Predictability of the effects of facet joint infiltration in the degenerate lumbar spine when assessing MRI scans

Lumbar Facet Joint Disease: What, Why, and When?

Low back pain (LBP) affects over 60% of individuals in their lifetime and is a leading cause of disability and increased healthcare expenditure. Facet joint pain (FJP) occurs in 27% to 40% of LBP patients but is often overlooked or misdiagnosed. Additionally, there is no clear correlation between the clinical examination, radiological findings, and clinical presentation, complicating the diagnosis and treatment of FJP. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the literature regarding facet joint pain and discusses the utility of medial branch blocks (MBBs) and intra-articular (IA) injections as diagnostic and therapeutic tools prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA). RFA is considered the gold standard for managing FJP, employing techniques that include precise needle placement and stimulation parameters to disrupt pain signals. Promising alternatives such as cooled RFA and cryodenervation require further research on their long-term efficacy and safety. Endoscopic denervation and multifidus stimulation are emerging therapies that may benefit chronic LBP patients, but additional research is needed to establish their effectiveness. When conservative management fails, RFA provides significant and lasting relief in well-selected patients and has a favourable safety profile. The current literature does not support surgical interventions for FJP management.

Association Between MRI Findings of Facet Arthropathy and Synovitis With Health-Related Outcome and Pain Scores Following Therapeutic Lumbar Facet Injections

Low back pain is a common complaint among adults. The facet joint is a major source of lumbar pain, and therapeutic facet injections have gained popularity as a minimally invasive treatment option. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilization for diagnosing low back pain has increased significantly over the past few decades. Facet synovitis is an entity characterized by edema and inflammatory changes affecting the facet joints, adjacent bone marrow, and surrounding soft tissues. Although its underlying etiology remains poorly understood, recent reports suggest a high incidence in patients with arthropathy and arthritis. It is essential to explore potential correlations between specific MRI findings and outcomes after lumbar facet injections. This investigation is particularly relevant for facet synovitis, given its inflammatory nature and the common use of anti-inflammatory agents in facet injections. We investigated associations between MRI evidence of facet arthropathy and/or synovitis and the degree of improvement in health-related outcome and pain scores after therapeutic facet injections. The review was conducted on patients who received bilateral therapeutic facet injections, excluding those with prior lumbar spinal surgery or transitional segments. Facet arthropathy and synovitis were assessed on MRI by two neuroradiologists, and postprocedure outcomes such as pain and function were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses based on MRI findings. Our retrospective review indicates that patients receiving facet injections experience greater mean reduction in daily activity and workability burden scores from back pain when facet synovitis is a known portion of their pathology. The authors pose that further study could help identify patient populations that are the best candidates for therapeutic intervention. This may ultimately improve delivery of care, cost efficacy, and patient satisfaction.

Osteoarthritis of zygapophysial joints as a cause of back pain and neck pain: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Zygapophysial joints (Z joints) can be a source of back pain and of neck pain, but the cause of pain is not known. Some authors attribute the pain to osteoarthritis but without citing evidence.

OBJECTIVES

The present review was undertaken to determine if there was sufficient evidence of association between spinal pain and osteoarthritis of Z joints to justify osteoarthritis being held to be the cause of pain. The null hypothesis was that osteoarthritis of Z joints does not cause back pain or neck pain.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Relevant studies were ones that provided primary data on the association between pain and osteoarthritis of Z joints. These could be population studies, diagnostic studies, or case-control studies.

SOURCES OF EVIDENCE

The database of PubMed was searched using the terms: Lumbar or cervical, zygapophysial or facet, pain, and osteoarthritis or degeneration or degenerative.

CHARTING METHODS

Data pertinent to the research question were extracted from original articles and tabulated for reporting. Odds ratios for associations were calculated, as were the prevalence rates of osteoarthritis in subjects with pain, and conversely the prevalence rates of pain in subjects with osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

The searches retrieved 11 population studies, 4 diagnostic studies, and 3 cases control studies. No study showed any positive association between osteoarthritis of Z joints and pain. All studies found pain to be independent of the presence or severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis was as common in subjects with no pain as in subjects with pain. The null hypothesis was not refuted.

CONCLUSION

The published evidence does not support the belief that osteoarthritis causes Z joint pain. All the evidence contradicts this belief.

Beyond Anatomy: Fat-Suppressed MR and Molecular Imaging of Spinal Pain Generators

Spine pain is highly prevalent and costly, but evaluation with clinical features and anatomic imaging remain limited. Fat-suppressed MR imaging and molecular imaging (MI) may help identify inflammatory, lesional, and malignant causes. Numerous MI agents are available, each with advantages and disadvantages. Herein, FDG PET, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), bone radiotracers, and others are highlighted. No specific pain MI agents have been identified, but mechanisms of key agents are shown in video format, and the mechanism of PSMA as a theranostic agent is displayed. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to master this topic.

3. Pain originating from the lumbar facet joints

INTRODUCTION

Pain originating from the lumbar facets can be defined as pain that arises from the innervated structures comprising the joint: the subchondral bone, synovium, synovial folds, and joint capsule. Reported prevalence rates range from 4.8% to over 50% among patients with mechanical low back pain, with diagnosis heavily dependent on the criteria employed. In well-designed studies, the prevalence is generally between 10% and 20%, increasing with age.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar facet joint pain was retrieved and summarized.

RESULTS

There are no pathognomic signs or symptoms of pain originating from the lumbar facet joints. The most common reported symptom is uni- or bilateral (in more advanced cases) axial low back pain, which often radiates into the upper legs in a non-dermatomal distribution. Most patients report an aching type of pain exacerbated by activity, sometimes with morning stiffness. The diagnostic value of abnormal radiologic findings is poor owing to the low specificity. SPECT can accurately identify joint inflammation and has a predictive value for diagnostic lumbar facet injections. After "red flags" are ruled out, conservatives should be considered. In those unresponsive to conservative therapy with symptoms and physical examination suggesting lumbar facet joint pain, a diagnostic/prognostic medial branch block can be performed which remains the most reliable way to select patients for radiofrequency ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-selected individuals with chronic low back originating from the facet joints may benefit from lumbar medial branch radiofrequency ablation.

Lower effectiveness of facet joint infiltration in patients with concurrent facet joint degeneration and active endplate changes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Facet joint degeneration (FJD) and disc degeneration (DD) with associated endplate (EP) changes, specifically Modic 1 changes, might occur concurrently and therefore pose a challenge in the treatment of lower back pain (LBP).

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate if the presence of active EP changes (Modic 1) would alter the effect of facet joint infiltrations (FJI) for the treatment of concurrent FJD.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study, Level III.

PATIENT SAMPLE

42 patients (Male:20, Female:22) with an average of 58±14 years with FJD on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) receiving a FJI for treatment of lower back pain were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The pain score at baseline, 15 min, 1 day, 1 week and 1 month following FJI as well as the reduction of pain were analyzed. Furthermore, active EP changes on conventional MRI and increased EP metabolic activity on PET/MRI were evaluated and compared.

METHODS

All the patients underwent a (18F)-NaF PET/MRI, conventional MRI and FJI for symptomatic FJD. Active EP changes on conventional MRI and increased EP metabolic activity on PET/MR were analyzed for conformity. The pain score as well as the pain reduction at the above-mentioned time points were compared between patients with and without increased EP metabolic activity in PET/MRI.

RESULTS

The LBP reduction was significantly different between patients with (n=20) and without (n=22) active EP changes at 15 minutes (1.3±2.4 vs. 2.9±2.4, p=.03) and 1 month (0.9±2.3 vs. 2.8±2.9, p<.001) following FJI. The minimal clinically important difference for LBP reduction was reached significantly more often in the absence of active EP changes (73%) compared with patients with active EP changes (35%) 1 month following FJI (p=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

FJI is less effective in LBP reduction of patients with FJD and concurrent active EP changes (eg Modic 1).

Facet syndrome. Minimally invasive surgical treatment. Clinical case with a literature review

Background: Degenerative pathology of the facet joints of the lumbar spine remains a significant medical and social problem due to persistent pain syndrome, high incidence and disability rate. Clinical case description: A patient complaining of pain and discomfort in the lumbosacral spine on the right, arising in the upright position, intensifying with bending and flexion-extension of the trunk, and periodically spreading to the right gluteal region and along the posterior surface of the thigh, was admitted to the neurosurgical department of the Irkutsk Scientific Center of Surgery and Traumatology. A surgical treatment was performed in the form of dereception of the LIILIII, LIIILIV, LIVLV arch-process joints. In the postoperative period, the patient noted a decrease in the intensity of pain in the lumbosacral spine to 3 points by a visual analog scale and was discharged from the department on the 5th day after the surgery in a satisfactory condition. Conclusion: Facet joint pathologies represent a most common nosological form of the degenerative-dystrophic process (spondyloarthrosis) and a potential source of pain with the formation of instability of the spinal motion segment and chronic pain syndrome. The complex anatomical and topographic relationships between the facet joints, intervertebral discs, and radicular nerves force clinicians to pay attention to the pathology of facet syndrome. Understanding the morphological, clinical, and radiological features of the course of the facet joint degeneration makes it possible to increase the diagnostic capabilities for detecting facet syndrome of the lumbar spine and effectively apply transcutaneous surgical technologies for the treatment of chronic pain syndromes.

The Role of Diagnostic Injections in Spinal Disorders: A Narrative Review

Neck and back pain is increasingly prevalent, and has increased exponentially in recent years. As more resources are dedicated to the diagnosis of pain conditions, it is increasingly important that the diagnostic techniques used are as precise and accurate as possible. Traditional diagnostic methods rely heavily upon patient history and physical examination to determine the most appropriate treatments and/or imaging studies. Though traditional means of diagnosis remain a necessity, in many cases, correlation with positive or negative responses to injections may further enhance diagnostic specificity, and improve outcomes by preventing unnecessary treatments or surgeries. This narrative review aims to present the most recent literature describing the diagnostic validity of precision injections, as well as their impact on surgical planning and outcomes. Diagnostic injections are discussed in terms of facet arthropathy, lumbar radiculopathy, discogenic pain and discography, and sacroiliac joint dysfunction. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of diagnostic local anesthetic injections or nerve blocks to aid in diagnosis. Spinal injections add valuable objective information that can potentially improve diagnostic precision, guide treatment strategies, and aid in patient selection for invasive surgical interventions.

Abnormal Conditions of the Diskovertebral Segment: MRI With Anatomic-Pathologic Correlation

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to review the appearance of various abnormalities that affect the lumbar intervertebral disk and diskovertebral segment through anatomic-pathologic correlation in cadavers. CONCLUSION. Familiarity with the pathologic conditions in and around the intervertebral disk is important in recognizing such conditions as a potential source of symptoms. We revisit the principal role of MRI in evaluating these abnormalities and excluding other sources of significant clinical manifestations.

Using inpatient gradual diagnostics to identify the treatment strategy for lumbar back pain-Can treadmill gait analysis objectify the patients' declaration of pain relief?

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic lumbar back pain (CLBP) often present with an altered gait profile, which is a crucial element of good functioning in everyday life. In patients with multisegmental spinal pathologies and incongruity between radiologic imaging and clinical presentation, inpatient gradual diagnostics (IGD) is performed to determine the precise origin of the disabling pain. The underlying principle of IGD is the assumption that by locally administering an analgesic and anti-inflammatory agent to possible surgical target areas, the surgical effect can be temporarily simulated. The conclusions drawn from IGD are, however, mostly based on the patients' subjective feedback about pain relief.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether reported pain relief during IGD can be objectified by gait analysis. We hypothesized that patients with greater pain relief during IGD would show greater improvement in their pathologic gait and stance.

METHODS

Treadmill gait and stance analyses were prospectively performed on CLBP patients before and after a one-week IGD. Self-report measures included the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Compared with a reference group (n = 28), IGD patients (n = 57) at admission showed reduced velocity, cadence, step length, and swing phase (p < .01 each). Their stance phase was increased by 5% of the gait cycle, and a more asymmetrical total load distribution during stance was observed. No difference was seen in stride width or foot rotation. While many patients reported good pain relief during IGD, no correlation was observed between subjective improvement and treadmill measures. We can thus confirm a pathologic gait profile in patients with CLBP. Based on our findings, gait analysis would not yet seem suitable to objectify IGD results. The short time interval between admission and discharge may not suffice to change a pathological gait that has developed over years.

Facet joint syndrome: from diagnosis to interventional management

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common pain syndrome, and is an enormous burden and cost generator for society. Lumbar facet joints (FJ) constitute a common source of pain, accounting for 15–45% of LBP. Facet joint degenerative osteoarthritis is the most frequent form of facet joint pain. History and physical examination may suggest but not confirm facet joint syndrome. Although imaging (radiographs, MRI, CT, SPECT) for back pain syndrome is very commonly performed, there are no effective correlations between clinical symptoms and degenerative spinal changes. Diagnostic positive facet joint block can indicate facet joints as the source of chronic spinal pain. These patients may benefit from specific interventions to eliminate facet joint pain such as neurolysis, by radiofrequency or cryoablation. The purpose of this review is to describe the anatomy, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and radiologic findings of facet joint syndrome. Specific interventional facet joint management will also be described in detail.

Teaching points

• Lumbar facet joints constitute a common source of pain accounting of 15–45%.

• Facet arthrosis is the most frequent form of facet pathology.

• There are no effective correlations between clinical symptoms, physical examination and degenerative spinal changes.

• Diagnostic positive facet joint block can indicate facet joints as the source of pain.

• After selection processing, patients may benefit from facet joint neurolysis, notably by radiofrequency or cryoablation.