1
|
Klein Haneveld MJ, Hieltjes IJ, Langendam MW, Cornel MC, Gaasterland CMW, van Eeghen AM. Improving care for rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review and critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines using AGREE II. Genet Med 2024; 26:101071. [PMID: 38224026 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders associated with intellectual disability require lifelong multidisciplinary care. Clinical practice guidelines may support healthcare professionals in their daily practice, but guideline development for rare conditions can be challenging. In this systematic review, the characteristics and methodological quality of internationally published recommendations for this population are described to provide an overview of current guidelines and inform future efforts of European Reference Network ITHACA (Intellectual disability, TeleHealth, Autism, and Congenital Anomalies). METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, and Orphanet were systematically searched to identify guidelines for conditions classified as "rare genetic intellectual disability" (ORPHA:183757). Methodological quality was assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research, and Evaluation II tool. RESULTS Seventy internationally published guidelines, addressing the diagnosis and/or management of 28 conditions, were included. The methodological rigor of development was highly variable with limited reporting of literature searches and consensus methods. Stakeholder involvement and editorial independence varied as well. Implementation was rarely addressed. CONCLUSION Comprehensive, high-quality guidelines are lacking for many rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorders. Use and transparent reporting of sound development methodologies, active involvement of affected individuals and families, robust conflict of interest procedures, and attention to implementation are vital for enhancing the impact of clinical practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirthe J Klein Haneveld
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iméze J Hieltjes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miranda W Langendam
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martina C Cornel
- Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Human Genetics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte M W Gaasterland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Agnies M van Eeghen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disability ERN-ITHACA, Clinical Genetics Department, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France; Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Advisium, 's Heeren Loo Zorggroep, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lignou S, Singh I. Pharmaceutical industry, academia and people with experience of mental illness as partners in research: a need for ethical guidance. Wellcome Open Res 2021. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16166.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Several social and policy developments have led to research partnerships in mental health research, which depart from traditional research models. One form of such partnerships is among Research institutions, Industry (pharmaceutical and biotech) and People with lived experience of mental illness (RIPs) in the NIHR services. There are several benefits but also challenges in such partnerships. An ethics-based approach to anticipating and addressing such problems is lacking. Given the expansion of RIPs in treatment development for mental health illness, guidance to support ethical and effective collaborations in NIHR-funded mental health research is essential. Methods: To develop a moral framework for evaluating the ethics of RIPs, we systematically searched PubMed for peer-reviewed literature discussing good practices in research partnerships. Searches were also conducted in websites of known organizations supporting patient engagement with industry in mental health research and in the references of short-listed articles. Following application of exclusion criteria, remaining articles were critically examined and summarised to synthesise principles for ethical RIPs and inform clear guidance and practices. Results: Critical analysis and synthesis of the short-listed articles highlighted the need for two sets of principles to guide ethical RIPs: principles for (a) RIPs as a trustworthy enterprise and (b) fair RIPs. We discuss the application of these principles in problem-solving strategies that can support best practice in establishing fair and effective research partnerships among research institutions, industry and people with lived experience of mental illness in the NIHR services. Conclusions: Ethical guidance is needed to prevent and address challenges in RIPs and to promote the scientific and social benefits of these new research partnership models in mental health research in the NIHR services. We show how the proposed moral framework can guide research partners in designing, sustaining and assessing ethical and effective mental health research collaborations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Cakir OO, Castiglione F, Tandogdu Z, Collins J, Alnajjar HM, Akers C, Albersen M, Alifrangis C, Ayres B, Brouwer O, Cullen I, Hawkey P, Jakobsen JK, Johansen TEB, Kalejaiye O, Kaul A, Köves B, Kumar V, Mancini M, Mitra AV, Parnham A, Pozzi E, Protzel C, Sangar VK, Wagenlehner F, Muneer A. Management of penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: An eUROGEN accelerated Delphi consensus study. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:197.e9-197.e17. [PMID: 33397593 PMCID: PMC7831701 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To develop an international consensus on managing penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 acute waves. A major concern for patients with penile cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is how the enforced safety measures will affect their disease management. Delays in diagnosis and treatment initiation may have an impact on the extent of the primary lesion as well as the cancer-specific survival because of the development and progression of inguinal lymph node metastases. Materials and methods A review of the COVID-19 literature was conducted in conjunction with analysis of current international guidelines on the management of penile cancer. Results were presented to an international panel of experts on penile cancer and infection control by a virtual accelerated Delphi process using 4 survey rounds. Consensus opinion was defined as an agreement of ≥80%, which was used to reconfigure management pathways for penile cancer. Results Limited evidence is available for delaying penile cancer management. The consensus rate of agreement was 100% that penile cancer pathways should be reconfigured, and measures should be developed to prevent perioperative nosocomial transmission of COVID-19. The panel also reached a consensus on several statements aimed at reconfiguring the management of penile cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions The international consensus panel proposed a framework for the diagnostic and invasive therapeutic procedures for penile cancer within a low-risk environment for COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omer Onur Cakir
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Fabio Castiglione
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Zafer Tandogdu
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Justin Collins
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Hussain M Alnajjar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Akers
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Constantine Alifrangis
- Department of Medical Oncology St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St George's University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar Brouwer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands
| | - Ivor Cullen
- National Cancer Control Programme, University Hospital Waterford, Ireland
| | - Peter Hawkey
- Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Truls Erik Bjerklund Johansen
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Odunayo Kalejaiye
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Asheesh Kaul
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Bela Köves
- Department of Urology, South Pest Hospital, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Vivekanandan Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anita Vanessa Mitra
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Arie Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Edoardo Pozzi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Chris Protzel
- Department of Urology, Helios Kliniken Schwerin Medical School MSH, Germany
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Urology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Asif Muneer
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, United Kingdom; NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lignou S, Singh I. Pharmaceutical industry, academia and people with experience of mental illness as partners in research: a need for ethical guidance. Wellcome Open Res 2020. [DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16166.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Several social and policy developments have led to research partnerships in mental health research, which depart from traditional research models. One form of such partnerships is among research institutions, industry (pharmaceutical and biotech) and people with lived experience of mental illness (RIPs). There are several benefits but also ethical challenges in RIPs. An ethics-based approach to anticipating and addressing such ethical issues in mental health research is lacking. Given the expansion of RIPs in treatment development for mental health illness, guidance to support ethical and trustworthy collaborative mental health research projects is essential. Methods: To develop a moral framework for evaluating the ethics of RIPs, we systematically searched PubMed for peer-reviewed literature discussing good practices in research partnerships. Searches were also conducted in websites of known organizations supporting patient engagement with industry in mental health research and in the references of short-listed articles. Following application of exclusion criteria, remaining articles were critically examined and summarised to synthesise principles for ethically acceptable RIPs and inform clear guidance and practices. Results: Critical analysis and synthesis of the short-listed articles highlighted the need for two sets of principles to guide ethical RIPs: principles for (a) RIPs as a trustworthy enterprise (e.g. public accountability, transparency) and (b) fair RIPs (e.g. effective governance, respect). We discuss the application of these principles in problem-solving strategies that can support best practice in establishing fair and successful mental health research partnerships among research institutions, industry and people with lived experience of mental illness. Conclusions: Ethical guidance is needed to prevent and address challenges in RIPs and to promote the scientific and social benefits of these new research partnership models in mental health research. We show how the proposed moral framework can guide research partners in designing, sustaining and assessing ethical and trustworthy collaborative mental health research projects.
Collapse
|
5
|
Schmiedeke E, Schaefer S, Aminoff D, Schwarzer N, Jenetzky E. Non-financial conflicts of interest: contribution to a surgical dilemma by the European Reference Networks for Rare Diseases. Pediatr Surg Int 2019; 35:999-1004. [PMID: 31278479 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-019-04516-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conflicts of interest can impede both research and medical treatment. The European Reference Networks require their members to deal with financial and non-financial conflicts according to an explicit protocol. In a literature review, we identified relevant interests in paediatric surgery, and drafted such a policy. METHODS We conducted a Pubmed query and identified additional publications based on the content of the papers. RESULTS 58 titles were identified. According to their abstracts, 10 publications were studied in full text. A scientific taxonomy does not yet exist, but a variety of factors are mentioned. Non-financial conflicts of interest are addressed less accurately and less frequently than financial ones, especially regarding surgical treatment. Since the clinical effect of surgical volume was identified as being relevant, additional 29 respective publications were analysed. This volume-quality relationship causes conflicts of interest for the many surgeons treating a broad spectrum of rare conditions. We present a recommendation that may guide referral of patients requiring complex surgery to centres with a higher volume. CONCLUSIONS Non-financial conflicts of interest need to be dealt with more accuracy, especially with regard to surgery in rare, complex congenital conditions. The European Reference Networks offer a framework to mitigate these conflicts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Schmiedeke
- Clinic for Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, eUROGEN-ERN, 28177, Bremen, Germany.
| | | | - D Aminoff
- ePAG eUROGEN-ERN, AIMAR Patient Organisation, Rome, Italy
| | - N Schwarzer
- ePAG ERNICA-ERN, SoMA Patient Organisation, Munich, Germany
| | - E Jenetzky
- SoMA Patient Organisation, Munich, Germany.,Department of Child- and Adolescent- Psychiatry and -Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.,Director of the German CURE-Net and the European ARM-Net-Registries, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schuller Y, Arends M, Körver S, Langeveld M, Hollak CE. Adaptive pathway development for Fabry disease: a clinical approach. Drug Discov Today 2018; 23:1251-1257. [DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 01/29/2018] [Accepted: 02/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
7
|
Health Systems Sustainability and Rare Diseases. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2017; 1031:629-640. [PMID: 29214595 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_33] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The paper is addressing aspects of health system sustainability for rare diseases in relation to the current economic crisis and equity concerns. It takes into account the results of the narrative review carried out in the framework of the Joint Action for Rare Diseases (Joint RD-Action) "Promoting Implementation of Recommendations on Policy, Information and Data for Rare Diseases", that identified networks as key factors for health systems sustainability for rare diseases. The legal framework of European Reference Networks and their added value is also presented. Networks play a relevant role for health systems sustainability, since they are based upon, pay special attention to and can intervene on health systems knowledge development, partnership, organizational structure, resources, leadership and governance. Moreover, sustainability of health systems can not be separated from the analysis of the context and the action on it, including fiscal equity. As a result of the financial crisis of 2008, cuts of public health-care budgets jeopardized health equity, since the least wealthy suffered from the greatest health effects. Moreover, austerity policies affected economic growth much more adversely than previously believed. Therefore, reducing public health expenditure not only is going to jeopardise citizens' health, but also to hamper fair and sustainable development.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pejcic AV, Iskrov G, Raycheva R, Stefanov R, Jakovljevic MM. Transposition and implementation of EU rare disease policy in Eastern Europe. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2017; 17:557-566. [PMID: 28975845 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1388741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION А series of European Union (EU) political decisions have made rare diseases one of the cornerstones of the common European health policy. Adopted in 2009, Council Recommendation on an action in the field of rare diseases aimed to serve as a policy-making guideline. However, the implementation report, which followed it, neither performed detailed cross-country comparison, nor assessed the impact of the policies. Areas covered: A 10-indicator set was elaborated to structure the review and to describe rare disease activities in 14 Eastern European countries. Expert commentary: Taking into account all indicators, EU member states outperform candidate and potential candidate countries in terms of rare disease policy planning and implementation. Hungary is the top performer, followed by Bulgaria and Czech Republic. Non-EU countries form the bottom tier, with Serbia being the best ranked among them. While EU adhesion is a major facilitator for planning and adopting rare disease policies, local stakeholders are the triggering factor for their successful implementation. European reference networks are likely to be the future of rare disease activities in the EU. They need to synchronize and closely collaborate with all important EU projects in the field of rare diseases if they are to achieve their objectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana V Pejcic
- a Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia
| | - Georgi Iskrov
- b Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health , Medical University of Plovdiv , Plovdiv , Bulgaria.,c Institute for Rare Diseases , Plovdiv , Bulgaria
| | - Ralitsa Raycheva
- b Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health , Medical University of Plovdiv , Plovdiv , Bulgaria
| | - Rumen Stefanov
- b Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Public Health , Medical University of Plovdiv , Plovdiv , Bulgaria.,c Institute for Rare Diseases , Plovdiv , Bulgaria
| | - Mihajlo Michael Jakovljevic
- d Global Health, Economics and Policy, Faculty of Medical Sciences , University of Kragujevac , Kragujevac , Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heuyer T, Pavan S, Vicard C. The health and life path of rare disease patients: results of the 2015 French barometer. PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES 2017; 8:97-110. [PMID: 28979171 PMCID: PMC5602466 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s131033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose A barometer has been set up to provide better knowledge about the daily situation of French rare disease (RD) patients, their families and relatives, in order to contribute to the elaboration of improvement measures. This report focuses on the care and life path of RD patients. Patients and methods A preliminary survey was carried out with three patients, five parents and three RD experts to identify the main hurdles and disruptions in the life path of RD patients. It was used to design a larger survey comprising 60 questions as well as open fields allowing free expression. Respondents (448) comprised patients, parents of RD children and close relatives of patients. The Percentage of Maximum Deviation, Yates’ correction for continuity and Fisher’s test were employed to compare the responses between groups. Results Large disparities in the delays to obtain a diagnosis were identified (<1 year to >20 years), and longer delays were associated with negative perception of care conditions. While good interactions with education teams were reported (59% of respondents), the professional situation of both patients and parents was strongly and negatively impacted by the disease (51% did not work or stopped working). Three hundred respondents expressed various needs and psychological and personal issues were reported by 62% and 75% of respondents, respectively. Interestingly, the medical care path and daily life of RD patients were positively impacted by the follow-up in a specialized consultation, as reflected by changes in scores measured by our barometer (Fisher’s test, p<0.05). Conclusion Some of the main hurdles and sources of disruption in the life path of RD patients were identified, as well as some positive outcomes. These data could serve not only as a background for further studies, but also to better adapt the support to real needs and to improve the synergies between the many people involved in the life path of RD patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Héon-Klin V. European Reference networks for rare diseases: what is the conceptual framework? Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12:137. [PMID: 28784158 PMCID: PMC5547471 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0676-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2017] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
With the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive (2011/24/EU) a mandatory framework was established to foster cooperation on a voluntary basis, within European Reference Networks (ERNs). These networks are composed of centres and healthcare providers. The exchange of knowledge is a central issue in this context. A detailed literature survey was carried out to determine the most important factors affecting information and knowledge exchange, as well as learning, in networks and how this can be supported. New communication technologies are identified as key tools for the European Reference Networks (ERN). This study recommends the elaboration of a systematic knowledge use and knowledge generation plan. The data of this study suggests that the future ERNs will mediate the adoption of the digitised and networked information society in medical practice.
Collapse
|
11
|
Karpman D, Höglund P. Orphan drug policies and use in pediatric nephrology. Pediatr Nephrol 2017; 32:1-6. [PMID: 27738765 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-016-3520-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Accepted: 09/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Orphan drugs designed to treat rare diseases are often overpriced per patient. Novel treatments are sometimes even more expensive for patients with ultra-rare diseases, in part due to the limited number of patients. Pharmaceutical companies that develop a patented life-saving drug are in a position to charge a very high price, which, at best, may enable these companies to further develop drugs for use in rare disease. However, is there a limit to how much a life-saving drug should cost annually per patient? Government interventions and regulations may opt to withhold a life-saving drug solely due to its high price and cost-effectiveness. Processes related to drug pricing, reimbursement, and thereby availability, vary between countries, thus having implications on patient care. These processes are discussed, with specific focus on three drugs used in pediatric nephrology: agalsidase beta (for Fabry disease), eculizumab (for atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome), and cysteamine bitartrate (for cystinosis). Access to and costs of orphan drugs have most profound implications for patients, but also for their physicians, hospitals, insurance policies, and society at large, particularly from financial and ethical standpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Karpman
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, 22185, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Peter Höglund
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Laboratory Medicine Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zschocke J, Baumgartner MR, Morava E, Patterson MC, Peters V, Rahman S. Recommendations and guidelines in the JIMD: suggested procedures and avoidance of conflicts of interest. J Inherit Metab Dis 2016; 39:327-329. [PMID: 27038029 DOI: 10.1007/s10545-016-9931-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Revised: 03/02/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Zschocke
- Division of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, Peter-Mayr-Str. 1, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Matthias R Baumgartner
- Division of Metabolism and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Eva Morava
- Department of Pediatrics, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University Medical School of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marc C Patterson
- Division of Child and Adolescent Neurology, Mayo Clinic Children's Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Verena Peters
- Centre for Paediatric and Adolescence Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shamima Rahman
- Mitochondrial Research Group, Genetics and Genomic Medicine, UCL Institute of Child Health, and Metabolic Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|