The new timing in acute care surgery (new TACS) classification: a WSES Delphi consensus study

The Operating Room management for emergency Surgical Activity (ORSA) study: a WSES international survey

BACKGROUND

Despite advances and improvements in the management of surgical patients, emergency and trauma surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This may be due in part to delays in definitive surgical management in the operating room (OR). There is a lack of studies focused on OR prioritization and resource allocation in emergency surgery. The Operating Room management for emergency Surgical Activity (ORSA) study was conceived to assess the management of operating theatres and resources from a global perspective among expert international acute care surgeons.

METHOD

The ORSA study was conceived as an international web survey. The questionnaire was composed of 23 multiple-choice and open questions. Data were collected over 3 months. Participation in the survey was voluntary and anonymous.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven emergency and acute care surgeons answered the questionnaire; the response rate was 58.8%. The majority of the participants come from Europe. One hundred nineteen surgeons (81%; 119/147) declared to have at least one emergency OR in their hospital; for the other 20/147 surgeons (13.6%), there is not a dedicated emergency operating room. Forty-six (68/147)% of the surgeons use the elective OR to perform emergency procedures during the day. The planning of an emergency surgical procedure is done by phone by 70% (104/147) of the surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no dedicated emergency OR in the majority of hospitals internationally. Elective surgical procedures are usually postponed or even cancelled to perform emergency surgery. It is a priority to validate an effective universal triaging and scheduling system to allocate emergency surgical procedures. The new Timing in Acute Care Surgery (TACS) was recently proposed and validated by a Delphi consensus as a clear and reproducible triage tool to timely perform an emergency surgical procedure according to the clinical severity of the surgical disease. The new TACS needs to be prospectively validated in clinical practice. Logistics have to be assessed using a multi-disciplinary approach to improve patients' safety, optimise the use of resources, and decrease costs.

Intrainstitutional Changes of the Treatment of Supracondylar Humerus Fracture in Children over a Period of 9 Years

To assess changes in treatment modalities for supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHFs) at a large pediatric university hospital, we analyzed patient data from 2014 to 2022. A total of 233 SCHFs treated surgically at our hospital were included. To evaluate postoperative outcome and quality of life, DASH and EuroQol-5D-Y questionnaires were sent to patients. In addition to a significant fluctuation in fracture severity, we found an increase in training interventions (more surgeries were performed by trainees) and a significant decrease in surgery times after 2016. From 2020, there was a significant shift in the type of surgical method away from closed reduction with elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN) and towards closed reduction and crossed K-wire osteosynthesis (CRK). Surgeries performed in the morning and evening hours increased, while those performed in the afternoon and after midnight decreased. After a mean follow-up of 4 years, there was no difference in elbow function between ESIN and open reduction and K-wires (ORK). Treatment with ESIN was equivalent to ORK in terms of function, at least in the medium-term follow-up. In summary, the combination of shifting treatment from SCHF to daytime hours, increasing trainee participation and using cross K-wire fixation instead of ESIN had no negative impact on surgery times. In our setting, these measures have reduced resource utilization and increased efficiency without compromising patient care.