1
|
Bribriesco AC, Bansal P, Subramanian MP, Bograd AJ. Reoperative Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Outcomes and Indications. Thorac Surg Clin 2025; 35:215-222. [PMID: 40246411 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2025.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Recurrent pulmonary metastasis after initial pulmonary metastasectomy is common and poses a clinical dilemma. Reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy is an option that in select patients has been shown to be safe and technically feasible resulting in encouraging survival results from non-randomized retrospective studies. As with metastasectomy in general, there is ongoing debate if observed benefit of repeat pulmonary resection is a result of surgery or a reflection of selection bias. This review summarizes available evidence regarding reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy, discusses selection bias, and outlines future directions in the context of our evolving understanding of the oligometastatic state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro C Bribriesco
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA; Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Surgical Services, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Puneet Bansal
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melanie P Subramanian
- Inova Thoracic Surgery, Schar Cancer Institute Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Inova Health System, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Adam J Bograd
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fairbairn K, Keshava HB. Workup, Indications, and Guiding Principles of Selection for Pulmonary Metastasectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 2025; 35:249-256. [PMID: 40246414 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2024.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Pulmonary metastasectomy is a potentially curative intervention for many different and distinct primary malignancies. It is safe in a diverse patient population. A short disease-free interval, multiple metastases, large metastases, and incomplete resection are all poor prognostic indicators for survival. Patients should be approached as any lung resection patient would, including a full history and physical, and a thorough review of their imaging, labs, medications, previous surgeries, and pulmonary function tests. All patients should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board, and a formal and united plan with input from all specialties should be developed before offering surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Fairbairn
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 6200, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | - Hari B Keshava
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, 3800 West Chapman Avenue, Suite 6200, Orange, CA 92868, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Derdiyok O, Temel U. Awake thoracoscopic non-anatomic pulmonary resections under thoracic paravertebral block: Results of a tertiary referral centre. J Minim Access Surg 2025; 21:189-194. [PMID: 39388148 PMCID: PMC12054961 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_124_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Awake video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) helps to avoid the adverse effects of general anaesthesia (GA) with single-lung ventilation. Its usage in anatomic and non-anatomic pulmonary resections has spread worldwide, and it is mostly performed under thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA). We herein report our surgical experience with awake VATS non-anatomical resections under the thoracic paravertebral block (TPB). PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective, single-centred study reviewed patients undergoing awake VATS non-anatomical pulmonary resection under TPB, who voluntarily accepted awake VATS despite being suitable for GA and were found unsuitable for GA based on pre-operative assessment results. Demographic, pre-, per- and post-operative data were collected, analysed and compared with the literature data. RESULTS Twenty-four patients (16 patients with normal pre-operative assessment results and 8 patients having high risk for GA) were selected. Fourteen bullectomies for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax and 10 wedge resections (nine for metastasectomy and one for lung biopsy) were performed. Global in-operating room time was 77 ± 31 min. The morbidity rate was 20.8% ( n = 5), including prolonged air leak in three and pneumonia in two patients. The mean duration of the chest tube was 1.9 ± 1.5 days and mean duration of hospital stay was 3.5 ± 2.1 days. There was no in-hospital mortality. Our results were mostly similar to the literature data. CONCLUSION Non-anatomical lung resections by VATS can be performed easily and safely under TPB in awake patients. Although the perioperative and post-operative outcomes are not superior to other anaesthesia approaches, preferring TPB may help to avoid the serious potential complications of TEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Derdiyok
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Uğur Temel
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shalabi A, Shalabi SF, Graeter T, Welter S, Ehab A, Kuon J. Low Rates of Intrapulmonary Local Recurrence After Laser Metastasectomy: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Colorectal Cancer Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:683. [PMID: 40002277 PMCID: PMC11852527 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2025] [Revised: 02/09/2025] [Accepted: 02/14/2025] [Indexed: 02/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal pulmonary metastasis is the most common resected metastatic disease of the lung. Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal oligometastases is a well-established intervention with curative intent. Local recurrence at the resection site in the lung is a problem, with an impact on survival. The use of a 1320 nm neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser causes the vaporization and coagulation at the resection line and thereby increases safety margins around the nodule. We aimed to evaluate the local recurrence rate after laser-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy (LPM) for colorectal metastases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 patients treated with laser-assisted pulmonary metastasectomy for 139 metastatic nodules from colorectal cancer from 2010 to 2018. All nodules were resected using Nd:YAG 1320 nm laser, aiming for a safety margin of five mm. The minimum follow-up time after PM was 24 months. Results: Local intrapulmonary recurrence developed at 7 of the 139 (5.0%) resection sites in 5 of the 49 patients (10.2%). Microscopically incomplete resection was a significant risk factor for recurrence (p = 0.023). Larger nodule size (>12 mm) negatively impacted local recurrence (p = 0.024). Nodules larger or equal to 12 mm in size also lowered the patients' probability of survival by 67.29% (HR: 0.3271, 95% CI: 0.1265-0.846, p = 0.018). Conclusions: The rate of local recurrence at the resection site after LPM for colorectal metastases is low. Complete resection is a positive predictor of survival without local recurrence. Microscopic complete resection with the addition of vaporization and coagulation at the resection margin seems to be sufficient to prevent local recurrence. However, larger nodules may require larger safety margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Shalabi
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, SLK Lungenklinik Löwenstein, 74245 Löwenstein, Germany
| | - Sundus F. Shalabi
- Faculty of Medicine, Arab American University, Jenin P.O. Box 240, Palestine;
| | - Thomas Graeter
- Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Department, SLK Lungenklinik Löwenstein, 74245 Löwenstein, Germany
| | - Stefan Welter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lungenklinik Hemer, 58675 Hemer, Germany;
| | - Ahmed Ehab
- Pulmonary Medicine Department, SLK Lungenklinik Löwenstein, 74245 Löwenstein, Germany
- Pulmonary Medicine Department, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35511, Egypt
| | - Jonas Kuon
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, SLK Lungenklinik Löwenstein, 74245 Löwenstein, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ambrogi MC, Aprile V, Sanna S, Forti Parri SN, Rizzardi G, Fanucchi O, Valentini L, Italiani A, Morganti R, Cartia CF, Hughes JM, Lucchi M, Droghetti A. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3106. [PMID: 38892816 PMCID: PMC11172471 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The surgical resection of pulmonary metastases is considered a therapeutic option in selected cases. In light of this, we present the results from a national multicenter prospective registry of lung metastasectomy. Methods: This retrospective analysis involves data collected prospectively and consecutively in a national multicentric Italian database, including patients who underwent lung metastasectomy. The primary endpoints were the analysis of morbidity and overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints focusing on the analysis of potential risk factors affecting both morbidity and OS. Results: A total 470 lung procedures were performed (4 pneumonectomies, 46 lobectomies/bilobectomies, 13 segmentectomies and 407 wedge resections) on 461 patients (258 men and 203 women, mean age of 63.1 years). The majority of patients had metastases from colorectal cancer (45.8%). In most cases (63.6%), patients had only one lung metastasis. A minimally invasive approach was chosen in 143 cases (30.4%). The mean operative time was 118 min, with no reported deaths. Morbidity most frequently consisted of prolonged air leaking and bleeding, but no re-intervention was required. Statistical analysis revealed that morbidity was significantly affected by operative time and pulmonary comorbidities, while OS was significantly affected by disease-free interval (DFI) > 24 months (p = 0.005), epithelial histology (p = 0.001) and colorectal histology (p = 0.004) during univariate analysis. No significant correlation was found between OS and age, gender, surgical approach, surgical extent, surgical device, the number of resected metastases, lesion diameter, the site of lesions and nodal involvement. Multivariate analysis of OS confirmed that only epithelial histology and DFI were risk-factors, with p-values of 0.041 and 0.031, respectively. Conclusions: Lung metastasectomy appears to be a safe procedure, with acceptable morbidity, even with a minimally invasive approach. However, it remains a local treatment of a systemic disease. Therefore, careful attention should be paid to selecting patients who could truly benefit from surgical intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Carlo Ambrogi
- Department for Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Vittorio Aprile
- Department for Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Sanna
- Multispecialistic Surgical Department, Private Forlì Hospitals, 47122 Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Giovanna Rizzardi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Olivia Fanucchi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Leonardo Valentini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS University Hospital of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Italiani
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, 24125 Bergamo, Italy
| | - Riccardo Morganti
- Statistical Support Division for Clinical Studies, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | | | - James M. Hughes
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| | - Marco Lucchi
- Department for Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Droghetti
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, 10060 Candiolo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prisciandaro E, Bertolaccini L, Fieuws S, Cara A, Spaggiari L, Huang L, Petersen RH, Ambrogi MC, Sicolo E, Barbarossa A, De Leyn P, Sporici D, Balsamo L, Donlagic A, Gonzalez M, Fuentes-Gago MG, Forcada-Barreda C, Congedo MT, Margaritora S, Belaroussi Y, Thumerel M, Tricard J, Felix P, Lebeda N, Opitz I, De Palma A, Marulli G, Braggio C, Thomas PA, Mbadinga F, Baste JM, Sayan B, Yildizeli B, Van Raemdonck DE, Weder W, Ceulemans LJ. Multicentre retrospective analysis on pulmonary metastasectomy: an European perspective. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 65:ezae141. [PMID: 38579246 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the current practice of pulmonary metastasectomy at 15 European Centres. Short- and long-term outcomes were analysed. METHODS Retrospective analysis on patients ≥18 years who underwent curative-intent pulmonary metastasectomy (January 2010 to December 2018). Data were collected on a purpose-built database (REDCap). Exclusion criteria were: previous lung/extrapulmonary metastasectomy, pneumonectomy, non-curative intent and evidence of extrapulmonary recurrence at the time of lung surgery. RESULTS A total of 1647 patients [mean age 59.5 (standard deviation; SD = 13.1) years; 56.8% males] were included. The most common primary tumour was colorectal adenocarcinoma. The mean disease-free interval was 3.4 (SD = 3.9) years. Relevant comorbidities were observed in 53.8% patients, with a higher prevalence of metabolic disorders (32.3%). Video-assisted thoracic surgery was the chosen approach in 54.9% cases. Wedge resections were the most common operation (67.1%). Lymph node dissection was carried out in 41.4% cases. The median number of resected lesions was 1 (interquartile range 25-75% = 1-2), ranging from 1 to 57. The mean size of the metastases was 18.2 (SD = 14.1) mm, with a mean negative resection margin of 8.9 (SD = 9.4) mm. A R0 resection of all lung metastases was achieved in 95.7% cases. Thirty-day postoperative morbidity was 14.5%, with the most frequent complication being respiratory failure (5.6%). Thirty-day mortality was 0.4%. Five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival were 62.0% and 29.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pulmonary metastasectomy is a low-risk procedure that provides satisfactory oncological outcomes and patient survival. Further research should aim at clarifying the many controversial aspects of its daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Prisciandaro
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Centre (LIFT), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Luca Bertolaccini
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Steffen Fieuws
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, KU Leuven-University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Andrea Cara
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Lin Huang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - René H Petersen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcello C Ambrogi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Sicolo
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Annalisa Barbarossa
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Centre (LIFT), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Paul De Leyn
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Centre (LIFT), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diana Sporici
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Ludovica Balsamo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Abid Donlagic
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michel Gonzalez
- Service of Thoracic Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Maria T Congedo
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Stefano Margaritora
- Unit of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Yaniss Belaroussi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Matthieu Thumerel
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Jérémy Tricard
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pierre Felix
- Department of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Nina Lebeda
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Isabelle Opitz
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Angela De Palma
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Marulli
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Cesare Braggio
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lung Transplantation and Oesophageal Diseases, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Pascal A Thomas
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lung Transplantation and Oesophageal Diseases, North Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Frankie Mbadinga
- Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Marc Baste
- Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Bihter Sayan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bedrettin Yildizeli
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dirk E Van Raemdonck
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Centre (LIFT), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Walter Weder
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bethanien Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Laurens J Ceulemans
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Intestinal Failure and Transplantation Centre (LIFT), University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hansdotter P, Scherman P, Nikberg M, Petersen SH, Holmberg E, Rizell M, Naredi P, Syk I. Treatment and survival of patients with metachronous colorectal lung metastases. J Surg Oncol 2023; 127:806-814. [PMID: 36607235 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The lungs are the second most common site for metachronous metastases in colorectal cancer. No treatment algorithm is established, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. This study aimed to map pulmonary recurrences in a modern multimodal treated population, and to evaluate survival depending on management. METHODS Retrospective study based on the COLOFOL-trial population of 2442 patients, radically resected for colorectal cancer stage II-III. All recurrences within 5 years were identified and medical records were scrutinized. RESULTS Of 165 (6.8%) patients developing lung metastases as first recurrence, 89 (54%) were confined to the lungs. Potentially curative treatment was possible in 62 (37%) cases, of which 33 with surgery only and 29 with surgery and chemotherapy combined. The 5-year overall survival (5-year OS) for all lung recurrences was 28%. In patients treated with chemotherapy only the 5-year OS was 7.5%, compared with 55% in patients treated with surgery, and 72% when surgery was combined with chemotherapy. Hazard ratio for mortality was 2.9 (95% confidence interval 1.40-6.10) for chemotherapy only compared to surgery. CONCLUSION A high proportion of metachronous lung metastases after colorectal surgery were possible to resect, yielding good survival. The combination of surgery and chemotherapy might be advantageous for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernilla Hansdotter
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Institute of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Section of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Peter Scherman
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Maziar Nikberg
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Clinical Research of Uppsala University, Västmanland's Hospital, Västerås, Sweden
| | - Sune H Petersen
- Department of Paediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, Section of Paediatric Haematology & Oncology, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Magnus Rizell
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Naredi
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ingvar Syk
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.,Institute of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Section of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim K, Han KN, Choi BH, Rho J, Lee JH, Eo JS, Kim C, Kim BM, Jeon OH, Kim HK. Identification of Metastatic Lymph Nodes Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071964. [PMID: 37046626 PMCID: PMC10093445 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Indocyanine green (ICG) has been used to detect several types of tumors; however, its ability to detect metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) remains unclear. Our goal was to determine the feasibility of ICG in detecting metastatic LNs. We established a mouse model and evaluated the potential of ICG. The feasibility of detecting metastatic LNs was also evaluated in patients with lung or esophageal cancer, detected with computed tomography (CT) or positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT, and scheduled to undergo surgical resection. Tumors and metastatic LNs were successfully detected in the mice. In the clinical study, the efficacy of ICG was evaluated in 15 tumors and fifty-four LNs with suspected metastasis or anatomically key regional LNs. All 15 tumors were successfully detected. Among the fifty-four LNs, eleven were pathologically confirmed to have metastasis; all eleven were detected in ICG fluorescence imaging, with five in CT and seven in PET/CT. Furthermore, thirty-four LNs with no signals were pathologically confirmed as nonmetastatic. Intravenous injection of ICG may be a useful tool to detect metastatic LNs and tumors. However, ICG is not a targeting agent, and its relatively low fluorescence makes it difficult to use to detect tumors in vivo. Therefore, further studies are needed to develop contrast agents and devices that produce increased fluorescence signals.
Collapse
|
9
|
Motas N, Davidescu MD, Tanase BC, Rus O, Burlacu AI, Alexe V, Manolache V, Mizea MC, Gheorghiu N, Trifanescu OG, Gales LN, Horvat T, Anghel RM. Oncologic Outcome after Pulmonary Metastasectomy as Part of Multidisciplinary Treatment in a Tertiary Oncological Center. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13010165. [PMID: 36611457 PMCID: PMC9818764 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Pulmonary metastases are encountered in approximately one-third of patients with malignancies, especially from colorectal, lung, breast, and renal cancers, and sarcomas. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the ablative approach of choice, when possible, as part of the multidisciplinary effort to integrate and personalize the oncological treatment. (2) Methods: The study includes 58 consecutive cases of pulmonary metastasectomies, retrospectively analyzed, performed in 12 consecutive months, in which the pathology reports confirmed lung metastases. (3) Results: Most frequent pathological types of metastases were: 14 of colorectal cancer, 10 breast, 8 lung, and 8 sarcomas. At the time of primary cancer diagnosis, 14 patients (24.14%) were in the metastatic stage. The surgical approach was minimally invasive through uniportal VATS (Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery) in 3/4 of cases (43 patients, 74%). Almost 20% of resections were typical (lobectomy, segmentectomy). Lymphadenectomy was associated in almost 1/2 of patients and lymph node metastases were found in 11.11% of cases. The mortality rate (intraoperative and 90 days postoperative) is zero. The OS after pulmonary metastasectomy is 87% at 18 months, and the estimated OS for cancer is 90% at 5 years. The worst outcome presents the patients with sarcomas and the best outcome-colorectal and lung cancer. The patients with 1 or 2 resected metastases presented 96% survival at 24 months. (4) Conclusions: After pulmonary metastasectomy, survival is favored by the small number of metastases resected (1 or 2), and by the dimension of metastases under 20.5 mm. The non-anatomic (wedge) type of lung resection may present a lower risk of death compared to lobectomy. No statistical significance on survival has the presence of lymphadenectomy, the laterality right/left lung, the upper/lower lobes. In the future, longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed for drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Motas
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Mihnea Dan Davidescu
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
- Correspondence: (N.M.); (M.D.D.)
| | - Bogdan Cosmin Tanase
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ovidiu Rus
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alin Ionut Burlacu
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Vlad Alexe
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Veronica Manolache
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Memorial Oncology Hospital, Șoseaua Gheorghe Ionescu Sisești 8a, 013812 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Madalina Cristiana Mizea
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Gheorghiu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Oana Gabriela Trifanescu
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Laurentia Nicoleta Gales
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Medical Oncology II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Teodor Horvat
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rodica Maricela Anghel
- Clinic of Oncology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Radiotherapy II, “Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu” Institute of Oncology Bucharest, 022328 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|