The long-term outcomes following the use of inactivated autograft in the treatment of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor

Frozen inactivated autograft replantation for bone and soft tissue sarcomas

Background

The frozen inactivation of autologous tumor bones using liquid nitrogen is an important surgical method for limb salvage in patients with sarcoma. At present, there are few research reports related to frozen inactivated autograft replantation.

Methods

In this study, we retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with bone and soft tissue sarcoma treated with liquid nitrogen-frozen inactivated tumor bone replantation, and analyzed the safety and efficacy of this surgical method. The healing status of the frozen inactivated autografts was evaluated using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) scoring system. Functional status of patients was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scale.

Results

This study included 43 patients. The average length of the bone defect after tumor resection is 16.9 cm (range 6.3-35.3 cm). Patients with autograft not including the knee joint surface had significantly better healing outcomes (ISOLS scores) (80.6% ± 15% vs 28.2% ± 4.9%, P<0.001) and limb function (MSTS score) (87% ± 11.6% vs 27.2% ± 4.4%, P<0.001) than patients with autografts including the knee joint surface. The healing time of the end of inactivated autografts near the metaphyseal was significantly shorter than that of the end far away from the metaphyseal (9.8 ± 6.3 months vs 14.9 ± 6.3 months, P=0.0149). One patient had local recurrence, one had an autograft infection, five (all of whom had an autograft including the knee joint surface) had joint deformities, and seven had bone non-union.

Conclusion

Frozen inactivated autologous tumor bone replantation is safe and results in good bone healing. But this method is not suitable for patients with autograft involving the knee joint surface.

Analysis of mechanical complications for patients with extremity sarcoma after biological reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Biological reconstruction after tumor resection is significant for restoration of limb integrality. However, it is unclear what risk factors influence mechanical complications of patients after extremity sarcoma resection and biological reconstruction. The objective of study was (1) to compare complications between patients receiving inactivated autograft and allograft, (2) to analyze influence of graft type, nonunion and fixation method on mechanical complications for patients after biological reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized allograft, nonunion and fixation method influence occurrence of mechanical complications after biological reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 71 patients with sarcomas at the extremity receiving biological reconstruction from January 1999 to November 2015. Eight patients were lost at last follow-up. Sixty-three patients with complete clinical data were recruited into the present study. There were 32 males and 31 females with a mean age of 20.5±14.9 years (median, 17 years; range, 2-72 years). Sixty-one cases had tumors at lower extremity and two at upper extremity. Histological diagnosis was confirmed as forty-five with osteosarcoma, thirteen with Ewing sarcoma and five with chondrosarcoma.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were free of disease, sixteen died of disease and three lived with pulmonary metastasis at last follow-up. Twenty-one out of 63 patients (33.3%) had local recurrence requiring surgical treatment. Reconstruction choice (mechanical complications rates were 38.9% for allograft (14/36) versus 14.8% for inactivated autograft (4/27)) and nonunion occurrence (yes 58.8% (10/17); no 17.4% (8/46)) had the close relationship with mechanical complication in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed fixation method (p=0.041) and nonunion (p=0.008) were prognostic factors for mechanical complication of sarcoma resection and biological reconstruction at the extremity. Fourteen of 36 patients receiving massive allograft had a second surgery due to mechanical complication compared to 4 of 27 patients with massive inactivated autograft (38.9%, 14/36 vs. 14.8%, 4/27 (p=0.05)). Time to union for diaphysis and metaphysis was not significantly different between allograft and inactivated autograft groups.

DISCUSSION

Patients receiving massive allograft are prone to suffer from the mechanical complications. Extramedullary plate and nonunion have the tendency of increasing occurrence of mechanical complications of biological reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Limb Salvage for Musculoskeletal Tumors in the Austere Environment: Review of the Literature With Illustrative Cases Regarding Considerations and Pitfalls

Although there is literature discussing the treatment of acute and chronic trauma in austere environments, no literature or guidelines for the treatment of musculoskeletal tumors exist. This series discusses case examples with considerations and pitfalls of performing limb-salvage surgery in an underserved location.

Cases of limb-salvage surgery performed by the same orthopaedic oncologist in Haiti and the Dominican Republic are discussed with a review of the literature on limb salvage for musculoskeletal tumors in developing nations.

All patients successfully underwent limb-salvage surgery after considering multiple factors including tumor type and location. Patients with metastatic disease, likelihood of substantial blood loss, and poor health were not candidates for limb-salvage surgery.

Medical missions and the development of partnerships with established training programs make limb salvage a greater possibility. Knowledge of the facility, anesthesia support, and instrumentation available is vital. Advanced imaging, blood products, and allograft are likely unavailable or difficult to obtain. Established continuity of care is necessary, and training of the local surgeon should be provided. Surgery should only be considered if it is safe and provides more of a benefit to the patient than an amputation.

Clinical evaluations of diaphysis malignant tumors of femur and tibia treated with microwave ablation in situ

Background

This study was designed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with diaphysis malignant tumors of femur and tibia treated with microwave ablation (MWA) in situ.

Methods

Retrospective study of 32 patients with diaphysis malignant bone tumors of femur or tibia have been treated by microwave ablation. Instead of en bloc resection, hyperthermia ablation in situ was carried out followed by strengthen procedure. The patients were followed up for a period ranging from 36 to 180 months.

Results

Twenty-five patients survived over 3 years and all of the patients alive have a satisfactory functional and cosmetic limb. The postoperative survival rate of MWA group was significantly higher than the amputation group in consecutive inclusions.

Conclusions

MWA is a feasible and effective surgical method for limb salvage operation and it might offer an innovative and distinctive therapeutic alternative for diaphysis malignant bone tumors, which avoiding osteotomy or prosthesis replacement.

Level of evidence

Level IV, clinical cohort study

[Application of pasteurized tumor-bearing bone replantation for primary malignant bone tumor of extremities]

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of the pasteurized tumor-bearing bone replantation in treatment of primary malignant bone tumor of extremities.

Methods

Between February 2012 and June 2016, 13 patients with primary malignant bone tumor of extremities were treated with pasteurized tumor-bearing bone replantation after extensive excision. There were 8 males and 5 females, aged from 11 to 27 years, with an average of 17.4 years. Tumors were located at the mid-upper humerus in 2 cases, the mid-upper femur in 2 cases, the mid-lower femur in 6 cases, the mid-upper tibia in 2 cases, and the middle tibia in 1 case. According to Enneking staging system, 3 patients were classified as stage ⅠB, 5 patients as stage ⅡA, and 5 patients as stage ⅡB. There were 11 cases of osteosarcoma and 2 cases of chondrosarcoma. The disease duration ranged from 3 to 8 months, with an average of 4.8 months. The length of the tumor-bearing bone ranged from 8 to 16 cm, with an average of 12.5 cm. Postoperative follow-up was conducted regularly to evaluate the status of inactivated bone and complications. The limb function was assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS-93) scoring system.

Results

All 13 patients were followed up 26-79 months, with an average of 50.5 months. Eleven patients survived without tumors. Two patients had local soft tissue recurrence and underwent amputation, 1 had lung metastasis after amputation and died. All patients had no complications of bone resorption, shortening, and internal fixation disorder. The nonunion of osteotomy occurred in 4 cases. Among them, 3 cases were successfully healed after autologous iliac bone grafting, and 1 case was treated conservatively. The healing time of metaphyseal osteotomy end was 10-15 months (mean, 12.6 months), the healing rate was 90.9% (10/11); the healing time of diaphyseal osteotomy end was 12-21 months (mean, 17.0 months), the healing rate was 72.7% (8/11); and the total healing rate of osteotomy end was 81.8% (18/22). One case had inactivated bone fracture and 1 case had incision dehiscence and infection after operation. At last follow-up, the MSTS-93 score of affected limb ranged from 21 to 28, with an average of 25.3.

Conclusion

The procedure of the pasteurized tumor-bearing bone replantation is an effective, simple, and economic way in repair of massive segmental bone defect to save limb function for primary malignant bone tumor of extremities.

Clinical outcome of various limb salvage surgeries in osteosarcoma around knee: Megaprosthesis, extracorporeal irradiation and resection arthrodesis

Background

We evaluated the outcome and the survival rate of Limb salvage surgeries (LSSs) in osteosarcoma around knee by using megaprosthesis, ECI autograft, and modified arthrodesis of the knee with metallic plus bone cement (MAMC).

Methods

We reviewed 35 cases of osteosarcoma around the knee that was treated by megaprosthesis, ECI autograft and MAMC from 2012 to 2017. The survival, local recurrence, metastases, complications and functional MSTS score were evaluated for each operation technique. Kaplan-Meier was used to describe the survival rate for each technique.

Result

Megaprostheses group had an excellent MSTS score (78.7%), the ECI group (72.3%) and MAMC group (68.4%). Local recurrence occurred in the megaprothesis group (0%), the ECI group (9.1%) and MAMC group (20%). Infection occurred in 3 cases of ECI (13.6%) while only 2 (40%) cases in MAMC group and 1 case (12.5%) in the megaprostheses group. Aseptic loosening occurred in the megaprostheses group 1 case (12.5%) and MAMC 1 case (20%). Metastases occurred in 18.2% of the ECI group compared to 25% of the megaprostheses group and 40% of the MAMC group. The megaprosthesis group had an overall survival rate of 90.9 months, whilst the ECI group is on 94.6 months and the MAMC group was 47.2 months.

Conclusion

Megaprosthesis showed good-excellent functional outcome and survival rate. ECI that is an option in LSS has good functional outcome as well. Knee arthrodesis with MAMC it is still an option to perform LSS even in the advanced local stage of the disease.

•

Various reconstruction options are available for the reconstruction of the distal femur and proximal tibia osteosarcoma.

•

Megaprosthesis showed good-excellent functional outcome and survival rate.

•

ECI that is an option in LSS has good functional outcome as well.

•

Knee arthrodesis with MAMC it is still an option to perform LSS even in the advanced local stage of the disease.

Does intramedullary nailing improve the union rate or decrease mechanical complications for patients with extremity sarcoma after biological reconstruction?

INTRODUCTION

This is a retrospective study that evaluate the outcome of patients with extremity sarcoma between extramedullary plate and intramedullary nailing for the biological reconstruction after tumor resection.

METHODS

58 patients (40 treated with plate fixation and 18 with intramedullary nailing, IM group) with sarcomas of the lower and upper extremity who received biological reconstruction at our bone tumor center from November 2003 to November 2015 were reviewed for the study. There were 29 male and 29 female patients with a mean age of 20.8 years (range, 5-72 years). The mean follow-up duration was 90.8 months (range, 12.2-244.4 months). All data were obtained from the clinical, radiograph records and follow-up information. The analysis of outcome, survival, local recurrence, function and complications of patients in the plate group and IM group was performed.

RESULTS

28 cases in the plate group lived at the last follow-up, of which 26 had no evidence of disease, 2 lived with the pulmonary metastasis, whereas 15 in the IM group lived at the last follow-up, of which all had no evidence of disease and no lived with the pulmonary metastasis. There was no significant difference between the two groups for the prognosis. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference of incidence of nonunion, graft fracture and fixation breakage between the two groups, whereas the time to diaphysis union in the plate group (11.6 ± 2.7 months) was shorter than that in IM group (14.7 ± 4.8 months, P = 0.015). It had the tendency that the time to mechanical complications in the intramedullary nailing group (38.1 ± 39.6 months) was longer than that in the plate group (15.7 ± 13.4 months, P = 0.058,95% CI,-45.6-0.8). Furthermore, the infection occurred in 12 cases and five grafts of them developed the deep infection and the mean time to deep infection was 14.8 ± 20.5 months. Furthermore, the incidence of local recurrence for the patients who had plate fixation was similar to the incidence of patients who had nailing fixation. At the last follow-up, the functional evaluation was performed for 39 patients. There was no significant difference in MSTS and VAS functional score for patients between in the plate group (n = 32) and IM group (n = 7).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study showed that intramedullary nailing does not improve the union rate or decrease the incidence of mechanical complications for patients with extremity sarcoma after biological reconstruction. However, intramedullary nailing may have potential advantages on the service life for the biological reconstruction after extremity sarcoma resection.

Impacts of Tumor Location, Nature and Bone Destruction of Extremity Osteosarcoma on Selection of Limb Salvage Operative Procedure

OBJECTIVE

To study the impacts of tumor location, nature and extent of bone destruction on selection of operative protocol for extremity osteosarcoma (OS).

METHODS

The medical records of 201 patients with extremity OS treated in our institute from December 1999 to June 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Ninety eligible patients (56 males and 34 females) of average age 20 ± 11 years (range, 4-40 years) were enrolled. Tumor locations were categorized as diaphyseal (4; diaphysis group) or juxta-articular (86); the latter being subclassified as with (51, type III, epiphysis group) or without invasion beyond the epiphyseal line or plate (35, type I and II, metaphysis group) according to MRI images. Tumor nature (osteogenic, 51; osteolytic, 39) was determined radiologically. Extent of bone destruction was quantitated according to Mirel's scoring system to obtain an "invasion score". Regular postoperative follow-up included physical examination and imaging evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients underwent biological reconstruction and 36 mechanical reconstruction. The mean follow-up duration was 51 months (range, 6-176 months, including four deaths within 12 months). Biological reconstruction was performed more frequently in the diaphysis and metaphysis groups (31/39, 79.5%) than mechanical reconstruction (8/39, 20.5%, P < 0.05). Biological reconstruction and articular preservation were associated with more satisfactory limb function (MSTS scores: 25.0 ± 3.3 and 25.1 ± 3.6) than mechanical reconstruction and articular resection (MSTS scores: 23.4 ± 3.7 and 23.1 ± 3.4, P < 0.05). Reconstruction methods and articular preservation had no relationship with overall or tumor-free survival (P > 0.05). Osteolytic lesions were associated with more extensive bone destruction than osteogenic lesions according to invasion scores (P < 0.05). Following biological reconstruction, high invasion scores (>8) had a 13.5-fold risk of fracture compared with low scores (≤8) (P < 0.05). Twenty-one subjects had recurrences, 30 metastases and 26 died. Postoperative complications included infection (6), fracture (10), and prosthesis loosening (4). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated 5- and 10-year survival rates of 68.9% and 62.8%, respectively, and 5- and 10-year tumor-free survival rates of 66.7% and 57.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Selection of limb salvage operative protocol for extremity OS should rely on tumor location, nature and extent of bone destruction. Regardless of tumor site, mechanical reconstruction is indicated for tumors with high invasion scores (>8), whereas biological reconstruction is preferred for those with low invasion scores (≤8). Tumors sparing the epiphyseal line or plate are ideal candidates for articular preservation.