1
|
Kivistik S, Metsälä E, Virtanen H. Perceptions, educational expectations and knowledge gaps of patients with non-metastatic breast cancer regarding radiotherapy: Integrative review. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2025; 34:100312. [PMID: 40321895 PMCID: PMC12049838 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2025.100312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2025] [Revised: 03/20/2025] [Accepted: 04/19/2025] [Indexed: 05/08/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective This integrative review investigates perceptions, educational expectations, and knowledge gaps of patients with breast cancer (BC) regarding radiotherapy (RT). Methods The included studies were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Each segment of data was coded with open coding. The codes were gathered into subthemes as they emerged and into overarching themes, after which the data was analysed again. Results 22 studies were included: 11 qualitative, 10 cross-sectional, and 1 case study. Our findings indicate that breast cancer patients perceptions of radiation therapy (RT) are influenced by their understanding of RT, its side effects, the treatment burden, emotional state or feelings, effectiveness if RT, prognosis, and viewing RT as the end-of-care phase. They expect education on the treatment pathway, psychosocial support, personalised aspects of RT, planning, delivery, follow-up, and side effects. Additionally, women undergoing RT have knowledge gaps related to preparedness and support, unforeseen risks and side effects, as well as daily practical issues. Conclusion Tailored, culturally sensitive education is essential to bridge gaps in understanding, manage anxiety, and build trust. It requires individualized communication strategies and psychosocial support. By integrating personalized information and leveraging technological solutions, healthcare providers can empower patients, improve adherence, and enhance outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siret Kivistik
- University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland
- Tartu University of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiography and Biomedical Laboratory Science, Tartu, Estonia
- Tartu University Hospital, Department of Radiation Therapy and Oncology, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Eija Metsälä
- University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland
- Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Healthcare and Nursing, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Virtanen
- University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miao W, Yang L, Li J, Yan X, Lu Y, Yang X. Disparities in consent to adjuvant radiotherapy in primary glioblastoma: a population-based study. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2025:1-8. [PMID: 39916389 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2025.2464935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2025] [Indexed: 02/14/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite adjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has long been the standard treatment for glioblastoma (GBM), a significant subset of patients chooses to refuse it. We aimed to investigate the factors influencing EBRT refusal in GBM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with GBM were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to evaluate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for the refusal of EBRT in relation to various clinical and demographic characteristics. RESULTS Among the 29,994 patients analyzed, 675 (2.3%) opted to refuse adjuvant EBRT. Patients aged ≥ 55 years (55-64: aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.04-2.61, p = 0.03; 65-74: aOR 1.80, 95% CI 1.17-2.87, p = 0.009; 75+: aOR 2.01, 95% CI 1.28-3.24, p = 0.002), being single (aOR 1.68, 95% CI 1.19-2.35, p = 0.002), with a household income of $55,000 to $64,999 (aOR 1.94, 95% CI 1.24-3.07, p = 0.004), and not undergoing chemotherapy (aOR 114, 95% CI 80.2-170.2, p < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of refusing adjuvant EBRT. CONCLUSIONS This study underscores the necessity for targeted communication strategies by physicians regarding the benefits of adjuvant EBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Miao
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Liu Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jinhu Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xia Yan
- Cancer Center, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ying Lu
- Cancer Center, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| | - Xin Yang
- Cancer Center, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pantelimon I, Stancu AM, Coniac S, Ionescu AI, Atasiei DI, Georgescu DE, Galeș LN. Local Control of Advanced Breast Cancer-Debate in Multidisciplinary Tumor Board. J Clin Med 2025; 14:510. [PMID: 39860516 PMCID: PMC11766072 DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2024] [Revised: 01/03/2025] [Accepted: 01/10/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In Romania, breast cancer is the second most common cancer, the third leading cause of cancer death, and the most prevalent cancer overall. De novo advanced-stage breast cancer often presents in clinical practice, and treatment decisions are best made in a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTD) involving surgeons, radiotherapists, and medical oncologists. Significant advances in systemic therapies, particularly in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), have surpassed traditional palliative mastectomy and radiotherapy for local control. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to emphasize the importance of the initial choice of treatment for patient prognosis. Methods: We expose two cases of patients with de novo severe, advanced-stage, hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer and their management and outcome using cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor and radiotherapy. An extensive review of the literature from the past five years was also conducted. Results: The role of palliative mastectomy is diminishing, as many patients are opting for novel therapies, including cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, which may improve quality of life. Conclusions: First-line therapy for locally advanced breast cancer has suffered changes due to the implementation of systemic targeted therapy. However, drug resistance-either de novo or acquired-remains a critical consideration. MTD discussions and informed patient decisions are essential to achieving a personalized, evidence-based treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iuliana Pantelimon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Hospital Dr. Ion Cantacuzino, 030167 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (A.M.S.); (S.C.)
- Discipline of Medical Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Andra Maria Stancu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Hospital Dr. Ion Cantacuzino, 030167 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (A.M.S.); (S.C.)
- Department of Physiology, Craiova University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania
| | - Simona Coniac
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinical Hospital Dr. Ion Cantacuzino, 030167 Bucharest, Romania; (I.P.); (A.M.S.); (S.C.)
- Department of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Coltea Clinical Hospital, 030167 Bucharest, Romania;
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dimitrie-Ionuț Atasiei
- Discipline of Oncological Radiotherapy and Medical Imaging, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Dragoș Eugen Georgescu
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Hospital Dr. Ion Cantacuzino, Bucharest, 030167 Bucharest, Romania;
- Discipline of Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurenția Nicoleta Galeș
- Discipline of Medical Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bucharest Institute of Oncology “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu”, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park SW, Park YL, Lee EG, Chae H, Park P, Choi DW, Choi YH, Hwang J, Ahn S, Kim K, Kim WJ, Kong SY, Jung SY, Kim HJ. Mortality Prediction Modeling for Patients with Breast Cancer Based on Explainable Machine Learning. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3799. [PMID: 39594754 PMCID: PMC11592669 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16223799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Revised: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/09/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, requiring strategic efforts to reduce its mortality. This study aimed to develop a predictive classification model for breast cancer mortality using real-world data, including various clinical features. Methods: A total of 11,286 patients with breast cancer from the National Cancer Center were included in this study. The mortality rate of the total sample was approximately 6.2%. Propensity score matching was used to reduce bias. Several machine learning models, including extreme gradient boosting, were applied to 31 clinical features. To enhance model interpretability, we used the SHapley Additive exPlanations method. ML analyses were also performed on the samples, excluding patients who developed other cancers after breast cancer. Results: Among the ML models, the XGB model exhibited the highest discriminatory power, with an area under the curve of 0.8722 and a specificity of 0.9472. Key predictors of the mortality classification model included occurrence in other organs, age at diagnosis, N stage, T stage, curative radiation treatment, and Ki-67(%). Even after excluding patients who developed other cancers after breast cancer, the XGB model remained the best-performing, with an AUC of 0.8518 and a specificity of 0.9766. Additionally, the top predictors from SHAP were similar to the results for the overall sample. Conclusions: Our models provided excellent predictions of breast cancer mortality using real-world data from South Korea. Explainable artificial intelligence, such as SHAP, validated the clinical applicability and interpretability of these models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Won Park
- Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea; (S.W.P.)
- Institute of Medical Science, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
| | - Ye-Lin Park
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Eun-Gyeong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Center of Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Heejung Chae
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Center for Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Phillip Park
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Dong-Woo Choi
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Yeon Ho Choi
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Juyeon Hwang
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Seohyun Ahn
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Keunkyun Kim
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| | - Woo Jin Kim
- Department of Medical Informatics, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea; (S.W.P.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon 24289, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun-Young Kong
- Targeted Therapy Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - So-Youn Jung
- Department of Surgery, Center of Breast Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Jin Kim
- Cancer Data Center, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang 10408, Republic of Korea; (Y.-L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Liu Y, Li J, Li H, Zhang G, Li C, Wei C, Zeng J. Radiotherapy is recommended for hormone receptor-negative older breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery. Sci Rep 2024; 14:21355. [PMID: 39266585 PMCID: PMC11393351 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66401-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
In this study, the necessity of radiotherapy (RT) for hormone receptor-negative older breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was investigated. The data of hormone receptor-negative invasive breast cancer patients who underwent BCS were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. All patients were separated into two groups, namely, the RT group and the no radiotherapy (No RT) group. The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were compared between the No RT and RT groups after propensity score matching (PSM). The nomograms for predicting the survival of patients were constructed from variables identified by univariate or multivariate Cox regression analysis. A total of 2504 patients were enrolled in the training cohort, and 630 patients were included in the validation cohort. After PSM, 738 patients were enrolled in the No RT group and RT group. We noted that RT can improve survival in hormone receptor-negative older breast cancer patients who undergo BCS. Based on the results of multivariate Cox analysis, age, race, tumour grade, receipt of RT and chemotherapy, pathological T stage, N status, M status and HER2 status were linked to OS and CSS for these patients, and nomograms for predicting OS and CSS were constructed and validated. Moreover, RT improved OS and CSS in hormone receptor-negative older breast cancer patients who underwent BCS. In addition, the proposed nomograms more accurately predicted OS and CSS for hormone receptor-negative older breast cancer patients after BCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaxiong Liu
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Jinsong Li
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Honghui Li
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Gongyin Zhang
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Changwang Li
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Changlong Wei
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Jinsheng Zeng
- Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mentrup F, Klein A, Lindner LH, Nachbichler S, Holzapfel BM, Albertsmeier M, Knösel T, Dürr HR. Refusal of Adjuvant Therapies and Its Impact on Local Control and Survival in Patients with Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:239. [PMID: 38254731 PMCID: PMC10814158 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In soft tissue or bone sarcomas, multimodal therapeutic concepts represent the standard of care. Some patients reject the therapeutic recommendations due to several reasons. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of that rejection on both prognosis and local recurrence. METHODS Between 2012 and 2019, a total of 828 sarcoma patients were surgically treated. Chemotherapy was scheduled as a neoadjuvant, and adjuvant multi-agent therapy was performed following recommendations from an interdisciplinary tumor board. Radiotherapy, if deemed appropriate, was administered either in a neoadjuvant or an adjuvant manner. The recommended type of therapy, patient compliance, and the reasons for refusal were documented. Follow-ups included local recurrences, diagnosis of metastatic disease, and patient mortality. RESULTS Radiotherapy was recommended in 407 (49%) patients. A total of 40 (10%) individuals did not receive radiation. A reduction in overall survival and local recurrence-free survival was evident in those patients who declined radiotherapy. Chemotherapy was advised for 334 (40%) patients, 250 (75%) of whom did receive all recommended cycles. A total of 25 (7%) individuals did receive a partial course while 59 (18%) did not receive any recommended chemotherapy. Overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were reduced in patients refusing chemotherapy. Overall survival was worst for the group of patients who received no chemotherapy due to medical reasons. Refusing chemotherapy for non-medical reasons was seen in 8.8% of patients, and refusal of radiotherapy for non-medical reasons was seen in 4.7% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Divergence from the advised treatment modalities significantly impacted overall survival and local recurrence-free survival across both treatment modalities. There is an imperative need for enhanced physician-patient communication. Reducing treatment times, as achieved with hypofractionated radiotherapy and with therapy in a high-volume sarcoma center, might also have a positive effect on complying with the treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Mentrup
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (F.M.); (A.K.); (B.M.H.)
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
| | - Alexander Klein
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (F.M.); (A.K.); (B.M.H.)
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
| | - Lars Hartwin Lindner
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
- Department of Medicine III, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Silke Nachbichler
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Boris Michael Holzapfel
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (F.M.); (A.K.); (B.M.H.)
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
| | - Markus Albertsmeier
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
- Institute of Pathology, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Hans Roland Dürr
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedic Oncology, Musculoskeletal University Center Munich (MUM), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (F.M.); (A.K.); (B.M.H.)
- SarKUM, Center of Bone and Soft Tissue Tumors, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 München, Germany; (L.H.L.); (S.N.); (M.A.); (T.K.)
| |
Collapse
|