Novel piston technique versus Ilizarov technique for the repair of bone defect after lower limb infection

Debridement-Reconstruction-Docking Management System Versus Ilizarov Technique for Lower-Extremity Osteomyelitis

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis causes marked disability and is one of the most challenging diseases for orthopaedists to treat because of the considerable rate of infection recurrence. In this study, we proposed and assessed the debridement-reconstruction-docking (DRD) system for the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis. This procedure comprises 3 surgical stages and 2 preoperative assessments; namely, pre-debridement assessment, debridement, pre-reconstruction assessment, reconstruction, and docking-site management. We evaluated the use of the DRD system compared with the Ilizarov technique, which is defined as a 1-stage debridement, osteotomy, and bone transport.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort included 289 patients who underwent either DRD or the Ilizarov technique for the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis at a single institution between January 2013 and February 2021 and who met the eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the rate of infection recurrence. Secondary outcomes included the external fixator index (EFI), refracture rate, and the Paley classification for osseous and functional results. An inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment model was utilized to estimate the effect of the DRD system and Ilizarov technique on the treatment of lower-extremity osteomyelitis.

RESULTS

A total of 131 and 158 patients underwent DRD or the Ilizarov technique, respectively. The inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment model suggested that DRD was associated with a significant reduction in infection recurrence (risk ratio [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13 to 0.50; p < 0.001) and EFI (-6.9 days/cm, 95% CI; -8.3 to -5.5; p < 0.001). Patients in the DRD group had better Paley functional results than those in the Ilizarov group (ridit score, 0.55 versus 0.45; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the rate of refracture (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.79; p = 0.71) and Paley osseous results (ridit score, 0.51 versus 0.49; p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

In this balanced retrospective cohort of patients with lower-extremity osteomyelitis, the use of the DRD system was associated with a reduced rate of infection recurrence, a lower EFI, and better Paley functional results compared with the use of the Ilizarov technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Predictive factors for docking site procedure in bone transport for large lower extremity segmental defects

BACKGROUND

Segmental bone transport is a common technique for treating large segmental bone defects. However, a docking site procedure is often necessary in segmental bone transport. To date, no prognostic factors for the need of docking site procedure have been reported. Thus, the decision is often made at random, based on the surgeon's subjective judgment and experience. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for the need of docking site operation.

METHODS

Patients with segmental bone transport in lower extremity bone defects were included regardless of age, aetiology, and defect size. We excluded patients undergoing treatments that were not yet completed, and those who discontinued therapy by any reason. The need for docking site operation was modelled with logistical and linear regression as well as univariate analysis of variances (ANOVA). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients from age 12 to 74 years (mean age: 39.07 ± 18.20 years) were included. The mean defect size was 76.39 ± 41.10 mm. The duration of transport (days) showed a significant influence (p = 0.049, 95%CI: 1.00-1.02) on the need for docking site operation. No other significant influences were detected.

CONCLUSION

A link between the duration of transport and the need for docking site operation was detected. Our data showed that if a threshold of about 188 days is exceeded, docking surgery should be considered.

Masquelet technique with radical debridement and alternative fixation in treatment of infected bone nonunion

Background

Infected bone nonunion is the toughest problem in fracture-related infection, leading to high disability and recurrence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Masquelet technique with radical debridement and alternative fixation in the management of infected bone nonunion.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data in two trauma centers was performed from 2016 to 2020. Patients diagnosed as infected bone nonunion were included in this study. The initial implant was removed and all patients received a two-stage Masquelet procedure with radical debridement and alternative fixation. The disappearance of inflammatory manifestations and regression of infection indicators (such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein, white blood cell count) to the normal range were regarded as radical debridement. The alternative fixation depended on local soft tissue conditions. Results were evaluated according to clinical and radiographic assessment and patient satisfaction.

Results

A total of 23 patients were included in our study. Six of them received internal fixation, while the other 17 received external fixation. Of the 23 cases, 21 were successfully reconstructed without infection recurrence, except 2 reinfected cases. Mean full weight bearing time was 6.6 months follow-up post last surgery. Out of the 23, 20 cases had satisfactory functional outcomes without additional bone or soft tissue comorbidities. Discrepancies in leg length and joint stiffness were observed in three cases and marked as unsatisfied results.

Conclusions

Infected bone nonunion can be successfully managed using the Masquelet technique under radical debridement combined with an alternative fixation method.

A meta-analysis of the Masquelet technique and the Ilizarov bone transport method for the treatment of infected bone defects in the lower extremities

Purpose:To compare the clinical outcomes of the Masquelet technique and Ilizarov bone transport method for the treatment of patients with infected bone defects in the lower extremities. Methods: Eligible studies were searched from six databases until 12 April 2021. Data extraction was independently conducted by two investigators, which was followed by a quality assessment. Weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to analyze continuous variables, while odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used to analyze categorical variables. All statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. Results: Thirteen articles were included in this meta-analysis. There was a significant difference observed in hospitalization costs (WMD [95% CI] = -1.75 [-2.50, -0.99] thousand US dollar, p < 0.00,001), final union time (WMD [95% CI] = -4.54 [-6.91, -2.17] months, p = 0.0002), time to full weight bearing (WMD [95% CI] = -1.73 [-3.36, -0.10] months, p = 0.04), quality of life (WMD [95% CI] = 7.70 [4.74, 10.67], p < 0.00,001), and the risk of complications (OR [95%CI] = 0.39 [0.19, 0.79], p = 0.009) between the Masquelet and Ilizarov groups. No significant differences in other outcomes were observed between the two groups. Conclusion: Masquelet technique exhibited the advantages in the lower hospitalization cost, shorter final union time, shorter time to full weight bearing, lower rate of complications, and better post-operative quality of life, compared with Ilizarov bone transport method. However, this finding should be confirmed in large-scale clinical samples.