1
|
Vaughan-Huxley E, Griggs J, Mohindru J, Russell M, Lyon R, Avest ET. A data-driven algorithm to support the clinical decision-making of patient extrication following a road traffic collision. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2023; 31:90. [PMID: 38049830 PMCID: PMC10696863 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-023-01153-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients involved in a road traffic collision (RTC) are physically entrapped and extrication is required to provide critical interventions. This can be performed either in an expedited way, or in a more controlled manner. In this study we aimed to derive a data-driven extrication algorithm intended to be used as a decision-support tool by on scene emergency service providers to decide on the optimal method of patient extrication from the vehicle. METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed of all trauma patients trapped after an RTC who were attended by a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) in the United Kingdom between March 2013 and December 2021. Variables were identified that were associated with the need for HEMS interventions (as a surrogate for the need for expedited extrication), based on which a practical extrication algorithm was devised. RESULTS During the study period 12,931 patients were attended, of which 920 were physically trapped. Patients who scored an "A" on the AVPU score (n = 531) rarely required HEMS interventions (3%). Those who did were characterised by a shorter than average (29 vs. 37 min) 999/112 emergency call to HEMS on-scene arrival interval. A third of all patients responding to voice required HEMS interventions. Absence of a patent airway (OR 6.98 [1.74-28.03] p < .001) and the absence of palpable radial pulses (OR 9.99 [2.48-40.18] p < .001) were independently associated with the need for (one or more) HEMS interventions in this group. Patients only responding to pain and unresponsive patients almost invariably needed HEMS interventions post extrication (90% and 86% respectively). Based on these findings, a practical and easy to remember algorithm "APEX" was derived. CONCLUSION A simple, data-driven algorithm, remembered by the acronym "APEX", may help emergency service providers on scene to determine the preferred method of extrication for patients who are trapped after a road traffic collision. This has the potential to facilitate earlier recognition of a 'sick' critical patient trapped in an RTC, decrease entrapment and extrication time, and may contribute to an improved outcome for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eyston Vaughan-Huxley
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK
- Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Joanne Griggs
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK
- University of Surrey, Duke of Kent Building, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Jasmit Mohindru
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK.
- Kings College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
| | - Malcolm Russell
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK
| | - Richard Lyon
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK
- University of Surrey, Duke of Kent Building, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
| | - Ewoud Ter Avest
- Air Ambulance Kent Surrey Sussex, Hanger 10 Redhill Aerodrome, Redhill, RH1 5YP, UK
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Binks F, Hardy A, Wallis LA, Stassen W. The variables predictive of ambulance non-conveyance of patients in the Western Cape, South Africa. Afr J Emerg Med 2023; 13:293-299. [PMID: 37807978 PMCID: PMC10551619 DOI: 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Emergency medical service (EMS) resources are limited and should be reserved for incidents of appropriate acuity. Over-triage in dispatching of EMS resources is a global problem. Analysing patients that are not transported to hospital is valuable in contributing to decision-making models/algorithms to better inform dispatching of resources. The aim is to determine variables associated with patients receiving an emergency response but result in non-conveyance to hospital. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed on data for the period October 2018 to September 2019. EMS records were reviewed for instances where a patient received an emergency response but the patient was not transported to hospital. Data were subjected to univariate and multivariate regression analysis to determine variables predictive of non-transport to hospital. Results A total of 245 954 responses were analysed, 240 730 (97.88 %) were patients that were transported to hospital and 5 224 (2.12 %) were not transported. Of all patients that received an emergency response, 203 450 (82.72 %) patients did not receive any medical interventions. Notable variables predictive of non-transport were green (OR 4.33 (95 % CI: 3.55-5.28; p<0.01)) and yellow on-scene (OR 1.95 (95 % CI: 1.60-2.37; p<0.01).Incident types most predictive of non-transport were electrocutions (OR 4.55 (95 % CI: 1.36-15.23; p=0.014)), diabetes (OR 2.978 (95 % CI: 2.10-3.68; p<0.01)), motor vehicle accidents (OR 1.92 (95 % CI: 1.51-2.43; p<0.01)), and unresponsive patients (OR 1.98 (95 % CI: 1.54-2.55; p<0.01)). The highest treatment predictors for non-transport of patients were nebulisation (OR 1.45 (95 % CI: 1.21-1.74; p<0.01)) and the administration of glucose (OR 4.47 (95 % CI: 3.11-6.41; p<0.01)). Conclusion This study provided factors that predict ambulance non-conveyance to hospital. The prediction of patients not transported to hospital may aid in the development of dispatch algorithms that reduce over-triage of patients, on-scene discharge protocols, and treat and refer guidelines in EMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Binks
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | | | - Lee A Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rossaint R, Afshari A, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Cimpoesu D, Curry N, Duranteau J, Filipescu D, Grottke O, Grønlykke L, Harrois A, Hunt BJ, Kaserer A, Komadina R, Madsen MH, Maegele M, Mora L, Riddez L, Romero CS, Samama CM, Vincent JL, Wiberg S, Spahn DR. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition. Crit Care 2023; 27:80. [PMID: 36859355 PMCID: PMC9977110 DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 92.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe trauma represents a major global public health burden and the management of post-traumatic bleeding continues to challenge healthcare systems around the world. Post-traumatic bleeding and associated traumatic coagulopathy remain leading causes of potentially preventable multiorgan failure and death if not diagnosed and managed in an appropriate and timely manner. This sixth edition of the European guideline on the management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following traumatic injury aims to advise clinicians who care for the bleeding trauma patient during the initial diagnostic and therapeutic phases of patient management. METHODS The pan-European, multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma included representatives from six European professional societies and convened to assess and update the previous version of this guideline using a structured, evidence-based consensus approach. Structured literature searches covered the period since the last edition of the guideline, but considered evidence cited previously. The format of this edition has been adjusted to reflect the trend towards concise guideline documents that cite only the highest-quality studies and most relevant literature rather than attempting to provide a comprehensive literature review to accompany each recommendation. RESULTS This guideline comprises 39 clinical practice recommendations that follow an approximate temporal path for management of the bleeding trauma patient, with recommendations grouped behind key decision points. While approximately one-third of patients who have experienced severe trauma arrive in hospital in a coagulopathic state, a systematic diagnostic and therapeutic approach has been shown to reduce the number of preventable deaths attributable to traumatic injury. CONCLUSION A multidisciplinary approach and adherence to evidence-based guidelines are pillars of best practice in the management of severely injured trauma patients. Further improvement in outcomes will be achieved by optimising and standardising trauma care in line with the available evidence across Europe and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolf Rossaint
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH, Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany.
| | - Arash Afshari
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bertil Bouillon
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Vladimir Cerny
- grid.424917.d0000 0001 1379 0994Department of Anaesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Masaryk Hospital, J.E. Purkinje University, Socialni pece 3316/12A, CZ-40113 Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic ,grid.4491.80000 0004 1937 116XDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charles University Faculty of Medicine, Simkova 870, CZ-50003 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Diana Cimpoesu
- grid.411038.f0000 0001 0685 1605Department of Emergency Medicine, Emergency County Hospital “Sf. Spiridon” Iasi, University of Medicine and Pharmacy ”Grigore T. Popa” Iasi, Blvd. Independentei 1, RO-700111 Iasi, Romania
| | - Nicola Curry
- grid.410556.30000 0001 0440 1440Oxford Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7HE UK ,grid.4991.50000 0004 1936 8948Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Jacques Duranteau
- grid.460789.40000 0004 4910 6535Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Saclay University, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, F-94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France
| | - Daniela Filipescu
- grid.8194.40000 0000 9828 7548Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, “Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu” Emergency Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Sos Fundeni 256-258, RO-022328 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Oliver Grottke
- grid.1957.a0000 0001 0728 696XDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH, Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Lars Grønlykke
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Thoracic Anaesthesiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anatole Harrois
- grid.460789.40000 0004 4910 6535Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Saclay University, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, F-94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Cedex, France
| | - Beverley J. Hunt
- grid.420545.20000 0004 0489 3985Thrombosis and Haemophilia Centre, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH UK
| | - Alexander Kaserer
- grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Radko Komadina
- grid.8954.00000 0001 0721 6013Department of Traumatology, General and Teaching Hospital Celje, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana University, Oblakova ulica 5, SI-3000 Celje, Slovenia
| | - Mikkel Herold Madsen
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marc Maegele
- grid.412581.b0000 0000 9024 6397Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Strasse 200, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Lidia Mora
- grid.7080.f0000 0001 2296 0625Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Clinic, Vall d’Hebron Trauma, Rehabilitation and Burns Hospital, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d’Hebron 119-129, ES-08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Louis Riddez
- grid.24381.3c0000 0000 9241 5705Department of Surgery and Trauma, Karolinska University Hospital, S-171 76 Solna, Sweden
| | - Carolina S. Romero
- grid.106023.60000 0004 1770 977XDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Universidad Europea of Valencia Methodology Research Department, Avenida Tres Cruces 2, ES-46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Charles-Marc Samama
- Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Perioperative Medicine, GHU AP-HP Centre - Université Paris Cité - Cochin Hospital, 27 rue du Faubourg St. Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
| | - Jean-Louis Vincent
- grid.4989.c0000 0001 2348 0746Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sebastian Wiberg
- grid.5254.60000 0001 0674 042XDepartment of Thoracic Anaesthesiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Donat R. Spahn
- grid.412004.30000 0004 0478 9977Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, May B, Stassen W, Smith JE, Bowdler J, Wallis L, Shippen J. A biomechanical study to compare spinal movement in a healthy volunteer during extrication between 'chain cabling' and 'roof off' methods of extrication. Injury 2022; 53:3605-3612. [PMID: 36167687 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Following a motor vehicle collision some patients will remain trapped. Traditional extrication methods are time consuming and focus on movement minimisation and mitigation. 'Chain cabling' is an alternative method of extrication used in some countries. The optimal extrication strategy and the effect of extrication methods on spinal movement is unknown. This study compares 'chain cabling' to the established roof removal method of extrication on spinal movement. METHODS Biomechanical data were collected using Inertial Measurement Units on a single healthy volunteer during multiple experiments. The extrication types examined were chain cabling and roof removal. Measurements were recorded at the cervical and lumbar spine, and in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LR) planes. Total movement (travel), maximal movement, mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals are reported. RESULTS Eight experiments were performed using each technique. The smallest mean overall movements were recorded during roof-off extrication (cervical spine 0.6 mm for AP and LR, lumbar spine 3.9 mm AP and 0.3 mm LR). The largest overall mean movements were seen with chain cabling extrication (cervical spine AP 5.3 mm. LR 6.1 mm and lumbar spine 6.8 mm AP and 6.3 mm LR). CONCLUSION In this study of a healthy volunteer, roof-off extrication was associated with less movement than chain cabling. The movement associated with chain cabling extrication was similar to that previously collected for other extrication types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nutbeam
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK; Devon Air Ambulance Trust, UK.
| | | | - Barbara May
- Institute for Future Transport and Cities, University of Coventry, UK
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK; Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jono Bowdler
- Fire and Rescue Service Trainer, Severn Park Fire and Rescue Centre, UK
| | - Lee Wallis
- Institute for Future Transport and Cities, University of Coventry, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nutbeam T, Brandling J, Wallis LA, Stassen W. Understanding people's experiences of extrication while being trapped in motor vehicles: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e063798. [PMID: 36127106 PMCID: PMC9490624 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore patient's experience of entrapment and subsequent extrication following a motor vehicle collision and identify their priorities in optimising this experience. DESIGN Semistructured interviews exploring the experience of entrapment and extrication conducted at least 6 weeks following the event. Thematic analysis of interviews. SETTING Single air ambulance and spinal cord injury charity in the UK. PARTICIPANTS 10 patients were recruited and consented; six air ambulance patients and two spinal cord injury charity patients attended the interview. 2 air ambulance patients declined to participate following consent due to the perceived potential for psychological sequelae. RESULTS The main theme across all participants was that of the importance of communication; successful communication to the trapped patient resulted in a sense of well-being and where communication failures occurred this led to distress. The data generated three key subthemes: 'on-scene communication', 'physical needs' and 'emotional needs'. Specific practices were identified that were of use to patients during entrapment and extrication. CONCLUSIONS Extrication experience was improved by positive communication, companionship, explanations and planned postincident follow-up. Extrication experience was negatively affected by failures in communication, loss of autonomy, unmanaged pain, delayed communication with remote family and onlooker use of social media. Recommendations which will support a positive patient-centred extrication experience are the presence of an 'extrication buddy', the use of clear and accessible language, appropriate reassurance in relation to co-occupants, a supportive approach to communication with family and friends, the minimisation of onlooker photo/videography and the provision of planned (non-clinical) follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nutbeam
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
- Devon Air Ambulance, Exeter, UK
| | - Janet Brandling
- Qualitative Researcher and Psychotherapist, Unaffiliated, Bristol, UK
| | - Lee A Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, Smith JE, Dayson M, Carlin B, Wilson M, Wallis L, Stassen W. A Delphi study of rescue and clinical subject matter experts on the extrication of patients following a motor vehicle collision. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2022; 30:41. [PMID: 35725580 PMCID: PMC9208189 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-022-01029-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 1.3 million people die each year globally as a direct result of motor vehicle collisions (MVCs). Following an MVC some patients will remain trapped in their vehicle; these patients have worse outcomes and may require extrication. Following new evidence, updated multidisciplinary guidance for extrication is needed. METHODS This Delphi study has been developed, conducted and reported to CREDES standards. A literature review identified areas of expertise and appropriate individuals were recruited to a Steering Group. The Steering Group formulated initial statements for consideration. Stakeholder organisations were invited to identify subject matter experts (SMEs) from a rescue and clinical background (total 60). SMEs participated over three rounds via an online platform. Consensus for agreement / disagreement was set at 70%. At each stage SMEs could offer feedback on, or modification to the statements considered which was reviewed and incorporated into new statements or new supporting information for the following rounds. Stakeholders agreed a set of principles based on the consensus statements on which future guidance should be based. RESULTS Sixty SMEs completed Round 1, 53 Round 2 (88%) and 49 Round 3 (82%). Consensus was reached on 91 statements (89 agree, 2 disagree) covering a broad range of domains related to: extrication terminology, extrication goals and approach, self-extrication, disentanglement, clinical care, immobilisation, patient-focused extrication, emergency services call and triage, and audit and research standards. Thirty-three statements did not reach consensus. CONCLUSION This study has demonstrated consensus across a large panel of multidisciplinary SMEs on many key areas of extrication and related practice that will provide a key foundation in the development of evidence-based guidance for this subject area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nutbeam
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK. .,Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Exeter, UK. .,Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Rob Fenwick
- Emergency Department, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.,Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mike Dayson
- Former Fire Officer (Research), National Fire Chiefs Council, Birmingham, UK
| | - Brian Carlin
- Association for Spinal Injury Research, Rehabilitation and Reintegration, Department of Orthopaedics & Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Wilson
- Imperial Neurotrauma Centre, Imperial College, London, UK.,Kent, Surrey and Sussex Air Ambulance, Rochester, UK
| | - Lee Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lapostolle F, Savary D. Traumatisme et température. ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3166/afmu-2022-0401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Le patient traumatisé est exposé à l’hypothermie. La mortalité des traumatisés hypothermes est multipliée par quatre ou cinq. Les interactions de l’hypothermie avec l’hémostase et le système cardiovasculaire sont délétères. Les effets sur la coagulation sont multiples et concourent directement à la surmortalité faisant de l’hypothermie une composante majeure de la « triade létale ». Les causes d’hypothermie chez le patient traumatisé sont multiples : 1) environnementales, le risque augmente quand la température ambiante diminue ; 2) cliniques, le risque augmente avec la gravité ; et aussi 3) thérapeutiques, par exemple par la perfusion de solutés à température ambiante. Une prise en charge optimale repose sur une mesure précoce et un monitorage continu de la température corporelle. L’objectif thérapeutique est de maintenir une température corporelle au moins égale à 36 °C. Limiter le déshabillage du patient, le protéger du froid avec une couverture de survie, l’installer rapidement dans une ambulance chauffée, recourir à des dispositifs de réchauffement actifs, perfuser des solutés réchauffés sont les éléments fondamentaux de la prise en charge d’un patient traumatisé, potentiellement hypotherme.
Collapse
|
8
|
Klose F. Rettungsdienstlicher Umgang mit Flugunfällen militärischer Luftfahrzeuge. Notf Rett Med 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10049-021-00880-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
9
|
Nutbeam T, Weekes L, Heidari S, Fenwick R, Bouamra O, Smith J, Stassen W. Sex-disaggregated analysis of the injury patterns, outcome data and trapped status of major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions: a prespecified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061076. [PMID: 35504646 PMCID: PMC9066497 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the differences between women and men in the probability of entrapment, frequency of injury and outcomes following a motor vehicle collision. Publishing sex-disaggregated data, understanding differential patterns and exploring the reasons for these will assist with ensuring equity of outcomes especially in respect to triage, rescue and treatment of all patients. DESIGN We examined data from the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) registry to explore sex differences in entrapment, injuries and outcomes. We explored the relationship between age, sex and trapped status using multivariate logistical regression. SETTING TARN is a UK-based trauma registry covering England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS We examined data for 450 357 patients submitted to TARN during the study period (2012-2019), of which 70 027 met the inclusion criteria. There were 18 175 (26%) female and 51 852 (74%) male patients. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We report difference in entrapment status, injury and outcome between female and male patients. For trapped patients, we examined the effect of sex and age on death from any cause. RESULTS Female patients were more frequently trapped than male patients (female patients (F) 15.8%, male patients (M) 9.4%; p<0.0001). Trapped male patients more frequently suffered head (M 1318 (27.0%), F 578 (20.1%)), face, (M 46 (0.9%), F 6 (0.2%)), thoracic (M 2721 (55.8%), F 1438 (49.9%)) and limb injuries (M 1744 (35.8%), F 778 (27.0%); all p<0.0001). Female patients had more injuries to the pelvis (F 420 (14.6%), M 475 (9.7%); p<0.0001) and spine (F 359 (12.5%), M 485 (9.9%); p=0.001). Following adjustment for the interaction between age and sex, injury severity score, Glasgow Coma Scale and the Charlson Comorbidity Index, no difference in mortality was found between female and male patients. CONCLUSIONS There are significant differences between female and male patients in the frequency at which patients are trapped and the injuries these patients sustain. This sex-disaggregated data may help vehicle manufacturers, road safety organisations and emergency services to tailor responses with the aim of equitable outcomes by targeting equal performance of safety measures and reducing excessive risk to one sex or gender.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nutbeam
- The Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Devon, UK
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Lauren Weekes
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
| | - Shirin Heidari
- GENDRO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Global Health Centre, Gender Centre, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rob Fenwick
- The Emergency Department, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK
| | - Omar Bouamra
- Institute of Population Health, Trauma Audit & Research Network, Salford, UK
| | - Jason Smith
- The Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK
- Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nutbeam T, Kehoe A, Fenwick R, Smith J, Bouamra O, Wallis L, Stassen W. Do entrapment, injuries, outcomes and potential for self-extrication vary with age? A pre-specified analysis of the UK trauma registry (TARN). Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2022; 30:14. [PMID: 35248129 PMCID: PMC8898443 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00989-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Motor vehicle collisions (MVCs), particularly those associated with entrapment, are a common cause of major trauma. Current extrication methods are focused on spinal movement minimisation and mitigation, but for many patients self-extrication may be an appropriate alternative. Older drivers and passengers are increasingly injured in MVCs and may be at an increased risk of entrapment and its deleterious effects. The aim of this study is to describe the injuries, trapped status, outcomes, and potential for self-extrication for patients following an MVC across a range of age groups. Methods This is a retrospective study using the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database. Patients were included if they were admitted to an English hospital following an MVC from 2012 to 2019. Patients were excluded when their outcomes were not known or if they were secondary transfers. Simple descriptive analysis was used across the age groups: 16–59, 60–69, 70–79 and 80+ years. Logistic regression was performed to develop a model with known confounders, considering the odds of death by age group, and examining any interaction between age and trapped status with mortality.
Results 70,027 patients met the inclusion criteria. Older patients were more likely to be trapped and to die following an MVC (p < 0.0001). Head, abdominal and limb injuries were more common in the young with thoracic and spinal injuries being more common in older patients (all p < 0.0001). No statistical difference was found between the age groups in relation to ability to self-extricate. After adjustment for confounders, the 80 + age group were more likely to die if they were trapped; adjusted OR trapped 30.2 (19.8–46), not trapped 24.2 (20.1–29.2). Conclusions Patients over the age of 80 are more likely to die when trapped following an MVC. Self-extrication should be considered the primary route of egress for patients of all ages unless it is clearly impracticable or unachievable. For those patients who cannot self-extricate, a minimally invasive extrication approach should be employed to minimise entrapment time.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nutbeam T, Fenwick R, May B, Stassen W, Smith JE, Bowdler J, Wallis L, Shippen J. Assessing spinal movement during four extrication methods: a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2022; 30:7. [PMID: 35033160 PMCID: PMC8760816 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-022-00996-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Motor vehicle collisions are a common cause of death and serious injury. Many casualties will remain in their vehicle following a collision. Trapped patients have more injuries and are more likely to die than their untrapped counterparts. Current extrication methods are time consuming and have a focus on movement minimisation and mitigation. The optimal extrication strategy and the effect this extrication method has on spinal movement is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the movement at the cervical and lumbar spine for four commonly utilised extrication techniques. Methods Biomechanical data was collected using inertial Measurement Units on 6 healthy volunteers. The extrication types examined were: roof removal, b-post rip, rapid removal and self-extrication. Measurements were recorded at the cervical and lumbar spine, and in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) planes. Total movement (travel), maximal movement, mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals are reported for each extrication type. Results Data from a total of 230 extrications were collected for analysis. The smallest maximal and total movement (travel) were seen when the volunteer self-extricated (AP max = 2.6 mm, travel 4.9 mm). The largest maximal movement and travel were seen in rapid extrication extricated (AP max = 6.21 mm, travel 20.51 mm). The differences between self-extrication and all other methods were significant (p < 0.001), small non-significant differences existed between roof removal, b-post rip and rapid removal. Self-extrication was significantly quicker than the other extrication methods (mean 6.4 s). Conclusions In healthy volunteers, self-extrication is associated with the smallest spinal movement and the fastest time to complete extrication. Rapid, B-post rip and roof off extrication types are all associated with similar movements and time to extrication in prepared vehicles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nutbeam
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK. .,Devon Air Ambulance Trust, Exeter, UK. .,Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Rob Fenwick
- University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Barbara May
- Institute for Future Transport and Cities, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK
| | - Willem Stassen
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Jason E Smith
- Emergency Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.,Academic Department of Military Emergency Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jono Bowdler
- Fire and Rescue Service Trainer, Severn Park Fire and Rescue Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Lee Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - James Shippen
- Institute for Future Transport and Cities, University of Coventry, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
The role of cervical collars and verbal instructions in minimising spinal movement during self-extrication following a motor vehicle collision - a biomechanical study using healthy volunteers. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2021; 29:108. [PMID: 34332623 PMCID: PMC8325791 DOI: 10.1186/s13049-021-00919-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Motor vehicle collisions account for 1.3 million deaths and 50 million serious injuries worldwide each year. However, the majority of people involved in such incidents are uninjured or have injuries which do not prevent them exiting the vehicle. Self-extrication is the process by which a casualty is instructed to leave their vehicle and completes this with minimal or no assistance. Self-extrication may offer a number of patient and system-wide benefits. The efficacy of routine cervical collar application for this group is unclear and previous studies have demonstrated inconsistent results. It is unknown whether scripted instructions given to casualties on how to exit the vehicle would offer any additional utility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cervical collars and instructions on spinal movements during self-extrication from a vehicle, using novel motion tracking technology. Methods Biomechanical data on extrications were collected using Inertial Measurement Units on 10 healthy volunteers. The different extrication types examined were: i) No instructions and no cervical collar, ii) No instructions, with cervical collar, iii) With instructions and no collar, and iv) With instructions and with collar. Measurements were recorded at the cervical and lumbar spine, and in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) planes. Total movement, mean, standard deviation and confidence intervals are reported for each extrication type. Results Data were recorded for 392 extrications. The smallest cervical spine movements were recorded when a collar was applied and no instructions were given: mean 6.9 mm AP and 4.4 mm LAT. This also produced the smallest movements at the lumbar spine with a mean of 122 mm AP and 72.5 mm LAT. The largest overall movements were seen in the cervical spine AP when no instructions and no collar were used (28.3 mm). For cervical spine lateral movements, no collar but with instructions produced the greatest movement (18.5 mm). For the lumbar spine, the greatest movement was recorded when instructions were given and no collar was used (153.5 mm AP, 101.1 mm LAT). Conclusions Across all participants, the most frequently occurring extrication method associated with the least movement was no instructions, with a cervical collar in situ.
Collapse
|