Quantifying the reduction of respiratory motion by mechanical ventilation with MRI for radiotherapy

Continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure may improve radiotherapy delivery in patients with intra-thoracic tumors

Background

Minimizing tumor motion in radiotherapy for intra-thoracic tumors reduces side-effects by limiting radiation exposure to healthy tissue. Continuous or Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP/BiPAP) could achieve this, since it could increase lung inflation and decrease tidal volume variability. We aim to identify the better CPAP/BiPAP setting for minimizing tumor motion.

Methods

In 10 patients (5 with lung cancer, 5 with other intra-thoracic tumors), CPAP/BiPAP was tested with the following settings for 10 min each: CPAP 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O and BiPAP 14/10 cmH2O with a lower (7 breaths/min) and higher back-up respiratory rate (BURR initially 1 breath/min above the spontaneous breathing frequency, with the option to adjust if the patient continued to initiate breaths). Electrical impedance tomography was used to analyse end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) as an estimate of end-expiratory lung volume and tidal impedance variation (TIV) as an estimate of tidal volume.

Results

Nine out of ten patients tolerated all settings; one patient could not sustain CPAP-15. A significant difference in EELI was observed between settings (χ2 22.960, p < 0.001), with most increase during CPAP-15 (median (IQR) 1.03 (1.00 - 1.06), normalized to the EELI during spontaneous breathing). No significant differences in TIV and breathing variability were found between settings.

Conclusions

This study shows that the application of different settings of CPAP/BiPAP in patients with intra-thoracic tumors is feasible and tolerable. BiPAP with a higher BURR may offer the greatest potential for mitigating tumor motion among the applied settings, although further research investigating tumor motion should be conducted.

Clinical practicality and patient performance for surface-guided automated VMAT gating for DIBH breast cancer radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of automated surface-guided gating for left-sided breast cancer with DIBH and VMAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated in the first year after introduction of DIBH with VMAT were retrospectively considered for analysis. With automated surface-guided gating the beam automatically switches on/off, if the surface region of interest moved in/out the gating tolerance (±3 mm, ±3°). Patients were coached to hold their breath as long as comfortably possible. Depending on the patient's preference, patients received audio instructions during treatment delivery. Real-time positional variations of the breast/chest wall surface with respect to the reference surface were collected, for all three orthogonal directions. The durations and number of DIBHs needed to complete dose delivery, and DIBH position variations were determined. To evaluate an optimal gating window threshold, smaller tolerances of ±2.5 mm, ±2.0 mm, and ±1.5 mm were simulated.

RESULTS

525 fractions from 33 patients showed that median DIBH duration was 51 s (range: 30-121 s), and median 4 DIBHs per fraction were needed to complete VMAT dose delivery. Median intra-DIBH stability and intrafractional DIBH reproducibility approximated 1.0 mm in each direction. No large differences were found between patients who preferred to perform the DIBH procedure with (n = 21) and without audio-coaching (n = 12). Simulations demonstrated that gating window tolerances could be reduced from ±3.0 mm to ±2.0 mm, without affecting beam-on status.

CONCLUSION

Independent of the use of audio-coaching, this study demonstrates that automated surface-guided gating with DIBH and VMAT proved highly efficient. Patients' DIBH performance far exceeded our expectations compared to earlier experiences and literature. Furthermore, gating window tolerances could be reduced.

Stomach Motion and Deformation: Implications for Preoperative Gastric Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Selection and development of image guided strategies for preoperative gastric radiation therapy requires quantitative knowledge of the various sources of anatomic changes of the stomach. This study aims to investigate the magnitude of interfractional and intrafractional stomach motion and deformation using fiducial markers and 4-dimensional (4D) imaging.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fourteen patients who underwent preoperative gastric cancer radiation therapy received 2 to 6 fiducial markers distributed throughout the stomach (total of 54 markers) and additional imaging (ie, 1 planning 4D computed tomography [pCT], 20-25 pretreatment 4D cone beam [CB] CTs, 4-5 posttreatment 4D CBCTs). Marker coordinates on all end-exhale (EE) and end-inhale (EI) scans were obtained after a bony anatomy match. Interfractional marker displacements (ie, between EE pCT and all EE CBCTs) were evaluated for 5 anatomic regions (ie, cardia, small curvature, proximal and distal large curvature, and pylorus). Motion was defined as displacement of the center-of-mass of available markers (COMstomach), deformation as the average difference in marker-pair distances. Interfractional (ie, between EE pCT and all EE CBCTs), respiratory (between EE and EI pCT and CBCTs), and pre-post (pre- and posttreatment EE CBCTs) motion and deformation were quantified.

RESULTS

The interfractional marker displacement varied per anatomic region and direction, with systematic and random errors ranging from 1.6-8.8 mm and 2.2-8.2 mm, respectively. Respiratory motion varied per patient (median, 3-dimensional [3D] amplitude 5.2-20.0 mm) and day (interquartile range, 0.8-4.2 mm). Regarding COMstomach motion, respiratory motion was larger than interfractional motion (median, 10.9 vs 8.9 mm; P < .0001; Wilcoxon rank-sum), which was larger than pre-post motion (3.6 mm; P < .0001). Interfractional deformations (median, 5.8 mm) were significantly larger than pre-post deformations (2.6 mm; P < .0001), which were larger than respiratory deformation (1.8 mm; P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The demonstrated sizable stomach motions and deformations during radiation therapy stress the need for generous nonuniform planning target volume margins for preoperative gastric cancer radiation therapy. These margins can be decreased by daily image guidance and adaptive radiation therapy.

Evaluation of the four-dimensional motion of lung tumors during end-exhalation breath-hold conditions using volumetric cine computed tomography images

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the four-dimensional motion of lung tumors during end-exhalation (EE) breath-holding (BH) using cine computed tomography (CT) and investigate the correlation between tumor and surrogate marker motions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 28 patients who underwent stereotactic body radiation therapy at our institution and were capable of 15-20 s of EE BH within a ±1.5-mm gating window with external markers. During EE BH with cine CT, 21 s of continuous data were acquired using 320-row multislice CT. Displacements in the tumor position during EE BH were assessed in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions. Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) between tumor motions during EE BH and diaphragm/external marker motions was also determined.

RESULTS

The mean absolute maximum displacements of the tumor position during EE BH were 1.3 (range: 0.2-4.0), 1.9 (range: 0.3-12.0), and 1.3 (range: 0.1-7.2) mm in the LR, AP, and SI directions, respectively. The displacement of the tumor position in the AP direction was weakly correlated (|r| < 0.4) with the external marker and diaphragm displacements in many cases (proportions of 50% and 46%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We found some cases showing substantial displacement in lung tumor positions during EE BH, especially in the AP direction. Because these tumor position displacements did not correlate with surrogate markers and were difficult to detect, we recommend pretreatment evaluation of the four-dimensional motions of tumors during BH using cine CT.