One-stage simultaneous hip-preserving surgeries for the management of bilateral femoral head osteonecrosis: a mean 7.0-year follow-up

Contralateral Neck-shaft Angle Lower Than 130° Is Associated With Clinical Failure in Nongeriatric Individuals: Analysis of the National Femoral Neck Fracture Database of 1066 Patients

BACKGROUND

Treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients who are nongeriatric (≤ 60 years) is challenging because of high failure rates. Anatomic parameters influence the biomechanical environment for fracture healing, but their associations with clinical prognosis remains unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Which anatomic parameter that is identifiable on pelvic radiographs shows a statistical correlation with a higher risk of clinical failure defined as nonunion, avascular necrosis (AVN), reoperation, and functional failure (decrease in Harris hip score reaching the minimum clinically important difference) in the screw fixation of femoral neck fractures among nongeriatric patients? (2) How does the influence of anatomic parameters on clinical prognosis manifest: directly or mediated by additional mechanisms?

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study used a nationwide database in China. Between January 2014 and December 2020, we evaluated 1066 patients with femoral neck fractures with a median age of 53 years (interquartile range 46 to 56) and median follow-up period of 62 months. Anatomic parameters including femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA), femoral head radius, femoral neck width, femoral offset, acetabular center-edge angle, and acetabular sharp angle were variables of interest. The primary outcome was clinical failure including nonunion, AVN, reoperation, and functional failure (decrease in Harris hip score reaching the minimum clinically important difference). Risk factors for failure were first filtered using the Bayesian information criterion and then assessed with multiple regression adjusting for confounders. The mediation effect was further explored using model-based causal mediation analysis with a quasi-Bayesian Monte Carlo method.

RESULTS

Of all anatomic parameters we assessed, the contralateral NSA was associated with clinical failure, after adjusting for all potential covariates and confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 0.92 [95% confidence interval 0.89 to 0.95]; p < 0.001). The optimal threshold for the NSA was 130°, with the highest Youden index of 0.27. Patients with an NSA < 130° (41% [441 of 1066]) demonstrated an increased occurrence of nonunion (15% [68 of 441] versus 5% [33 of 625]; p < 0.001), AVN (32% [141 of 441] versus 22% [136 of 625]; p < 0.001), functional failure (25% [110 of 441] versus 15% [93 of 625]), and reoperations (28% [122 of 441] versus 13% [79 of 625]). The impact of an NSA less than 130° on clinical failure was direct and substantially mediated by the type of displaced fracture (mediation proportion: 18.7%).

CONCLUSION

In our study of screw fixations for femoral neck fractures among nongeriatric patients, we identified that a contralateral NSA < 130° correlates with an increased risk of clinical failure including nonunion, AVN, functional failure, and reoperation. The effect is either direct or mediated through displaced fracture types. This is important for surgeons in order to recognize the elevated rate of clinical failure and nature of the challenging biomechanical environment, which should guide them in refining surgical details and selecting appropriate fixation and rehabilitation plans. Approaches to managing these fractures require further validation with large-scale clinical trials.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Partial femoral head replacement: a new innovative hip-preserving approach for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its finite element analysis

Purpose: Controversy remains regarding the optimal treatment for stage III Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This study presents, for the first time, the precise treatment of stage III ONFH using the "substitute the beam for a pillar" technique and performs a comparative finite element analysis with other hip-preserving procedures. Methods: A formalin-preserved femur of male cadavers was selected to obtain the CT scan data of femur. The proximal femur model was reconstructed and assembled using Mimics 20.0, Geomagic, and UG-NX 12.0 software with four different implant types: simple core decompression, fibula implantation, porous tantalum rod implantation, and partial replacement prosthesis. The finite element simulations were conducted to simulate the normal walking gait, and the stress distribution and displacement data of the femur and the implant model were obtained. Results: The peak von Mises stress of the femoral head and proximal femur in the partial replacement of the femoral head (PRFH) group were 22.8 MPa and 37.4 MPa, respectively, which were 3.1%-38.6% and 12.8%-37.4% lower than those of the other three surgical methods. Conclusion: The PRFH group exhibits better mechanical performance, reducing stress and displacement in the ONFH area, thus maintaining femoral head stability. Among the four hip-preserving approaches, from a biomechanical perspective, PRFH offers a new option for treating ONFH.

Fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation versus ordinary cannulated screw fixation for femoral neck fractures: a 10-year retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

For femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients, both fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation and ordinary cannulated screw fixation are clinically effective treatments. However, for unstable femoral neck fractures, ordinary cannulated screw fixation is characterized by a high risk of postoperative complications and a high rate of mechanical failure after internal fixation. For this study, we systematically compared the long-term efficacy and postoperative complications of these two procedures.

METHODS

A total of 156 subjects diagnosed as femoral neck fractures participated in our study. Subjects in the combination group underwent fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation (n = 76), and those in the control group were treated with ordinary cannulated screw fixation (n = 80). Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, Harris hip score (HHS) and EuroQoL five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D); and the incidence of postoperative and bone healing complications in the two groups were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The average follow-up time was more than 10 years. Intra-operative blood loss significantly increased in the combination group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). There were significantly improved performances in healing time, the time course of recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping, HHS and EQ-5D scores in the combination group compared with the control group (P < 0.05). Besides, the incidence rates of femoral head necrosis, nonunion, femoral neck shortening and total hip replacement were significantly lower in the combination group than those in the control group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fibula allograft with cannulated screw fixation shows a better long-term therapeutic effect than ordinary cannulated screw fixation for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients. Patients receiving the combination strategy have faster and high-quality functional recovery after femoral neck fractures and a lower incidence rate of postoperative complications.

Comparison of minimally-invasive fibular supporting of T-type with traditional bloody iliac flap metastasis for osteonecrosis of the femoral head at ARCO stage II

Purpose

Our research mainly evaluates the clinical efficacy of two surgical methods in the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) at ARCO stage II, aiming to provide optimal hip-preserving treatment of ONFH.

Method

From October 2018 to September 2020, 48 patients (59 hips) met the inclusion criteria and randomized. 24 cases (29 hips) in experimental group were treated with minimally-invasive fibular supporting of T-type; 24 cases (30 hips) in control group were treated with traditional bloody iliac flap metastasis. We will compare some intraoperative and postoperative conditions.

Result

The operation time in experimental group was 37 (6) minutes, in control group was 130 (21.75) minutes; the length of surgical incision in two groups was 3.7 (0.7) cm and 12.85 (2.68) cm. The intraoperative blood loss in two groups was 69 (21) ml and 363 (87) ml; the postoperative VAS score of the experimental group on day 1, day 3, day 7 after surgery was 5.5 (2), 3.5 (1), 0 (1); the control group was 6 (1.75), 4 (1), 3 (1). The data differences between above groups have statistically significant. The follow-up time of two groups was (33.86 ± 5.66) months and (35.67 ± 4.69) months. The bone graft healing time in two groups was (14.21 ± 1.93) months and (13.83 ± 2.34) months. The Harris hip scores of two groups at the last follow-up were 90 (7.5) and 86.5 (8.5). The survival rates of two groups were 79.31% (23/29) and 76.67% (23/30). The difference was no statistically significant in above groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The two different bone graft implantation showed satisfactory early outcomes. Compared to the control group, the experimental group has the advantages of lesser pain, lesser blood loss, lesser trauma and shorter operation time. It may be a choice as bone graft for the treatment of ONFH at early stage.

Single Stage Simultaneous Core Decompression for Ficat Stage I and II Bilateral Femoral Head Osteonecrosis among Hip Surgeries done in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of femoral head is a disease affecting young individuals and often occurs in bilateral hips. The purpose of this study is to find out the prevalence of single stage simultaneous core decompression for Ficat stage I and II bilateral femoral head osteonecrosis among total hip surgeries done in a tertiary care center.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care trauma centre from April 2017 and March 2020. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Committee prior to data collection (Reference no: 673/2077/78). Convenience sampling was done. Patients undergoing hip surgeries were included in the study. Patients with missing data were excluded. Patients operated upto Ficat Stage IIb femoral head osteonecrosis were followed up. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22.0. Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and percentage for binary data.

RESULTS

Out of 916 patients who underwent hip surgeries, 12 (1.31%) (0.57-2.04 at 95% Confidence Interval) underwent single stage simultaneous core decompression. Idiopathic cause in 6 (50%) and prolonged corticosteroid usage in 4 (33.33%) were the leading causes. Twelve (50%) of the treated hips were in Ficat stage IIa. At the end of one year, of the 11 patients who followed up, 12 (54.5%) hips had a good Harris hip outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that a small proportion of hip surgeries were single stage simultaneous bilateral core decompression for osteonecrosis of femoral head in our setting. Our findings were similar to studies done internationally with a very low complication rate.

Long-term survival and clinical outcomes of non-vascularized autologous and allogeneic fibular grafts are comparable for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a disabling disease, which often involves young patients. Recently, various hip-preserving surgeries were recommended to delay total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Questions/purposes

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and survival rate in the long-term follow-up between core decompression combined with a non-vascularized autologous fibular graft (group A) and an allogeneic fibular graft (group B) for the treatment of ONFH.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 117 patients (153 hips) with ONFH (Association Research Circulation Osseous [ARCO] stages IIa to IIIc) who underwent the abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries between January 2003 and June 2012. The mean (range) follow-up times (years) were 12.9 (7–16) and 9.3 (6–16) in groups A and B, respectively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, and forgotten joint score (FJS). A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The end point was THA.

Results

Groups A and B showed postoperative improvements, respectively, in HHS from 65 ± 7.2 to 80.3 ± 14.5 and from 66 ± 5.9 to 82.4 ± 13.6 (p < 0.05), and in VAS score from 6.3 ± 1.1 to 2.3 ± 1.6 and from 6.1 ± 1 to 2.2 ± 2.2 (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in the HHS, VAS score, and hip FJS at the last follow-up (p > 0.05) and 15-year survival rate (84.1% and 86%, respectively, p > 0.05) were found between groups A and B.

Conclusions

Autologous and allogeneic fibular grafts can attain equally good clinical outcomes and high survival rates in long-term follow-up, and thus can greatly delay THA owing to good bone osseointegration and sufficient mechanical support. Notably, the ratio of failure will increase when patients were more than 37 years old.

Level of evidence

Level III, therapeutic study

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02246-3.

Fibula allograft propping as an effective treatment for early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) causes severe hip dysfunction. Left untreated, 80% of patients experience femoral head collapse, and 65-70% of patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, effective treatment is very important for ONFH.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of fibula allografting for the treatment of early-stage ONFH METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases using "avascular necrosis" or "ischemic necrosis" or "osteonecrosis" and "femoral head" and "fibula*," and checking the references of primary articles and reviews. Two independent authors completed the study selection separately. We extracted the following details from each article: characteristics of the patients, clinical efficacy evaluation (Harris hip score [HSS], radiographic outcomes, the rate of conversation to total hip arthroplasty [THA], and adverse effects).

RESULTS

A total of 213 articles were selected from PubMed (n = 45), EMBASE (n = 77), Web of Science (n = 203), and other sources (n = 10). After checking the articles, five articles were included in the final analysis. The average age of patients involved in this review was 34.48 years. The studies investigated fibula allografts to treat ONFH in 394 hips with a mean follow-up of 49.06 months. HHS was improved from 62.73 to 86.94. Radiographic progression was found in 33.66% of hips. The failure rate of head-saving surgery by THA was 14.5%. No patients had serious postoperative complications.

LIMITATIONS

The number of articles included in the study was small, and all studies were single-center studies. Most studies were retrospective with a low level of evidence. Surgical procedures were not identical with different follow-up times.

CONCLUSION

Although there are some limitations to our approach, this systematic review supports fibula allografting as a simple, effective treatment for early-stage ONFH, which presents less postoperative complications, and has a satisfactory clinical effect. We consider it to be worthy of promotion as a therapy for ONFH.