The utility of 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in the diagnosis and staging of chondrosarcoma: a meta-analysis

A retrospective external validation study of the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to externally validate the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) recommendations for differentiation/follow-up of central cartilage tumours (CCTs) of the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia and to propose BACTIP adaptations if the results provide new insights.

METHODS

MRIs of 123 patients (45 ± 11 years, 37 men) with an untreated CCT with MRI follow-up (n = 62) or histopathological confirmation (n = 61) were retrospectively/consecutively included and categorised following the BACTIP (2003-2020 / Ghent University Hospital/Belgium). Tumour length and endosteal scalloping differences between enchondroma, atypical cartilaginous tumour (ACT), and high-grade chondrosarcoma (CS II/III/dedifferentiated) were evaluated. ROC-curve analysis for differentiating benign from malignant CCTs and for evaluating the BACTIP was performed.

RESULTS

For lesion length and endosteal scalloping, ROC-AUCs were poor and fair-excellent, respectively, for differentiating different CCT groups (0.59-0.69 versus 0.73-0.91). The diagnostic performance of endosteal scalloping and the BACTIP was higher than that of lesion length. A 1° endosteal scalloping cut-off differentiated enchondroma from ACT + high-grade chondrosarcoma with a sensitivity of 90%, reducing the potential diagnostic delay. However, the specificity was 29%, inducing overmedicalisation (excessive follow-up). ROC-AUC of the BACTIP was poor for differentiating enchondroma from ACT (ROC-AUC = 0.69; 95%CI = 0.51-0.87; p = 0.041) and fair-good for differentiation between other CCT groups (ROC-AUC = 0.72-0.81). BACTIP recommendations were incorrect/unsafe in five ACTs and one CSII, potentially inducing diagnostic delay. Eleven enchondromas received unnecessary referrals/follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Although promising as a useful tool for management/follow-up of CCTs of the proximal humerus, distal femur, and proximal tibia, five ACTs and one chondrosarcoma grade II were discharged, potentially inducing diagnostic delay, which could be reduced by adapting BACTIP cut-off values.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Mostly, Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) assesses central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and the knee correctly. Both when using the BACTIP and when adapting cut-offs, caution should be taken for the trade-off between underdiagnosis/potential diagnostic delay in chondrosarcomas and overmedicalisation in enchondromas.

KEY POINTS

• This retrospective external validation confirms the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol as a useful tool for initial assessment and follow-up recommendation of central cartilage tumours in the proximal humerus and around the knee in the majority of cases. • Using only the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol, both atypical cartilaginous tumours and high-grade chondrosarcomas (grade II, grade III, and dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas) can be misdiagnosed, excluding them from specialist referral and further follow-up, thus creating a potential risk of delayed diagnosis and worse prognosis. • Adapted cut-offs to maximise detection of atypical cartilaginous tumours and high-grade chondrosarcomas, minimise underdiagnosis and reduce potential diagnostic delay in malignant tumours but increase unnecessary referral and follow-up of benign tumours.

Correlation between 18F-FDG PET-derived parameters and quantitative pathological characteristics of soft tissue sarcoma

Background

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been widely used for evaluating patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). However, uncertainties and overlap among individuals may be observed, and the relevance of these findings remains to be further explored. The present study was aimed at investigating the correlation between PET metabolic parameters and quantitative pathological characteristics in STS.

Methods

We retrospectively collected 39 patients with STS who underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) examination before treatment. Metabolic parameters including the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and intratumoral FDG uptake heterogeneity (IFH) were measured. Histological grading was performed according to the French Federation of Cancer Centers grading system. Continuous staining of tissue sections and digital quantitative analysis methods were used, the characteristics of tumor nucleated cells were observed through hematoxylin-eosin staining, and the expression of CD163, CD68, CD8, and CD4 in tumor tissues was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), then the correlation between FDG metabolic parameters and the above quantitative pathological characteristics in patients with STS were evaluated.

Results

The SUVmax of 18F-FDG PET/CT in STS was positively correlated with the total nuclear area (r=0.355, P=0.027). SUVmax was also positively correlated with the expression levels of CD163, CD68, CD8, and CD4 (r=0.582, 0.485, 0.343, and 0.324, with P<0.001, 0.002, 0.032, and 0.044, respectively), but was not significantly correlated with cell count and mean nuclear area (all P>0.05). However, MTV, TLG, and IFH were not significantly correlated with the above quantitative pathological characteristics. Further multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that only CD163 expression and histological grade were independently correlated with SUVmax. Moreover, SUVmax remained positively correlated with CD163 expression in the low-grade STS (r=0.820, P=0.001) and high-grade STS groups (r=0.430, P=0.028).

Conclusions

18F-FDG uptake was positively correlated with the quantitative pathological features of soft tissue tumors. SUVmax may be a meaningful method reflecting the level of M2 macrophage infiltration and may provide additional valuable information for preclinical evaluation of STS.

Chondrosarcoma of the spine-a case report

CASE

A 73-year-old male patient presented with a 3-month history of back pain. In bone scintigraphy and the FDG PET-CT scan (fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission computed tomography), highly suspect uptake levels were found in TH12-L1. Accordingly, an osteodestructive process was found on MRI (magnetic resonance imaging). Following a successfully performed biopsy of TH12, histologic analysis of the bone material revealed a chondrosarcoma (G1; T4N2M0). Complete resection of the tumor was successfully performed, since chondrosarcoma are resistant to radiation and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

As chondrosarcoma is a rare bone neoplasm, it must be considered in the differential diagnosis of lower back pain to initiate adequate treatment.

Chondrosarcoma Resistance to Radiation Therapy: Origins and Potential Therapeutic Solutions

Chondrosarcoma is a malignant cartilaginous tumor that is particularly chemoresistant and radioresistant to X-rays. The first line of treatment is surgery, though this is almost impossible in some specific locations. Such resistances can be explained by the particular composition of the tumor, which develops within a dense cartilaginous matrix, producing a resistant area where the oxygen tension is very low. This microenvironment forces the cells to adapt and dedifferentiate into cancer stem cells, which are described to be more resistant to conventional treatments. One of the main avenues considered to treat this type of tumor is hadrontherapy, in particular for its ballistic properties but also its greater biological effectiveness against tumor cells. In this review, we describe the different forms of chondrosarcoma resistance and how hadrontherapy, combined with other treatments involving targeted inhibitors, could help to better treat high-grade chondrosarcoma.

Molecular imaging of sarcomas with FDG PET

Sarcoma comprises a heterogenous entity of musculoskeletal malignancies arising from a mesenchymal origin. The diagnosis and management of pediatric sarcoma requires a multidisciplinary approach and the use of various imaging modalities including CT, MRI and FDG PET scans. FDG PET/CT (FDG PET), as a metabolic imaging, complements and provides superior diagnostic information as against other imaging modalities alone. Advantages of FDG PET in differentiating malignant sarcomatous lesions from benign lesions, and value in staging and restaging have been noted in several studies. The use of FDG PET in clinical management has increased over the years. The data on prognostication of outcomes or predicting responders to therapy with FDG PET in patients with sarcoma is somewhat limited. This review will focus on the pearls and pitfalls of FDG PET and role of FDG PET in initial extent of disease assessment, treatment response, and surveillance imaging pertaining to osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. We also discuss the limitations and unmet needs of FDG PET in the management of patients with sarcoma.

Whole body imaging in musculoskeletal oncology: when, why, and how

The use of whole-body imaging has become increasingly popular in oncology due to the possibility of evaluating total tumor burden with a single imaging study. This is particularly helpful in cases of widespread disease where dedicated regional imaging would make the evaluation more expensive, time consuming, and prone to more risks. Different techniques can be used, including whole-body MRI, whole-body CT, and PET-CT. Common indications include surveillance of cancer predisposing syndromes, evaluation of osseous metastases and clonal plasma cell disorders such as multiple myeloma, and evaluation of soft tissue lesions, including peripheral nerve sheath tumors. This review focuses on advanced whole-body imaging techniques and their main uses in musculoskeletal oncology.

Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions of the ribs

PURPOSE

Imaging biomarkers for rib mass are needed to optimize treatment plan. We investigated the diagnostic value of metabolic and volumetric parameters from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions of the ribs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with pathologically proven diagnosis of rib lesions were retrospectively enrolled. The size of rib lesions, the maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak), tumor-to-background ratio (TBR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesions glycolysis (TLG) were measured. The FDG uptake patterns (segmental and discrete) and CT findings (soft tissue involvement and fracture) were also reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the multiple parameters extracted from PET/CT, the MTV of malignant lesions was significantly higher than that of benign lesions (median; 4.7 vs 0.2, respectively, P = .041). In receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, MTV had the largest area under curve of 0.672 for differentiating malignant from benign lesions. For identifying malignant lesions, an MTV threshold of 0.5 had a sensitivity of 85.0%, specificity of 47.1%, positive predictive value of 79.1%, negative predictive value of 57.1%, and accuracy of 73.7%. The presence of adjacent soft tissue involvement around rib lesions showed a significant association with malignancy (odds ratio = 6.750; 95% CI, 1.837-24.802, P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

The MTV is a useful PET/CT parameter for assisting in the differential diagnosis of suspected malignant lesions of the ribs. CT finding of adjacent soft tissue involvement around rib was significantly associated with malignant lesions of the ribs.

Peripheral and periosteal chondrosarcoma: MRI-pathological correlation in 58 cases

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether MRI can distinguish atypical cartilaginous tumour/grade 1 peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (ACT/Gd1 PP-CS) from high-grade peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (HG-PP-CS) or dedifferentiated peripheral/periosteal chondrosarcoma (DD-PP-CS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of patients diagnosed between January 2007 and December 2020 who had undergone resection of PP-CS. Data collected included age, sex, and skeletal location. Histological tumour grades based on surgical resection were classified as ACT/grade 1 PP-CS, HG-PP-CS, or DD-PP-CS. A variety of MRI features were reviewed independently by 2 musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to final diagnosis and compared between the 3 groups. For statistical analysis, HG-PP-CS and DD-PP-CS were combined.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 31 (53%) males and 27 (47%) females with a mean age at diagnosis of 46.1 years (range 11-83 years), 14 (24%) of whom had an underlying diagnosis of diaphyseal aclasis. Forty-one (70.7%) cases were peripheral and 17 (29.3%) periosteal, 38 (66%) involving the flat bones, 15 (26%) the major long bones, 3 (5%) the spine, and 2 (3%) the bones of the hands and feet. Final histology revealed 33 (57%) ACT/Gd1-PP-CS, 18 (31%) HG-PP-CS, and 7 (12%) DD-PP-CS. Periosteal tumours were 16 times more likely to be HG/DD-CS compared to peripheral tumours (p < 0.001). Intra-medullary tumour extension was predictive of HG/DD-CS (p = 0.004) for both tumour types, while cap thickness (p = 0.04) and a diffuse cap type (p = 0.03) were differentiating features of low-grade and high-grade peripheral CS.

DISCUSSION

A variety of features can help differentiate low-grade from high-grade peripheral/periosteal CS, the most significant being origin from the bone surface.

The Diagnostic Performance of Maximum Uptake Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Ovarian or Adnexal Masses: A Meta-Analysis

Objective

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to provide evidence for using maximum uptake value (SUVmax) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to quantitatively differentiate benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and to indirectly compare their diagnostic performance.

Material and Methods

The association between SUVmax, ADC and ovarian or adnexal benign and malignant masses was searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases until October 1, 2021. Two authors independently extracted the data. Studies included in the analysis were required to provide data for the construction of a 2 × 2 contingency table to evaluate the diagnostic performance of SUVmax or ADC in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses. The quality of the enrolled studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument, and the meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software version 14.0. Forest plots were generated according to the sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax and ADC, and meta-regression analysis was further used to assess heterogeneity between studies.

Results

A total of 14 studies were finally included in this meta-analysis by gradually excluding duplicate literatures, conference abstracts, guidelines, reviews, case reports, animal studies and so on. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of SUVmax for quantitative differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses were 0.88 and 0.89, respectively, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity for ADC were 0.87 and 0.80, respectively.

Conclusion

Quantitative SUVmax and ADC values have good diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses, and SUVmax has higher accuracy than ADC. Future prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed for the analysis of the role of SUVmax and ADC in the differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian or adnexal masses. 

Can 18F-FDG PET/CT alone or combined with radiology be used to reliably grade cartilage bone neoplasms for surgical decision making?

OBJECTIVE

Treatment of chondrosarcomas is grade based; intralesional curettage for grade 1 and resection for grade 2 or more. Currently used methods to determine grades before surgery are not highly accurate and create a dilemma for the surgeon. We have used a PET-CT combined with imaging to answer the following study questions: (1) Does SUVmax value from an 18F-FDG PET/CT correlate with the grade of chondrosarcoma? (2) Can a cutoff SUVmax value be used to differentiate between various grades of chondroid neoplasms with sufficient sensitivity and specificity? (3) Does SUVmax guide the clinician and add value to radiology in offering histologic grade-dependent management?

METHODS

SUVmax values of patients with suspected chondrosarcoma were retrospectively correlated with the final histology grade for the operated patients. Radiologic parameters and radiology aggressiveness scores (RAS) were reevaluated and tabulated.

RESULTS

Totally 104 patients with chondroid tumors underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment. In total 73 had tissue diagnosis available as a pretreatment investigation. Spearman correlation indicated that there was a significant positive association between SUVmax and the final histology grading of chondroid tumors (correlation coefficient = 0.743; P < 0.01). SUVmax cutoff of 13.3 was 88.9% sensitive and 100% specific for diagnosing dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas. An RAS cutoff value of 3 or more could diagnose IHGCS with a sensitivity of 80.7% and specificity of 93.75%. Adding an SUVmax cutoff of 3.6 improves the sensitivity to 89.5%.

CONCLUSION

SUVmax value can reliably help diagnose dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma and when added to the radiology score can improve the accuracy of grading chondrosarcoma.

Common Skeletal Neoplasms and Nonneoplastic Lesions at 18F-FDG PET/CT

Numerous primary and metastatic osseous lesions and incidental osseous findings are encountered at fluorine 18 (¹⁸F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. These lesions show varying degrees of FDG uptake. Malignancies are generally more FDG avid than are benign lesions, but many exceptions exist. Although aggressive lesions tend to be more FDG avid than nonaggressive lesions, this concept holds true particularly for lesions of the same histologic subtype. In addition, some benign osseous processes such as Paget disease have variable degrees of FDG avidity on the basis of disease metabolic activity. This creates a diagnostic dilemma for radiologists and clinicians, especially in patients with known malignancies, and can result in unnecessary diagnostic imaging or interventions for incidental osseous lesions. Evaluation of morphologic CT characteristics of osseous lesions at FDG PET/CT can be a valuable adjunct to metabolic analysis to further characterize lesions, enhance diagnostic and staging accuracy, and avoid unnecessary invasive biopsy procedures. The authors review the common primary and metastatic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT, with an emphasis on morphologic CT assessment of lesions to help narrow the differential diagnosis. Imaging manifestations of common incidental nonneoplastic bone lesions at FDG PET/CT are discussed to provide information on differentiation of these lesions from osseous neoplasms. The guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) for common primary osseous malignancies are also summarized. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Atypical Cartilaginous Tumors: Trends in Management

INTRODUCTION

Chondrosarcomas are the most common primary bone malignancy in adults within the United States. Low-grade chondrosarcomas of the long bones, now referred to as atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs), have undergone considerable changes in recommended management over the past 20 years, although controversy remains. Diagnostic needle biopsy is recommended only in ambiguous lesions that cannot be clinically diagnosed with a multidisciplinary team. Local excision is preferred due to better functional and equivalent oncologic outcomes. We sought to determine whether these changes are reflected in reported management of ACTs.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) 2004 to 2016 was queried for ACTs of the long bones. Reported patient demographics and tumor clinicopathologic findings were extracted and compared between patients who underwent local excision versus wide resection.

RESULTS

We identified 1174 ACT patients in the NCDB. Of these, 586 underwent local excision and 588 underwent wide resection. No significant differences were found in patient demographics. No significant change was found in the reported percentage of diagnostic biopsies or wide resections performed over time. After multivariate regression, the single greatest predictor of performing wide resection on an ACTs was presenting tumor size.

DISCUSSION

Evaluation of the NCDB demonstrated that despite changes in the recommended management of ACTs, there has not been a significant change in surgical treatment over time. Surgeons have been performing diagnostic biopsies and wide resections at similar to historical rates. Persistency of these practices may be due to presenting tumor size, complex anatomic location, uncertainty of underlying tumor grade, or patient choice as part of clinical shared decision making. The authors anticipate that the rate of biopsies and wide resections performed will decrease over time as a result of improvements in advanced imaging and the implementation of recently updated clinical practice guidelines.

An update on the imaging of diaphyseal aclasis

Solitary osteochondromas are common, benign hyaline cartilage-capped exostoses that primarily arise from the metaphyses of long and flat bones. Diaphyseal aclasis is an autosomal dominant condition resulting from EXT1 or EXT2 gene mutations and is characterized by multifocal osteochondromas. These can result in a wide spectrum of complications, such as skeletal deformity, neurological and vascular complications, adventitial bursa formation, fracture, and rarely malignant transformation to peripheral chondrosarcoma. In this review, we outline in detail the multimodality imaging features of DA and its associated complications.

Is 2 mm a wide margin in high-grade conventional chondrosarcomas of the pelvis?

AIMS

Controversy exists as to what should be considered a safe resection margin to minimize local recurrence in high-grade pelvic chondrosarcomas (CS). The aim of this study is to quantify what is a safe margin of resection for high-grade CS of the pelvis.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 105 non-metastatic patients with high-grade pelvic CS of bone who underwent surgery (limb salvage/amputations) between 2000 and 2018. There were 82 (78%) male and 23 (22%) female patients with a mean age of 55 years (26 to 84). The majority of the patients underwent limb salvage surgery (n = 82; 78%) compared to 23 (22%) who had amputation. In total, 66 (64%) patients were grade 2 CS compared to 38 (36%) grade 3 CS. All patients were assessed for stage, pelvic anatomical classification, type of resection and reconstruction, margin status, local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. Surgical margins were stratified into millimetres: < 1 mm; > 1 mm but < 2 mm; and > 2 mm.

RESULTS

The disease--specific survival (DSS) at five years was 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56% to 81%) and 51% (95% CI 31% to 70%) for grade 2 and 3 CS, respectively (p = 0.092). The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) at five years was 59% (95% CI 45% to 72%) for grade 2 CS and 42% (95% CI 21% to 63%) for grade 3 CS (p = 0.318). A margin of more than 2 mm was a significant predictor of increased LRFS (p = 0.001). There was a tendency, but without statistical significance, for a > 2 mm margin to be a predictor of improved DSS. Local recurrence (LR) was a highly significant predictor of DSS, analyzed in a competing risk model (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Obtaining wide margins in the pelvis remains challenging for high-grade pelvic CS. On the basis of our study, we conclude that it is necessary to achieve at least a 2 mm margin for optimal oncological outcomes in patients with high-grade CS of the pelvis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1150-1154.

Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies

Chondrosarcoma (CHS) is the second most common primary malignant bone sarcoma. Overall survival and prognosis of this tumor are various and often extreme, depending on histological grade and tumor subtype. CHS treatment is difficult, and surgery remains still the gold standard due to the resistance of this tumor to other therapeutic options. Considering the role of differentiation of CHS subtypes and the need to develop new treatment strategies, in this review, we introduced a multidisciplinary characterization of CHS from its pathology to therapies. We described the morphology of each subtype with the role of immunohistochemical markers in diagnostics of CHS. We also summarized the most frequently mutated genes and genome regions with altered pathways involved in the pathology of this tumor. Subsequently, we discussed imaging methods and the role of currently used therapies, including surgery and the limitations of chemo and radiotherapy. Finally, in this review, we presented novel targeted therapies, including those at ongoing clinical trials, which can be a potential future target in designing new therapeutics for patients with CHS.

Conventional Cartilaginous Tumors: Evaluation and Treatment

»

Enchondromas are benign cartilaginous lesions that rarely require surgical intervention.

»

Atypical cartilaginous tumors (ACTs), also referred to as grade-1 chondrosarcomas, may be managed without any intervention or with extended intralesional curettage and bone-void filling.

»

High-grade chondrosarcomas, or grade-2 and 3 chondrosarcomas, should be managed aggressively with wide resection.

»

Chemotherapy and radiation do not currently play a role in the treatment of chondrosarcomas.

»

Differentiating an enchondroma from an ACT and an ACT from a high-grade chondrosarcoma can be difficult and requires clinical experience, radiographic and advanced imaging, and possibly a biopsy. Ultimately, a multidisciplinary team that includes a musculoskeletal oncologist, a radiologist, and a pathologist is needed to make the most appropriate diagnosis and treatment plan for each patient.