Deep-inspirational breath-hold (DIBH) technique in left-sided breast cancer: various aspects of clinical utility

Long-term cardiac outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy: Evaluating the applicability of 3D-based dose constraints for intensity modulated radiation therapy

Adjuvant breast radiotherapy has been associated with cardiac toxicity due to older 2D and 3D techniques, with a linear relationship between mean heart dose (MHD) and ischemic cardiac events. Cardiac dose distribution differs with modern techniques like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), potentially affecting this relationship. This study evaluates long-term cardiac toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with tomotherapy to reassess 3D-derived dose constraints. Breast cancer patients treated with tomotherapy at Institut Curie from August 2010 to December 2015 were included. Patients had undergone breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy, with some receiving chemotherapy or trastuzumab. Tomotherapy was used for anatomically challenging cases. The primary endpoint was cardiac toxicity correlated with MHD; secondary endpoints were overall and disease-specific survival. Statistical analyses included logistic regression and Cox models. Among 179 patients, the median MHD was 7.04 Gy, with 95.6% having an MHD above 5 Gy. Sixty-six patients had cardiovascular risk factors, and 28.5% were obese. Over a median follow-up of 9.1 years, eight patients (4.5%) experienced cardiovascular events-all with pre-existing risks or obesity. No significant correlation was found between MHD and major coronary events (p = 0.607) or heart failure (p = 0.800). Cardiac mortality was absent, and 10-year overall and disease-specific survival were 88.0% and 94.3%, respectively. Cardiac events in patients treated with tomotherapy were rare and driven by pre-existing risk factors. The linear MHD-toxicity relationship observed in 3D radiotherapy may not apply to IMRT, potentially leading to overestimated risks. Long-term studies are needed to refine IMRT dose constraints.

Survival determinants and toxicity of second-course radiotherapy for isolated nodal recurrences in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Isolated nodal recurrence (INR) after localized breast cancer is rare, with an incidence of less than 1%. Curative management typically includes surgical resection, often with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), followed by regional nodal radiotherapy. However, evidence-based guidelines remain limited due to the rarity of this clinical scenario. The aim of this study was to evaluate survival determinants and the acute and long-term toxicities associated with second-course regional nodal irradiation as part of curative strategies for INR after localized breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 11 patients with localized breast cancer who developed ipsilateral, nonmetastatic INR between 2003 and 2019. All patients were treated with curative intent, including regional nodal irradiation. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local control, and treatment toxicities were analyzed. Survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression was used to assess prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The 5‑year OS and CSS were 71.6%, while MFS was 62.3%. Inclusion of internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation significantly improved OS, CSS, and MFS (p < 0.01). Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) INRs were associated with worse survival outcomes. Acute grade 2 toxicities included radiodermatitis (36.4%), and late grade 2 toxicities were limited to fibrosis (18.2%). No cardiac, pulmonary, or grade 3 or higher toxicities were reported.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the favorable survival outcomes and safety profile of contemporary curative strategies for INRs following localized breast cancer, with a 5-year OS rate exceeding historical benchmarks. Internal mammary chain irradiation appears to improve survival without increased toxicity. However, the poor prognosis associated with TNBC INR underscores the need for effective systemic therapies. Prospective multicenter trials are essential to validate these findings and optimize treatment protocols.

Improving organ dose sparing in left-sided breast cancer with yaw-limited volumetric modulated arc therapy: A dosimetric comparison to conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy approaches

BACKGROUND

To assess the dose-sparing capabilities of a yaw-limited volumetric modulated arc therapy (YL_VMAT) beam setup for adjacent organs at risk (OAR) in comparison with 3D-conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and conventional VMAT for radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients.

METHODS

In total, 80 treatment plans for 20 patients, of which 10 patients underwent CT-scans in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and 10 patients in free-breathing (FB) technique. Besides generally tangential-weighted static and IMRT beams, VMAT treatment plans with approximately 270° arc length have been compared and analyzed to a multi-field, yaw-adapted, unconventional partial VMAT technique retrospectively. The prescription dose was set to 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions.

RESULTS

We achieved a more pronounced steeper dose falloff directed from the thoracic wall to the adjacent lung tissue resulting in a significantly better ipsilateral lung and considerably cardiac dose sparing using the YL_VMAT method in general. Compared with standard techniques (IMRT, VMAT, 3D-CRT), YL-VMAT in combination with DIBH can achieve lower mean doses for the heart (1.05 Gy vs. 1.73 Gy, 2.16 Gy and 1.44 Gy), the left anterior descending (LAD) artery (3.68 Gy vs. 6.53 Gy, 5.13 Gy and 8.64 Gy) and the left lung (3.59 Gy vs. 5.39 Gy, 4.79 Gy and 5.87 Gy), respectively. Also with FB, the corresponding mean doses for the left lung and cardiac structures were lower with the YL-VMAT method than with IMRT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.44 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 11.97 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 4.72 Gy), VMAT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.52 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 9.06 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 4.46 Gy) and 3D-CRT (heart: 1.70 Gy vs. 2.78 Gy; LAD: 6.50 Gy vs. 15.09 Gy; left lung: 3.10 Gy vs. 5.77 Gy). In addition, we found out superiority of YL_VMAT for the V5, V10, and V20 Gy to the left lung. For DIBH and FB, all differences for the left lung were significant, with p < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

With the YL_VMAT technique, dose exposures to radiosensitive OARs like the lung, heart and LAD artery can be reduced considerably to very low values in comparison to already established planning methods. The benefits must be weighed against the potential risks induced by an increased dose exposure to the contralateral breast.

Heart and lung sparing with isocentric lateral decubitus positioning compared with dorsal decubitus positioning during adjuvant localized breast cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The cardiac and pulmonary dosimetric benefit of alternative positioning in isocentric lateral decubitus compared with dorsal decubitus during adjuvant breast irradiation has yet to be proven, in spite of the relative long-standing use of isocentric lateral decubitus.

METHODS

Eight consecutive patients with an indication for adjuvant breast irradiation without boost or lymph node irradiation were scanned in both isocentric lateral and dorsal decubitus positions. For each patient, a plan delivering 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions in isocentric lateral decubitus and in dorsal decubitus using a field-in-field technique was calculated. Doses to the heart, to various cardiac substructures, and to the lungs were compared.

RESULTS

Mean dose to the heart, to various cardiac structures (left ventricle, left coronary, right coronary), to the homolateral lung, and to the contralateral lung were significantly lower in isocentric lateral decubitus than in dorsal decubitus. Average absolute mean dose reductions were -40 cGy for the heart, -27.5 cGy for the left ventricle, -56.5 cGy for the right coronary artery, -64.5 cGy for the left coronary artery, -45.5 cGy for the sinoatrial node, -74 cGy for the homolateral lung, and -4.5 cGy for the contralateral lung. For all organs at risk, median dose-volume histograms in isocentric lateral decubitus showed lower relative volumes than in dorsal decubitus.

CONCLUSION

Lateral decubitus positioning significantly reduces dose to the heart, to various cardiac substructures, to the homolateral lung, and to the contralateral lung, compared with dorsal decubitus. This technique is easily implemented and can be widely recommended to reduce heart and lung doses to a minimum.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Lateral decubitus positioning significantly reduces dose to the heart, to various cardiac substructures, to the homolateral lung, and to the contralateral lung, compared with dorsal decubitus. This technique is easily implemented and can be widely recommended to reduce heart and lung doses to a minimum.

Dosimetric advantage of ipsilateral lung and cardiac sparing of left breast cancer prone position compared with supine free breathing in the COVID-19 era and personalized medicine

Background

As coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) run unabated across the globe, its potential survival detrimental effects on lung function may be potentiated by systemic therapy and/or radiotherapy. Limiting lung exposure to high radiation dose in addition to sparing the heart may be critical for left-sided breast cancer patients. Deep inspiration breath-hold allows heart sparing. However, a minority of patients cannot hold breath for radiotherapy. We aim to evaluate whether a prone setup can be advantageous in these patients.

Materials and methods

Left breast cancer patients who had dual supine and prone planning, both in free-breathing, were retrospectively identified. A multiple-structures penalty score was computed from the mean absolute dose deviation (MADD) to heart, lungs, breasts, and tumor bed for each supine and prone plan. Dosimetric advantage of prone was assessed by the reduction of penalty score compared with supine. Patients' characteristics effect on the reduction of penalty was analyzed using robust linear regression.

Results

The prone vs. supine MADD for 27 patients demonstrated significant sparing for the ipsilateral lung and was 0.6 vs. 3 Gy, respectively, without differences regarding heart and target volumes. The average penalty ± standard deviation was 0.90 ± 0.28 Gy prone, vs. 1.13 ± 0.38 Gy supine, p = 0.024. Overall, 70.4% (19/27) patients had a reduction of penalty with prone setup, as compared with 29.6% (8/27) supine, p = 0.0065. Pre-dosimetry characteristics could not predict the reduction of penalty.

Conclusion

Prone conferred substantial lung sparing without dose-deterioration to other structures, providing a significant advantage as compared with supine free-breathing radiotherapy in left-breast cancer patients.

Robustness of Machine Learning Predictions for Determining Whether Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Is Required in Breast Cancer Radiation Therapy

Background/Objectives: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) is a commonly used technique to reduce the mean heart dose (MHD), which is critical for minimizing late cardiac side effects in breast cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Although previous studies have explored the potential of machine learning (ML) to predict which patients might benefit from DIBH, none have rigorously assessed ML model performance across various MHD thresholds and parameter settings. This study aims to evaluate the robustness of ML models in predicting the need for DIBH across different clinical scenarios. Methods: Using data from 207 breast cancer patients treated with RT, we developed and tested ML models at three MHD cut-off values (240, 270, and 300 cGy), considering variations in the number of independent variables (three vs. six) and folds in the cross-validation (three, four, and five). Robustness was defined as achieving high F2 scores and low instability in predictive performance. Results: Our findings indicate that the decision tree (DT) model demonstrated consistently high robustness at 240 and 270 cGy, while the random forest model performed optimally at 300 cGy. At 240 cGy, a threshold critical to minimize late cardiac risks, the DT model exhibited stable predictive power, reducing the risk of overestimating DIBH necessity. Conclusions: These results suggest that the DT model, particularly at lower MHD thresholds, may be the most reliable for clinical applications. By providing a tool for targeted DIBH implementation, this model has the potential to enhance patient-specific treatment planning and improve clinical outcomes in RT.

A Study on Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Based on an Accelerator Integrated with Optical Surface Monitoring System

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the optimal radiotherapy regimen for synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) by utilizing dosimetric and radiobiological indicators, and to assess the impact of applying an optical surface monitoring system(OSMS) on the precision of SBBC radiotherapy treatment.

METHODS

Nine patients with SBBC who underwent breast-conserving radiotherapy were retrospectively selected. Four treatment plans were designed for each patient using the Versa HD (Elekta, Stockholm) accelerator: single-isocenter intensity-modulated radiotherapy/volumetric modulated arc therapy(IMRT-ISO1/VMAT-ISO1) and dual-isocenter IMRT/VMAT(IMRT-ISO2/VMAT-ISO2), with a prescription dose of 42.4 Gy in 16 fractions. Dosimetric parameters and radiobiological impact were measured for the target and organs at risk(OARs). The monitoring log files of three SBBC patients were analyzed to quantitatively assess real-time delta shifts encompassing six degrees of freedom (DOFs) during intrafraction and interfraction treatment processes.

RESULTS

Compared to both the IMRT techniques, the VMAT techniques offered superior target conformity, uniformity, and dose fall-off capability. Among the four treatment plans, VMAT-ISO1 exhibited optimal performance by significantly reducing radiation exposure volume to OARs while maintaining exceptional precision in dose delivery and execution efficiency. The tumor control probability (TCP) was exceeded by 98.5% for all four modalities. According to the OSMS logs, the maximum absolute error in translational motion during the treatment of three SBBC patients was predominantly manifested along the vertical(VRT) axis, with an mean value of 2.2 mm. Additionally, it was observed that the coronal plane (YAW) exhibited the largest error in terms of rotational angle, with an mean deviation of 1.1°.

CONCLUSIONS

The VMAT-ISO1 technique demonstrates apparent dosimetric and radiobiological advantages in SBBC radiotherapy, ensuring precise dose delivery and shortening treatment durations. The accuracy of SBBC radiotherapy is ensured by OSMS through pre-treatment positioning correction and real-time monitoring throughout the treatment process.

Surface-based deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer: final results from the SAVE-HEART study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) plays an essential role in the management of early breast cancer (BC), but can lead to cardiovascular and lung toxicities. RT in deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) often allows better protection of organs at risk. This prospective study compares surface-guided DIBH with free breathing (FB) in patients with left-sided BC, by evaluating individual cardiovascular risks and treatment plan dosimetry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study enrolled 585 patients from October 2016 to January 2021 with left-sided invasive breast carcinoma with indicated adjuvant RT of the breast/thoracic wall with or without regional lymph nodes. The ability to hold breath for 20 s was a prerequisite. The treatments were either hypofractionated (HF; 40.05 Gy/15Fx) or normofractionated (NF; 50.00 Gy/25Fx). DIBH was applied using the automatically triggered surface guidance system Catalyst with audio-video feedback. Computed tomography and surface data were acquired during both DIBH and FB. The primary endpoint of the study was the comparative evaluation of heart dose reduction using DIBH.

RESULTS

Plan dosimetry was significantly improved by DIBH. The mean and maximum doses to the heart and the left coronary artery were significantly reduced by 36%-42% in HF and NF plans (P < 0.001), while the mean ipsilateral lung dose was reduced by 12%-14% (P < 0.001). Furthermore, DIBH resulted in a 5% reduction in the cumulative 10-year cardiovascular disease risk (10-year cardiovascular disease risk) compared with FB (3.59% to 3.41%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest prospective study showing better sparing for cardiac and ipsilateral lung doses with surface-guided DIBH compared with FB in patients with left-sided BC.

Impact of deep inspiration breath hold, surface-guided radiotherapy, and daily CBCT on the organs at risk in breast cancer radiotherapy

The goal of the study was to assess the impact of deep inspiration breath hold technique (DIBH), surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), and daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) on the dose to organs at risk (OAR) in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Twenty-six consecutive left-sided breast cancer patients treated using Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), DIBH, SGRT, and a hypofractionated regimen were retrospectively evaluated in this study. Dose parameters were extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVH). The Wilcoxon Matched Pairs test was used to test dose parameters obtained in free breathing (FB) and DIBH for statistical significance. Multivariable analysis of variance (ANOVA) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were used to identify parameters and cut-off points associated with the reduction of the mean heart dose (MHD) by DIBH. Based on published models, the risk of cardiac and lung toxicity (pneumonitis) using SGRT or daily kV-CBCT was estimated and compared. DIBH substantially reduced the MHD (median, 43.6%; range, 4.2% to 75.1%; P < 0.00001). The risk of cardiac toxicity using SGRT increased by 1%, compared to 3.6% to 20.5% using daily kV-CBCT. No significant difference in the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis using SGRT versus daily kV-CBCT was detected. The ANOVA revealed the relative increase of the left lung volume by DIBH as the only significant impact factor for the MHD. The ROC analysis of this parameter showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95%CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P < 0.0001). DIBH can substantially reduce the MHD in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques and hypofractionation. Patient setup using SGRT compared to daily kV-CBCT may be the preferred option for many patients. In our patient cohort, the relative reduction of the left lung volume by DIBH can be used as a predictor to select patients who benefit from DIBH.

Clinical benefits of deep inspiration breath-hold in postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to emphasize the clinical importance of the Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) technique by quantifying its dosimetric advantages over Free Breathing (FB) in reducing radiation exposure to the heart, liver, and lungs for right-sided breast cancer patients. This evidence supports its potential for routine clinical use to mitigate radiation-induced toxicity.

METHODS

A systematic retrieval of controlled trials comparing DIBH and FB techniques in postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The primary outcomes assessed included the doses of adjacent normal tissues (heart, liver, and lungs). Summary standardized mean differences (SMD) along with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed, respectively. StataMP 17 software was selected to perform data analysis.

RESULTS

The study encompassed an analysis of 313 patients derived from seven online studies, comprising 168 individuals in the DIBH group and 269 individuals in the FB group. The findings indicated that the DIBH group received significantly lower irradiation doses to the heart, liver, and lungs in comparison to the FB group, with statistical significance (heart dose: SMD = -0.63, 95% CI -0.85 to -0.41, P < 0.05; liver dose: SMD = -1.15, 95% CI -1.91 to -0.38, P < 0.05; lung dose: SMD = -0.79, 95% CI -1.23 to -0.35, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that the application of DIBH during postoperative radiotherapy for right-sided breast cancer markedly decreases radiation exposure to the heart, liver, and lungs, while maintaining consistent tumor dose coverage.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?

BACKGROUND

In the context of left breast cancer radiotherapy, long term cardiopulmonary toxicity has been well-documented, significant efforts have been undertaken to mitigate such toxicity by using 4D gating, deep inspiration breath-hold(DIBH) and active breath control(ABC) techniques.

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the cardio-pulmonary radiation doses incurred during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in two distinct breathing conditions such as DIBH and Free Breathing (FB), with a specific focus on the left chest wall with comprehensive regional nodal irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective dosimetric study was conducted on 15 patients who received adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy of chest-wall (CW), supraclavicular fossa(SCF), and internal mammary region(IMC), with or without axilla. Two sets of planning CT scans were taken in DIBH and FB conditions. The dosimetric difference between DIBH CT and FB CT plans analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, employing SPSS software version 21.0.

RESULTS

Comparison of DIBH and FB parameters for target coverage revealed a statistically significant advantage with DIBH in SCF(D95, V90, p<0.017) and IMC(D98, V90 & V95, p<0.03). Dosimetric characteristics of heart and LAD exhibited statistically significant lower doses with DIBH (V20, V25, and Dmean, p<0.001) compared to FB plans. Lung doses were similar with no discernible advantage of one technique over the other. Other OARs such as contralateral breast (p=0.027) and esophagus (p=0.001) received lower doses with the DIBH technique while the spinal cord (p=0.691) and thyroid(p=0.496) showed no significant difference. Maximum heart distance (p= 0.001), central lung distance (p= 0.011) and Haller index (p= 0.001) exhibited statistical significance between the two techniques, whereas chest wall separation showed no significant statistical difference (p=0.629).

CONCLUSION

DIBH demonstrates a substantial reduction in cardiac and LAD doses compared to the FB technique. This study underscores the efficacy of DIBH as a viable strategy for mitigating cardiac and LAD radiation doses in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing PMRT of chest wall with comprehensive regional nodes.

Postoperative radiotherapy for right breast cancer with regional nodal irradiation utilizing the surface-guided radiotherapy based deep inspiration breath hold technique on a TrueBeam HD linear accelerator: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has proven effective in minimizing radiation exposure to organs at risk (OARs) in right-sided breast cancer patients requiring regional nodal irradiation (RNI). However, there has been no dosimetric evaluation comparing DIBH techniques to free-breathing (FB) conditions on the TrueBeam (TB) HD linear accelerator (LINAC). To address this gap and accommodate breast cancer patients requiring RNI on the TB HD LINAC, an innovative method involving a 90-degree rotation of the regional lymph nodes' field during treatment planning was devised.

CASE DESCRIPTION

The study focused on a 39-year-old woman who underwent right breast-conserving radical surgery and subsequently required postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Both noncontrast FB and DIBH computed tomography (CT) scans were performed using a CT simulator. Due to limitations in MLC field length, a 90-degree rotation was employed for planning the regional lymph nodes' field on the TB LINAC. Patient positioning accuracy was ensured by aligning based on body surface under both FB and DIBH conditions, facilitated by an optical surface management system (OSMS). The target volume and OARs were meet the dose limit on the TB HD LINAC. Noteworthy reductions in radiation exposure to the right lung and liver were evident with DIBH. The mean dose reduction rate for the right lung was 11.9%, while the mean dose reduction rate for the liver was 68.9%. Parameters such as V5, V20, V30, and mean dose (Dmean) also demonstrated decreases with DIBH compared to FB.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report underscores the potential of TB HD LINAC for formulating treatment approaches for breast cancer involving RNI. Furthermore, it emphasizes the effectiveness of DIBH radiotherapy in mitigating doses to OARs when implemented on the TB LINAC.

Survival and toxicity after breast-conserving surgery and external beam reirradiation for localized ipsilateral breast tumour recurrence: A population-based study

PURPOSE

Breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse may increase the radiation dose delivered to the heart and result in a greater risk of cardiac adverse events. This study aimed to compare the incidence of cardiac mortality in patients treated for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse, either with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation or with total mastectomy between 2000 and 2020.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated for a primary non-metastatic breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database, and those who subsequently experienced a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse treated with breast-conserving surgery and reirradiation ("BCS+ReRT" group, n=239) or with total mastectomy ("TM" group, n=3127) were included. The primary objective was to compare the cardiac mortality rate between the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation and total mastectomy. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and cancer specific survival.

RESULTS

Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.40, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.19-4.86, P=0.006) in univariate analysis; non-statistically significant differences were observed after adjusting for age, laterality and chemotherapy on multivariate analysis (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.96-3.94, P=0.067), age being the only confounding factor. A non-statistically significant difference towards lower overall survival was observed in patients who had breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation compared with those who underwent total mastectomy (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.98-1.90, P=0.066), and no differences were observed in terms of cancer specific survival (HR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.56-1.82, P=0.965).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the incidence of cardiac mortality was low, and breast-conserving surgery followed by reirradiation did not independently increased the risk of cardiac mortality for a localized ipsilateral breast tumour relapse.

Benefit of respiratory gating in the Danish Breast Cancer Group partial breast irradiation trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Partial breast irradiation (PBI)has beenthe Danish Breast Cancer Group(DBCG) standard for selected breast cancer patients since 2016 based onearlyresults from the DBCG PBI trial.During trial accrual, respiratory-gated radiotherapy was introduced in Denmark. This study aims to investigate the effect of respiratory-gating on mean heart dose (MHD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2009 to 2016 the DBCG PBI trial included 230 patientswith left-sided breast cancer receiving external beam PBI, 40 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks.Localization of the tumor bed on the planning CT scan, the use of respiratory-gating, coverage of the clinical target volume (CTV), and doses to organs at risk were collected.

RESULTS

Respiratory-gating was used in 123 patients (53 %). In 176 patients (77 %) the tumor bed was in the upper and in 54 patients (23 %) in the lower breast quadrants. The median MHD was 0.37 Gy (interquartile range 0.26-0.57 Gy), 0.33 Gy (0.23-0.49 Gy) for respiratory-gating, and 0.49 Gy (0.31-0.70 Gy) for free breathing, p < 0.0001. MHD was < 1 Gy in 206 patients (90 %) and < 2 Gy in 221 patients (96 %). Respiratory-gating led to significantly lower MHD for upper-located, but not for lower-located tumor beds, however, all MHD were low irrespective of respiratory-gating. Respiratory-gating did not improve CTV coverage or lower lung doses.

CONCLUSIONS

PBI ensured a low MHD for most patients. Adding respiratory-gating further reduced MHD for upper-located but not for lower-located tumor beds but did not influence target coverage or lung doses. Respiratory-gating is no longer DBCG standard for left-sided PBI.

A Beam Angle Selection Method to Improve Plan Robustness Against Position Error in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

We report a dosimetric study in whole breast irradiation (WBI) of plan robustness evaluation against position error with two radiation techniques: tangential intensity-modulated radiotherapy (T-IMRT) and multi-angle IMRT (M-IMRT).

METHODS

Ten left-sided patients underwent WBI were selected. The dosimetric characteristics, biological evaluation and plan robustness were evaluated. The plan robustness quantification was performed by calculating the dose differences (Δ) of the original plan and perturbed plans, which were recalculated by introducing a 3-, 5-, and 10-mm shift in 18 directions.

RESULTS

M-IMRT showed better sparing of high-dose volume of organs at risk (OARs), but performed a larger low-dose irradiation volume of normal tissue. The greater shift worsened plan robustness. For a 10-mm perturbation, greater dose differences were observed in T-IMRT plans in nearly all directions, with higher ΔD98%, ΔD95%, and ΔDmean of CTV Boost and CTV. A 10-mm shift in inferior (I) direction induced CTV Boost in T-IMRT plans a 1.1 (ΔD98%), 1.1 (ΔD95%), and 1.7 (ΔDmean) times dose differences greater than dose differences in M-IMRT plans. For CTV Boost, shifts in the right (R) and I directions generated greater dose differences in T-IMRT plans, while shifts in left (L) and superior (S) directions generated larger dose differences in M-IMRT plans. For CTV, T-IMRT plans showed higher sensitivity to a shift in the R direction. M-IMRT plans showed higher sensitivity to shifts in L, S, and I directions. For OARs, negligible dose differences were found in V20 of the lungs and heart. Greater ΔDmax of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was seen in M-IMRT plans.

CONCLUSION

We proposed a plan robustness evaluation method to determine the beam angle against position uncertainty accompanied by optimal dose distribution and OAR sparing.

A Potential Pitfall and Clinical Solutions in Surface-Guided Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Purpose

Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an effective technique to spare the heart in treating left-sided breast cancer. Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) is increasingly applied in DIBH setup and motion monitoring. Patient-specific breathing behavior, either thoracically driven or abdominally driven (A-DIBH), should be unaltered, online identified, and monitored accordingly to ensure reproducible heart-sparing treatment.

Methods and Materials

Sixty patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with SGRT were analyzed: 20 A-DIBH patients with vertical chest elevation (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were prospectively identified, and 40 control patients were retrospectively and randomly selected for comparison. At simulation, both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH computed tomography (CT) were acquired, guided by a motion surrogate placed around the xiphoid process. For SGRT treatment setups, the region of interest (ROI) was defined on the CT chest surface, and the surrogate-based setup was a backup. For all 60 patients, the VCE was measured as the average of the FB-to-DIBH elevations at the breast and xiphoid process, together with abdominal elevation. In the 40-patient control group, A-DIBH patients (VCE ≤ 5 mm) were identified. Of the 20 A-DIBH patients, 10 were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, and 10 patients were treated with tangent plans. Clinical DIBH plans were recalculated on FB CT to compare maximum dose (DMax), 5% of the maximum dose (D5%), mean dose (DMean), and V30Gy, V20Gy, and V5Gy of the heart and lungs and their significance.

Results

In the 20 A-DIBH patients, VCE = 3 ± 2 mm, surrogate motion (9 ± 6 mm), and abdomen motion of 14 ± 5 mm are found. Heart dose reduction from FB to DIBH is significant (P < .01): ∆DMax = -8.4 ± 9.8 Gy, ∆D5% = -2.4 ± 4.4 Gy, and ∆DMean = -0.6 ± 0.9 Gy. Six out of 40 control patients (15%) are found to have VCE ≤ 5 mm.

Conclusions

A-DIBH (VCE ≤ 5 mm) patient population is significant (15%), and they should be identified in the SGRT workflow and monitored accordingly. A new abdominal ROI or an abdominal surrogate should be used instead of the conventional chest-only ROI. Patient-specific DIBH should be preserved for higher reproducibility to ensure heart sparing.

The Impact of Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) Implementation on the Hybrid Technique in Left-Sided Whole Breast Irradiation: A Dosimetric Characteristic Study of 3D-CRT Hybrid VMAT in DIBH and Free Breathing Conditions, and VMAT in Free Breathing Conditions

Aim

To investigate the impact of DIBH for heart sparing effect on left sided breast postoperative whole breast irradiation by comparing the dosimetric characteristics of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT and pure VMAT treatment planning under DIBH condition.

Materials and Methods

The primary CT data sets from previously treated left sided early breast cancer were used for pure volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) technique re-planning for the dosimetric characteristics comparison. A treatment plan of 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique was re-planned on the free breath (FB) condition for the investigation of the dosimetric characteristics comparison on DIBH condition. The prescribed dose for all the treatment plans was 42.5Gy in 16 fractions. All plans were optimized to cover 100% of the PTV by 95% of prescribed dose. The dosimetric differences among the 3 treatment plans for the 20 patients were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, with p value<0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique yielded the best results on the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). By comparing this 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique using FB and DIBH technique, the mean heart dose (MHD) was reduced from 5.38Gy to 1.65Gy, respectively (p =0.001) and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)0.03cc dose was reduced from 27.87Gy to 9.41Gy, respectively (p =0.001). 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT using DIBH technique significantly reduced the V5, V20 and D mean of the ipsilateral lung and D mean of the contralateral lung. The D5 of right breast was significantly reduced by 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT compared with VMAT using DIBH technique.

Conclusion

The incorporation of DIBH into 3D-CRT hybrid VMAT technique provides the best benefits for the heart and the OAR with respect to the radiation dose-sparing effect without compromising the target conformity and homogeneity in the treatment planning.

Investigation of Intra-fraction Stability and Inter-fraction Consistency of Active Breathing Coordinator (ABC)-Based Deep Inspiration Breath Holds in Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Background Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) has been established as a standard technique to reduce cardiac dose. The part of the heart exposed to radiation can be significantly decreased using the DIBH technique during tangential left-sided breast cancer (LSBC) irradiation. Aim The objective of this study was to investigate the intra-fraction breath-hold stability and inter-fraction consistency of patient breath-hold against the threshold as a function of air volumes in the setting of active breathing coordinator (ABC)-based DIBH (ABC-DIBH) treatment to LSBC. Methods A total of 34 patients treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the left breast using the ABC-DIBH device were included. The frequency of breath-holds per fraction and the entire course of treatment along with the total treatment time was evaluated for all patients. A prescription dose of either 200 cGy (conventional) or 267 cGy (hypofractionation) was administered during 649 fractions, resulting in a total of 4,601 breath-hold measurements being evaluated. The amplitude of deviation in terms of air volumes between the baseline threshold and the patient-specific measurement (during each breath-hold) per fraction was used to define the DIBH stability. Likewise, the consistency of the breathing amplitudes was used to define the compliance of patient breath-holds throughout the entire treatment period. Positional accuracy was evaluated using orthogonal (portal) images. Results The average number of breath-holds measured over the entire course of treatment for each patient was 144 inspirations (58-351). Similarly, the average number of breath-holds for each fraction during the course of treatment was 11 inspirations (7-21), which included setup imaging and treatment. The total number of breath-holds reduced significantly (p-value < 0.05) with hypofractionation (104 inspirations; range 58-170) as compared to conventional fractionation (145 inspirations; 58-351). The average breath-hold threshold in terms of air volume was 1.41 L (0.6-2.1 L) for all patients. The total treatment time reduced significantly after the third fraction (p-value < 0.05). The average deviation between the measured and baseline threshold breath-holds during the course of treatment was 0.5 L/sec (0.12-1.32 L/sec). The consistency of the breathing amplitudes were maintained within ±0.05 L during the entire treatment for all patients. The average translational shifts measured during setup were 0.28 cm ± 0.3 cm, 0.38 cm ± 0.4 cm, and 0.21 cm ± 0.3 cm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively. Conclusion The study has demonstrated the variations in intra-fraction breath-hold stability and inter-fraction breath-hold consistency in terms of air volumes for patients who were treated for LSBC. The frequency of breath-holds was observed to be higher with increased total treatment time for the first few fractions and reduced over the course of treatment.

New patient setup procedure using surface-guided imaging to reduce body touch and skin marks in whole-breast irradiation during the COVID-19 pandemic

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a new patient-setup procedure using surface-guided imaging during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for left-sided whole-breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold. Two setup procedures were compared regarding patient positioning accuracy for the first 22 patients. The first was a traditional setup (T-setup) procedure that used a surface-guided system after patient setup with traditional skin marks and lasers. The second procedure involved a new setup (N-setup) that used only a surface-guided system. The positioning accuracy of the remaining 23 patients was assessed using a setup that combined marker reduction and the N-setup procedure. No significant difference was observed in positioning accuracy between the two setups. The positioning accuracy of the marker-reduction setup was within 3 mm in all directions. The N-setup procedure may be a useful strategy for preventing infection during or after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Integrating subvolume dose and myocardial perfusion imaging parameters to assess the impact of radiation therapy on heart function in breast cancer patients: A comparative analysis between left- and right-sided breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to utilize an innovative method of integrating the 20 subvolume dose of left ventricle and the Tl-201 single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) parameters in patients with left- and right-sided breast cancer after radiation therapy.

METHODS

Female patients with breast cancer underwent SPECT MPI before commencing radiotherapy and 12 months later were enrolled from January 2014 to December 2018. The images of CT simulation and SPECT MPI were integrated into the treatment planning system. The differences of doses and parameters of MPI in all cardiac subvolumes between left- and right-sided breast cancer patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with left-sided breast cancer (n = 61) received a higher radiation dose to the heart, left ventricular, and its territories and subvolumes, compared to patients with right-sided breast cancer (n = 19). The 20-segment analysis also showed statistically significant disparities in the average radiation doses received by the two groups. In different coronary artery territories, the end-diastolic perfusion and end-systolic perfusion showed a decrease in both sides, with no significant differences. However, the wall motion and wall thickening showed a significant decline in subregions within the left- and right-sided coronary artery territories.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates an innovative integrated method combining the left ventricular 20 regional doses with SPECT MPI which shows that left-sided breast cancer patients receive a higher subvolume dose than right-sided breast cancer patients. Further research is needed to confirm the potential impact on heart function after radiotherapy on both sides.

Radiation-induced circulating microRNAs linked to echocardiography parameters after radiotherapy

Introduction

Patients treated with radiotherapy to the chest region are at risk of cardiac sequelae, however, identification of those with greatest risk of complications remains difficult. Here, we sought to determine whether short-term changes in circulating miRNA expression are related to measures of cardiac dysfunction in follow-up.

Materials and methods

Two parallel patient cohorts were enrolled and followed up for 3 years after completion of RT to treat left-sided breast cancer. In the primary group (N=28) we used a a panel of 752 miRNAs to identify miRNAs associated with radiation and cardiac indices at follow up. In the second, independent cohort (N=56) we validated those candidate miRNAs with a targeted qPCR panel. In both cohorts. serum samples were collected before RT, 24h after the last dose and 1 month after RT; cardiac echocardiography was performed 2.5-3 year after RT.

Results

Seven miRNAs in the primary group showed marked changes in serum miRNAs immediately after RT compared to baseline and associations with cardiopulmonary dose-volume histogram metrics. Among those miRNAs: miR-15b-5p, miR-22-3p, miR-424-5p and miR-451a were confirmed to show significant decrease of expression 24 hours post-RT in the validation cohort. Moreover, miR-29c, miR-451 and miR-424 were correlated with the end-diastolic diameter of the left ventricle, which was also confirmed in multivariable analysis adjusting for RT-associated factors.

Conclusion

We identified a subset of circulating miRNAs predictive for cardiac function impairment in patients treated for left-sided breast cancer, although longer clinical observation could determine if these can be used to predict major clinical endpoints.

Cardiac dose in the treatment of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patients between three different radiotherapy techniques (VMAT, IMRT, and 3D CRT)

PURPOSE

Synchronous bilateral irradiation of both mammary glands and chest wall is a challenging task due to technical difficulties and limited evidence supporting an optimal technique to improve treatment outcomes. We studied and compared the dosimetry data of three radiotherapy techniques to select the most optimal one.

METHODS

We compared three-dimensional conformal radiation treatment (3D CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) during irradiation of synchronous bilateral breast cancer in nine patients followed by examination of dose distribution to the cardiac conduction system (SA node, AV node and Bundle of His), myocardium, lungs, left anterior descending artery (LADA) and right coronary artery (RCA) .

RESULTS

VMAT is the most sparing technique for SBBC treatment. Even though doses to the SA node, AV node and Bundle of His were higher with VMAT (D_mean were 3.75 ± 0.62, 2.58 ± 0.83 and 3.03 ± 1.18 Gy respectively) compared with 3D CRT (D_mean were 2.61 ± 0.66, 1.52 ± 0.38 and 1.88 ± 0.70 Gy respectively), this difference is statistically insignificant. Doses to the right and left lung (average D_mean = 12.65 ± 3.20 Gy, V_20Gy = 24.12 ± 6.25%), myocardium (D_mean = 5.33 ± 1.51 Gy, V_10Gy = 9.80 ± 3.83%, V_20Gy = 7.19 ± 3.15%, V_25Gy = 6.20 ± 2.93%), and LADA (D_mean = 10.04 ± 4.92 Gy, V_20Gy = 18.17 ± 13.24% and V_25Gy = 15.41 ± 12.19%) were highest with 3D CRT. The highest  D_mean in the cardiac conduction system (5.30 ± 2.23, 3.15 ± 1.61 and 3.89 ± 1.85 Gy respectively) was observed with IMRT, and a similar effect was noted in RCA (D_mean = 7.48 ± 2.11 Gy).

CONCLUSION

VMAT is the optimal and satisfactory radiation therapy technique for sparing organs at risk (OARs). With VMAT, a lower D_mean value was noted in the myocardium, LADA, and lungs. The use of 3D CRT significantly increases the dose of radiation reaching the lungs, myocardium, and LADA, which can subsequently cause cardiovascular and lung complications, but not in the cardiac conduction system.

Dosimetric evaluation of the benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for locoregional irradiation of right breast cancer with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT)

INTRODUCTION

Right-lateralized cardiac substructures can be substantially exposed during right breast cancer (R-BC) radiotherapy. The cardiac benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is established in combination with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) for left breast cancer with regional node irradiation but is unknown for R-BC. This study evaluated the dosimetric benefit of DIBH for locoregional irradiation of R-BC with VMAT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients treated for R-BC with adjuvant locoregional DIBH-VMAT in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Institut Curie (Paris, France) until December 2022 were included, corresponding to 15 patients. FB- and DIBH-VMAT plans were compared both for a normofractionated regimen (50 Gy/25fx) used for treatment and a replanned hypofractionated regimen (40 Gy/15fx). Dose to the heart, cardiac substructures (sinoatrial node (SAN), atrio-ventricular node (AVN), right coronary artery, left anterior descending coronary artery, left ventricle), ipsilateral lung and liver were retrieved and compared.

RESULTS

Mean heart dose (MHD) was 3.33 Gy with FB vs. 3.10 Gy with DIBH on normofractionated plans (p = 0.489), and 2.58 Gy with FB vs. 2.41 Gy with DIBH on hypofractionated plan (p = 0.489). The benefit of DIBH was not significant for any cardiac substructure. The most exposed cardiac substructure were the SAN (mean dose of 6.62 Gy for FB- and 5.64 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans) and the RCA (mean dose of 4.21 Gy for FB- and 4.06 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans). The maximum benefit was observed for the RCA with a median individual dose reduction of 0.84 Gy on normofractionated plans (p = 0.599). No significant dosimetric difference were observed for right lung. Liver mean dose was significantly lower with DIBH with median values decreasing from 2.54 Gy to 0.87 Gy (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Adding DIBH to efficient cardiac-sparing radiotherapy techniques, such as VMAT, is not justified in the general case for locoregional R-BC irradiation. Specific R-BC patient subpopulations who could benefit from additional DIBH combination with locoregional VMAT are yet to be identified.

Surface guided 3DCRT in deep-inspiration breath-hold for left sided breast cancer radiotherapy: implementation and first clinical experience in Iran

Background

The aim of the study is to evaluate the overall accuracy of the surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) workflow through a comprehensive commissioning and quality assurance procedures and assess the potential benefits of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy as a cardiac and lung dose reduction approach for left-sided breast cancer irradiation.

Materials and methods

Accuracy and reproducibility of the optical surface scanner used for DIBH treatment were evaluated using different phantoms. Patient positioning accuracy and reproducibility of DIBH treatment were evaluated. Twenty patients were studied for treatment plan quality in target dose coverage and healthy organ sparing for the two different treatment techniques.

Results

Reproducibility tests for the surface scanner showed good stability within 1 mm in all directions. The maximum position variation between applied shifts on the couch and the scanner measured offsets is 1 mm in all directions. The clinical study of 200 fractions showed good agreement between the surface scanner and portal imaging with the isocenter position deviation of less than 3 mm in each lateral, longitudinal, and vertical direction. The standard deviation of the DIBH level showed a value of < 2 mm during all evaluated DIBHs. Compared to the free breathing (FB) technique, DIBH showed significant reduction of 48% for heart mean dose, 43% for heart V25, and 20% for ipsilateral lung V20.

Conclusion

Surface-guided radiotherapy can be regarded as an accurate tool for patient positioning and monitoring in breast radiotherapy. DIBH treatment are considered to be effective techniques in heart and ipsilateral lung dose reductions for left breast radiotherapy.

Comparison of fulfilling the criteria for critical organs in irradiation of patients with breast cancer using the deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing techniques

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate organ-at-risk dose sparing in treatment plans for patients with left-sided breast cancer irradiated with Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) and Free Breathing (FB) techniques.

Material and methods: Twenty patients with left-sided breast cancer were analyzed and divided into two groups. Group A included 10 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer, while group B involved 10 patients with metastatic breast cancer spreading to regional lymph nodes. All patients went through the DIBH coaching. For planning purposes, CT scans were obtained in both DIBH and FB. Mean heart dose (Dmean,heart), mean heart volume receiving 50% of the prescribed dose (V50), V20 (V20L.lung), V10 (V10L.lung) and V5 for left lung (V5L.lung), the volume of the PTV receiving a dose greater than or equal to 95% of the prescribed dose (V95 [%]), the maximum point dose (Dmax), and the volume of PTV receiving 107% of the prescribed dose were reported.

Results: In all 20 analyzed pairs of plans, a reduction by more than half in the mean heart dose in DIBH technique plans was achieved, as well as a significant reduction was found in DIBH plans for the heart V50. In 19 patients, the use of the DIBH technique also reduced the volume of the left lung receiving doses of 20 Gy, 10 Gy, and 5 Gy compared to the FB technique.

Conclusions: Dosimetric analysis showed that the free breathing plans don’t fulfill the criteria for a mean heart dose (group B) and the left lung receiving a 20 Gy dose (group A) compared to the DIBH plans. Radiation therapy of left breast cancer with the use of the DIBH technique results in a significant dose reduction in the heart and also reduces the dose in the left lung in the majority of patients, compared to the FB procedure.

Retrospective Analysis for Dose Reduction to Organs at Risk with New Personalized Breast Holder (PERSBRA) in Left Breast IMRT

This study evaluated dose differences in normal organs at risk, such as the lungs, heart, left anterior descending artery (LAD), right coronary artery, left ventricle, and right breast under personalized breast holder (PERSBRA), when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). This study evaluated the radiation protection offered by PERSBRA in left breast cancer radiation therapy. Here, we retrospectively collected data from 24 patients with left breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery as well as IMRT radiotherapy. We compared the dose differences in target coverage and organs at risk with and without PERSBRA. For target coverage, tumor prescribed dose 95% coverage, conformity index, and homogeneity index were evaluated. For organs at risk, we compared the mean heart dose, mean left ventricle dose, LAD maximum and mean dose, mean left lung receiving 20 Gy, 10 Gy, and 5 Gy of left lung volume, maximum and mean coronary artery of the right, maximum of right breast, and mean dose. Good target coverage was achieved with and without PERSBRA. When PERSBRA was used with IMRT, the mean dose of the heart decreased by 42%, the maximum dose of LAD decreased by 26.4%, and the mean dose of LAD decreased by 47.0%. The mean dose of the left ventricle decreased by 54.1%, the volume (V₂₀) of the left lung that received 20 Gy decreased by 22.8%, the volume (V₁₀) of the left lung that received 10 Gy decreased by 19.8%, the volume (V₅) of the left lung that received 5 Gy decreased by 15.7%, and the mean dose of the left lung decreased by 23.3%. Using PERSBRA with IMRT greatly decreases the dose to organs at risk (left lung, heart, left ventricle, and LAD). This study found that PERSBRA with IMRT can achieve results similar to deep inspiration breath-hold radiotherapy (DIBH) in terms of reducing the heart radiation dose and the risk of developing heart disease in patients with left breast cancer who cannot undergo DIBH.

External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation in Early Breast Cancer and the Risk for Radiogenic Pneumonitis

In order to evaluate the risk for radiation-associated symptomatic pneumonitis in a prospective external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) trial, between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early stage breast cancer were enclosed in the trial. Patients were eligible for study participation if they had a histologically confirmed breast cancer or an exclusive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a tumor size ≤3 cm, free safety margins ≥2 mm, no involved axillary lymph nodes, tumor bed clips, and were ≥50 years old. Patients received APBI with 38 Gy with 10 fractions in 10 consecutive working days. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00004417. Median follow-up was 56 (1−129) months. Ipsilateral lung MLD, V20, and V30 were 4.3 ± 1.4 Gy, 3.0 ± 2.0%, and 1.0 ± 1.0%, respectively. Radiogenic pneumonitis grade 2 appeared in 1/170 (0.6%) patients two months after radiotherapy. Ipsilateral MLD, V20, and V30 were 6.1 Gy, 7, and 3% in this patient. Additionally, individual radiosensitivity was increased in this specific patient. Compared to WBI, APBI leads to lower lung doses. Using APBI, the risk of symptomatic radiogenic pneumonitis is very low and may be limited, with an ipsilateral V20 < 3% to very exceptional cases associated with innate risk factors with an increased radiation susceptibility.

Evaluation of Plan Robustness Using Hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Arc Modulation Radiotherapy (VMAT) for Left-Sided Breast Cancer

Purpose: We aim to evaluate the robustness of multi-field IMRT and VMAT plans to target motion for left-sided BC radiotherapy. Methods: The 7-field hybrid IMRT (7F-H-IMRT) and 2-arc VMAT (2A-VMAT) plans were generated for ten left-sided BC patients. Shifts of 3 mm, 5 mm, and 10 mm in six directions were introduced and the perturbed dose distributions were recalculated. The dose differences (∆D) of the original plan and perturbed plan corresponded to the plan robustness for the structure. Results: Higher ∆D_98%, ∆D_95%, and ∆D_mean of CTV were observed in 2A-VMAT plans, which induced higher tumor control probability reductions. A higher ∆Dmean of CTV Boost was found in 7F-H-IMRT plans despite lower ∆D_98% and ∆D_95%. Shifts in the S-I direction exerted the largest effect on CTV and CTV Boost. Regarding OARs, shifts in R, P, and I directions contributed to increasing the received dose. The 2A-VMAT plans performed better dose sparing, but had a higher robustness in a high-dose volume of the left lung and heart. The 2A-VMAT plans decreased the max dose of LAD but exhibited lower robustness. Conclusion: The 2A-VMAT plans showed higher sensitivity to position deviation. Shifts in the S-I direction exerted the largest effect for CTV and CTV Boost.

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy for chest wall and nodal irradiation using hybrid techniques

Aim:

This study compares three different hybrid plans, for left-sided chest wall (CW) and nodal stations irradiation using a hypofractionated dose regimen.

Materials and methods:

Planning target volumes (PTVs) of 25 breast cancer patients that included CW, supraclavicular (SCL) and internal mammary node (IMN) were planned with 3 different hybrid techniques: 3DCRT+IMRT, 3DCRT+VMAT and IMRT+VMAT. All hybrid plans were generated with a hypofractionated dose prescription of 40·5 Gy in 15 fractions. Seventy per cent of the dose was planned with the base-dose component and remaining 30% of the dose was planned with the hybrid component. All plans were evaluated based on the PTVs and organs at risk (OARs) dosimetric parameters.

Results:

The results for PTVs parameters have shown that the 3DCRT+IMRT and 3DCRT+VMAT plans were superior in uniformity index to the IMRT+VMAT plan. The OARs dose parameters were comparable between hybrid plans. The IMRT+VMAT plan provided a larger low dose volume spread to the heart and ipsilateral lung (p < 0·001). The 3DCRT+VMAT plan required less monitor units and treatment time (p = 0·005) than other plans.

Conclusion:

The 3DCRT+VMAT hybrid plan showed superior results with efficient treatment delivery and provide clinical benefit by reducing both low and high dose levels.

Modern Rotational Radiation Techniques with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy or Helical Tomotherapy for Optimal Sparing of the Lung and Heart in Left-Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Plus Regional Nodal Irradiation: A Comparative Dosimetric Analysis

Simple Summary

For advanced left-breast cancer patients, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) has been indicated to reduce cancer recurrence and mortality. Modern arc RT techniques, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or helical tomotherapy (HT), can minimize normal organ exposure without compromising disease control. The aim of this study is to identify which arc technique is optimal for patients receiving left-breast RT with RNI, and to explore distinct RNI volumes with or without IMN. A total of 108 eligible patients were enrolled (70 VMAT, 38 HT). VMAT reduced the mean dose and low-dose exposure to the heart, ipsilateral lung, whole lung, contralateral breast, and esophagus compared with HT. The advantage of VMAT for normal organ sparing was distinct when performing RNI with IMN irradiation. To limit normal organ exposure and reduce potential toxicities, VMAT is the optimal technique for patients with left-breast cancer who are undergoing RT with RNI.

Abstract

Background: For advanced breast cancer with lymph node involvement, adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) has been indicated to reduce cancer recurrence and mortality. However, an extensive RT volume is associated with normal organ exposure, which increases the toxicity and affects patient outcomes. Modern arc RT techniques can improve normal organ sparing compared with conventional techniques. The aim of this study was to explore the optimal technique for left-breast RT with RNI. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving RT with RNI for left-breast cancer. We used modern arc RT techniques with either volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) or helical tomotherapy (HT) with a novel block technique, and compared differences in dosimetry parameters between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RNI with or without internal mammary node (IMN) volume was also performed. Results: A total of 108 eligible patients were enrolled between 2017 and 2020, of whom 70 received VMAT and 38 received HT. The median RT dose was 55 Gy. No significant differences were found regarding the surgery, RT dose, number of fractions, target volume, and RNI volume between the VMAT and HT groups. VMAT reduced the heart mean dose more than HT (3.82 vs. 5.13 Gy, p < 0.001), as well as the cardiac parameters of V5–V20, whole-lung mean dose, lung parameters of V5–V20, and contralateral-breast and esophagus mean dose. In the subgroup analysis of RNI with IMNs, the advantage of VMAT persisted in protecting the heart, lung, contralateral breast, and esophagus. HT was beneficial for lowering the thyroid mean dose. For RNI without IMN, VMAT improved the low-dose exposure of the heart and lung, but HT was similar to VMAT in terms of heart, whole-lung, and contralateral-breast mean dose. Conclusions: For patients with left-breast cancer receiving adjuvant RT with RNI, VMAT reduced the exposure dose to the heart, lung, contralateral breast, and esophagus compared with HT. VMAT was superior to HT in terms of normal organ sparing in the patients who underwent RNI with IMN irradiation. Considering the reduction in normal organ exposure and potential toxicity, VMAT is the optimal technique for patients receiving RNI when deep inspiration breath-hold is not available.