Results of advanced core decompression in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head depending on age and sex-a prospective cohort study

Subtrochanteric fracture after core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common clinical disease. Improper treatment can lead to femoral head collapse and hip joint dysfunction. Core decompression is particularly important for early ONFH. However, subtrochanteric fractures after core decompression cause some clinical problems.

CASE PRESENTATION

This article describes a 34-year-old male patient with early ONFH. After core decompression, he suffered a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur while bearing weight on the affected limb when going up stairs. He was subsequently treated with open reduction and intramedullary nail fixation.

CONCLUSION

When core decompression is used to treat ONFH, the location or size of the drill hole, whether a tantalum rod or bone is inserted, and partial weight-bearing of the affected limb may directly affect whether a fracture occurs after surgery. It is hoped that this case report can provide a reference for clinical orthopedic surgeons in the treatment of early ONFH.

Management of Scleritis in Older Adults

Scleritis, an inflammatory disease of the eye affecting scleral tissue, presents unique challenges in the older adult population. Unlike their younger counterparts, older individuals manifest a distinct spectrum of the disease with different underlying etiologies, co-morbidities, altered immune function, and an increased risk of systemic side effects from medication choices. Addressing these complexities necessitates a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach. Treatment of choice will depend on any underlying cause but generally involves non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic or local corticosteroids, and potentially disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Utilization of these therapeutic agents in older adults warrants careful consideration because of their potential side-effect profiles. This article critically examines the specific concerns for the use of these drugs in older patients and reviews the existing literature on their use in this specific cohort.

Femoral Head Core Decompressions: Characterization of Subsequent Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty and Related Complications

BACKGROUND

Core decompression is a minimally invasive joint-preserving approach for early-stage osteonecrosis. The rate at which core decompression patients require total hip arthroplasty (THA) and rates of perioperative adverse outcomes have not been well-characterized.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing core decompression and/or THA with osteonecrosis of the femoral head were identified from the 2015 to 2021 Q3 PearlDiver M157 database. Those undergoing THA without or with antecedent core decompression were identified and matched 4:1 on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index. Postoperative 90-day adverse events were compared with multivariable analysis. Five-year rates of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture were compared by the Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Core decompressions were identified for 3,025 patients of whom 387 (12.8%) went on to THA within 5 years (64% within the first year). The median time from initial core decompression to THA was 252 days. For THA, 26,209 adults were identified and 387 had prior core decompression. After matching, there were 1,320 without core decompression and 339 with core decompression. No statistically significant differences were observed in 90-day postoperative adverse events or 5-year rates of revision, dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Core decompression may be an option for patients with osteonecrosis and does not seem to affect THA outcomes if required later.

Core decompression vs. allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Background

Core decompression and allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting are used in the early stage of osteonecrosis of the femoral head for a period. Since the comparison of the core decompression and allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting are less reported, the purpose of our study was to investigate the difference of two procedures in patients with the osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Methods

Between January 2018 and January 2019, 59 patients (64 hips) were divided into core decompression group and non-vascularized bone grafting group according to their procedures. The primary outcomes are visual analog score (VAS) and Harris hip score. Survivorship was analyzed with the collapse of the femoral head or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint.

Results

At the final follow-up, two hips underwent THA in the core decompression group and three hips in the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group. The radiographic survival rates were 76.9% and 77.3%, respectively, in both groups. The VAS of the core decompression group was 6.08 ± 1.164 and 3.30 ± 1.431 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. The VAS of the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group was 6.00 ± 1.209 and 3.15 ± 1.537 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. The Harris hip score of the core decompression group was 52.49 ± 6.496 before operation, and 2 years after operation, it increased by 81.14 ± 8.548 (P < 0.05); The Harris hip score of allogenic the non-vascularized bone grafting group was 53.56 ± 5.925 and 81.33 ± 7.243 before and 2 years after operation (P < 0.05), respectively. In the core decompression group, body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m2 was correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA [P < 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.006-1.334], and Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) III was correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA (P < 0.05; 95% CI, 2.514-809.650). In the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group, age, BMI, and ARCO stage were significantly associated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The clinical survival rate of the femoral head in the core decompression group was slightly better than that in the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group. There was no significant difference in the radiographic survival rate of the femoral head between the two groups. Both groups can alleviate pain and improve functional of patients, but there was no significant difference in the degree of improvement. In the core decompression group, BMI >25 kg/m2 and ARCO III correlated with the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA. In the allogenic non-vascularized bone grafting group, no association was found between age, BMI, and ARCO stage and the collapse of femoral head or conversion to THA.

Level of evidence

III.

Prognostic factors in the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Several hip preserving techniques have been described for the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). This systematic review identified prognostic factors in the treatment of ONFH that are associated with treatment failure and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in November 2021. All clinical trials comparing two or more treatments for femoral head osteonecrosis were accessed. A multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association between baseline characteristics and the surgical outcome. A multiple linear model regression analysis through the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (r) was used.

RESULTS

Data from 88 articles (6112 procedures) were retrieved. Female gender was associated with increased time to THA (P = 0.03) and reduced rate of THA (P = 0.03). Longer symptom duration before treatment was associated with shorter time to failure (P = 0.03). Increased pre-treatment VAS was associated with reduced time to failure (P = 0.03) and time to THA (P = 0.04). Reduced pre-treatment hip function was associated with increased rate of THA (P = 0.02) and failure (P = 0.005). Patient age and BMI, aetiology, time from surgery to full weight bearing and the side did not show evidence of a statistically significant association with the surgical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Male gender, longer symptom duration before treatment, higher VAS scores, and lower HHS scores were negative prognostic factors after treatment for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

The indications for core decompression surgery in patients with ARCO stage I-II osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a new, comprehensive prediction system

Background

Core decompression (CD) is considered the most popular treatment method for patients with Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage I-II osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the definitive indication for CD is currently not well established.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients who were diagnosed with ARCO stage I-II ONFH and who underwent CD were included. According to the prognosis, the patients were divided into two groups: collapse of the femoral head after CD and noncollapse of the femoral head. Independent risk factors for the failure of CD treatment were identified. Subsequently, a new scoring system that included all these risk factors was built to help estimate the individual risk of CD failure in patients who were planning to undergo CD.

Results

The study included 1537 hips after decompression surgery. The overall failure rate of CD surgery was 52.44%. Seven independent prognostic factors for failed CD surgery were identified, such as male sex (HR = 75.449; 95% confidence interval (CI), 42.863-132.807), Aetiology (Idiopathic HR = 2.762; 95% CI, 2.016–3.788, Steroid-induced HR = 2.543; 95% CI, 1.852–3.685), if the patient had a seated occupation (HR = 3.937; 95% CI, 2.712–5.716), age (HR = 1.045; 95% CI, 1.032–1.058), haemoglobin level (HR = 0.909; 95% CI, 0.897–0.922), disease duration (HR = 1.217; 95% CI, 1.169–1.267) and the combined necrosis angle (HR = 1.025; 95% CI, 1.022–1.028). The final scoring system included these seven risk factors, and the area under the curve of this scoring system was 0.935 (95% confidential interval = 0.922–0.948).

Conclusion

This new scoring system might provide evidence-based medical proof for determining whether a patient with ARCO stage I - II ONFH might benefit from CD surgery. This scoring system is crucial for making clinical decisions. Consequently, this scoring system is recommended before CD surgery, which could help determine the potential prognosis of patients.

Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head. Optimizing the Early-Stage Joint-Preserving Surgical Treatment?

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating condition with various etiologies. Comprehension of the pathophysiology of the disease is limited, adding to the challenge of devising a clinically effective treatment strategy. High clinical suspicion and magnetic resonance imaging aid early diagnosis, leading to less invasive and more effective treatment. Recent advancements in joint-preserving surgical treatment have led to improved outcomes, reduced pain, and a higher hip survival rate for early onset osteonecrosis of the femoral head compared with more invasive approaches such as total hip replacement. Core decompression is the gold standard procedure to relieve the ischemic area of the femoral head and is crucial in the early stage of osteonecrosis. The addition of biologic regenerative agents to core decompression is auspicious as they can introduce new cells to the area of necrosis, osteoinductive and osteoconductive agents, while enhancing healing and cellular repair. Adjunctive bone marrow-derived cell therapies have been advocated, potentially aiding the regenerative process. Arthroscopic core decompression and robot-assisted orthopaedic surgery are believed to improve the precision of graft placement, decreasing radiation and operative time. The current study provides a comprehensive review and update of the literature surrounding the latest developments regarding joint-preserving surgical treatment for patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

[The importance of removing osteonecrosis during treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis]

Atraumatic femoral head necrosis (aFHN) in adults is estimated to be the leading cause of approximately 10% of all hip prosthesis implantations. Due to the relatively frequent occurrence of aFHN at a young age, the possibility of a joint-preserving intervention should be examined. This includes the classic "core decompression" and modifications based on it. There are different data on the success rates of this method. Reasons for treatment failure could include a lack of clearance of the necrosis zone. The clearance of the necrosis zone is taken into account by alternative surgical procedures for the treatment of aFHN. These are the "trap-door procedure", the "light-bulb procedure" and "advanced core decompression". The current state of knowledge on these procedures is reviewed in this keynote article. It is shown that the extensive excision of femoral head necrosis is of particular importance. None of the procedures mentioned can currently be recommended in preference over the others.

Does Age Affect the Outcomes of Core Decompression for the Treatment of Kienböck Disease?

Background: Core decompression of the distal radius is a minimally invasive technique that has demonstrated good clinical outcomes in the treatment of Kienböck disease. However, the effectiveness of core decompression has not been compared in different age groups. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of core decompression in patients <45 years of age to those ≥45 years of age. Methods: This retrospective study included 36 patients with Kienböck disease who were treated with core decompression over a 20-year period. The mean follow-up was 7 years. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale pain score (VAS), active range of flexion/extension at the wrist, grip strength, and modified Mayo wrist score. The patients were divided into two age groups namely <45 years (younger group; n = 22) and ≥45 years (older group; n = 12) and the outcome measures were compared between the two age groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the outcomes of the two age groups. Conclusion: The outcomes of core decompression of the distal radius for Kienböck disease in older patients (≥45 years) are favorable and similar to those seen in younger patients (<45 years). Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Concentric Circle Technique for Assessment of Femoral Head Deficiency in Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head

Introduction

There is a lack of standardized objective tools to assess collapse for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) patients’ follow-up. We describe a quantitative technique of collapse assessment using a superimposed concentric circular ring matching the intact part of the femoral head in anteroposterior (AP) radiographs.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 30 normal femoral heads and 30 ONFH (15 pre-collapse,15 post-collapse) in anteroposterior hip radiographs. A best-fitting circle was superimposed on articular margins of the femoral head and the maximum width of the deficient zone of the femoral head (not matching the circle) was measured. The width (pW) was measured as percentage-width in proportion to the circle’s diameter. The findings were compared among normal and ONFH radiographs. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the measurements.

Results

The mean femoral head deficiencies predicted by pW were 0.2±0.5% for normal hip, 2.8±1.1% for pre-collapse, and 8.9±3.8% for post-collapse radiographs. We observed significant differences in the measurements of pW among the control group, pre-collapse and post-collapse groups. Interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities for the measurements were high.

Conclusion

The described concentric circle technique is a simple and reliable method for objective assessment of subtle alterations in the sphericity of the femoral head and can be helpful for the radiographic follow-up of ONFH patients.