Quantifying the learning curve for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy

Pulmonary Endarterectomy for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: A Systematic Review of the Most Updated Literature

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice in case of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). PEA is performed by an increasing number of surgeons; however, the reported outcomes are limited to a few registries or to individual centers' experiences. This systematic review focuses on pre-operative evaluation, intra-operative procedure and post-operative results in patients submitted to PEA for CTEPH. The literature included was searched using a formal strategy, combining the terms "pulmonary endarterectomy" AND "chronic pulmonary hypertension" and focusing on studies published in the last 5 years (2017-2022) to give a comprehensive overview on the most updated literature. The selection of the adequate surgical candidate is a crucial point, and the decision should always be performed by expert multidisciplinary teams composed of surgeons, pulmonologists and radiologists. In all the included studies, the surgical procedure was performed through a median sternotomy with intermittent deep hypothermic circulatory arrest under cardiopulmonary bypass. In case of residual pulmonary hypertension, alternative combined treatments should be considered (balloon angioplasty and/or medical therapy until lung transplantation in highly selected cases). Short- and long-term outcomes, although not homogenous across the different studies, are acceptable in highly experienced CTEPH centers.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is the gold standard treatment for patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, the results are poorly quantified outside a few registry reports and several individual centers.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed searching five electronic databases assessing the outcomes for adult patients undergoing PTE for CTEPH. All articles that reported mortality data were included. Primary outcome measures were early/inpatient mortality; secondary outcomes were survival, pulmonary haemodynamics, morbidity and functional status following PTE for CTEPH. Results were pooled via a meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression.

RESULTS

A total of 5,717 studies were identified, yielding sixty-one relevant papers. Thirty-day mortality ranged from 0.8% to 24.4%, and on meta-analysis was 8.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.2-9.6%]. Mortality was noted to decrease with increasing center volume of PTE cases (P<0.01). Residual pulmonary hypertension was reported in 8.2% to 44.5% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CTEPH is associated with acceptable short-term mortality and an improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics. With increasing volume of experience and ongoing developments over time peri-operative mortality continues to decrease.

Pulmonary endarterectomy

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is an underdiagnosed condition. Patients typically present with the symptoms of right heart failure. Diagnosis is usually done by radionuclide ventilation/perfusion (VQ) scan, high-quality multidetector computed tomography (CT) or pulmonary angiography at expert centers. Pulmonary endarterectomy remains the corner stone in management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Deep hypothermic circulatory arrest is commonly used for the operation at most centers. In-hospital mortality ranges from 1.7 to 14.2%. Pulmonary hemorrhage, reperfusion lung injury, and right ventricular failure remain major early post-operative concerns. Five-year survival is reported to be 76 to 89%. Long-term outcome depends on residual pulmonary hypertension. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty and medical management play an adjunctive role. Here, we provide a comprehensive review on surgical management of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

Quantifying the learning curve of emergent total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection with arch involvement is a life-threatening condition, which requires immediate surgical attention. Emergent total arch replacement and root reconstruction is a technically demanding operation with varying outcomes based on surgeon experience. The human factors in total arch replacement in the emergent setting have never been systematically investigated. The ability of surgeons with low volumes to achieve acceptable results in their start-up period is not known.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2016, patients with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent emergent total arch replacement with three surgeons were enrolled. Basic characteristics, procedural and postoperative outcomes were collected. The time of critical surgical steps and operative mortality were calculated using descriptive statistics and cumulative SUM (CUSUM) analysis.

Results

A total of 300 patients (age 53.8±11.5 years, female 63, 21.0%) with acute type A aortic dissection underwent emergent total arch replacement. A total of 219 patients (73.0%) had root reinforcement, 295 patients (98.3%) underwent frozen elephant trunk repair. Mean circulatory arrest and cross-clamp times were 29.8±9.8 and 112.3±32.1 min, respectively. The operative mortality was 6.7%, the stroke rate was 4.0%. The mean length of postoperative ICU and hospital stays were 8.4±10.6 and 18.0±12.2 days, respectively. By CUSUM depictions, surgeons appeared to have different learning curves with regards to operative time. By CUSUM failure analysis on operative mortality, two newly appointed surgeons in their start-up period stayed in an acceptable range, while one senior surgeon with higher volumes experienced superior outcomes and better performance.

Conclusions

Although emergent total arch replacement for acute type A dissection is a complex scenario, surgeons well-trained in adult cardiac surgery are able to achieve acceptable results in their start-up period.