A prospective stepped wedge cohort evaluation of the new national trauma team activation criteria in Sweden - the TRAUMALERT study

Accuracy of the Norwegian trauma protocol. An observational population study from South-Western Norway

BACKGROUND

The Norwegian trauma plan was established in 2007 and renewed in 2017 defining national trauma team activation (TTA) criteria. Norwegian studies validating the performance of previous TTA protocols have found overtriage and undertriage to be out of line with the quality indicators set in the national trauma plan, but studies have not yet been published validating the new TTA protocol.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This was a registry study of a prospectively maintained database in the period from 01/01/2018 to 12/31/2020. Data were collected from the Trauma Registry including prehospital documents. A total of 1519 patients were eligible, of which 95 were excluded, yielding a study population of 1424 patients. All patients were evaluated for a total of 29 criteria in four criteria groups: 1 Physiology, 2 Anatomical injury, 3 Mechanism of injury, and 4 Special considerations. Overtriage, undertriage, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were estimated for the current and alternative TTA protocols, criteria groups, and single criteria.

RESULTS

The current Norwegian TTA protocol involving criteria groups 1-3 had a total sensitivity of 84.8 %, hence an undertriage of 15.2 % (95 % confidence interval, 11.1-20.3 %), and PPV of 19.2 % hence an overtriage of 80.8 % (78.3-83.1 %). Patients 60 years and older had an undertriage of 21.6 %, whilst patients under 60 years of age had an undertriage of 11.2 %. A TTA protocol including criteria group 4 as well yielded a lower undertriage (5.6 %) without significantly increasing overtriage (81.7 %), and a TTA protocol with criteria group 4 replacing group 3 yielded an undertriage of 7.4 % and an overtriage of 81.0 %. Criteria group 3 Mechanism of injury was the criteria group with the most overtriage, at 95 %. Patients that did not meet any criteria had a similar overtriage of 94 %.

CONCLUSION

Both overtriage and undertriage are out of line with the goals set in the Norwegian trauma plan. Undertriage is often caused by older patients that do not fulfill the trauma criteria in the current TTA protocol. Mechanism of injury increases overtriage but does not reduce undertriage. The TTA protocol could be improved by changing the composition of criteria groups, removal of single criteria with low PPV, and by better compliance to the existing criteria.

Adherence to national trauma triage criteria in Norway: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Norwegian hospitals employed individual trauma triage criteria until 2015 when nationwide criteria were implemented. There is a lack of empirical evidence regarding adherence to Norwegian national criteria for activation of the trauma team (NTrC) and the decision-making processes regarding trauma team activation (TTA) within Norwegian trauma hospitals. The objectives of this study were to investigate institutional adherence to the NTrC and to investigate similarities and differences in the decision-making process leading to TTA in Norwegian trauma hospitals.

METHODS

A digital semi-structured questionnaire regarding adherence to criteria, TTA decision-making and criteria documentation was distributed to all Norwegian trauma hospitals (n = 38) in the spring of 2022. Contact details of trauma coordinators and registrars were provided by the Norwegian Trauma Registry secretariat. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted at the investigator's discretion in cases of non-respondents or need to clarify answers.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight trauma hospitals were invited to answer the survey, where 35 hospitals responded (92%), making 35 the denominator of the results. Thirty-four (97.1%) hospitals stated that they followed NTrC. Thirty-three (94.3%) of the responding hospitals provided documentation of their criteria in use, of which twenty-eight (80%) of responding hospitals adhered to the NTrC. Three (8.6%) hospitals employed a tiered TTA approach with different sized teams. In addition four hospitals (11.4%) used specialized teams to meet the needs of defined patient groups (e.g. geriatric patients, traumatic brain injury). Twenty-one (60%) of the responding hospitals had written guidelines on who could perform TTA and in 18 hospitals (51.4%) TTA could be performed by pre-hospital personnel. Twenty-three (65.7%) of the hospitals documented which criteria that were used for TTA.

CONCLUSION

There is good adherence to the national criteria for activation of the trauma team among Norwegian trauma hospitals after implementation of national guidelines. Individual hospitals argue the use of certain local criteria and trauma team activation decision-making processes to increase their precision in specific patient populations and demographics. Further steps should be done to reduce the variation in TTA decision-making processes among hospitals and improve documentation quality.

Penetrating trauma on the rise- nine-year trends of severe trauma in Sweden

PURPOSE

Sweden has an established trauma system involving national trauma criteria and the Swedish trauma registry (SweTrau), since over a decade. Meanwhile, the injury panorama has evolved, with an increase in gang-related violence in the Swedish community. In this study, we aimed to investigate long-term trends in mortality, management and trauma type in two major Swedish trauma centers over a nine-year period.

METHODS

All trauma patients with a New Injury Score (NISS) > 15 or a Trauma Alert (TA) call during 2013-2021 were identified in the participating centers' SweTrau registries. Data were analysed regarding mortality, proportion of emergency interventions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, mechanism of injury and type of trauma (penetrating or blunt). To assess trends, Chi-Squared test for trend and JoinPoint regression method were used.

RESULTS

A total of 10,587 patients were included in the study. Mortality remained unchanged over time in patients with NISS > 15 (10.0-10.9%, p = 0.963) but increased in patients with a TA and NISS < 15 (1.3-2.7%, p = 0.005). For NISS > 15, the proportion undergoing emergency interventions was stable (53.9%-48.8%, p = 0.297) while ICU admissions declined (62.1%-45.7%, p < 0.001). Penetrating trauma increased (12.4-19.6%, p < 0.001), including knife (10.0-15.7%, p < 0.001) and gunshot wounds (2.3-3.8%, p < 0.001), whereas accidents involving motorcycles (8.8%-7.0%, p = 0.004) and pedestrians (5.3%-2.2%, p < 0.001) decreased. Assaults (both penetrating and blunt) increased from 14.7 to 21.4% (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this trend analysis at two major Swedish trauma centers during 2013-2021, penetrating trauma increased with over 50% while traffic injuries decreased. The rise in mortality in patients with a TA and NISS < 15 is concerning and requires further evaluation, as do the reduction in ICU admissions.

Trauma team activation and triage of severely injured patients at one non-trauma-center hospital in Stockholm

BACKGROUND

In 2017 the Swedish public insurance company Löf published national guidelines for in-hospital trauma team activation (TTA), which are now widely adopted in Sweden. No studies have examined triage accuracy at non-trauma-center hospitals in the Stockholm trauma system since the implementation of the new TTA criteria.

AIM

To assess trauma triage accuracy at one non-trauma-center hospital in Stockholm.

METHODS

3528 trauma patients treated at Södersjukhuset during 2019-2022 were acquired from the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) to calculate TTA triage accuracy. Undertriage was defined in accordance with national guidelines as patients with a New Injury Severity Score > 15 who did not prompt level 1 TTA on arrival to hospital.

RESULTS

In total there were 849 severely injured patients during the study period, of which 2.2% (n = 19) prompted TTA level 1, corresponding to an undertriage of 98% (n = 830). Of the 849 severely injured patients, 41% (n = 348) prompted TTA level 2 whereas the remaining 57% (n = 482) prompted no TTA on arrival to hospital. There were a total of 3046 patients prompting TTA during the study period, but only 19% (n = 19) of level 1 and 12% (n = 348) of level 2 patients were severely injured, and 45% had a NISS ≤ 3.

CONCLUSION

Undertriage of severely injured trauma patients was 98% according to the definition specified by Swedish trauma triage guidelines, higher than reasonably acceptable. There is considerable overtriage with non-severely injured patients prompting TTA. However, the suitability of using NISS > 15 to retrospectively define the need for TTA is debatable as this does not always correlate with the fulfillment of the TTA criteria. Further investigation of adherence to trauma triage guidelines in clinical practice may be of value to improve triage accuracy in organized regional trauma systems.

The predictive value of serum lactate to forecast injury severity in trauma-patients increases taking age into account

BACKGROUND

Two-tier trauma team activation (TTA)-protocols often fail to safely identify severely injured patients. A possible amendment to existing triage scores could be the measurement of serum lactate. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of the combination of serum lactate and age to predict severe injuries (ISS > 15).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a single level one trauma center in a 20 months study-period and analyzed every trauma team activation (TTA) due to the mechanism of injury (MOI). Primary endpoint was the correlation between serum lactate (and age) and ISS and mortality. The validity of lactate (LAC) and lactate contingent on age (LAC + AGE) were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. We used a logistic regression model to predict the probability of an ISS > 15.

RESULTS

During the study period we included 325 patients, 75 met exclusion criteria. Mean age was 43 years (Min.: 11, Max.: 90, SD: 18.7) with a mean ISS of 8.4 (SD: 8.99). LAC showed a sensitivity of 0.82 with a specificity of 0.62 with an optimal cutoff at 1.72 mmol/l to predict an ISS > 15. The AUC of the ROC for LAC was 0.764 (95% CI: 0.67-0.85). The LAC + AGE model provided a significantly improved predictive value compared to LAC (0.765 vs. 0.828, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The serum lactate concentration is able to predict injury severity. The prognostic value improves significantly taking the patients age into consideration. The combination of serum lactate and age could be a suitable Ad-on to existing two-tier triage protocols to minimize undertriage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Epidemiology of patients assessed for trauma by Swedish ambulance services: a retrospective registry study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of knowledge regarding the epidemiology of severe trauma assessed by Swedish emergency medical services (EMS).

AIM

To investigate the prevalence of trauma in Sweden assessed by EMS from a national perspective and describe patient demography, aetiology, trauma type, prehospital triage and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Data from two national quality registries, the Swedish Ambulance Registry and the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) were collected from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Inclusion criteria were an Emergency Symptoms and Signs code equivalent to trauma in the Swedish Ambulance Registry and criteria fulfilled for SweTrau inclusion. Exclusion criteria were patients < 18 years old, those not transported to a hospital and those without a personal identification number.

RESULTS

In total, 53,120 patients with trauma were included (14% of primary EMS missions involving a personal identification number). Of those, 2,278 (4.3%) patients (median age: 45 years; 32% women) were reported in SweTrau to have severe or potentially severe trauma (penetrating: 7%, blunt: 93%). In terms of including all causes of trauma, the code for 'trauma alert activation' was most frequent (55%). The most frequent injury mechanism was an injury caused by a car (34%). Most (89%) cases were assigned Priority 1 (life-threatening condition) at the dispatch centre. 62% were regarded as potentially life threatening upon EMS arrival, whereas 29% were assessed as non-life-threatening. Overall, 25% of the patients had new injury severity scores > 15. 12% required invasive treatment, 11% were discharged with severe disability and the 30-day mortality rate was 3.6%.

CONCLUSION

In this cross-sectional study, 14% of the primary EMS missions for one year were caused by trauma. However, only a small proportion of these cases are severe injuries, and the risk of severe disabilities and death appears to be limited. The most frequent aetiology of a severe trauma is injury caused by a car, and most severe traumas are blunt. Severe traumas are given the highest priority at the dispatch centre in the vast majority of cases, but nearly one-third of these cases are considered a low priority by the EMS nurse. The latter leaves room for improvement.

Current trauma team activation processes at Canadian trauma centres: A national survey

BACKGROUND

Trauma team activation (TTA) allows the provision of specialized and timely care to improve outcomes for severely injured patients. Limited information is available on the current state of TTA in Canadian trauma centres (TC). Study objectives were to describe TTA processes, data and reports, along with the challenges and successes from a national perspective.

METHODS

A mixed-methods, cross-sectional survey was undertaken with Canadian trauma leadership, utilizing a total population sampling strategy. The questionnaire, containing 108-items, was administered online between February-April 2022, utilizing a modified Dillman technique. Descriptive statistics and thematic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Trauma leaders from 9 out of 10 provinces responded for a response rate of 68% (32/47). Two-thirds (67%) of respondents worked in adult TC; 63% in a level I center. A higher proportion of pediatric TC had a two-tiered TT response (60% pediatric; 35% adult). The most common criteria were neurologic compromise (100% one-level TTA) and hypotension (pediatric: 100% one-level, 100% tier 1; adult: 92% one-level, 86% tier 1). All one-level TTA included penetrating trauma criteria. One-third of respondents reported using TTA subgroup criteria for pediatric, pregnant, and/or geriatric patients. There was variability with disciplines responding to TTA, with largest, most comprehensive teams for tier 1. Two-thirds of TC review activation compliance (under/overtriage), while 55% focus on non-compliance and reasons for missed TTA. The most frequent challenges related to TTA practices were reliable data collection (60%) while successes included were the establishment of TTA guidelines to improve team compliance (33%) and RN initiated TTA.

CONCLUSIONS

Some TTA practices were similar among Canadian TC, while others showed variability. Findings provide opportunities for improvement, including a two-tier system, geriatric-specific criteria, and RN initiated TTA, and could help establish national standards and best practices. Compliance with standards has the potential to improve Canadian TTA practices and patient outcomes.

Implementation of a major trauma team. Analysis of activation and care times in patients admitted to the ICU

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the factors associated with the activation of the severe trauma care team (STAT) in patients admitted to the ICU, to measure its impact on care times, and to analyze the groups of patients according to activation and level of anatomical involvement.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of severe trauma admitted to the ICU. From June 2017 to May 2019. Risk factors for the activation of the STAT analysed with logistic regression and CART type classification tree.

SETTING

Second level hospital ICU.

PATIENTS

Patients admitted consecutively.

INTERVENTIONS

No.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

STAT activation. Demographic variables. Injury severity (ISS), intentionality, mechanism, assistance times, evolutionary complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were admitted (46.8% of STAT activation), median age of 52 (37-64) years (activated 47 (27-62) vs not activated 55 (42-67) P = 0.023), males 84.0%. No difference in mortality according to activation. The logistic model finds as factors: care (16.6 (2.1-13.2)) and prehospital intubation (4.2 (1.8-9.8)) and severe lower extremity injury (4.4 (1.6-12.3)). Accidental fall (0.2 (0.1-0.6)) makes activation less likely. The CART model selects the type of trauma mechanism and can separate high and low energy trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with STAT activation were prehospital care, requiring prior intubation, high-energy mechanisms, and severe lower extremity injuries. Shorter care times if activated without influencing mortality. We must improve activation in older patients with low-energy trauma and without prehospital care.

Validation of the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau)

PURPOSE

Validation of registries is important to ensure accuracy of data and registry-based research. This is often done by comparisons of the original registry data with other sources, e.g. another registry or a re-registration of data. Founded in 2011, the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) consists of variables based on international consensus (the Utstein Template of Trauma). This project aimed to perform the first validation of SweTrau.

METHODS

On-site re-registration was performed on randomly selected trauma patients and compared to the registration in SweTrau. Accuracy (exact agreement), correctness (exact agreement plus data within acceptable range), comparability (similarity with other registries), data completeness (1-missing data) and case completeness (1-missing cases) were deemed as either good ([Formula: see text] 85%), adequate (70-84%) or poor (< 70%). Correlation was determined as either excellent ([Formula: see text] 0.8), strong (0.6-0.79), moderate (0.4-0.59) or weak (< 0.4).

RESULTS

The data in SweTrau had good accuracy (85.8%), correctness (89.7%) and data completeness (88.5%), as well as strong or excellent correlation (87.5%). Case completeness was 44.3%, however, for NISS > 15 case completeness was 100%. Median time to registration was 4.5 months, with 84.2% registered one year after the trauma. The comparability showed an accordance with the Utstein Template of Trauma of almost 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of SweTrau is good, with high accuracy, correctness, data completeness and correlation. The data are comparable to other trauma registries using the Utstein Template of Trauma; however, timeliness and case completeness are areas of improvement.

Trauma Registry Data as a Policy-Making Tool: A Systematic Review on the Research Dimensions

Objective:

To review the research dimensions of trauma registry data on health policy making.

Methods:

PubMed and EMBASE were searched until July 2020. Keywords were used on the search process included Trauma, Injury, Registry and Research, which were searched by using appropriate search strategies. The included articles had to: 1. be extracted from data related to trauma registries; 2- be written in English; 3- define a time period and a patient population; 4- preferably have more details and policy recommendations; and 5- preferably have a discussion on how to improve diagnosis and treatment. The results obtained from the included studies were qualitatively analyzed using thematic synthesis and comparative tables.

Results:

In the primary round of search, 19559 studies were retrieved. According to PRISMA statement and also performing quality appraisal process, 30 studies were included in the final phase of analysis. In the final papers’ synthesis, 14 main research domains were extracted and classified in terms of the policy implication and research priority. The domains with the highest frequency were “The relationship between trauma registry data and hospital care protocols for trauma patients” and “The causes of Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) due to trauma”.

Conclusion:

Using trauma registry data as a tool for policy-making could be helpful in several ways, namely increasing the quality of patient care, preventing injuries and decreasing their number, figuring out the details of socioeconomic status effects, and improving the quality of researches in practical ways. Also, follow-up of patients after trauma surgery as one of the positive effects of the trauma registry can be the focus of attention of policy-making bodies.

Trauma triage criteria as predictors of severe injury - a Swedish multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Adequate performance of trauma team activation (TTA) criteria is important in order to accurately triage trauma patients. The Swedish National Trauma Triage Criteria (SNTTC) consists of 29 criteria that trigger either a Trauma Alert, the highest level of TTA, or a Trauma Response. This study aimed to evaluate the SNTTC and its accuracy in predicting a severely injured patient in a multicenter setting.

METHODS

A cohort study in Sweden involving six trauma receiving hospitals. Data was collected from the Swedish Trauma Registry. Some 626 patients were analyzed with regard to the specific criteria used to initiate the TTA, injury severity with New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and emergency interventions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of the criteria were calculated, as well as undertriage and overtriage.

RESULTS

All 29 criteria of SNTTC had a sensitivity > 80% for identifying a severely injured patient. The 16 Trauma Alert Criteria had a lower sensitivity of 62.6% but higher LR+ (3.5 vs all criteria 1.4), specificity (82.3 vs 39.1%) and PPV (55.4 vs 37.6%) and the highest accuracy (AUC 0.724). When using only the six physiological criteria, sensitivity (44.8%) and accuracy (AUC 0.690) decreased while LR+ (6.7), specificity (93.3%) and PPV (70.2%) improved.

CONCLUSION

SNTTC is efficient in identifying severely injured patients. The current set of criteria exhibits the best sensitivity compared to other examined combinations and no additional criterion was found to improve the protocol enough to promote a change.

Vital and Clinical Signs Gathered Within the First Minutes After a Motorcycle Accident on a Racetrack: an Observational Study

Background

Little is known about vital signs during the very first minutes after an accident. This study aimed to describe the vital signs of motorcycle riders shortly after racetrack crashes and examine the clinical value of these data for the prehospital clinical assessments.

Methods

A retrospective observational cohort based on data from medical records on 104 motorcycle accidents at a racetrack in Sweden, covering the season of 2019 (May 01 until September 17), was conducted. Both race and practice runs were included. In addition, data from the Swedish Trauma Registry were used for patients referred to the hospital. Kruskal-Wallis test and linear regression were calculated in addition to descriptive statistics.

Results

In all, 30 riders (29%) were considered injured. Sixteen riders (15%) were referred to the hospital, and of these, five patients (5% of all riders) had suffered serious injuries. Aside from a decreased level of consciousness, no single vital sign or kinematic component observed within the early minutes after a crash was a strong clinical indicator of the occurrence of injuries. However, weak links were found between highsider or collision crashes and the occurrence of injuries.

Conclusion

Except for a decreased level of consciousness, this study indicates that the clinical value of early measured vital signs might be limited for the pre-hospital clinical assessment in the motorsport environment. Also, an adjustment of general trauma triage protocols might be considered for settings such as racetracks. Using the context with medical professionals at the victim’s side within a few minutes after an accident, that is common in motorsport, offers unique possibilities to increase our understanding of clinical signs and trauma in the early state after an accident.

Elevated serum lactate levels and age are associated with an increased risk for severe injury in trauma team activation due to trauma mechanism

BACKGROUND

The identification of risk factors for severe injury is crucial in trauma triage and trauma team activation (TTA) depends on a sufficient triage. The aim of this study was to determine whether or not elevated serum lactate levels and age are risk factors for severe injury in TTA due to trauma mechanism.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in a single level one trauma center between September 2019 and May 2021 and analysed every TTA due to trauma mechanism. Primary endpoint of interest was the association of serum lactate as well as age with injury severity assessed by the injury severity score (ISS).

RESULTS

During the study period, we included 250 patients. Mean age was 43.3 years (Min.: 11, Max.: 90, SD: 18.7) and the initial lactate level was 1.7 mmol/L (SD: 0.95) with a mean ISS of 8.4 (SD: 8.99). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) for age > 65 being associated with an ISS > 16 is 9.7 (p < 0.001; 95% CI 4.01-25.58) and for lactate > 2.2 mmol/L being associated with an ISS > 16 is 6.29 (p < 0.001; 95% CI 2.93-13.48). A lactate level of > 4 mmol/L results in a 36-fold higher risk of severe injury with an ISS > 16 (OR 36.06; 95% CI 4-324.29).

CONCLUSION

This study identifies age (> 65) and lactate (> 2.2 mmol/L) as independent risk factors for severe injury in a TTA due to trauma mechanism. Existing triage protocols might benefit from congruous amendments.

Mortality of trauma patients treated at trauma centers compared to non-trauma centers in Sweden: a retrospective study

Objective

The main objective was to compare the 30-day mortality rate of trauma patients treated at trauma centers as compared to non-trauma centers in Sweden. The secondary objective was to evaluate how injury severity influences the potential survival benefit of specialized care.

Methods

This retrospective study included 29,864 patients from the national Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) during the period 2013–2017. Three sampling exclusion criteria were applied: (1) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of zero; (2) missing data in any variable of interest; (3) data falling outside realistic values and duplicate registrations. University hospitals were classified as trauma centers; other hospitals as non-trauma centers. Logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of trauma center care on mortality rate, while adjusting for other factors potentially affecting the risk of death.

Results

Treatment at a trauma center in Sweden was associated with a 41% lower adjusted 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.59 [0.50–0.70], p < 0.0001) compared to non-trauma center care, considering all injured patients (ISS ≥ 1). The potential survival benefit increased substantially with higher injury severity, with up to > 70% mortality decrease for the most critically injured group (ISS ≥ 50).

Conclusions

There exists a potentially substantial survival benefit for trauma patients treated at trauma centers in Sweden, especially for the most severely injured. This study motivates a critical review and possible reorganization of the national trauma system, and further research to identify the characteristics of patients in most need of specialized care.

Trauma-team-activation in Germany: how do emergency service professionals use the activation due to trauma mechanism? Results from a nationwide survey

BACKGROUND

Trauma team activation (TTA) requires significant human and financial resources. The implemented German guidelines reduced the mortality of severe injured patients significantly over the last decade. Up to now there is no two-tier trauma team activation protocol in Germany. A two-tier TTA [often activated due to trauma mechanism (TM)] is thought to be a reasonable way to maintain patient safety while increasing cost efficiency.

METHODS

We created an online survey addressed at the Emergency Medical Service in Germany to conduct a cross-sectional study. Both physicians and rescue service professionals (RSPs) were included. A minimum of 1550 participants answered questions in 4 different categories concerning the aspects of limited-TTA (L-TTA). Case studies were presented to evaluate the usage of TTA due to TM in the daily routine.

RESULTS

Eighty percent (n:1233) of the respondents wish for a possibility to activate a limited trauma team. Seventy-two percent (n: 1109) of the participants consider a L-TTA due to TM to be adequate. There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the assessment and opinion on L-TTA among physicians and RSPs as well as different medical professions. The evaluated case studies showed diverse answers: depending on the profession, the same patient was ranked as severely injured by 54% and as minorly injured by 46% of the 1550 participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Members of the German Emergency Medical Service call for a two-tier TTA-protocol. Up to now we cannot fully recommend an automatic reduction of the trauma team when activated due to TM in Germany with the guidelines implemented. The profession might affect the L-TTA-behavior. Criteria for a L-TTA in Germany have to be defined and evaluated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, cross-sectional study.