence in patients with lymph node invasion is associated with high risk of disease progression and reduced prostate cancer-specific survival. Management was hindered by the limitation of imaging modalities utilized during the study period in accurately detecting residual disease. Novel molecular imaging may improve staging and help design a therapeutic strategy adapted to patients' specific needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Souhil Lebdai
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, University of Angers, France
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nicole Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin B Beech
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ricardo G Alvim
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Adam S Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Pocharapong Jenjitranant
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Vincent P Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Roberts MJ, Maurer T, Perera M, Eiber M, Hope TA, Ost P, Siva S, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, Emmett L, Fendler WP. Using PSMA imaging for prognostication in localized and advanced prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:23-47. [PMID: 36473945 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00670-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The use of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed applications in modern prostate cancer management has evolved rapidly over the past few years, helping to establish new treatment pathways and provide further insights into prostate cancer biology. However, the prognostic implications of PSMA-PET have not been studied systematically, owing to rapid clinical implementation without long follow-up periods to determine intermediate-term and long-term oncological outcomes. Currently available data suggest that traditional prognostic factors and survival outcomes are associated with high PSMA expression (both according to immunohistochemistry and PET uptake) in men with localized and biochemically recurrent disease. Treatment with curative intent (primary and/or salvage) often fails when PSMA-positive metastases are present; however, the sensitivity of PSMA-PET in detecting all metastases is poor. Low PSMA-PET uptake in recurrent disease is a favourable prognostic factor; however, it can be associated with poor prognosis in conjunction with high 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clinical trials embedding PSMA-PET for guiding management with reliable oncological outcomes are needed to support ongoing clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Roberts
- Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Department of Urology, Redcliffe Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, GZA Ziekenhuizen, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bukavina L, Luckenbaugh AN, Hofman MS, Hope T, Kamran SC, Murphy DG, Yamoah K, Ost P. Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2022; 83:521-533. [PMID: 36404204 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings. OBJECTIVE To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with 68Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting. CONCLUSIONS Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined. PATIENT SUMMARY PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinical Value of PET.CT Based on Big Data in Colorectal and Peritoneal Metastatic Cancer. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:6120337. [PMID: 36262991 PMCID: PMC9546711 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6120337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
This study focuses on the evaluation of the clinical utility of PET-CT imaging in peritoneal metastases and colorectal cancer. One hundred patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases, who underwent whole-body PET-CT imaging from January 2015 to December 2019, were selected as the experimental group, and 20 healthy individuals were selected as the control group. The SUVmax of the two groups of patients was 5.73 ± 3.84 and 2.70 ± 2.32, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The SUVmax AUC was 0.720, and the AUC of serum AFP, CEA, CA125, and CA199 were 0.596, 0.677, 0.642, and 0.696, respectively. Conclusion. 100 patients with colorectal and peritoneal metastatic cancer underwent PET/CT examination. The follow-up or other imaging examinations confirmed the diagnosis. Analysis of the ROC curve in this study found that with a peritoneal SUVmax> 3.2 as the diagnostic index for colorectal peritoneal metastatic cancer, the sum of sensitivity and specificity reached the maximum.
Collapse
|
14
|
Mukherjee AG, Wanjari UR, Prabakaran DS, Ganesan R, Renu K, Dey A, Vellingiri B, Kandasamy S, Ramesh T, Gopalakrishnan AV. The Cellular and Molecular Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10081370. [PMID: 36016257 PMCID: PMC9416492 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent history, immunotherapy has become a viable cancer therapeutic option. However, over many years, its tenets have changed, and it now comprises a range of cancer-focused immunotherapies. Clinical trials are currently looking into monotherapies or combinations of medicines that include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), CART cells, DNA vaccines targeting viruses, and adoptive cellular therapy. According to ongoing studies, the discipline should progress by incorporating patient-tailored immunotherapy, immune checkpoint blockers, other immunotherapeutic medications, hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Despite significantly increasing morbidity, immunotherapy can intensify the therapeutic effect and enhance immune responses. The findings for the immunotherapy treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) are compiled in this study, showing that is possible to investigate the current state of immunotherapy, covering new findings, PCa treatment techniques, and research perspectives in the field’s unceasing evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirban Goutam Mukherjee
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Uddesh Ramesh Wanjari
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - D. S. Prabakaran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Chungdae-ro 1, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea
- Department of Biotechnology, Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College (Autonomous), Srivilliputhur Main Road, Sivakasi 626124, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Raja Ganesan
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Diseases, Hallym University, Chuncheon 24252, Korea
| | - Kaviyarasi Renu
- Centre of Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics (COMManD), Department of Biochemistry, Saveetha Dental College & Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 600077, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Abhijit Dey
- Department of Life Sciences, Presidency University, Kolkata 700073, West Bengal, India
| | - Balachandar Vellingiri
- Human Molecular Cytogenetics and Stem Cell Laboratory, Department of Human Genetics and Molecular Biology, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore 641046, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Sabariswaran Kandasamy
- Water-Energy Nexus Laboratory, Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Seoul 02504, Korea
| | - Thiyagarajan Ramesh
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 173, Al-Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abilash Valsala Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The Role of PSMA PET/CT in the Primary Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Prostate Cancer-A Practical Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153638. [PMID: 35892897 PMCID: PMC9367536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The combination of positron emission tomography (PET)-diagnostics with ligands binding to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been a diagnostic milestone in the situation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and is gaining importance in primary diagnostics, providing a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method in various clinical situations. However, the clinical application of this method requires a comprehensive knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages, potential pitfalls and influencing factors. This review aims to provide a practical clinical review of the currently available background data on PSMA PET/CT, as well as the clinical implications. Although a large amount of data already exist, a thorough analysis is complicated by study heterogeneity, showing the need for future systematic and prospective research. Abstract The importance of PSMA PET/CT in both primary diagnostics and prostate cancer recurrence has grown steadily since its introduction more than a decade ago. Over the past years, a vast amount of data have been published on the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management. Nevertheless, a large heterogeneity between studies has made reaching a consensus difficult; this review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the available scientific literature, covering the currently known data on physiological and pathological PSMA expression, influencing factors, the differences and pitfalls of various tracers, as well as the clinical implications in initial TNM-staging and in the situation of biochemical recurrence. This review has the objective of providing a practical clinical overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the examination in various clinical situations and the body of knowledge available, as well as open questions still requiring further research.
Collapse
|
16
|
Clinicopathological and oncological significance of persistent prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Urol 2022. [PMID: 37538158 PMCID: PMC10394292 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the association of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with clinicopathological features and long-term oncological prognosis for the development of a potential management strategy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science up to June 2021 to identify the eligible studies focusing on understanding the impact of persistent PSA in patients who underwent RP for localized prostate cancer. Meta-analyses were performed on parameters with available information. Results A total of 32 RP studies were identified, of which 11 included 26 719 patients with consecutive cohorts and the remaining 21 comprised 24 177 patients with cohorts carrying specific restrictions. Of the 11 studies with consecutive cohorts, the incidence of persistent PSA varied between 3.1% and 34.6% with a median of 11.0%. Meta-analyses revealed patients with persistent PSA consistently showed unfavorable clinicopathological features and a more than 3.5-fold risk of poorer biochemical recurrence, metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific mortality prognosis independently, when compared to patients with undetectable PSA. Similarly, cases with persistent PSA in different specific patient cohorts with a higher risk of prostate cancer also showed a trend of worse outcomes. Conclusion We found that the frequency of persistent PSA was about 11.0% in consecutive RP cohorts. Persistent PSA was significantly associated with unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics and worse oncological outcomes. Patients with persistent PSA after RP may benefit from early salvage treatment to delay or prevent biochemical recurrence, improving oncological outcomes for these patients. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to understand optimal systemic therapy in these patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Pozdnyakov A, Kulanthaivelu R, Bauman G, Ortega C, Veit-Haibach P, Metser U. The impact of PSMA PET on the treatment and outcomes of men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2022:10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3. [PMID: 35440642 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00544-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET is highly sensitive in identifying disease recurrence in men with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after primary therapy and is rapidly being adopted in clinical practice. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the documented impact of PSMA-PET on patient management and outcomes, including prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and intermediate and long-term outcome measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS MBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and OVID databases were searched for studies reporting on the impact of PSMA-PET on the management and outcomes of patients with BCR after definitive primary therapy. Outcome measures assessed included biochemical response to therapy after PET and BCR-free survival (BRFS). The proportions of patients in whom management changed, and the proportion of patients in whom each outcome measure was obtained were tabulated and pooled into meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird method. RESULTS A total of 34 studies with 3680 men reported change in management after PSMA-PET and 27 studies with 2639 men reported on at least one outcome measure and had follow-up data. PSMA-PET was positive in 2508/3680 (68.2%). The pooled proportion of change in management after PSMA-PET was 56.4% (95% CI, 48.0-63.9%). A decrease in serum PSA was documented in 72.4% of men (95% CI, 63.4-81.5%), and complete biochemical response in 23.3% (95% CI, 14.6-32.0%) at a median follow-up of 8.1 and 11 months, respectively. The pooled BRFS rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 49.1-71.4%) at a median follow-up of 20 months. CONCLUSION In conclusion, PSMA PET is positive in more than 2/3 of men with BCR and impacts patient management in more than half of the men. BRFS after PET-directed management is 60% at a median of 20 months after salvage therapy, and complete biochemical response may be achieved in up to a quarter of men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Pozdnyakov
- Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Roshini Kulanthaivelu
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn Bauman
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claudia Ortega
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patrick Veit-Haibach
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Mount Sinai Hospital & Women's College Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Alongi P, Laudicella R, Lanzafame H, Farolfi A, Mapelli P, Picchio M, Burger IA, Iagaru A, Minutoli F, Evangelista L. PSMA and Choline PET for the Assessment of Response to Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review from the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14071770. [PMID: 35406542 PMCID: PMC8997431 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiolabeled choline and PSMA PET have been largely tested in the initial staging of prostate cancer and for biochemical recurrence. Moreover, diverse data are now available about their role in the evaluation of response to local and systematic therapies, and their predictive impact on the prognosis, before and after therapy. Therefore, in the present systematic review, we aimed to describe the available data, to summarize the current evidence in these settings of disease. Abstract The aims of this systematic review were to (1) assess the utility of PSMA-PET and choline-PET in the assessment of response to systemic and local therapy, and to (2) determine the value of both tracers for the prediction of response to therapy and survival outcomes in prostate cancer. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed/Scopus/Google Scholar/Cochrane/EMBASE databases (between January 2010 and October 2021) accordingly. The quality of the included studies was evaluated following the “Quality Assessment of Prognostic Accuracy Studies” tool (QUAPAS-2). We selected 40 articles: 23 articles discussed the use of PET imaging with [68Ga]PSMA-11 (16 articles/1123 patients) or [11C]/[18F]Choline (7 articles/356 patients) for the prediction of response to radiotherapy (RT) and survival outcomes. Seven articles (three with [68Ga]PSMA-11, three with [11C]Choline, one with [18F]Choline) assessed the role of PET imaging in the evaluation of response to docetaxel (as neoadjuvant therapy in one study, as first-line therapy in five studies, and as a palliative regimen in one study). Seven papers with radiolabeled [18F]Choline PET/CT (n = 121 patients) and three with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET (n = 87 patients) were selected before and after enzalutamide/abiraterone acetate. Finally, [18F]Choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT as gatekeepers for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with Radium-223 were assessed in three papers. In conclusion, in patients undergoing RT, radiolabeled choline and [68Ga]PSMA-11 have an important prognostic role. In the case of systemic therapies, the role of such new-generation imaging techniques is still controversial without sufficient data, thus requiring additional in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Alongi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, A.R.N.A.S. Ospedale Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Riccardo Laudicella
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione Istituto G.Giglio, 90015 Cefalù, Italy;
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Helena Lanzafame
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Paola Mapelli
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Maria Picchio
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Irene A. Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Baden, 5404 Baden, Switzerland
| | - Andrei Iagaru
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94035, USA;
| | - Fabio Minutoli
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy;
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0498211310
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Luining WI, Cysouw MCF, Meijer D, Hendrikse NH, Boellaard R, Vis AN, Oprea-Lager DE. Targeting PSMA Revolutionizes the Role of Nuclear Medicine in Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1169. [PMID: 35267481 PMCID: PMC8909566 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) protein has become of great clinical value in prostate cancer (PCa) care. PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly used in initial staging and restaging at biochemical recurrence in patients with PCa, where it has shown superior detection rates compared to previous imaging modalities. Apart from targeting PSMA for diagnostic purposes, there is a growing interest in developing ligands to target the PSMA-protein for radioligand therapy (RLT). PSMA-based RLT is a novel treatment that couples a PSMA-antibody to (alpha or beta-emitting) radionuclide, such as Lutetium-177 (177Lu), to deliver high radiation doses to tumor cells locally. Treatment with 177Lu-PSMA RLT has demonstrated a superior overall survival rate within randomized clinical trials as compared to routine clinical care in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current review provides an overview of the literature regarding recent developments in nuclear medicine related to PSMA-targeted PET imaging and Theranostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietske I. Luining
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (A.N.V.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| | - Matthijs C. F. Cysouw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (A.N.V.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| | - N. Harry Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (D.M.); (A.N.V.)
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.C.F.C.); (N.H.H.); (R.B.); (D.E.O.-L.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abbott EM, Falzone N, Lenzo N, Vallis KA. Combining External Beam Radiation and Radionuclide Therapies: Rationale, Radiobiology, Results and Roadblocks. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:735-743. [PMID: 34544640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The emergence of effective radionuclide therapeutics, such as radium-223 dichloride, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA ligands, over the last 10 years is driving a rapid expansion in molecular radiotherapy (MRT) research. Clinical trials that are underway will help to define optimal dosing protocols and identify groups of patients who are likely to benefit from this form of treatment. Clinical investigations are also being conducted to combine new MRT agents with other anticancer drugs, with particular emphasis on DNA repair inhibitors and immunotherapeutics. In this review, the case is presented for combining MRT with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). The technical and dosimetric challenges of combining two radiotherapeutic modalities have impeded progress in the past. However, the need for research into the specific radiobiological effects of radionuclide therapy, which has lagged behind that for EBRT, has been recognised. This, together with innovations in imaging technology, MRT dosimetry tools and EBRT hardware, will facilitate the future use of this important combination of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Abbott
- MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
| | - N Falzone
- GenesisCare, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - N Lenzo
- GenesisCare Theranostics, St John of God Murdoch Cancer Centre, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Medicine, Notre Dame University Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - K A Vallis
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Rogowski P, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Eze C, Ganswindt U, Li M, Unterrainer M, Zacherl MJ, Ilhan H, Beyer L, Kretschmer A, Bartenstein P, Stief C, Belka C, Schmidt-Hegemann NS. Outcome after PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage radiotherapy for nodal recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 49:1417-1428. [PMID: 34628521 PMCID: PMC8921036 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05557-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Nodal recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) represents a common state of disease, amenable to local therapy. PSMA-PET/CT detects PCa recurrence at low PSA levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage radiotherapy (sRT) for lymph node (LN) recurrence. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients treated with PSMA-PET/CT-based salvage elective nodal radiotherapy (sENRT) for LN recurrence were retrospectively examined. Patients underwent PSMA-PET/CT scan due to biochemical persistence (bcP, 76%) or biochemical recurrence (bcR, 24%) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) defined as PSA < post-RT nadir + 0.2 ng/ml and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and uni- and multivariate analysis was performed. Results Median follow-up was 37 months. Median PSA at PSMA-PET/CT was 1.7 ng/ml (range 0.1–40.1) in patients with bcP and 1.4 ng/ml (range 0.3–5.1) in patients with bcR. PSMA-PET/CT detected 1, 2, and 3 or more LN metastases in 35%, 23%, and 42%, respectively. Eighty-three percent had only pelvic, 2% had only paraaortic, and 15% had pelvic and paraaortic LN metastases. Cumulatively, a total dose converted to EQD21.5 Gy of 66 Gy (60–70 Gy) was delivered to the prostatic fossa, 70 Gy (66–72 Gy) to the local recurrence, if present, 65.1 Gy (56–66 Gy) to PET-positive lymph nodes, and 47.5 Gy (42.4–50.9 Gy) to the lymphatic pathways. Concomitant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was administered in 83% of patients. One-, 2-, and 3-year BRFS was 80.7%, 71.6%, and 65.8%, respectively. One-, 2-, and 3-year DMFS was 91.6%, 79.1%, and 66.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, concomitant ADT, longer ADT duration (≥ 12 vs. < 12 months) and LN localization (pelvic vs. paraaortic) were associated with improved BRFS and concomitant ADT and lower PSA value before sRT (< 1 vs. > 1 ng/ml) with improved DMFS, respectively. No such association was seen for the number of affected lymph nodes. Conclusions Overall, the present analysis shows that the so far, unmatched sensitivity and specificity of PSMA-PET/CT translates in comparably high BRFS and DMFS after PSMA-PET/CT-based sENRT for patients with PCa LN recurrence. Concomitant ADT, duration of ADT, PSA value before sRT, and localization of LN metastases were significant factors for improved outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Milonas D, Laenen A, Venclovas Z, Jarusevicius L, Devos G, Joniau S. Benefits of early salvage therapy on oncological outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer with persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:371-378. [PMID: 34453699 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02700-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence are at the increased risk of disease progression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of early salvage therapy on oncological outcomes in patients with persistent PSA after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Within a single tertiary centre database, we identified men with persistent (≥ 0.1 ng/ml) versus undetectable (< 0.1 ng/ml) PSA 4-8 weeks after RP for high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). The cumulative incidence function was used to estimate cancer-specific survival (CSS) and clinical progression-free survival (CPFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS). The effects on oncological outcomes of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs. ADT monotherapy were tested in the subgroup of patients with persistent PSA. RESULTS Of 414 consecutive patients who underwent RP for HRPC, 125 (30.2%) had persistent PSA. Estimated 10-year CPFS, CSS and OS for men with persistent vs. undetectable PSA were 63.8% vs. 93.5%, 78.5% vs. 98.3% and 54% vs. 83.2% (all p < 0.0001), respectively. In men with persistent PSA, ADT alone was associated with higher risk (hazard ratio (HR) for worse CSS (HR 3.9, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 4.7, p < 0.0001) but not for CP (HR 1.6, p = 0.2) when compared with SRT ± ADT. CONCLUSION In patients who underwent RP for HRPCa, persistent PSA was associated with poor oncological outcomes. Early SRT ± ADT resulted in significantly improved CSS and OS in men with persistent PSA comparing with early androgen deprivation monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Milonas
- Medical Academy, Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania. .,Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - A Laenen
- Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Center, KU Leuven, Oude Markt 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Z Venclovas
- Medical Academy, Department of Urology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - L Jarusevicius
- Medical Academy, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickeviciaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - G Devos
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - S Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
[ 68Ga]Ga-P16-093 as a PSMA-Targeted PET Radiopharmaceutical for Detection of Cancer: Initial Evaluation and Comparison with [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Prostate Cancer Patients Presenting with Biochemical Recurrence. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:752-763. [PMID: 31429050 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was undertaken to evaluate radiation dosimetry for the prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 radiopharmaceutical, and to initially assess agent performance in positron emission tomography (PET) detection of the site of disease in prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence. PROCEDURES Under IND 133,222 and an IRB-approved research protocol, we evaluated the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 with serial PET imaging following intravenous administration to ten prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. The recruited subjects were all patients in whom a recent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) exam had been independently performed under IND 131,806 to assist in decision-making with regard to their clinical care. Voided urine was collected from each subject at ~ 60 min and ~ 140 min post-[68Ga]Ga-P16-093 injection and assayed for Ga-68 content. Following image segmentation to extract tissue time-activity curves and corresponding cumulated activity values, radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated using IDAC Dose 2.1. The prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT exam (whole-body PET imaging at 60 min post-injection, performed with contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT) served as a reference scan for comparison to the [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 findings. RESULTS [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET images at 60 min post-injection provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to the subject's prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 scan. With both radiopharmaceuticals, sites of tumor recurrence were found in eight of the ten patients, identifying 16 lesions. The site of recurrence was not detected with either agent for the other two subjects. Bladder activity was consistently lower with [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The kidneys, spleen, salivary glands, and liver receive the highest radiation exposure from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093, with estimated doses of 1.7 × 10-1, 6.7 × 10-2, 6.5 × 10-2, and 5.6 × 10-2 mGy/MBq, respectively. The corresponding effective dose from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 is 2.3 × 10-2 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSIONS [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in this limited series of ten prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence, with the kidneys found to be the critical organ. Diminished tracer appearance in the urine represents a potential advantage of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 over [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for detection of lesions in the pelvis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Valle L, Shabsovich D, de Meerleer G, Maurer T, Murphy DG, Nickols NG, Vapiwala N, Calais J, Kishan AU. Use and Impact of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Prior to Salvage Radiation Therapy in Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: A Scoping Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:339-355. [PMID: 33637464 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The use, common findings, and impact of modern molecular positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging prior to salvage radiation therapy (RT) in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) have not been evaluated comprehensively. OBJECTIVE We performed a scoping systematic review of the literature assessing detection rates, detection patterns, changes in management, as well as changes in patient outcome resulting from molecular PET/CT imaging using three molecular tracers: 18F-fluciclovine, 8Ga prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11, and 18F-DCFPyL. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A computerized bibliographic search of the Medline/PubMed database was carried out from inception to October 1, 2020. We included published reports and abstracts evaluating the utility of 1Fluciclovine, 68Ga-PSMA-11, and 18F-DCFPyL PET in the detection of recurrent disease in the post-RP, pre-salvage RT setting. Outcomes of interest were extracted and tabulated, and existing evidence was synthesized qualitatively. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 45 studies were included in our qualitative synthesis. Detection rates were high across most studies, and there was often a clear relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and positive imaging findings. Though limited randomized data are available, there appears to be increased sensitivity with the use of PSMA ligands compared with fluciclovine at low PSA values. Most studies have shown that only one-third to one-half of patients with detected lesions have lesions in the prostatic fossa alone. Management changes occur in nearly 50% of patients undergoing molecular imaging, and biochemical response in patients who undergo molecular PET-based RT planning appears to be statistically superior to the response in patients who undergo conventional imaging -based RT planning alone. High biochemical responses from molecular PET-based salvage RT, ranging from 45% to 94%, did not appear to come at the expense of increased genitourinary or gastrointestinal toxicity. The presence or absence of avid lesions appears to be a strong prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS Molecular PET/CT imaging in the post-RP, pre-salvage RT setting often triggers management changes that result from detecting lesions in locations not typically included in consensus-driven postoperative RT fields. Ongoing trials will assess the benefit of PSMA PET in guiding salvage RT following RP and determine its impact on long-term outcomes. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed and reported detection rates, detection patterns, and changes in management resulting from molecular positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy. Prior to the receipt of salvage radiation therapy, molecular tracers targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen appear to be especially sensitive at identifying the place where prostate cancer has come back after surgery, which can help radiation oncologists better target the recurrent disease and potentially improve the rates of cure from prostate cancer in this setting. Future studies will determine whether these imaging tools will change cure rates and side effects, but early results are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Valle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - David Shabsovich
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gert de Meerleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Martini-Klinik, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Neha Vapiwala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Vogel MME, Dewes S, Sage EK, Devecka M, Gschwend JE, Eiber M, Combs SE, Schiller K. A survey among German-speaking radiation oncologists on PET-based radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:82. [PMID: 33933111 PMCID: PMC8088662 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Positron emission tomography-(PET) has evolved as a powerful tool to guide treatment for prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this survey was to evaluate the acceptance and use of PET—especially with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting tracers—in clinical routine for radiotherapy (RT) and the impact on target volume definition and dose prescription. Methods We developed an online survey, which we distributed via e-mail to members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). The survey included questions on patterns of care of RT for PC with/without PET. For evaluation of doses we used the equivalent dose at fractionation of 2 Gy with α/β = 1.5 Gy [EQD2(1.5 Gy)].
Results From 109 participants, 78.9% have the possibility to use PET for RT planning. Most centers use PSMA-targeting tracers (98.8%). In 39.5%, PSMA-PET for biochemical relapse after prior surgery is initiated at PSA ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, while 30.2% will perform PET at ≥ 0.2 ng/mL (≥ 1.0 ng/mL: 16.3%, ≥ 2.0 ng/mL: 2.3%, regardless of PSA: 11.7%). In case of PET-positive local recurrence (LR) and pelvic lymph nodes (LNs), 97.7% and 96.5% of the participants will apply an escalated dose. The median total dose in EQD2(1.5 Gy) was 70.00 Gy (range: 56.89–85.71) for LR and 62.00 Gy (range: 52.61–80.00) for LNs. A total number of ≤ 3 (22.0%) or ≤ 5 (20.2%) distant lesions was most often described as applicable for the definition as oligometastatic PC. Conclusion PSMA-PET is widely used among German radiation oncologists. However, specific implications on treatment planning differ among physicians. Therefore, further trials and guidelines for PET-based RT are warranted. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01811-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco M E Vogel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
| | - Sabrina Dewes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Eva K Sage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devecka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute for Radiation Medicine (IRM), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kilian Schiller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Farolfi A, Calderoni L, Mattana F, Mei R, Telo S, Fanti S, Castellucci P. Current and Emerging Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Diagnostic Imaging for Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:596-604. [PMID: 33712536 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.257238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed on most prostate cancer (PCa) cells, and several PSMA ligands for PET imaging are now available worldwide. 68Ga-PSMA-11 has already received U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approval, and use of PSMA PET is currently suggested by several international guidelines for investigating PCa in different clinical settings. In primary PCa, PSMA PET has been shown to be superior to cross-sectional imaging for the detection of pelvic lymph nodes and distant metastases with subsequent clinical management changes. Additionally, it might also have a role in intraprostatic tumor localization, especially when combined with multiparametric MRI. In a setting of PCa recurrence, higher detection rates have been observed than for any other available imaging techniques, especially at low prostate-specific antigen values. Furthermore, PSMA PET consistently led to a shift in clinical management, thus increasing the proportion of radiotherapy, surgery, or other focal therapies at the expense of systemic options or no treatment. In oligometastatic disease after radical surgery, PSMA PET may be relevant in guiding a metastasis-directed therapy approach, as preliminary data seem to suggest a benefit in terms of progression-free survival after treatment of PSMA PET-positive lesions. As a staging and gatekeeping technique, PSMA PET represents a reliable whole-body imaging procedure in combination with second-line therapy of castration-resistant PCa, as well as being pivotal when assessing patients eligible for radioligand therapy such as 177Lu-PSMA. This critical review aims at providing a comprehensive overview of the latest literature on the current or emerging main indications, as well as a general outlook on the recommended interpretation criteria for PSMA PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Letizia Calderoni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Mattana
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Riccardo Mei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Sivi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rogowski P, Roach M, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Trapp C, von Bestenbostel R, Shi R, Buchner A, Stief C, Belka C, Li M. Radiotherapy of oligometastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:50. [PMID: 33750437 PMCID: PMC7941976 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01776-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to improved imaging sensitivity, the term "oligometastatic" prostate cancer disease is diagnosed more often, leading to an increasing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT). There are two types of radiation based MDT applied when treating oligometastatic disease: (1) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) generally used for bone metastases; or (2) SBRT for isolated nodal oligometastases combined with prophylactic elective nodal radiotherapy. This review aims to summarize current evidence data, which may shed light on the optimal management of this heterogeneous group of patients. METHODS A systematic review of the Medline database through PubMed was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All relevant studies published up to November 2020 were identified and screened. Fifty-six titles were included. Besides outcome parameters, different prognostic and predictive factors were assessed, including site of metastases, time between primary treatment and MDT, use of systemic therapies, hormone sensitivity, as well as pattern of recurrence. FINDINGS Evidence consists largely of retrospective case series and no consistent precise definition of oligometastasis exists, however, most investigators seem to acknowledge the need to distinguish between patients presenting with what is frequently called "synchronous" versus "metachronous" oligometastatic disease. Available data on radiotherapy as MDT demonstrate high local control rates and a small but relevant proportion of patients without progressive disease after 2 years. This holds true for both hormone sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer diseases. The use of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for staging increased dramatically. Radiation doses and field sizes varied considerably among the studies. The search for relevant prognostic and predictive factors is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS To our best knowledge this review on oligometastatic prostate cancer included the largest number of original articles. It demonstrates the therapeutic potential and challenges of MDT for oligometastatic prostate cancer. Prospective studies are under way and will provide further high-level evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, Suite H 1031, San Francisco, CA 94143-1708 USA
| | | | - Christian Trapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rieke von Bestenbostel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Run Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Ploussard G, Fossati N, Wiegel T, D'Amico A, Hofman MS, Gillessen S, Mottet N, Joniau S, Spratt DE. Management of Persistently Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 4:150-169. [PMID: 33574012 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The prognosis and optimal management of pN0/pN1 patients with persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 6-8 wk after radical prostatectomy (RP) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and effectiveness of salvage therapies in men with a detectable PSA level after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed in May 2020. A total of 2374 articles were screened, and 25 studies including 5217 men were selected and included in the systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS PSA persistence was most commonly defined as PSA >0.1 ng/ml. PSA persistence was significantly correlated with disease aggressiveness and associated with worse oncologic outcomes than in men with undetectable PSA levels. The 5-yr recurrence-free survival rates varied from 21.5% to 67.0%. The ≥10-yr cancer-specific survival was 75-88%. Salvage radiotherapy ± androgen deprivation therapy was associated with improved survival outcomes. Risk stratification according to pathologic features, PSA levels/kinetics, and genomic classifier may aid in personalization of treatment. The usefulness of molecular imaging in this setting remains underevaluated. Main limitations of this systematic review are the retrospective design of the included studies and the lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on this specific population. CONCLUSIONS PSA persistence after RP is strongly correlated with poor oncologic outcomes. Our review suggests a benefit from immediate radiotherapy; however, current evidence is still low. Indication of subsequent therapies should be based on individual discussions, taking into account all the prognostic factors and the efficacy/toxicity imbalance of proposed treatment. Results from ongoing RCTs are awaited to state on the role of more intensified systemic therapy in this population. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with a detectable prostate-specific antigen level after surgery are at high risk of subsequent progression. Immediate radiotherapy might improve survival outcomes. Further research into the role of molecular imaging and genomic classifier is needed in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France and Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Anthony D'Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence (ProsTIC), Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Department of Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouvière O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PPM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol 2020; 79:243-262. [PMID: 33172724 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1779] [Impact Index Per Article: 355.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present a summary of the 2020 version of the European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on screening, diagnosis, and local treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2016 and 2020. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. Risk-adapted screening should be offered to men at increased risk from the age of 45 yr and to breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers, who have been confirmed to be at risk of early and aggressive disease (mainly BRAC2), from around 40 yr of age. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is performed, a combination of targeted and systematic biopsies must be offered. There is currently no place for the routine use of tissue-based biomarkers. Whilst prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography computed tomography is the most sensitive staging procedure, the lack of outcome benefit remains a major limitation. Active surveillance (AS) should always be discussed with low-risk patients, as well as with selected intermediate-risk patients with favourable International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the AS journey and the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A strong recommendation to consider moderate hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. The 2020 EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on PCa summarise the most recent findings and advice for their use in clinical practice. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY Updated prostate cancer guidelines are presented, addressing screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. These guidelines rely on the available scientific evidence, and new insights will need to be considered and included on a regular basis. In some cases, the supporting evidence for new treatment options is not yet strong enough to provide a recommendation, which is why continuous updating is important. Patients must be fully informed of all relevant options and, together with their treating physicians, decide on the most optimal management for them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S. Orsola, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicola Fossati
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nikos Grivas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Grummet
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Caulfield North, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ann M Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James's University Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Thomas B Lam
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Michael Lardas
- Department of Urology, Metropolitan General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Matthew Liew
- Department of Urology, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
| | - Malcolm D Mason
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine Cardiff University, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Lisa Moris
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Molecular Endocrinology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Department of Urinary and Vascular Imaging, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France; Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Ivo G Schoots
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter-Paul M Willemse
- Department of Urology, Cancer Center University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Slevin F, Beasley M, Cross W, Scarsbrook A, Murray L, Henry A. Patterns of Lymph Node Failure in Patients With Recurrent Prostate Cancer Postradical Prostatectomy and Implications for Salvage Therapies. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1126-1140. [PMID: 33305073 PMCID: PMC7718540 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE There is increasing use of radical prostatectomy to treat patients with high-risk prostate cancer. This has contributed toward a pathologic stage migration, and a greater number of patients are subsequently being diagnosed with biochemical failure. There is increasing use of advanced imaging techniques in the setting of biochemical failure, including positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). METHODS AND MATERIALS This critical literature review highlights the evidence for PET-CT in postprostatectomy biochemical failure and identifies sites of pelvic lymph node relapse in the setting of biochemical failure and the potential implications that the locations of these relapses may have for salvage therapies. Potential future directions are then considered. RESULTS The optimal PET-CT tracer remains uncertain but there is increasing use of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT for investigating sites of nodal metastasis at low prostate-specific antigen levels, and this is leading to a blurring of the biochemical and radiologic recurrence phases. The optimal therapeutic approach remains undefined, with current trials investigating postoperative radiation therapy to the whole pelvis in addition to the prostatic fossa, the use of PET-CT in the setting of biochemical recurrence to guide delivery of salvage radiation therapy, and, for patients with node-only relapsed prostate cancer, the addition of whole pelvis radiation therapy to metastasis-directed therapies such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS The most appropriate target volume for salvage radiation therapy remains uncertain, and the findings of studies using PET-CT to map nodal recurrences suggest that there could be a role for extending whole pelvis radiation therapy volumes to increase coverage of superior nodal regions. The emerging fields of radiomics and radiogenomics could provide important prognostic information and aid decision making for patients with relapsed prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Finbar Slevin
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew Beasley
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - William Cross
- Department of Urology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Louise Murray
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
- University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
[F18] FDG-PET/CT for manual or semiautomated GTV delineation of the primary tumor for radiation therapy planning in patients with esophageal cancer: is it useful? Strahlenther Onkol 2020; 197:780-790. [PMID: 33104815 PMCID: PMC8397654 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-020-01701-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Target volume definition of the primary tumor in esophageal cancer is usually based on computed tomography (CT) supported by endoscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound and can be difficult given the low soft-tissue contrast of CT resulting in large interobserver variability. We evaluated the value of a dedicated planning [F18] FDG-Positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PET/CT) for harmonization of gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation and the feasibility of semiautomated structures for planning purposes in a large cohort. Methods Patients receiving a dedicated planning [F18] FDG-PET/CT (06/2011–03/2016) were included. GTV was delineated on CT and on PET/CT (GTVCT and GTVPET/CT, respectively) by three independent radiation oncologists. Interobserver variability was evaluated by comparison of mean GTV and mean tumor lengths, and via Sørensen–Dice coefficients (DSC) for spatial overlap. Semiautomated volumes were constructed based on PET/CT using fixed standardized uptake values (SUV) thresholds (SUV30, 35, and 40) or background- and metabolically corrected PERCIST-TLG and Schaefer algorithms, and compared to manually delineated volumes. Results 45 cases were evaluated. Mean GTVCT and GTVPET/CT were 59.2/58.0 ml, 65.4/64.1 ml, and 60.4/59.2 ml for observers A–C. No significant difference between CT- and PET/CT-based delineation was found comparing the mean volumes or lengths. Mean Dice coefficients on CT and PET/CT were 0.79/0.77, 0.81/0.78, and 0.8/0.78 for observer pairs AB, AC, and BC, respectively, with no significant differences. Mean GTV volumes delineated semiautomatically with SUV30/SUV35/SUV40/Schaefer’s and PERCIST-TLG threshold were 69.1/23.9/18.8/18.6 and 70.9 ml. The best concordance of a semiautomatically delineated structure with the manually delineated GTVCT/GTVPET/CT was observed for PERCIST-TLG. Conclusion We were not able to show that the integration of PET/CT for GTV delineation of the primary tumor resulted in reduced interobserver variability. The PERCIST-TLG algorithm seemed most promising compared to other thresholds for further evaluation of semiautomated delineation of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
|
35
|
Tan N, Oyoyo U, Bavadian N, Ferguson N, Mukkamala A, Calais J, Davenport MS. PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus 18F Fluciclovine for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2020; 296:44-55. [PMID: 32396045 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background National guidelines endorse fluorine 18 (18F) fluciclovine PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with biochemically recurrent PCa. The comparative performance between fluciclovine and gallium 68 or 18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, a newer examination, is unclear. Purpose To compare the detection of biochemical recurrence using fluciclovine versus PSMA-targeted radiotracers in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 2 ng/mL. Materials and Methods With use of the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, or PRISMA-DTA, guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases between 2012 and 2019 was performed. Studies of fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence were identified. PSA levels, clinical data, and reference standards were obtained when available. A random-effects model was applied to pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the prevalence of a positive examination, stratified according to PSA tier. Results Quantitative analysis included 482 patients (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 67-67 years) in six fluciclovine studies and 3217 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 67-70 years) in 38 PSMA studies. Pooled detection rates for PSMA and fluciclovine were 45% (95% CI: 38%, 52%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%, 49%), respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (P = .46); 59% (95% CI: 52%, 66%) and 48% (95% CI: 34%, 61%) for a PSA level of 0.5-0.9 ng/mL (P = .19); and 80% (95% CI: 75%, 85%) and 62% (95% CI: 54%, 70%) for a PSA level of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL (P = .01). A reference standard was positive in 703 of 735 patients (96%) in the PSMA cohort and 247of 256 (97%) in the fluciclovine cohort. Conclusion Patient-level detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were greater for prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radiotracers than fluciclovine for prostate specific antigen levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelly Tan
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Udochukwu Oyoyo
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Niusha Bavadian
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Nicholas Ferguson
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Anudeep Mukkamala
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Jeremie Calais
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| | - Matthew S Davenport
- From the Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St, Suite MC-2605E, Loma Linda, CA 92354 (N.T., U.O., N.F.); Riverside School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Calif (N.T., N.B.); Departments of Radiology and Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich (A.M., M.S.D.); and Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif (J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Coppola A, Platania G, Ticca C, De Mattia C, Bortolato B, Palazzi MF, Vanzulli A. Sensitivity of CE-MRI in detecting local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Radiol Med 2020; 125:683-690. [PMID: 32078119 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01149-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of our study was to evaluate the sensitivity of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (CE-MR) with phased array coil in the diagnosis of local recurrence in patients with prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and referred for salvage radiotherapy (SRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 73 patients treated with SRT after radical prostatectomy in the period between September 2006 and November 2017. All patients performed a CE-MRI with phased array coil before the start of SRT. A total of 213 patients treated at the ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda in the period between September 2006 and November 2017 with SRT after radical prostatectomy were reviewed. Seventy-three patients with a CE-MRI with phased array coil of the pelvis before the start of SRT were included in the present study. RESULTS At imaging review, recurrence local recurrent disease was diagnosed in 48 of 73 patients. By considering as reference standard the decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value after radiotherapy, we defined: 41 true positive (patients with MRI evidence of local recurrence and PSA value decreasing after SRT), 7 false positive (patients with MRI evidence of local recurrence without biochemical response after SRT), 3 true negative (patients without MRI evidence of local recurrence and stable or increased PSA value after SRT) and 22 false negative (patients without MRI evidence of local recurrence and PSA value decreasing after SRT) cases. The sensitivity values were calculated in relation to the PSA value before the start of treatment, obtaining a value of 74% for PSA above 0.2 ng/mL. CONCLUSION The sensitivity of CE-MRI in local recurrence detection after radical prostatectomy increases with increasing PSA values. CE-MRI with phased array coil can detect local recurrences after radical prostatectomy with a good sensitivity in patients with pre-RT PSA value above 0.2 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cristiana Ticca
- Department of Radiology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Bortolato
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Mauro F Palazzi
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Heidenreich A, Pfister D. PSA persistence after radical prostatectomy needs more than standard therapeutic options to improve outcomes. BJU Int 2019; 124:716-718. [PMID: 31646759 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urological Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urological Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Shakespeare TP, Eggert E, Wood M, Westhuyzen J, Turnbull K, Rutherford N, Aherne N. PSMA-PET guided dose-escalated volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) for newly diagnosed lymph node positive prostate cancer: Efficacy and toxicity outcomes at two years. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:188-191. [PMID: 31668514 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES There are no published reports of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) guided dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT) in newly diagnosed lymph node (LN) positive prostate cancer. We report early toxicity and efficacy outcomes with this approach. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer were staged using PSMA PET, computed tomography (CT) and bone scans. Patients with LN positive-only metastases were offered curative therapy using 3 months androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by DE-IMRT (using volumetric arc therapy), and 3 years adjuvant ADT. All patients had fiducial marker insertion, with privately insured patients having spacer hydrogel insertion. PET and prostate magnetic resonance imaging were fused with the planning CT. We aimed to deliver 81 Gy in 45 fractions (Fx) to the prostate and PET-positive LNs, and 60 Gy in 45Fx to bilateral elective pelvic LNs. RESULTS In all, 46 patients were treated, with 83% Gleason 8-10, 67% T3/T4, median number of LNs 2 (range 1-6), and median PET-positive LN volume 1.14 cc (range 0.15-4.14). LNs were outside of standard contouring guidelines in 37% of patients. The mean PET-positive LN clinical target volume dose ranged from 73.3 to 85.9 Gy (median 83.6 Gy). With 24 months median follow-up, two year failure-free survival was 100%, and 2 year overall survival 95.7%. Acute grade 1 and 2 GI toxicity occurred in 48 and 11% of patients, and GU toxicity in 72 and 24%. Late grade 1, 2 and 3 GI toxicity occurred in 13, 2 and 0%, and GU toxicity 28, 13 and 4%. No toxicity was attributable to the high dose LN boost. CONCLUSIONS PSMA PET-guided DE-IMRT up to 81 Gy to the prostate and involved LNs, and long term ADT, is a promising approach for newly diagnosed LN positive prostate cancer. LN contouring guidelines require re-evaluation in the era of PSMA PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Eggert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, Australia
| | - Maree Wood
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, Australia
| | - Justin Westhuyzen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, Australia
| | - Kirsty Turnbull
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, Australia
| | - Natalie Rutherford
- Nuclear Medicine and PET Department, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Noel Aherne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT and the clinical management of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Commun 2019; 40:913-919. [DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
41
|
Kranzbühler B, Müller J, Becker AS, Garcia Schüler HI, Muehlematter U, Fankhauser CD, Kedzia S, Guckenberger M, Kaufmann PA, Eberli D, Burger IA. Detection Rate and Localization of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in Patients with Low PSA Values ≤ 0.5 ng/mL. J Nucl Med 2019; 61:194-201. [PMID: 31375566 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.225276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A first analysis of simultaneous 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/MRI showed some improvement in the detection of recurrent disease at low serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) values below 0.5 ng/mL compared with the already high detection rate of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. We therefore focused on all patients with biochemical recurrence and PSA values no higher than 0.5 ng/mL to assess the detection rate for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 66 consecutive patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for biochemical recurrence with a PSA value no higher than 0.5 ng/mL at our institution. Median PSA level was 0.23 ng/mL (range, 0.03-0.5 ng/mL). Detection of PSMA-positive lesions within the prostate fossa, local and distant lymph nodes, bones, or visceral organs was recorded. In addition, all scans with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-positive lesions were retrospectively assessed to analyze if lesions were detected inside or outside a standard salvage radiotherapy volume. Results: Overall, in 36 of 66 patients (54.5%) PSMA-positive lesions were detected; in 26 of 40 (65%) patients with a PSA level between 0.2 and 0.5 ng/mL and in 10 of 26 (38.5%) patients with a PSA level less than 0.2 ng/mL. Even at those low PSA values, only 8 of 66 (12.1%) patients had exclusive local recurrence. Lymph nodes were detected in 23 patients and bone metastases in 5 on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI. In 26 of 66 patients (39.4%), PSMA-positive lesions were located outside a standard salvage radiotherapy volume. Conclusion: Our data confirm that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI has a high detection rate for recurrent prostate cancer, even at low PSA levels no higher than 0.5 ng/mL. In addition, we show that 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI detected PSMA-positive lesions outside a standard salvage radiotherapy volume in 39.4% of all patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Kranzbühler
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Julian Müller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Anton S Becker
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland; and
| | - Helena I Garcia Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Urs Muehlematter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christian D Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Kedzia
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Philipp A Kaufmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Eberli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Irene A Burger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
New approaches for effective and safe pelvic radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2019; 16:523-538. [DOI: 10.1038/s41585-019-0213-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
43
|
Bartkowiak D, Siegmann A, Böhmer D, Budach V, Wiegel T. The impact of prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy on the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy in patients with primary N0 prostate cancer. BJU Int 2019; 124:785-791. [PMID: 31220400 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test whether salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with lymph node negative (N0) prostate cancer is equally effective with persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA rising from the undetectable range (<0.1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed post-SRT PSA progression-free survival (PFS) in 555 patients with prostate cancer. The entire cohort was compared with a risk-adjusted subgroup of 112 patient pairs with matching pre-RP PSA level (±10 ng/mL), Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs ≥8), and pre-SRT PSA level (±0.5 ng/mL). RESULTS The median follow-up was 6.1 years. After RP, PSA was undetectable in 422 and persistent in 133 patients. PSA persistence and a pre-SRT PSA level of ≥0.5 ng/mL reduced Kaplan-Meier rates of PFS significantly. In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort and after risk adjustment, the pre-SRT PSA level but not post-RP PSA persistence was a significant parameter. In the matched cohort's subgroup with early SRT at a PSA level of <0.5 ng/mL, a trend towards a worse outcome with post-RP PSA persistence was observed. Delayed SRT with a PSA level ≥0.5 ng/mL led to a PFS of <30%, irrespective of the post-RP PSA level. CONCLUSION In patients with N0 prostate cancer with post-RP PSA persistence, early SRT at a PSA level <0.5 ng/mL seems to be less effective than in recurrent patients with post-RP undetectable PSA. They might benefit from intensified therapy, but larger case numbers are required to substantiate this conclusion. In patients with a PSA level ≥0.5 ng/mL and higher-risk features associated with post-RP PSA persistence, SRT alone is unlikely to provide long-term freedom from further progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Detlef Bartkowiak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Alessandra Siegmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Fanti S, Minozzi S, Antoch G, Banks I, Briganti A, Carrio I, Chiti A, Clarke N, Eiber M, De Bono J, Fizazi K, Gillessen S, Gledhill S, Haberkorn U, Herrmann K, Hicks RJ, Lecouvet F, Montironi R, Ost P, O'Sullivan JM, Padhani AR, Schalken JA, Scher HI, Tombal B, van Moorselaar RJA, Van Poppel H, Vargas HA, Walz J, Weber WA, Wester HJ, Oyen WJG. Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol 2019; 19:e696-e708. [PMID: 30507436 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30604-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Rapid developments in imaging and treatment with radiopharmaceuticals targeting prostate cancer pose issues for the development of guidelines for their appropriate use. To tackle this problem, international experts representing medical oncologists, urologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine specialists convened at the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Focus 1 meeting to deliver a balanced perspective on available data and clinical experience of imaging in prostate cancer, which had been supported by a systematic review of the literature and a modified Delphi process. Relevant conclusions included the following: diphosphonate bone scanning and contrast-enhanced CT are mentioned but rarely recommended for most patients in clinical guidelines; MRI (whole-body or multiparametric) and prostate cancer-targeted PET are frequently suggested, but the specific contexts in which these methods affect practice are not established; sodium fluoride-18 for PET-CT bone scanning is not widely advocated, whereas gallium-68 or fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen gain acceptance; and, palliative treatment with bone targeting radiopharmaceuticals (rhenium-186, samarium-153, or strontium-89) have largely been replaced by radium-223 on the basis of the survival benefit that was reported in prospective trials, and by other systemic therapies with proven survival benefits. Although the advances in MRI and PET-CT have improved the accuracy of imaging, the effects of these new methods on clinical outcomes remains to be established. Improved communication between imagers and clinicians and more multidisciplinary input in clinical trial design are essential to encourage imaging insights into clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Division, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Epidemiology, Lazio Regional Health Service, Rome, Italy
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ian Banks
- European Cancer Organisation and European Men's Health Forum, Ulster, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology and Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ignasi Carrio
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Humanitas University and Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Karim Fizazi
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - Silke Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Division of Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Genitourinary Cancer Program, Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Piet Ost
- Genitourinary Program, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiotherapy and Experimental Cancer Research, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jack A Schalken
- Department of Experimental Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Howard I Scher
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Heindrik Van Poppel
- Urology, University Hospital Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hebert Alberto Vargas
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, Marseille, France
| | - Wolfgang A Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Lehrstuhl für Pharmazeutische Radiochemie, Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany
| | - Wim J G Oyen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, Debus J, Guckenberger M, Hörner-Rieber J, Lagerwaard FJ, Mazzola R, Palacios MA, Philippens MEP, Raaijmakers CPJ, Terhaard CHJ, Valentini V, Niyazi M. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:92. [PMID: 31167658 PMCID: PMC6551911 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) marks the beginning of a new era. MR is a versatile and suitable imaging modality for radiotherapy, as it enables direct visualization of the tumor and the surrounding organs at risk. Moreover, MRgRT provides real-time imaging to characterize and eventually track anatomical motion. Nevertheless, the successful translation of new technologies into clinical practice remains challenging. To date, the initial availability of next-generation hybrid MR-linac (MRL) systems is still limited and therefore, the focus of the present preview was on the initial applicability in current clinical practice and on future perspectives of this new technology for different treatment sites.MRgRT can be considered a groundbreaking new technology that is capable of creating new perspectives towards an individualized, patient-oriented planning and treatment approach, especially due to the ability to use daily online adaptation strategies. Furthermore, MRL systems overcome the limitations of conventional image-guided radiotherapy, especially in soft tissue, where target and organs at risk need accurate definition. Nevertheless, some concerns remain regarding the additional time needed to re-optimize dose distributions online, the reliability of the gating and tracking procedures and the interpretation of functional MR imaging markers and their potential changes during the course of treatment. Due to its continuous technological improvement and rapid clinical large-scale application in several anatomical settings, further studies may confirm the potential disruptive role of MRgRT in the evolving oncological environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - F. Alongi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - N. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - C. Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - L. Boldrini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - F. Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - J. Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M. Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - J. Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F. J. Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R. Mazzola
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCSS Sacro Cuore don Calabria Hospital, Negrar-Verona, Italy
- University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - M. A. Palacios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU medical center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. E. P. Philippens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. P. J. Raaijmakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - C. H. J. Terhaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - V. Valentini
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Rome, Italy
| | - M. Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ekmekcioglu Ö, Busstra M, Klass ND, Verzijlbergen F. Bridging the Imaging Gap: PSMA PET/CT Has a High Impact on Treatment Planning in Prostate Cancer Patients with Biochemical Recurrence—A Narrative Review of the Literature. J Nucl Med 2019; 60:1394-1398. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.222885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
47
|
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based metastasis-directed radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2019; 37:1535-1542. [PMID: 30824985 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02701-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this communication was to assess the efficacy of directed oligometastatic radiotherapy (RT) based on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical relapse (BCR) after primary treatment with curative intent. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of a monocentric cohort of PCa patients diagnosed with oligometastatic disease on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and treated with metastasis-directed RT. Inclusion criteria were: histologically proven PCa, BCR after primary treatment with curative intent, oligometastatic disease defined as ≤ 3 metastatic lesions. To evaluate the efficacy of the therapy, biochemical response defined as a decrease of > 50% of PSA (PSA50) was measured at 1 and 4 months. Patients were followed up until progression and start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). BCR-free survival and ADT-free survival were calculated. RESULTS 20 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median PSA value: 1.4 ng/ml (IQR, 0.3-2.3 ng/ml). A total of 30 PSMA-positive lesions were treated: 18 lymph nodes (60%), nine bone (30%) and three visceral lesions (10%). Median follow-up was 15 months (range 4-33 months). Biochemical response at 1 and 4 months was found in 3/20 patients (15%) and 14/20 (70%), respectively. BCR-free survival rate at 1 year was 79% and 53% at 2 years. ADT-free survival at 2 years was 74%. CONCLUSION This retrospective study suggests that metastasis-directed RT based on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT may be a valuable treatment in patients with PCa oligometastatic disease, providing promising BCR-free survival rates and potentially postponing ADT for at least 2 years in 74% of the patients. Response assessment should not be measured before 4 months after treatment.
Collapse
|
48
|
Calais J, Czernin J, Fendler WP, Elashoff D, Nickols NNG. Randomized prospective phase III trial of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT molecular imaging for prostate cancer salvage radiotherapy planning [PSMA-SRT]. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:18. [PMID: 30616601 PMCID: PMC6322287 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5200-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after prostatectomy offers long-term biochemical control in about 50-60% of patients. SRT is commonly initiated in patients with serum PSA levels < 1 ng/mL, a threshold at which standard-of-care imaging is insensitive for detecting recurrence. As such, SRT target volumes are usually drawn in the absence of radiographically visible disease. 68Ga-PSMA-11 (PSMA) PET/CT molecular imaging is highly sensitive and may offer anatomic localization of PCa biochemical recurrence. However, it is unclear if incorporation of PSMA PET/CT imaging into the planning of SRT could improve its likelihood of success. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the success rate of SRT for recurrence of PCa after prostatectomy with and without planning based on PSMA PET/CT. METHODS We will randomize 193 patients to proceed with standard SRT (control arm 1, n = 90) or undergo a PSMA PET/CT scan (free of charge for patients) prior to SRT planning (investigational arm 2, n = 103). The primary endpoint is the success rate of SRT measured as biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) after initiation of SRT. Biochemical progression is defined by PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL and rising. The randomization ratio of 1:1.13 is based on the assumption that approximately 13% of subjects randomized to Arm 2 will not be treated with SRT because of PSMA-positive extra-pelvic metastases. These patients will not be included in the primary endpoint analysis but will still be followed. The choice of treating the prostate bed alone vs prostate bed and pelvic lymph nodes, with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), is selected by the treating radiation oncologist. The radiation oncologist may change the radiation plan depending on the findings of the PSMA PET/CT scan. Any other imaging is allowed for SRT planning in both arms if done per routine care. Patients will be followed until either one of the following conditions occur: 5 years after the date of initiation of randomization, biochemical progression, diagnosis of metastatic disease, initiation of any additional salvage therapy, death. DISCUSSION This is the first randomized phase 3 prospective trial designed to determine whether PSMA PET/CT molecular imaging can improve outcomes in patients with PCa early BCR following radical prostatectomy. ACRONYM PSMA-SRT Phase 3 trial. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ■ IND#130649 ◦ Submission: 04.26.2016 ◦ Safe-to-proceed letter issued by FDA: 05.25.2016 ■ UCLA IRB #18-000484, ■ First submission: 3.27.2018 ■ Date of approval: 5.31.2018 ■ UCLA JCCC Short Title NUC MED 18-000484 ■ NCI Trial Identifier NCI-2018-01518 ■ ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03582774 ■ First Submitted: 06.19.2018 ■ First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: 06.27.2018 ■ First Posted: 07.11.2018 ■ Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: 07.17.2018 ■ Last Update Posted: 07.19.2018 TRIAL STATUS: Current Trial Status Active as of 08/13/2018 Trial Start Date 09/01/2018-Actual Primary Completion Date 09/01/2023-Anticipated Trial Completion Date 09/01/2024-Anticipated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremie Calais
- Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Theranostics/ Imaging Division, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Theranostics/ Imaging Division, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Wolfgang P. Fendler
- Department of Molecular & Medical Pharmacology, Ahmanson Translational Theranostics/ Imaging Division, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Elashoff
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core (DOMStat), UCLA CTSI Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Nicholas Nicholas G. Nickols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Eze C, Li M, Rogowski P, Schaefer C, Stief C, Buchner A, Zamboglou C, Fendler WP, Ganswindt U, Cyran C, Bartenstein P, Belka C, Ilhan H. Impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on the Radiotherapeutic Approach to Prostate Cancer in Comparison to CT: A Retrospective Analysis. J Nucl Med 2018; 60:963-970. [PMID: 30552203 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.118.220855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) offers unprecedented accuracy for staging of primary, persistent, or recurrent prostate cancer. Thus, we hypothesized that 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy significantly affects the radiotherapeutic approach in comparison to the current standard, a CT-based approach. Methods: Between February 2014 and December 2017, 172 patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radiotherapy and were included in this retrospective analysis. Twenty-two (13%) patients were referred for primary definitive radiotherapy, 51% (88/172) for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence, and 36% (62/172) for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy. An experienced radiation oncologist, masked to the CT and PET/CT results, decided on the radiation treatment management of all patients on the basis of the clinical and pathologic variables. The potential increase in diagnostic accuracy, and the subsequent change in radiotherapeutic approach, were documented separately for PET/CT versus CT. Results: The overall detection rate was 70% (120/172) for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. Patients with a pre-PET/CT PSA level of more than 0.5 ng/mL (98/111; 88%) had PET-positive results significantly more often. Overall, PSMA PET/CT revealed 171 lesions, PET alone 156, and CT alone 85. For all patients, a continuous diagnostic increase in positive findings was observed for primary tumor/local recurrence (CT, 18%, vs. PET/CT, 37%), pelvic lymph nodes (CT, 21%, vs. PET/CT, 44%), and distant metastases (CT, 7%, vs. PET/CT, 19%) when comparing CT with PET/CT. Compared with CT, the combination of PET/CT information resulted in a change in treatment in 107 of 172 (62%) patients, that is, 8 of 22 (36%) patients before any treatment, 31 of 62 (50%) with PSA recurrence, and 68 of 88 (77%) with PSA persistence. Comparing the different radiotherapy indications with one another, there was a higher rate of change in management for postoperative patients than for patients before any treatment. Conclusion: Compared with conventional CT, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT had a remarkable impact on radiotherapeutic approach, especially in postoperative patients. Thus, considering the growing amount of data on the impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on postoperative patients, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has recently been endorsed by a few cancer guidelines as an imaging modality in patients with PSA persistence or recurrence (e.g., the German S3 guideline and the European Association of Urology guideline).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chukwuka Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minglun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Rogowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schaefer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stief
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Buchner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Clemens Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Müller J, Ferraro DA, Muehlematter UJ, Garcia Schüler HI, Kedzia S, Eberli D, Guckenberger M, Kroeze SGC, Sulser T, Schmid DM, Omlin A, Müller A, Zilli T, John H, Kranzbuehler H, Kaufmann PA, von Schulthess GK, Burger IA. Clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on patient management and outcome, including all patients referred for an increase in PSA level during the first year after its clinical introduction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:889-900. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4203-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|