Comparative analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive and open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a propensity score matched observational study

Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are widely used in the comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the advantages of MIE for esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Published clinical studies were reviewed and survival data and safety data were extracted. We compared the long-term survival and safety of MIE versus open esophagectomy after neoadjuvant surgery in a series of meta-analyses.

RESULTS

6 retrospective studies were included. Overall, MIE could significantly improve the overall survival of patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy compared with open esophagectomy [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.75, 0.98)]. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE could significantly reduce intraoperative blood loss and operative time [mean difference (MD) = -40.28.78, 95% CI (- 62.98, - 17.58); MD = -28.78, 95% CI (- 42.48, - 15.07), respectively]. There was no significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between MIE and open esophagectomy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.42, 95% CI (0.09, 2.01); OR 0.80, 95% CI (0.25, 2.60), respectively]. MIE could not significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and chylothorax [OR 0.70, 95% CI (0.37, 1.32); OR 1.43, 95% CI (0.33, 6.25); HR = 1.79, 95% CI (0.67, 4.75), respectively], but the incidence of pneumonia was significantly reduced [HR = 0.43, 95% CI (0.22, 0.82)]. In addition, the length of hospital stay and the incidence of total complications were significantly reduced after MIE [MD = -2.61, 95% CI (- 3.10, - 2.12); HR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.45, 0.98), respectively].

CONCLUSION

MIE after neoadjuvant therapy is effective and safe. Compared with open esophagectomy, MIE can improve the long-term survival and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications of esophageal cancer patients.

Efficacy of modified thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis versus traditional thoraco-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis for esophageal cancer: Propensity score-matched analysis

Objective

To compare the clinical results of the modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues, with the traditional Ivor-Lewis procedure, which removes these tissues, for treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and evaluating whether the azygous vein, thoracic duct and surrounding tissues are required to be removed for the surgery of esophageal cancer.

Methods

To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of patients suffering from esophageal cancer treated by thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis procedure admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from September 2017 to September 2019. According to the surgical method, they were divided into the modified thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (modified group) and the traditional thoracolaparoscopic Ivor-Lewis (traditional group). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was applied to reduce the selection bias of confounding factors.

Results

A total of 245 patients who suffered from esophageal cancer and underwent thoracic-laparoscopic Ivor-Lewis were enrolled in the study. There were 124 cases in the modified group and 121 cases in the traditional group. The discrepancies in the age and T-stage among patients in the traditional and modified groups were statistically significant. After PSM, the above-mentioned factors became statistically insignificant. There were 86 patients in each group after PSM. Compared with the traditional group, the modified group has shorter operative time (p=0.007), less intraoperative bleeding (p=0.003) and less postoperative 3 days chest drainage(p=0.001), with a statistically significant difference. No significant difference in local recurrence (p=0.721) and distant metastasis (p=0.742) after surgery were found in the two groups, and the difference was not statistically significant. There was also no statistically significant difference in the 3-year postoperative survival rate (44.2% vs. 41.9%, p=0.605) between the modified and traditional groups.

Conclusion

The modified Ivor-Lewis procedure, which preserves the azygous vein, thoracic duct, and surrounding tissue, reduces surgical trauma in esophageal cancer, has not increased postoperative recurrent metastases, while achieved the same long-term outcomes as expanded surgery.