Identification of the intersegmental plane by arterial ligation method during thoracoscopic segmentectomy

V6 vein-preserving superior segmentectomy: A potentially preferable option

Objective

The increasing identification of pulmonary nodules has led to a growing emphasis on segmentectomy. Nevertheless, the surgical process for segmentectomy is complex and optimizing segmentectomy is a critical clinical concern. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short- and long-term efficacy of V6-preserving superior segmentectomy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent thoracoscopic superior segmentectomy at our hospital between January 2019 and June 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into an V6 vein-preserving segmentectomy (VVPS) group and a Non V6 vein-preserving segmentectomy (NVVPS) group depending on the preservation of V6. Primary outcome measures encompassed the evaluation of surgical safety (surgical margins, 3-year overall survival, and disease-free survival), whereas secondary measures included postoperative complication rates, operative time, estimated intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and associated costs.

Results

The analysis included a final cohort of 78 patients. In the NVVPS group (n = 43), 95.3 % of patients exceeded the tumor diameter, and no positive surgical margins were observed. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates for the NVVPS group were 95.3 %, with no significant differences in OS (p = 0.572) and DFS (P = 0.800) compared with the VVPS group. Additionally, the median total hospitalization cost for the NVVPS group was 41,400 RMB (IQR, 38,800-43,400), which was significantly lower than that of the VVPS group, showing statistical significance (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications and length of stay between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

V6-preserving superior segmentectomy is a secure and optimized surgical alternative. Its streamlined procedure facilitates easier adoption in primary healthcare facilities, rendering it a superior choice for superior segmentectomy.

Influencing Factors on Intersegmental Identification Adequacy in Segmentectomy with Intraoperative Indocyanine Green (ICG) Intravenous Administration

Accurate identification of the intersegmental plane is essential in segmentectomy, and Indocyanine Green (ICG) assists in visualizing lung segments. Various factors, including patient-related, intraoperative, and technical issues, can influence boundary delineation. This study aims to assess the rate of unsuccessful intersegmental identification and identify the contributing factors. We analyzed cases of lung segmentectomy from April 2020 to March 2023, where intraoperative ICG was intravenously administered during robot-assisted or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Cases where fluorescence extended beyond expected boundaries within 30 s were classified as the "unclear boundary group". This group was then compared to the "clear boundary group". The study encompassed 111 cases, 104 (94%) of which were classified under the "clear boundary group" and 7 (6%) under the "unclear boundary group". The "unclear boundary group" had a significantly lower DLCO (15.7 vs. 11.8, p = 0.03) and DLCO/VA (4.3 vs. 3.0, p = 0.01) compared to the "clear boundary group". All cases in the "unclear boundary group" underwent lower lobe segmentectomy. ICG administration effectively outlines pulmonary segments. Challenges in segment demarcation may occur in cases with low DLCO and DLCO/VA values, particularly during lower lobe segmentectomy.