Plasma levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation product are unreliable for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing re-revision arthroplasty

Comprehensive analysis of the pathogen spectrum and antibiotic resistance profiles in periprosthetic joint infections: a single center retrospective study

Objective

The objective of this study was to preliminarily examine the demographic profiles, the spectrum of pathogenic bacteria, and the antibiotic resistance patterns among patients with periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), while also offering deeper insights into the microbiological characteristics specifically in diabetic patients with PJI.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 278 patients diagnosed with PJI from January 2019 to December 2024 at our institution was performed. Demographic characteristics of the patients, the distribution of pathogenic bacteria, and data on antibiotic resistance were statistically analyzed employing the chi-square test and t-test.

Results

Gram-positive cocci comprised 56.6% of all pathogenic bacteria, whereas coagulase-negative staphylococci constituted 28.1% of the total. Throughout the study period, a significant decrease was observed in the proportion of rifampicin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), from 27.0% to 10.4%. Similarly, a marked decline was noted in the proportion of gentamicin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, from 50.0% to 15.4%. Conversely, there was a dramatic increase in the proportion of amoxicillin-clavulanate-resistant gram-negative bacilli, from 23.1% to 64.7%. The incidence of fungal infections was notably higher among diabetic patients with PJI compared to their non-diabetic counterparts.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the distribution pattern of pathogenic bacteria and their antibiotic resistance profiles among patients with PJI undergoes continuous variation. Moreover, there exist significant differences in the distribution of pathogenic bacteria between those with diabetes and those without diabetes among PJI patients. This serves as a crucial theoretical foundation and empirical support for the rigorous and tailored development of anti-infective treatment strategies for patients with various types of PJI.

Are Red Blood Cell Distribution Width and Platelet Count Useful for Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients Undergoing Re-Revision Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

Accurate and prompt identification of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is critical prior to re-revision arthroplasty to ensure optimal surgical outcomes. Among routinely measured blood indices, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and platelet count (PLT) have shown strong correlations with infection presence. This study aimed to assess the utility of RDW and PLT for diagnosing PJI in patients scheduled for re-revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

This retrospective research encompassed all patients who underwent re-revision hip or knee arthroplasty at our institution from 2008 to 2022. Participants were categorized into either the PJI (n = 41) or the non-PJI (n = 47) group following the guidelines established in the 2013 International Consensus Meeting on PJI. In this analysis, RDW and PLT counts were evaluated alongside conventional inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The efficacy of these diagnostics was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ([area under the curve AUC]).

RESULTS

RDW demonstrated a modest AUC of 0.678 with sensitivity at 61.0% and specificity at 71.7%, using a threshold of 14.5%. PLT was on par with ESR, showing an AUC of 0.773, and both sensitivity and specificity around 73% at a threshold of 201 × 109/L. CRP presented the highest diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 0.815, achieving a sensitivity of 82.9% and specificity of 73.9% at a 6.9 mg/L threshold, surpassing ESR's AUC of 0.754. None of the biomarkers, individually or combined, outperformed CRP alone (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the context of re-revision arthroplasty, RDW and PLT demonstrate limited efficacy as diagnostic biomarkers for PJI. However, CRP retains its reliability as a biomarker when the diagnostic threshold is appropriately recalibrated.

Finding the Optimal Screening Test for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serological markers are often used as screening tools to avoid unnecessary joint aspiration in cases with a low probability of infection. This study aimed to determine the utility of standard-of-care serological tests as a screening tool for PJI in patients undergoing revision arthroplasty.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 502 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty between May 2017 and August 2021. A PJI was defined using a modified definition of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. There were 82 patients undergoing reimplantation who were excluded. Additionally, 8 patients who had an inconclusive International Consensus Meeting score were also excluded. Of the 412 included patients, 317 (76.9%) underwent revision for aseptic failure, and 95 (23.1%) had PJI. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the diagnostic utility of each serological test. A pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was performed to determine whether the differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) between the tests were significant. Additional analyses were performed to find the threshold for each test that offered 100% sensitivity, allowing it to be the optimal screening test.

RESULTS

All 4 serological markers, D-dimer (AUC 0.860, sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 81.7%), CRP (AUC 0.862, sensitivity 90.4%, specificity 70.0%), ESR (AUC 0.833, sensitivity 73.9%, specificity 85.2%), and fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, sensitivity 74.7%, specificity 75.4%), demonstrated comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI (all P > .05). When maximizing sensitivity to 100%, D-dimer demonstrated the highest specificity (AUC 0.860, specificity 40.2%), outperforming ESR (AUC 0.833, specificity 3.3%), fibrinogen (AUC 0.798, specificity 2.3%), and CRP (AUC 0.862, specificity 0%). A plasma D-dimer level of ≥ 244 ng/mL was identified as the optimal cutoff for use as a screening test.

CONCLUSIONS

Although plasma D-dimer demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy as CRP, ESR, and fibrinogen, it outperformed all 3 aforementioned serological markers when used as a screening test for PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Serum and Synovial Markers in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip, Knee, and Shoulder: An Algorithmic Approach

➤ No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).➤ Physicians rely on a combination of serological tests, synovial markers, and clinical findings plus clinical judgment to help to guide preoperative decision-making.➤ Several organizations have proposed criteria for the diagnosis of hip or knee PJI on which we now rely.➤ Given that shoulder arthroplasty has only recently become popular, it is possible that a shoulder-specific definition of PJI will be introduced in the coming years.➤ Although a number of serum and synovial markers have demonstrated high accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI of the hip and knee, further research is needed in order to identify markers that may be more suitable for the diagnosis of shoulder PJI and for the potential development and identification of specific serological tests as screening tools for PJI.

Plasma D-Dimer Is Noninferior to Serum C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

No single test has demonstrated absolute accuracy in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Serological markers are often used as screening tools in the workup of patients with suspected PJI. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic utility of plasma D-dimer for PJI in a variety of clinical scenarios.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 502 patients undergoing revision hip or knee arthroplasty. PJI was defined per a modified version of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria. Plasma D-dimer, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and fibrinogen were measured preoperatively. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the utility of each biomarker in the diagnosis of PJI. Pairwise comparison with Bonferroni correction was performed to determine whether the differences in areas under the curve (AUCs) between the markers were significant.

RESULTS

Of the 412 patients included, 317 (76.9%) did not have an infection (aseptic group) and 95 (23.1%) had an infection (PJI group). All 4 serological markers, D-dimer (AUC, 0.860; sensitivity, 81.3%; specificity, 81.7%), CRP (AUC, 0.862; sensitivity, 90.4%; specificity, 70.0%), ESR (AUC, 0.833; sensitivity, 73.9%; specificity, 85.2%), and fibrinogen (AUC, 0.798; sensitivity, 74.7%; specificity, 75.4%), demonstrated comparable accuracy for the diagnosis of PJI (all p > 0.05). When examining the performance of the different inflammatory markers in diagnosing infection caused by indolent organisms, D-dimer demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that plasma D-dimer was noninferior to serum CRP and ESR in the diagnosis of PJI and may be a useful adjunct when screening patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Limited value of coagulation parameters in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

Exploring biomarkers for easy and reliable diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has attracted an increasing attention. Coagulation parameters have been found to be associated with infections, but their role in diagnosing PJI is not well understood. The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of coagulation parameters in PJI.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited patients who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from January 2014 to December 2020. Patients were grouped into PJIs or non-PJIs, and PJIs were further divided into culture positive and culture negative groups. The diagnostic value of coagulation parameters including fibrin degradation product (FDP), D-dimer, platelet count (PC), and platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PVR) was evaluated by using receiver operating characteristic curve, in comparison with traditional biomarkers C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients including 136 THA and 50 TKA were studied. There were 105 PJI and 81 non-PJI patients. The coagulation parameters showed an inferior performance to CRP and ESR, with the area under the curve (AUC) of FDP, D-dimer, PC, PVR, CRP, and ESR being 0.805, 0.571, 0.703, 0.704, 0.882, and 0.824, respectively. The diagnostic performance of those coagulation parameters was similar in THA and TKA PJIs and was not superior to ESR or CRP in either culture-positive or culture-negative PJIs.

CONCLUSION

Coagulation parameters FDP, D-dimer, PC, and PVR are of limited value for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection in both THA and TKA patients.

Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective

The current diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) are diverse and controversial, leading to delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate and unify their diagnostic accuracy and the threshold selection of serum and synovial routine tests for PJI at an early stage.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for retrospective or prospective studies which reported preoperative‐available assays (serum, synovial, or culture tests) for the diagnosis of chronic PJI among inflammatory arthritis (IA) or non‐IA populations from January 1, 2000 to June 30, 2022. Threshold effective analysis was performed on synovial polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN%), synovial white blood cell (WBC), serum C‐reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to find the relevant cut‐offs.

Results

Two hundred and sixteen studies and information from 45,316 individuals were included in the final analysis. Synovial laboratory‐based α‐defensin and calprotectin had the best comprehensive sensitivity (0.91 [0.86–0.94], 0.95 [0.88–0.98]) and specificity (0.96 [0.94‐0.97], 0.95 [0.89–0.98]) values. According to the threshold effect analysis, the recommended cut‐offs are 70% (sensitivity 0.89 [0.85–0.92], specificity 0.90 [0.87–0.93]), 4100/μL (sensitivity 0.90 [0.87–0.93], specificity 0.97 [0.93–0.98]), 13.5 mg/L (sensitivity 0.84 [0.78–0.89], specificity 0.83 [0.73–0.89]), and 30 mm/h (sensitivity 0.79 [0.74–0.83], specificity 0.78 [0.72–0.83]) for synovial PMN%, synovial WBC, serum CRP, and ESR, respectively, and tests seem to be more reliable among non‐IA patients.

Conclusions

The laboratory‐based synovial α‐defensin and synovial calprotectin are the two best independent preoperative diagnostic tests for PJI. A cut off of 70% for synovial PMN% and tighter cut‐offs for synovial WBC and serum CRP could have a better diagnostic accuracy for non‐IA patients with chronic PJI.

Diagnostic value of platelet indices in infected nonunion: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic value of platelet indices has been evaluated in various infectious diseases but not in infected nonunion. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of platelet indices for diagnosis of infected nonunion after open reduction and internal fixation.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent primary fracture nonunion revision surgeries from January 2016 to December 2021. A total of 297 patients were included in the study: 96 with infected nonunion (group A) and 201 with aseptic nonunion (group B). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate diagnostic value of each index. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. White blood cell (WBC) count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), plasma fibrinogen, plasma D-dimer, platelet count (PC), plateletcrit, and ratio of platelet count to mean platelet volume (PC/MPV) were significantly higher, and MPV and platelet distribution width (PDW) significantly lower, in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed PC/MPV and plasma fibrinogen to have better diagnostic value than the other coagulation indicators (AUC of 0.801 and 0.807, respectively). The combination of ESR, plasma fibrinogen, and PC/MPV had good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of infected nonunion. PC/MPV had better diagnostic value than ESR and plasma fibrinogen in the subgroup of patients with coagulation-related comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma fibrinogen and PC/MPV ratio might be useful parameters for early diagnosis of infected nonunion.