Single approach to double-channel core decompression and bone grafting with structural bone support for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head in different stages

Clinical outcomes and risk factors for failure of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 bracing rod combined with allogeneic bone in treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head

PURPOSE

This study was performed to analyse the clinical factors associated with failure of nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (nHA/PA66) bracing rods combined with allogeneic bone in the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

In total, 96 patients were treated with nHA/PA66 bracing rods combined with allogeneic bone for ONFH between October 2016 and September 2020. The patients were classified according to aetiology, Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) type, Japanese Investigation Committee (JIC) type, age, and body mass index(BMI). The outcome measures were the Hip Harris Score (HHS), imaging changes, and the need for total hip arthroplasty (THA) (performed in cases of clinical failure, at which point follow-up was discontinued).

RESULTS

All patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up duration of 50.76 ± 17.94 months. The preoperative HHS was 79.00 ± 13.61 and that at the final follow-up was 81.73 ± 17.67(P = 0.149). The excellent and good rate improved from 43.88% preoperatively to 65.47% at the final follow-up(P = 0.000). The radiographic progression rate was 36.70% and the incidence of THA was 23.02%. Univariate analysis identified ARCO type (P = 0.000), JIC type (P = 0.000), and age (P = 0.003) as independent risk factors for postoperative failure. Postoperative multivariate analysis also confirmed ARCO type, JIC classification, and age as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

This technique is not recommended for patients older than 44 years or those with ARCO type 3 or JIC type C ONFH.

Core decompression assisted by multi-functional minimally invasive instruments for the treatment of early osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Core decompression is a common method for treating early osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the surgical procedure is cumbersome due to the lack of appropriate surgical instruments. This study aims to modify surgical instruments to improve surgery efficiency. A total of 28 patients with early ONFH treated with the core decompression were enrolled. 13 cases were treated with new instruments and the other 15 cases were treated with the traditional methods. The convenience of the new instruments was evaluated by comparing evaluation indicators. The multi-functional instruments reduced the number of fluoroscopy, shorted the operation time, improved the delivery efficiency, reduced the intraoperative blood loss, and reduced the surgical incision compared with the traditional method (p < 0.05). The new instruments removed the healthy bone of the femoral head and neck for reuse, the overall hospitalization cost was lower, and patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.05). In the postoperative follow-up, the VAS was lower and Harris score was higher compared with the traditional group (p < 0.05). The multi-functional instruments can achieve the advantages of accurate positioning of the necrotic area, removed and reused healthy bone, effective expanded decompression, and efficient implant delivery, which is the effective instrument for the early ONFH.

Jack Surgery: Reconstructing Collapsed Femoral Head in Association Research Circulation Osseous Stage III Osteonecrosis: A Series of 13 Cases

OBJECTIVE

According to Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging, patients with ARCO III osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) have joint pain and dysfunction due to the collapse of femoral head. Current hip preservation surgeries are not satisfying in the treatment of ARCO III ONFH according to the long-term follow-up. In our practice, we focused on reconstructing femoral head by restoring the round shape of femoral head and subsequently preventing the development of hip arthritis. To lift the collapsed femoral head and postpone the potential total hip arthroplasty, we practiced Jack surgery, combining surgical hip dislocation, removal of necrotic bone, impaction bone grafting, and lifting the cartilage of femoral head.

METHODS

From February 2019 to July 2022, 13 patients (15 hips) who received Jack surgery in the research center were included in this retrospective study. Follow-up was conducted every 3 months after surgery for imaging and clinical evaluation. The differences between visual analogue scale (VAS) and Harris hip score (HSS) before and after surgery were compared to observe whether the femoral head collapsed and whether osteotomy healed after surgery. Severe collapse of the femoral head ( > 2 mm) or receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) was defined as failure of hip preservation therapy. An Independent sample t-test was used to compare the data, and the chi-square test was used for categorical data.

RESULTS

All the 13 patients successfully completed the surgery and were followed up. The average time of follow-up was 36.46 ± 16.87 months (ranging from 14 to 66 months). HSS was assessed 12 months after surgery: excellent in 1 patient with 1 hip; good in 9 patients with 11 hips; modest in 3 patients with 3 hips. To the last follow-up, the VAS scores decreased from 6.17 ± 1.02 to 2.08 ± 0.90 (p < 0.001), HSS increased from 46.69 ± 4.15 to 89.77 ± 2.86 (p < 0.001). No deep infection, fracture, osteotomy nonunion, nerve injury, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or other complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

For young patients with ONFH of ACRO III, this surgical technique can effectively restore the original shape of the femoral head and achieve satisfactory hip function in the short term. The mechanism is similar to jacking the roof of a house; thus, we named it "Jack surgery".

Advances in mechanism and management of bone homeostasis in osteonecrosis: a review article from basic to clinical applications

Osteonecrosis, characterized by bone cell death leading to impaired bone recovery, causes challenges in bone homeostasis maintenance. Bone homeostasis relies on the delicate balance between osteoclasts and osteoblasts, encompassing a series of complex and strictly regulated biological functions. Current treatments, including conservative therapies and surgeries, often fall short of expected outcomes, necessitating a reorientation towards more effective therapeutic strategies according to the pathogenesis. In this review, the authors hierarchically outlined risk factors, emerging mechanisms, and last-decade treatment approaches in osteonecrosis. By connecting mechanisms of bone homeostasis, the authors proposed future research directions should be focused on elucidating risk factors and key molecules, performing high-quality clinical trial, updating practice, and accelerating translational potential.

Reliability and repeatability of 2021 ARCO classification and its guiding significance in treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head

BACKGROUND

The study was designed to evaluate the interobserver reliability and intraobserver repeatability of the 2021 Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) classification and explore its guiding significance in the treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we randomly selected and investigated 50 sets of preoperative computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans from 96 patients (139 hips) to validate the reliability and repeatability of the 2021 ARCO classification. Patients with a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide-66 support rod were included in the clinical efficacy study. The Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess hip function. Femoral head collapse of > 2 mm was considered radiological failure. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) was performed for clinical failure, and follow-up was discontinued.

RESULTS

The average kappa value of interobserver consistency was 0.652. The average rate of consistency was 90.25%, and the average kappa value of intraobserver consistency was 0.836. Eighty-two patients (122 hips) were enrolled and followed up for a mean of 43.57 ± 9.64 months. There was no significant difference in the HHS among the three groups before surgery, but the difference was statistically significant at the last follow-up. Among them, types 1 and 2 had significantly higher scores at the last follow-up than preoperatively (P < 0.05), whereas type 3 had a lower score at the last follow-up than preoperatively, although the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).According to the imaging evaluation, the failure rate of type 1, 2, and 3 at the last follow-up was 0%, 19%, and 87%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the femoral head survival rate of radiography was significantly affected by the new classification system (P = 0.00). At the last follow-up, the incidence rate of THA in type 1, 2, and 3 was 5%, 7%, and 31%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the femoral head survival rate was significantly affected by the new classification system (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2021 ARCO classification for early-stage ONFH shows substantial consistency and repeatability. We do not recommend femoral head-preserving surgery for patients with type 3 ONFH.

Preliminary report of the outcomes and indications of single approach, double-channel core decompression with structural bone support and bone grafting for osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Background

To report the outcomes of the single approach to double-channel core decompression and bone grafting with structural bone support (SDBS) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and define the indications.

Methods

One-hundred-and-thirty-nine hips in 96 patients (79 males, 17 females; mean age 37.53±10.31 years, range 14–58 years; mean body mass index 25.15±3.63 kg/m²) were retrospectively analysed. The Harris hip score (HHS) was used to assess hip function, and radiographs were used to assess the depth of femoral head collapse. Treatment failure was defined as the performance of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The variables assessed as potential risk factors for surgical failure were: aetiology, Japanese Osteonecrosis Investigation Committee (JIC) type, age, and Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage. Complications were recorded.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 29.26±10.02 months. The HHS increased from 79.00±13.61 preoperatively to 82.01±17.29 at final follow-up (P=0.041). The average HHS improvement was 3.00±21.86. The combined excellent and good rate at final follow-up (65.6%) was significantly higher than that before surgery (34.5%) (P<0.05). On radiographic evaluation, 103 (74.1%) hips remained stable, while 36 (25.9%) had femoral head collapse or aggravation of ONFH. THA was performed in 18 hips. Thus, the overall femoral head survival rate was 87.05% (121/139). The success rate was adversely affected by JIC type, but not by aetiology, age, or ARCO stage. The only complication was a subtrochanteric fracture in one patient.

Conclusion

The SDBS may be an effective method to delay or even terminate the natural progression of ONFH, especially for patients with JIC types B and C1. The SDBS represents a new option for treating early-stage ONFH.

Failure and progression to total hip arthroplasty among the treatments for femoral head osteonecrosis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) often leads to secondary osteoarthritis and total hip arthroplasty.

SOURCE OF DATA

Recent published literatures.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

There has been increasing focus on the early intervention in ONFH patients to preserve the native hip articulation, reduce pain and improve function.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

Efficacy of surgical strategies for ONFH is debated. Several clinical studies showed controversial results, and the best treatment has not yet been clarified.

GROWING POINTS

To provide an overview over current treatment options for ONFH compares their failure rates and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Core decompression (CD) augmented with autologous bone grafting plus the implantation of bone marrow concentrate can decrease the rate of failure and progression to THA rates compared to CD alone.

Long-term survival and clinical outcomes of non-vascularized autologous and allogeneic fibular grafts are comparable for treating osteonecrosis of the femoral head

Background

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a disabling disease, which often involves young patients. Recently, various hip-preserving surgeries were recommended to delay total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Questions/purposes

This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and survival rate in the long-term follow-up between core decompression combined with a non-vascularized autologous fibular graft (group A) and an allogeneic fibular graft (group B) for the treatment of ONFH.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 117 patients (153 hips) with ONFH (Association Research Circulation Osseous [ARCO] stages IIa to IIIc) who underwent the abovementioned hip-preserving surgeries between January 2003 and June 2012. The mean (range) follow-up times (years) were 12.9 (7–16) and 9.3 (6–16) in groups A and B, respectively. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), visual analog scale (VAS) score, and forgotten joint score (FJS). A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The end point was THA.

Results

Groups A and B showed postoperative improvements, respectively, in HHS from 65 ± 7.2 to 80.3 ± 14.5 and from 66 ± 5.9 to 82.4 ± 13.6 (p < 0.05), and in VAS score from 6.3 ± 1.1 to 2.3 ± 1.6 and from 6.1 ± 1 to 2.2 ± 2.2 (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences in the HHS, VAS score, and hip FJS at the last follow-up (p > 0.05) and 15-year survival rate (84.1% and 86%, respectively, p > 0.05) were found between groups A and B.

Conclusions

Autologous and allogeneic fibular grafts can attain equally good clinical outcomes and high survival rates in long-term follow-up, and thus can greatly delay THA owing to good bone osseointegration and sufficient mechanical support. Notably, the ratio of failure will increase when patients were more than 37 years old.

Level of evidence

Level III, therapeutic study

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02246-3.