Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Comparison of Outcomes in High Versus Low Activity Level Patients After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Activity level (AL) recommendations following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remain controversial. Our purpose was to compare implant survivorship of high activity (HA) and low activity (LA) patients after primary TJA. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in implant survivorship based on AL.

METHODS

This was a retrospective 1:1 matched cohort study after primary TJA with minimum 5-year follow-up. High activity patients were designated by the University of California and Los Angeles activity-level rating scale score ≥8 and matched to LA patients based on age (±5), sex, and body mass index (±5). There were 396 HA patients (149 knees and 48 hips) who met inclusion criteria. We analyzed revision rates, adverse events, and radiographic lucencies.

RESULTS

Crepitus was the most common adverse events in both HA and LA total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Adverse events were rare in total hip arthroplasty (THA) cohorts. For both THA and TKA patients, the HA cohort did not have increased reoperations or revisions when compared to the LA cohort. No differences were noted in overall radiographic analysis between HA (16.1%) and LA (12.1%) TKA patients (P = .318), and in THA patients, more radiographic problems were noted in LA (P = .004).

CONCLUSION

We found no difference in minimum 5-year postoperative implant survivorship based on AL. This may change AL recommendations after TKA and THA.

Short-Term Surface Damage Mechanisms of Retrieved Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Patellar Components

BACKGROUND

Previous retrieval studies of patellar components for total knee arthroplasty focused on historical designs and polyethylene materials that are no longer clinically relevant. Therefore, this study aimed to compare revision reasons and surface damage mechanisms of conventional, gamma inert sterilized polyethylene and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) patellar components in contemporary designs from a single manufacturer.

METHODS

A total of 114 gamma inert and 76 HXLPE patellar components were gathered in a multicenter orthopaedic implant retrieval program. Patient age and body mass index were similar between cohorts (P = .27 and P = .42, respectively); however, the gamma inert cohort was implanted longer (μ_difference = 3.1 years; P = .005). A matched subset was created based on the total knee arthroplasty design, patellar shape, and implantation time. Revision reasons were gathered from revision operating notes, and surface damage was examined via the Hood scoring method. Differences between HXLPE and gamma inert cohorts were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

The most common revision reasons were infection, loosening, and instability, with the most common patellar complication resulting in revision being patellar loosening for both cohorts with similar incidences for both (chi-square; P = .60, P = .59). The most common surface damage modes were burnishing, scratching, and pitting in both cohorts. Total surface damage was significantly higher in the gamma inert components (P = .02), but not in the matched subset (P = .46).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the clinical performance of HXLPE was similar to that of conventional polyethylene for patellar components with short implantation times. While this study provides much needed information on the performance of HXLPE patellae in short-term retrievals, long-term studies are still needed.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty is associated with a lower rate of revision for aseptic loosening: a meta-analysis of 962,467 cases

BACKGROUND

The evolution in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) includes the highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) which has been reported as an effective manner to reduce the wear of the polyethylene and the osteolysis. The purpose of the present study is to synthesize the results of comparative studies between HXLPE and conventional polyethylenes and determine their effect in primary TKA.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: "cross-linked", "polyethylene", "HXLPE", "conventional", "total knee arthroplasty", "TKA", "total knee replacement" and "TKR" combined with Boolean operators AND and OR.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis with 962,467 patients. No significant difference was found regarding the revision rate for any reason between the patients who received HXLPE and those with conventional liner (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.39-1.18; I²: 97.7%). In addition, there was no difference regarding the radiolucent lines between the two types of liners (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.20-1.49; I²: 69.4%). However, with data coming from seven studies enrolling a total of 411,543 patients, it was demonstrated that patients who received HXLPE were less likely to be revised due to aseptic loosening compared to the patients with conventional liners (OR 0.35; 95% CI 0.31-0.39; I²: 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis showed that regarding the overall revision rate and radiographic outcomes there was no significant difference between the two types of liners. On the other hand, the significantly less revision rate due to loosening supports the routine continued use of HXLPE in primary TKA.

Trends in Polyethylene Design and Manufacturing Characteristics for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Advances in polyethylene bearing characteristics have led to various options for total knee arthroplasty. We examine trends in use of polyethylene in the United States.

METHODS

An analysis of American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to 2019 for primary total knee arthroplasty procedures was conducted. Design and manufacturing characteristics were obtained and validated in the American Joint Replacement Registry dataset. Polyethylene bearing design and manufacturing use characteristics were compared by year, gender, age group, and geographic region of the procedure. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 993,292 cases over the study period. In total, 791,233 (80%) cases had complete device data available and were included in analysis. In addition, 366,280 (49.4%) cases utilized minimally stabilized bearings compared to 374,809 (50.6%) for posterior-stabilized bearings. Posterior-stabilized use was stable over the study period and highest in the Northeast (64.5%; P < .0001). Cruciate-retaining use decreased from 29.7% to 20.2% and anterior-stabilized use increased from 17.4% to 25.2%. Conventional polyethylene use decreased from 42.8% to 21.9%, and was highest in the 81+ age group (37.8%; P < .0001) and Northeast (43.0%; P < .0001). Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) with antioxidant use increased from 9.08% to 31.8%, while HXLPE without antioxidant use remained constant.

CONCLUSION

There was an increase in use of anterior-stabilized and pivot bearings and an increase in use of HXLPE with antioxidant. Additionally, there were noted age group and regional differences in the use of various bearings. Further study should evaluate if these changing utilization trends are related to clinical outcomes, or due to regional training, preferences, or manufacturer pressures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective.

Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

PURPOSE

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has experienced exponential growth over the last decade, including increasingly younger patients with high functional demands. Highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been proven effective in reducing osteolysis and loosening revisions while improving long-term survival and performance in total hip arthroplasty; nevertheless, this superiority is not demonstrated in TKA. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine whether HXLPE improved overall survival and postoperative functional and radiological outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in TKA.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, a literature search of five databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Science Direct and Embase) was made. A PICOS model was performed. The initial screening identified 2541 studies. Each eligible clinical article was analysed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 Levels of Evidence (LoE). Only randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of LoE 1 and 2 were included. The methodological quality of the articles was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.

RESULTS

Six clinical studies were included in the final study. This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). A total of 2285 knees were included. Eight outcomes (total reoperations, reoperations for prosthesis loosening and infections, radiolucent lines, osteolysis, mechanical failure, postoperative KSS knee score and function score) were analysed. For none of them, a statistically significant difference was found about the superiority of HXLPE over CPE (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no statistically significant differences between HXLPE and CPE for TKA concerning clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes; nevertheless, HXLPE did not show higher failure rates or complications and can be safely used for TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is equivalent to conventional polyethylene (CPE) in total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The benefits of HXLPE in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have not been as evident as total hip arthroplasty (THA). A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of highly-crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) on TKA outcomes compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE) is described.

METHODS

All studies comparing HXLPE with CPE for primary TKA were included for analysis. The minimum dataset included revision rates, indication for revision, aseptic component loosening and follow-up time. The primary outcome variables were all-cause revision, aseptic revision, revision for loosening, radiographic component loosening, osteolysis and incidence of radiolucent lines. Secondary outcome measures included postoperative functional knee scores. A random-effects meta-analysis allowing for all missing data was performed for all primary outcome variables.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, there were 2,234 knees (1,105 HXLPE and 1,129 CPE). The combined mean follow-up for all studies was 6 years. The aseptic revision rate in the HXLPE group was 1.02% compared to 1.97% in the CPE group. There was no difference in the rate of all-cause revision (p = 0.131), aseptic revision (p = 0.298) or revision for component loosening (p = 0.206) between the two groups. Radiographic loosening (p = 0.200), radiolucent lines (p = 0.123) and osteolysis (p = 0.604) was similar between both groups. Functional outcomes were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of HXLPE in TKA yields similar results for clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared to CPE at midterm follow-up. HXLPE does not confer the same advantages to TKA as seen in THA.

Patellar management during total knee arthroplasty: a review

The optimal management of the patella during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial and surgeons tend to approach the patella with one of three general mindsets: always resurface the patella, never resurface the patella, or selectively resurface the patella based on specific patient or patellar criteria.

Studies comparing resurfacing and non-resurfacing of the patella during TKA have reported inconsistent and contradictory findings.

When resurfacing the patella is chosen, there are a number of available patellar component designs, materials, and techniques for cutting and fixation.

When patellar non-resurfacing is chosen, several alternatives are available, including patellar denervation, lateral retinacular release, and patelloplasty. Surgeons may choose to perform any of these alone, or together in some combination.

Prospective randomized studies are needed to better understand which patellar management techniques contribute to superior postoperative outcomes. Until then, this remains a controversial topic, and options for patellar management will need to be weighed on an individual basis per patient.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:861-871. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200156

Influence of radiation conditions on the wear behaviour of Vitamin E treated UHMWPE gliding components for total knee arthroplasty after extended artificial aging and simulated daily patient activities

The long term performance of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with regards to the bearing materials is related to the aging behaviour of these materials. The use of highly crosslinked materials in hip arthroplasty improved the clinical outcome. Nevertheless, the outcome for these materials compared to conventional UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) remains controversial in TKA and alternative bearing materials may be advantageous to improve its outcome in the second and third decade. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the influence of radiation conditions on the wear behaviour of Vitamin E blended UHMWPE gliding components for TKA by simulation of extended aging and high demanding daily patient activities. For a medium radiation dose (30 kGy), the influence of the irradiation type (E-beam or Gamma radiation) and the thermal conditions (room temperature (RT) or heated to 115 °C) are evaluated in comparison to non-irradiated material. Significant influences on the wear behaviour were found for the radiation source and temperature during irradiation. Furthermore, no relevant degradation of the tested materials was observed after extended artificial aging. There was a good correspondence between the wear pattern in this study and retrievals.

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for hip and knee arthroplasty: The present and the future

PURPOSE

to review advances and clinical performance of polyethylene in total joint arthroplasty, summing up historical problems and focusing on the latest innovations.

METHODS

search for medical grade Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight-Polyethylene (UHMWPE); Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

the increasing number of joint arthroplasties and high-activity patients led to progressive developments of bearing surfaces to improve performance and durability. Different strategies such as crosslinking UHMWPE (HXLPE) and the addition of vitamin-E (HXLPE) have been tested to improve wear and oxidation resistance.

CONCLUSION

Recent innovations about UHMWPE showed improvements either for hip and knee, with the potential of long-term survivorship.

Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Composites as Artificial Joint Materials

Because ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is susceptible to frictional wear when used in sliding members of artificial joints, it is common practice to use cross-linked UHMWPE instead. However, cross-linked UHMWPE has low impact resistance; implant breakage has been reported in some cases. Hence, sliding members of artificial joints pose a major trade-off between wear resistance and impact resistance, which has not been resolved by any UHMWPE. On the other hand, multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) are used in industrial products for reinforcement of polymeric materials but not used as biomaterials because of their unclear safety. In the present study, we attempted to solve this trade-off issue by complexing UHMWPE with MWCNTs. In addition, we assessed the safety of these composites for use in sliding members of artificial joints. The results showed the equivalence of MWCNT/UHMWPE composites to cross-linked UHMWPE in terms of wear resistance and to non-cross-linked UHMWPE in terms of impact resistance. In addition, all MWCNT/UHMWPE composites examined complied with the requirements of biosafety testing in accordance with the ISO10993-series specifications for implantable medical devices. Furthermore, because MWCNTs can occur alone in wear dust, MWCNTs in an amount of about 1.5 times that contained in the dust produced from 50 years of wear (in the worst case) were injected into rat knees, which were monitored for 26 weeks. Although mild inflammatory reactions occurred in the joints, the reactions soon became quiescent. In addition, the MWCNTs did not migrate to other organs. Furthermore, MWCNTs did not exhibit carcinogenicity when injected into the knees of mice genetically modified to spontaneously develop cancer. The MWCNT/UHMWPE composite is a new biomaterial expected to be safe for clinical applications in both total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty as the first sliding member of artificial joints to have both high wear resistance and high impact resistance.

Polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty: Where are we now?

Polyethylene (PE) remains the gold standard for the articulating surface in hip and knee arthroplasty. To increase arthroplasty longevity and improve wear resistance, newer versions of PE have been designed with resultantly different wear properties. Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is used in total hip arthroplasty with excellent outcomes; however, its use in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains conflicting. This review summarizes biomechanical and wear properties, clinical outcomes, and cost of polyethylene inserts in TKA. Simulation studies have convincingly shown decreased wear and oxidation rates with HXLPE when compared to conventional polyethylene (CPE). Registry results have been conflicting, and short- to midterm clinical studies have not demonstrated a significant difference between HXLPE and CPE. The cost of HXLPE inserts is higher than CPE. Long-term clinical data are lacking and further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of HXLPE in TKA.

No Detectable Polyethylene Wear 15 Years After Implantation of a Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty With Electron Beam-Irradiated Polyethylene

BACKGROUND

The present study was designed to evaluate the risk of significant polyethylene (PE) wear 10 years or more after implantation of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using electron beam-irradiated highly cross-linked PE component.

METHODS

All patients operated between 2001 and 2004 for implantation of this particular TKA in the two participating centers were eligible for this study. All patients were contacted after the 10-year follow-up for repeat clinical examination and radiological evaluation. The occurrence of a revision prior to the final evaluation and its reason were recorded. The thickness of the PE piece was measured on plain X-rays.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventy-eight TKAs were implanted during the study time-frame. One hundred sixteen patients deceased prior to the 10-year follow-up (20%). An additional 121 patients were lost to follow-up prior to the 10-year follow-up (21%). Complete follow-up at 10 years or more (including death or revision) was obtained for 448 cases (78%). Ten prosthetic revisions were performed for mechanical reasons during the follow-up time (2%). One single revision was performed because PE wear after 13 years. No significant PE wear was detected at the final radiographic evaluation for nonrevised cases. The 10-year survival rate for mechanical revision only was 98.0% and decreased to 96.2% at 15 years.

CONCLUSION

The use of electron beam-irradiated PE was associated with an extremely low incidence of wear. This technology may be considered as safe regarding PE behavior for TKA after more than 10 years. Further improvement of PE manufacturing may be not required.

Peri-apatite coating decreases uncemented tibial component migration: long-term RSA results of a randomized controlled trial and limitations of short-term results

Background and purpose - Biological fixation of uncemented knee prostheses can be improved by applying hydroxyapatite coating around the porous surface via a solution deposition technique called Peri-Apatite (PA). The 2-year results of a randomized controlled trial, evaluating the effect of PA, revealed several components with continuous migration in the second postoperative year, particularly in the uncoated group. To evaluate whether absence of early stabilization is diagnostic of loosening, we now present long-term follow-up results. Patients and methods - 60 patients were randomized to PA-coated or uncoated (porous only) total knee arthroplasty of which 58 were evaluated with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) performed at baseline, at 3 months postoperatively and at 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results - PA-coated components had a statistically significantly lower mean migration at 10 years of 0.94 mm (95% CI 0.72-1.2) compared with the uncoated group showing a mean migration of 1.72 mm (95% CI 1.4-2.1). Continuous migration in the second postoperative year was seen in 7 uncoated components and in 1 PA-coated component. All of these implants stabilized after 2 years except for 2 uncoated components. Interpretation - Peri-apatite enhances stabilization of uncemented components. The number of components that stabilized after 2 years emphasizes the importance of longer follow-up to determine full stabilization and risk of loosening in uncemented components with biphasic migration profiles.

The use of highly crosslinked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty

Advances in polyethylene (PE) in total hip arthroplasty have led to interest and increased use of highly crosslinked PE (HXLPE) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Biomechanical data suggest improved wear characteristics for HXLPE inserts over conventional PE in TKA. Short-term results from registry data and few clinical trials are promising. Our aim is to present a review of the history of HXLPEs, the use of HXLPE inserts in TKA, concerns regarding potential mechanical complications, and a thorough review of the available biomechanical and clinical data. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:996-1002.