Controller and battery changes due to technical problems related to the HVAD® left ventricular assist device - a single center experience

It's not only the pump: Assessment of human factors of wearable components and user experience of patients with left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Despite design improvements in left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) over the past decade, limitations of external, wearable VAD components affect patient quality of life and safety. The aim of this study was to describe both user experience and human factor issues of 2 contemporary LVADs.

METHODS

This single-center, cross-sectional study included LVAD outpatients who were at least 3 months after implantation. Before developing the 16-item survey, a systematic literature review and 2-round Delphi method involving 9 VAD clinicians were used to select items in 6 domains: power supply, emergency situations, wearability, mobility, and freedom to travel, user modifications, lifestyle, and home adaptations.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients (61.6 ± 11.6 years, 13.8% female, HeartMate 3 (HM3)/HVAD: n = 39/19) completed the one-time survey after median of 853 days on device: 10.3% reported problems changing power supply, 12.7% unintentional driveline disconnection (HM3: 5.6% vs HVAD: 26.3%, p = 0.041). Against the recommendation 74.1% sleep with battery-support (HM3: 88.9% vs HVAD: 44.4%, p = 0.001). About 65.3% criticized the carry bag weight/size (HM3: 71.4% vs HVAD: 50.0%, p = 0.035), thus 24.1% wear an own carrying-system, 42.1% modified their wearables, 38.9% their clothing, and 65.3% their home to cope with life on LVAD support. Mobility is reduced due to limited wearability: 18.9% went abroad (only 3.7% by plane) and 40.0% use less public transport than before implantation (the older the less: r = -0.37, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

HVAD and HM3 wearables still show a variety of human factors issues and potential for improved user experience. User-centered design and incorporation of patient feedback may increase user satisfaction, and patient safety.

Food and Drug Administration Malfunction Recalls of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are being increasingly implanted given the increasing prevalence of patients with advanced heart failure stages. However, they are not exempt from device malfunctions. A PubMed search for the key words (left ventricular assist device malfunction) (ventricular assist system malfunction) was performed. We identified 28 publications in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website database that addressed LVAD malfunction. Twenty-nine FDA recalls were identified regarding LVAD malfunctions: 17 regarding HeartWare ventricular assist device, six for HeartMate II, three for HeartMate 3, and three for total artificial heart. Mechanisms involved in LVAD malfunction include battery malfunction, loose driveline connector, malfunction of the system controller, loose power supply connector ports, malfunction of the driveline splice kit, problems with the percutaneous lead connection, disconnection of the bend relief and outflow graft and outflow graft occlusion among others. Multiple mechanisms could be linked to LVAD malfunction. However, multiple device modifications have been developed over the past decade to avoid recurrent malfunctions. Constant improvements and research in biotechnology are needed to prevent these complications. It remains to be seen if newer generation devices will lead to improved patient outcomes over the long term.

A Rising Hope of an Artificial Heart: Left Ventricular Assisted Device - Outcome, Convenience, and Quality of Life

With the introduction of mechanical circulatory support, mainly continuous-flow left ventricular assisted devices (CF-LVAD), prolonging survival in end-stage heart failure patients can be seen in a new light. We also anticipate its use as a definitive therapy to overcome the limited donor organ resources for cardiac transplant. However, LVADs also have undesirable device-related complications and questionable improvement in the quality of life. In this review, we searched published articles using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify the complications and outcome of post-LVAD patients from 2014 to 2019. The studies we used included all study design types and a wide range of demographic variables focusing on age, sex, choice of LVAD as a bridge to cardiac transplant, or definitive therapy. For patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III B or IV or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with maximal medication therapy, there is a significant increase in mean ejection fraction from 4% to 6%. For patients with drug-induced cardiac toxicity or other causes of cardiac toxicity, with no significant risk factors, the ejection fraction increased to nearly 50% within 10-25 days of LVAD usage. There is also a substantial improvement in the quality of life in this literature review comparing to the pre-LVAD stage, as long as complications are taken into account. Data is limited for making an accurate judgment on the quality of life and functional capacity of LVADs. We found that the use of LVADs is not fully cost-effective, but still less financially burdening than a cardiac transplant. Although data from worldwide is limited and restricted to studies having a range of one to two years of follow-up, we conclude that LVADs are promising in improving cardiac function and the best bridging therapy available for patients waiting on a transplant.

Cardiac Assist Devices: Early Concepts, Current Technologies, and Future Innovations

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a debilitating condition that afflicts tens of millions of people worldwide and is responsible for more deaths each year than all cancers combined. Because donor hearts for transplantation are in short supply, a safe and durable means of mechanical circulatory support could extend the lives and reduce the suffering of millions. But while the profusion of blood pumps available to clinicians in 2019 tend to work extremely well in the short term (hours to weeks/months), every long-term cardiac assist device on the market today is limited by the same two problems: infections caused by percutaneous drivelines and thrombotic events associated with the use of blood-contacting surfaces. A fundamental change in device design is needed to address both these problems and ultimately make a device that can support the heart indefinitely. Toward that end, several groups are currently developing devices without blood-contacting surfaces and/or extracorporeal power sources with the aim of providing a safe, tether-free means to support the failing heart over extended periods of time.