Safety of transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a retrospective observational cohort study

Transanal minimally invasive proctectomy for ulcerative colitis is beneficial in terms of short-term outcomes and defecation function

Objective

Despite being reported safety, the advantages of transanal minimally invasive proctocolectomy (TAMIP) are controversial, and comparative studies on postoperative defecation function between ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) using laparoscopic transanal manipulation (TAMIP-IPAA) and without this technique (traditional IPAA) are lacking. This study analyzed TAMIP's impact on short-term and postoperative defecation function in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) to evaluate its safety and feasibility.

Methods

Inclusion criteria comprised patients with UC undergoing minimally invasive proctocolectomy at our hospital from May 2014 to May 2023. The TAMIP-IPAA approach involved precise rectal mucosa removal while preserving the sphincter muscle during laparoscopic transanal manipulation.

Results

In the evaluation of short-term outcomes for 71 patients undergoing proctocolectomy, the TAMIP group (37 patients) outperformed the non-TAMIP group in operative time (395 vs. 289 min, p < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (12 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). Additionally, TAMIP-IPAA demonstrated advantages over traditional IPAA (seven patients), in operative time (443 vs. 289 min, p = 0.006), intraoperative blood loss (392 vs. 130 mL, p = 0.001), postoperative hospital stay (18 vs. 8 days, p = 0.003), anastomotic leakage (42.9% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.041), and re-admission within 30 days (57.1% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.009). Wexner scores were significantly superior in the TAMIP-IPAA group at 6 months (14.5 vs. 8.0 points, p = 0.029) and 1 year post stoma closure (14.0 vs. 7.0 points, p = 0.020), indicating enhanced short-term outcomes and defecation function compared to traditional IPAA.

Conclusions

TAMIP-IPAA for UC has the potential to offer promising benefits, including the enhancement of short-term outcomes and the improvement of defecation function.

Controversies in IPAA for Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review of Different Anastomotic Techniques

BACKGROUND

Available techniques for IPAA in ulcerative colitis include handsewn, double-stapled, and single-stapled anastomoses. There are controversies, indications, and different outcomes regarding these techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To describe technical details, indications, and outcomes of 3 specific types of anastomoses in restorative proctocolectomy.

DATA SOURCE

Systematic literature review for articles in the PubMed database according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies describing outcomes of the 3 different types of anastomoses, during pouch surgery, in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

INTERVENTION

IPAA technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative outcomes (anastomotic leaks, overall complication rates, and pouch function).

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were initially included: 6 studies exclusively on single-stapled IPAA, 2 exclusively on double-stapled IPAA, 6 studies comparing single-stapled to double-stapled techniques, 6 comparing double-stapled to handsewn IPAA, and 1 comprising single-stapled to handsewn IPAA. Thirty-seven studies were added according to authors' discretion as complementary evidence. Between 1990 and 2015, most studies were related to double-stapled IPAA, either only analyzing the results of this technique or comparing it with the handsewn technique. Studies published after 2015 were mostly related to transanal approaches to proctectomy for IPAA, in which a single-stapled anastomosis was introduced instead of the double-stapled anastomosis, with some studies comparing both techniques.

LIMITATIONS

A low number of studies with handsewn IPAA technique and a large number of studies added at authors' discretion were the limitations of this strudy.

CONCLUSIONS

Handsewn IPAA should be considered if a mucosectomy is performed for dysplasia or cancer in the low rectum or, possibly, for re-do surgery. Double-stapled IPAA has been more widely adopted for its simplicity and for the advantage of preserving the anal transition zone, having lower complications, and having adequate pouch function. The single-stapled IPAA offers a more natural design, is feasible, and is associated with reasonable outcomes compared to double-stapled anastomosis. See video from symposium.

Current Management of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: New Insights on the Surgical Approaches

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency with considerable morbidity. Despite recent advances in medical IBD therapy, colectomy rates for ASUC remain high. A scoping review of published articles on ASUC was performed. We collected data, such as general information of the disease, diagnosis and initial assessment, and available medical and surgical treatments focusing on technical aspects of surgical approaches. The most relevant articles were considered in this scoping review. The management of ASUC is challenging; currently, personalized treatment for it is unavailable. Sequential medical therapy should be administrated, preferably in high-volume IBD centers with close patient monitoring and indication for surgery in those cases with persistent symptoms despite medical treatment, complications, and clinical worsening. A total colectomy with end ileostomy is typically performed in the acute setting. Managing rectal stump is challenging, and all individual and technical aspects should be considered. Conversely, when performing elective colectomy for ASUC, a staged surgical procedure is usually preferred, thus optimizing the patients' status preoperatively and minimizing postoperative complications. The minimally invasive approach should be selected whenever technically feasible. Robotic versus laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) has shown similar outcomes in terms of safety and postoperative morbidity. The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) is a recent technique for creating an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis via a transanal route. Early experiences suggest comparable short- and medium-term functional results of the transanal technique to those of traditional approaches. However, there is a need for additional comparative outcomes data and a better understanding of the ideal training and implementation pathways for this procedure. This manuscript predominantly explores the surgical treatment of ASUC. Additionally, it provides an overview of currently available medical treatment options that the surgeon should reasonably consider in a multidisciplinary setting.

Transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of technical approaches and clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Transanal minimally invasive surgery has theoretical advantages for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. We performed a systematic review assessing technical approaches to transanal IPAA (Ta-IPAA) and meta-analysis comparing outcomes to transabdominal (abd-IPAA) approaches.

METHODS

Three databases were searched for articles investigating Ta-IPAA outcomes. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, post operative morbidity, and length of stay (LoS). Staging, plane of dissection, anastomosis, extraction site, operative time, and functional outcomes were also assessed.

RESULTS

Searches identified 13 studies with 404 unique Ta-IPAA and 563 abd-IPAA patients. Anastomotic leak rates were 6.3% and 8.4% (RD 0, 95% CI -0.066 to 0.065, p = 0.989) and conversion rates 2.5% and 12.5% (RD -0.106, 95% CI -0.155 to -0.057, p = 0.104) for Ta-IPAA and abd-IPAA. Average LoS was one day shorter (MD -1, 95% CI -1.876 to 0.302, p = 0.007). A three-stage approach was most common (47.6%), operative time was 261(± 60) mins, and total mesorectal excision and close rectal dissection were equally used (49.5% vs 50.5%). Functional outcomes were similar. Lack of randomised control trials, case-matched series, and significant study heterogeneity limited analysis, resulting in low to very low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis demonstrated the feasibility and safety of Ta-IPAA with reduced LoS, trend towards less conversions, and comparable anastomotic leak rates and post operative morbidity. Though results are encouraging, they need to be interpreted with heterogeneity and selection bias in mind. Robust randomised clinical trials are warranted to adequately compare ta-IPAA to transabdominal approaches.

Laparoscopic Versus Transanal IPAA for Ulcerative Colitis: A Patient-Centered Treatment Trade-Off Study

BACKGROUND

Transanal IPAA is a relatively new technique aiming to reduce surgical invasiveness while providing better access to the pelvis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Currently, patients' preference for a surgical approach has never been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To observe patient preference between transanal and laparoscopic IPAA by measuring the potential risk, expressed in pouch function reduction, patients are willing to take to undergo transanal surgery.

DESIGN

We conducted standardized interviews of patients using the threshold technique.

SETTINGS

Patients from Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto were included.

PATIENTS

Fifty-two patients with ulcerative colitis participated in this study.

INTERVENTION

Patients with ulcerative colitis, with or without previous pouch surgery, were submitted to standardized interviews using the threshold technique.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We measured the absolute increase in bowel frequency, bowel urgency, and fecal incontinence that patients would accept if undergoing transanal IPAA.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (mean age: 38.7 ± 15.3 years) with previous surgery and 20 patients (mean age: 39.5 ± 11.9 years) with no previous surgery participated in this study. Patients accepted an absolute increase of 2 bowel movements per day and 1 episode of fecal incontinence per month to undergo transanal IPAA. They also accepted 10 minutes of worsening bowel urgency (ie, decrease of 10 minutes in "holding time") for transanal surgery. Younger patients aged 21 to 29 years only accepted an absolute decrease of 5 minutes in "holding time" ( p = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

Biases inherent to study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were willing to accept a potential reduction in pouch function to receive the less invasive method of transanal IPAA. More studies evaluating long-term functional outcomes after transanal IPAA are required to help patients make educated surgical decisions. See Video Abstract.

ANASTOMOSIS LAPAROSCPICA VERSUS TRANSANAL ILEALBOLSA ANAL PARA LA COLITIS ULCEROSA UN ESTUDIO DE COMPENSACIN DE TRATAMIENTO CENTRADO EN EL PACIENTE

ANTECEDENTES:La anastomosis anal transanal con reservorio ileal es una técnica relativamente nueva que tiene como objetivo reducir la invasividad quirúrgica y al mismo tiempo proporcionar un mejor acceso a la pelvis en pacientes con colitis ulcerosa. Actualmente, nunca se ha investigado la preferencia de los pacientes sobre el abordaje quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Observar la preferencia de los pacientes entre la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio transanal y laparoscópica midiendo el riesgo potencial, expresado en la reducción de la función del reservorio, que los pacientes están dispuestos a someterse a una cirugía transanal.DISEÑO:Realizamos entrevistas estandarizadas de pacientes utilizando la técnica del umbral.AJUSTES:Se incluyeron pacientes del Hospital Mount Sinai en Toronto.PACIENTES:Cincuenta y dos pacientes con colitis ulcerosa participaron en este estudio.INTERVENCIÓN(ES):Los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa, con o sin cirugía previa de reservorio fueron sometidos a entrevistas estandarizadas utilizando la técnica del umbral.MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO PRINCIPALES:Medimos el aumento absoluto en la frecuencia intestinal, la urgencia intestinal y la incontinencia fecal que los pacientes aceptarían si se sometieran a una anastomosis transanal con bolsa ileal.RESULTADOS:Treinta y dos pacientes (edad media: 38,7 ± 15,3) con cirugía previa y 20 pacientes (edad media: 39,5 ± 11,9) sin cirugía previa participaron en este estudio. Los pacientes aceptaron un aumento absoluto de 2 deposiciones por día y un episodio de incontinencia fecal por mes para someterse a una anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio. También aceptaron 10 minutos de empeoramiento de la urgencia intestinal (es decir, disminución de 10 minutos del "tiempo de espera") para la cirugía transanal. Los pacientes más jóvenes de 21 a 29 años solo aceptaron una disminución absoluta de 5 minutos en el "tiempo de espera" ( P = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Sesgos inherentes al diseño del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes estaban dispuestos a aceptar una reducción potencial en la función del reservorio para recibir el método menos invasivo de anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio. Se requieren más estudios que evalúen los resultados funcionales a largo plazo después de la anastomosis transanal ileoanal con reservorio para ayudar a los pacientes a tomar decisiones quirúrgicas informadas. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).

Functional outcomes after transanal ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: narrative review of the current literature

The transanal approach to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (Ta-IPAA) for ulcerative colitis was introduced in 2015 and has since been shown to be a safe and feasible technique, although the impact of this approach on patient function remains unclear. A systematic literature review was performed to identify studies exploring functional outcomes and quality of life after Ta-IPAA. Seven papers were identified, which all demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes after Ta-IPAA as measured by tools such as Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQOL), Oresland Score (OS), Pouch Functional Score (PFS), and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ). Many gaps in the literature were identified including paucity of follow-up data beyond the 1-year mark, lack of fertility and fecundity assessment as functional outcomes, and limited evaluation of objective physiologic anal sphincter function. The Ta-IPAA therefore shows promise for good functional results in the short-term, although further research will be required to evaluate the stability of function over time as the technique becomes increasingly integrated into modern surgical practice.

The effect of percentage of ideal body weight on outcomes in ileo-anal pull through for ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

Ileo-anal pull through (IAPT) is a commonly performed operation for the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. The effect of body weight on outcomes for patients undergoing this operation has not been extensively studied.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study at a single tertiary care inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center. A total of 457 patients who were operated on at the Mount Sinai Medical Center between 1983 and 2015 were included. Demographic characteristics, the patients' body weight at the time of IAPT, and postoperative outcome data were collected.

RESULTS

For each patient, body weight was calculated as a percentage of the ideal body weight (IBW) for that patient's height. The mean percentage of ideal body weight was 93.9% with a standard deviation of 20%. The range for the population was 53.1 to 175%. Four hundred forty (96%) of the patients had a weight within two standard deviations of the mean, indicating a normal distribution. Seventy-nine patients developed a Clavien-Dindo class III complication necessitating a procedural treatment. The most common of these was a stricture at the anastomotic site (n = 54). Our study identified an association between a percentage of ideal body weight in the lowest quartile of our population and development of an anastomotic stricture. This association was statistically significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Low body weight at the time of ileo-anal pull through for treatment of UC may be a risk factor for development of anastomotic stricture requiring dilation.

Colectomy reconstruction for ulcerative colitis in Sweden and England: a multicenter prospective comparison between ileorectal anastomosis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis after colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis. (CRUISE-study)

BACKGROUND

There are no prospective trials comparing the two main reconstructive options after colectomy for Ulcerative colitis, ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis. An attempt on a randomized controlled trial has been made but after receiving standardized information patients insisted on choosing operation themselves.

METHODS

Adult Ulcerative colitis patients subjected to colectomy eligible for both ileal pouch anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis are asked to participate and after receiving standardized information the get to choose reconstructive method. Patients declining reconstruction or not considered eligible for both methods will be followed as controls. The CRUISE study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label, controlled trial on satisfaction, QoL, function, and complications between ileal pouch anal anastomosis and ileorectal anastomosis.

DISCUSSION

Reconstruction after colectomy is a morbidity-associated as well as a resource-intensive activity with the sole purpose of enhancing function, QoL and patient satisfaction. The aim of this study is to provide the best possible information on the risks and benefits of each reconstructive treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05628701.

Transanal ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The incidence of pediatric onset ulcerative colitis (UC) is increasing, with increasing rate of children eventually requiring surgical treatment. Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment. Although transanal IPAA (ta-IPAA) is becoming widely accepted for adult UC patients, data regarding this procedure in children are scarce. Nevertheless, some adult publications also include patients under 18 years old. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize surgical and functional outcomes following ta-IPAA, and extract conclusion regarding pediatric UC patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library databases, Embase, Web of science and Google Scholar databases were searched, using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses [PRISMA] guidelines. The final search was updated in April 2022. Four comparative cohorts (n = 868) and 11 non-comparative case series (n = 241) were included. Six reports included children. Anastomotic leak, complications, operative time, conversion rate, length of stay and functional outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 1103 patients, ranging 9-79 years were included in this review. We found no difference in risk for anastomotic leak (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.46-4.06), minor and major complications (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48-1.76 and OR 0.78 95% CI 0.36-1.69, respectively) comparing ta-IPAA to transabdominal IPAA. Short- and long-term follow-up showed satisfying functional outcomes and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review suggests that ta-IPAA is not inferior to transabdominal IPAA. Implementation of this method in children is technically feasible due to familiarity with the dissection plane. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life are paramount in the pediatric population and should be particularly investigated. Multicenter prospective studies are required to investigate pediatric UC patients undergoing ta-IPAA.