Left ventricular free wall rupture as a result of delayed presentation of an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to fear of COVID-19: case report

Left Ventricular Pseudoaneurysm After Sutureless Repair for Post-Myocardial Infarction Oozing-Type Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture

A 66-year-old male patient underwent repair using the sutureless technique for an oozing-type cardiac rupture associated with myocardial infarction of the anterior left ventricular wall. On postoperative day 10, echocardiography revealed a thrombus in the apex region, and anticoagulation therapy was started with warfarin. The thrombus disappeared two months postoperatively. Four months after surgery, the patient came to the hospital with a chief complaint of breathlessness. The computer tomography scan showed a pseudoaneurysm in the left ventricular anterior wall. Because of breathlessness due to decreased effective cardiac output associated with the left ventricular mass and the risk of rupture of the left ventricular pseudoaneurysm, we decided that surgery was indicated. When the left ventricular pseudoaneurysm was incised under cardiac arrest using an artificial heart-lung machine, an oval-shaped communication orifice was found, which was closed directly with continuous sutures. The breathlessness disappeared and the patient was discharged 13 days after surgery.

Left Thoracotomy as an Alternative to Redo Sternotomy in a Case of Left Ventricle Rupture

Left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is a rare but serious complication following ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), occurring in a small fraction of patients. Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture presents as three types: There are three types of Left Ventricular Free Wall Rupture: Type 1 with an abrupt tear and high mortality, Type 2 with a slower tear, and Type 3 with aneurysm perforation. Despite reperfusion therapies, LVFWR remains concerning due to increased mortality described from 75% to 90%. We present a case of LVFWR in a 64-year-old with a history of previous aortic valve surgery and heart failure, managed through left thoracotomy surgical repair. Our approach led to successful repair, emphasizing collaborative intraoperative strategies for improved outcomes in LVFWR cases.

Managing Ventricular Wall Rupture as a Complication of Late Presentation MI in a Complex Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ventricular free wall rupture is an infrequent but serious complication of myocardial infarction with high mortality despite surgical intervention. In recent years with the COVID-19 pandemic, observational studies have reported a rise in this complication most likely due to patient hesitation in seeking urgent medical assistance for fear of contracting COVID-19 in a hospital setting. This case report highlights the early recognition and diagnosis of ventricular wall rupture by the heart team with a good surgical outcome in a complex patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Ventricular rupture should be considered in deteriorating patients presenting with suspicion of late presentation myocardial infarction. Clinicians in the post-COVID-19 era should expect to see these complications more frequently.

Cardiac Tamponade Secondary to Hemorrhagic Pericardial Effusion: A Complication of STEMI

Background: Most pericardial effusions that occur in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are small, simple, and without symptomology. However, in its most severe form, pericardial effusion can precipitate cardiac tamponade, and when untreated, can cause abrupt hemodynamic instability. Pericardial effusion may be a manifestation of left ventricular free-wall rupture, hemorrhagic pericarditis, or aortic dissection involving a coronary artery. Case Report: We describe the case of a 65-year-old male who experienced chest pain for several days prior to admission but delayed seeking care because he wished to avoid coronavirus disease 2019 exposure. Upon arrival, he was hemodynamically unstable. Electrocardiogram was consistent with anterior STEMI. Bedside echocardiogram demonstrated a hypertrophic left ventricle with preserved function and a large, complex pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade physiology. Computed tomography of the chest identified hemopericardium but was unable to delineate etiology. The patient underwent emergent thoracotomy because of persistent shock, and during the surgery, left ventricular free-wall rupture was identified and repaired. Coronary artery bypass grafting to the patient's left anterior descending artery was also performed. The patient remained asymptomatic at 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: The differential for hemodynamic compromise in a patient with STEMI is broad, but quickly distinguishing pump failure from other life-threatening causes of shock is imperative to dictate time-sensitive management decisions. The presence of a hemorrhagic pericardial effusion in the setting of STEMI is a surrogate marker for a severe infarct and can help the bedside physician determine whether a patient will be better served in the catheterization lab for revascularization or in the operating room for surgical repair.

Myocardial infarction throughout 1 year of the COVID-19 pandemic: French nationwide study of hospitalization rates, prognosis and 90-day mortality rates

Background

Studies reported a decrease in hospital admissions for myocardial infarction (MI) in early 2020 as a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis, mainly restricted to the beginning of the pandemic.

Aims

To describe national trends in hospital admissions for MI in 2020, and to compare patient characteristics, in-hospital prognosis and 90-day mortality between patients who had an MI in 2020 and those admitted in 2017–2019.

Methods

All patients hospitalized for MI in France from 2017 to 2020 were selected from the national hospital discharge database. Analyses compared temporal trends in MI admissions, in-hospital cardiac complications and mortality rates in 2020 versus 2017–2019.

Results

In 2020, 94,747 patients were hospitalized for MI, corresponding to a 6% decrease in MI admissions compared with 2017–19. This decrease was larger during the first lockdown (–24%; P < 0.0001) than during the second lockdown (–8%; P < 0.0001). Reductions in MI admissions were more pronounced and longer among patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI, older people and women. An increase in ST-segment elevation MI admissions was observed between lockdowns (+4%; P = 0.0005). Globally, and after adjustment for age, sex and calendar year, in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge mortality rates did not differ in 2020 versus 2017–19: incidence rate ratio (IRR)_{adjin-hospital} 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.98–1.08); IRR_{adj90-daypost-discharge} 1.06, 95% CI (0.98–1.13).

Conclusions

In 2020, a significant decrease in MI admissions was observed, and was marked at the beginning of the year. This highlights the need to disseminate public information on the importance of maintaining care and regular medical follow-up. The effect of the COVID-19 crisis on acute and 3-month outcomes of patients hospitalized for MI appears limited. Nevertheless, monitoring of chronic MI complications and the impact on non-hospitalized patients should continue.

Simultaneous Left Ventricular Aneurysm and Ventricular Septal Rupture Complicating Delayed STEMI Presentation: A Case-Based Review of Post-MI Mechanical Complications Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an unprecedented increase in public avoidance of hospitals predominantly driven by fear of contracting the virus. Recent publications highlight a re-emergence of rare post-myocardial infarction complications. While mechanical complications are infrequent in the era of primary percutaneous coronary intervention, they are associated with high mortality rates. The concurrent occurrence of mechanical complications such as left ventricular aneurysm and ventricular septal rupture is an extremely rare entity. We hereby delineate a unique case of a 53-year-old Caucasian male who underwent successful concomitant closure of a ventricular septal rupture, left ventricular aneurysmectomy, and 3-vessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Due to a delayed initial presentation owing to the patient's fear of contracting COVID-19, the surgery was carried out 3 months after the myocardial infarction. His postoperative evaluation confirmed normal contractility of the left ventricle and complete closure of the ventricular septal rupture. Six months postoperatively, the patient continues to do well. We also present a literature review of the mechanical complications following delayed presentation of myocardial infarction amid the COVID-19 pandemic. This article illustrates that clinicians should remain cognizant of these extremely rare but potentially lethal collateral effects during the ongoing global public-health challenge. Furthermore, it highlights a significant concern regarding the delay in first medical contact due to the reluctance of patients to visit the hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.