Palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases in octogenarians: How do the oldest olds respond? Results from a tertiary cancer center with 288 treated patients

Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Geriatric Patients: Implications of Age and Dose on Iatrogenic Vertebral Compression Fracture Risk

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for spinal metastases; however, outcomes specific to a geriatric population have not been described. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of spine SBRT, in particular the rate of iatrogenic vertebral compression fracture (VCF), in patients aged 70 and older.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a prospectively maintained single-institutional database of 976 patients and 2407 spinal segments treated with SBRT for vertebral metastases between 2008 and 2021, all patients aged 70 or above were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome is the risk of VCF. Secondary outcomes included magnetic resonance imaging-based local failure and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 252 consecutive patients with 580 spinal segments treated with spine SBRT were reviewed. The median age was 75.8 (range: 70-90.3) years and the median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 16.9 (6.4-41.3) months. The median overall survival of the entire cohort was 20.3 months and the 2-year local failure rate was 14.3%. The cumulative risk of VCF at 12 and 24 months were 8.4% and 12.3%, respectively. Significant predictors of VCF on multivariable analyses included greater biologically equivalent dose, baseline fracture, and increasing age. In particular, the 2-year VCF rate and median time to VCF were 30.3% and 3.4 months for those 86 and older, compared with 11.2% and 12.8 months for those younger than 86, respectively (P = .0011).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Spine SBRT should be considered in a geriatric population; however, for those 86 and older, we suggest caution due to the significant risk of VCF.

Bridging the care gap: radiation therapy in elderly and frail cancer patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to address the gap in radiation therapy (RT) care for elderly cancer patients. It will discuss the barriers to implementing effective RT in elderly and frail patients with a focus on breast cancer and metastatic settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies indicate that SBRT provides better pain control for bone metastases compared to cEBRT, but elderly patients are underrepresented in these trials. Evidence on the effectiveness of geriatric assessment tools in predicting RT tolerance and toxicity is mixed, with some studies showing a correlation while others do not. Comprehensive geriatric assessments, though promising, are often impractical due to time and resource constraints.

SUMMARY

There is a critical need for more inclusive research to better understand the risks and benefits of RT in elderly patients. Developing streamlined geriatric assessment tools and integrating them into clinical practice can enhance treatment personalization. Future studies should prioritize elderly populations to generate robust data, thereby improving RT outcomes and quality of life for this growing patient group.

Innovative Biomaterials for Bone Tumor Treatment and Regeneration: Tackling Postoperative Challenges and Charting the Path Forward

Surgical resection of bone tumors is the primary approach employed in the treatment of bone cancer. Simultaneously, perioperative interventions, particularly postoperative adjuvant anticancer strategies, play a crucial role in achieving satisfactory therapeutic outcomes. However, the occurrence of postoperative bone tumor recurrence, metastasis, extensive bone defects, and infection are significant risks that can result in unfavorable prognoses or even treatment failure. In recent years, there has been significant progress in the development of biomaterials, leading to the emergence of new treatment options for bone tumor therapy and bone regeneration. This progress report aims to comprehensively analyze the strategic development of unique therapeutic biomaterials with inherent healing properties and bioactive capabilities for bone tissue regeneration. These composite biomaterials, classified into metallic, inorganic non-metallic, and organic types, are thoroughly investigated for their responses to external stimuli such as light or magnetic fields, internal interventions including chemotherapy or catalytic therapy, and combination therapy, as well as their role in bone regeneration. Additionally, an overview of self-healing materials for osteogenesis is provided and their potential applications in combating osteosarcoma and promoting bone formation are explored. Furthermore, the safety concerns of integrated materials and current limitations are addressed, while also discussing the challenges and future prospects.

Radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: A 20-year retrospective analysis in a single ternary centre

INTRODUCTION

The global burden of cancer and the ageing population is increasing, resulting in an increase in cancer incidence among elderly patients. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety profile of radiotherapy in nonagenarians and to contribute to the existing knowledge on radiotherapy in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included nonagenarian patients who received external beam radiotherapy at a single centre in Japan between May 2003 and May 2023. Data, including patient demographics, tumour characteristics, treatment details, and clinical outcomes, were collected from medical records. Statistical analyses including survival and subgroup analyses were performed to summarize the data.

RESULTS

The analysis included 124 nonagenarian patients who received 151 treatment courses. Among the patients with a median age of 92 years (range, 90-98 years), 71 received palliative-intent radiotherapy and 53 underwent curative-intent radiotherapy. The overall survival rates at 1 and 3 years after radiotherapy were 55.4% and 38.3%, respectively. Performance status and radiotherapy at the primary site were independent prognosis factors for improved overall survival, while age was not. The incidence rate of grades 3-5 radiation-related toxicities was 3.4%, which is generally considered to be acceptable.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that radiotherapy can be effectively and safely used in this age group, supporting its use as a treatment option for both palliative and curative goals. These results contribute to the existing body of evidence on radiotherapy in elderly patients and can guide clinical decision-making in the management of nonagenarian patients with cancer.

Survival Following Palliative Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Examining Treatment Indications in Elderly Patients

Background/Aim

This study investigated the survival outcomes of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) undergoing palliative radiotherapy, particularly focusing on challenges and factors associated with older age, providing insights into appropriate palliative radiotherapy use in this demographic.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using electronic medical records of 73 patients with HNSCC who were deemed unsuitable for curative therapy. Palliative radiotherapy involved a uniform dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariate analysis identified significant prognostic factors.

Results

The median overall survival was 7.5 months, with no significant difference between age groups. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >70 correlated with favorable survival. Multivariate analysis confirmed KPS as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=1.949, p=0.031).

Conclusion

The results of this study align with those of previous studies, emphasizing the importance of palliative radiotherapy for HNSCC treatment. Optimal dose fractionation regimens remain undetermined, and tailored approaches that consider factors, such as age and performance status are crucial. Individualized, comprehensive assessments and supportive care measures enhance patient well-being, reflecting palliative care principles.