Energy devices safety and impact on video-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy postoperative course: monopolar electrocautery versus ultrasonic dissector

A Retrospective Study of Transaxillary Endoscopic Breast Augmentation Using Ultrasonic Scalpel or Conventional Electrocautery for Implant Pocket Dissection

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonic scalpel has been reported to be superior to conventional electrocautery in many studies. However, with respect to transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation, few studies on the effect of ultrasonic scalpel are available in the literature.

METHODS

The medical records of 173 female patients who underwent breast augmentation via endoscopic transaxillary approach from January 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to the implant pocket dissection instruments. In group A, the implant pockets were dissected with conventional electrocautery (EC group) on 81 patients, and in group B, ultrasonic scalpel (US group) was used for implant pockets on 92 patients. All operations were performed by the same senior plastic surgeon and the same surgical team. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative total drainage volume, days of drainage, postoperative surgical site pain and hospital stay time of the two groups were compared and analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The average operation time of the US group (83.82 ± 11.57 min) was significantly shorter than that of the EC group (101.40 ± 14.36 min), intraoperative blood loss in the US group was significantly less than that of the EC group (18.67 ± 6.20 ml vs. 21.59 ± 6.44 ml), the mean hospital stay days (2.96 ± 0.69 vs. 4.30 ± 1.11), total drainage volume (122.24 ± 43.81 vs. 232.37 ± 99.15), and duration of drain (2.52 ± 0.54 vs. 3.77 ± 1.10), mean VAS score for surgical site pain on 3 postoperative days (5.08 ± 1.35 vs. 6.51 ± 1.36, 4.08 ± 1.16 vs. 5.40 ± 1.32, 3.04 ± 0.91 vs. 4.06 ± 1.11) were significantly lower in the US group compared to the EC group.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrasonic scalpel reduces operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative pain, hospital stay time, and incidence of complications. The ultrasonic scalpel is safe and reliable for transaxillary endoscopic breast augmentation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Energy devices versus electrocoagulation in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: a propensity-match cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the effect on perioperative outcome of intraoperative use of different devices for tissue dissection (electrocoagulation [EC] or energy devices [ED]) in patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 191 consecutive patients who underwent VATS lobectomy, divided into two cohorts: ED (117 patients), and EC (74 patients); after propensity score matching, 148 patients were extracted, 74 for each cohort. The primary endpoints considered were complication rate and 30-day mortality rate. The secondary endpoints considered were length of stay (LOS) and the number of lymph nodes harvested.

RESULTS

The complication rate did not differ between the two cohorts (16.22% EC group, 19.66% ED group, P=0.549), before and after propensity matching (16.22% for both EC and ED group, P=1.000). The 30-day mortality rate was 1 in the overall population. Median LOS was 5 days for both groups, before and after propensity match, with the same interquartile range, (IQR: 4-8). ED group had a significantly higher median number of lymph nodes harvested (ED median: 18, IQR: 12-24; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0002). The difference was confirmed after the propensity score matching (ED median: 17, IQR: 13-23; EC median: 10, IQR: 5-19; P=0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

ED dissection during VATS lobectomy did not lead to different complication rates, mortality rates, and LOS compared to EC tissue dissection. ED use led to a significantly higher number of intraoperative lymph nodes harvested compared to EC use.