Learning about stress from building, drilling and flying: a scoping review on team performance and stress in non-medical fields

[Development of a measuring tool for performance anxiety in obstetrics]

OBJECTIVE

Developing a measuring tool for physician's performance anxiety during obstetrical procedures, as a self-administered questionnaire.

METHODS

We used the Delphi method. First, we did a literature review to identify the items to submit for the first round. A panel of experts was asked to rate the relevance of items from one to six. For the first round of Delphi, items were retained if more than 70% of respondents assigned a five or six rating. Items were excluded if more than 70% of respondents assigned a one or two rating. All the other items, plus those suggested by the panel, were submitted to a second round of Delphi. The same item selection conditions were applied to the second round.

RESULTS

The overall response rate to the Delphi was 79% (19 respondents). At the end of the first round, 14 items were consensually relevant, no item was consensually irrelevant. For the second round, the 18 items that did not find consensus and seven new items suggested by the experts in the first round were submitted. At the end of the second round, nine items were retained by consensus as relevant.

CONCLUSION

This study defined by consensus 23 items for a self-questionnaire to measure specific performance anxiety in obstetrics divided into five dimensions: perceived stress, assessment of the risk of complications, medico-legal risk, impact of the healthcare team and peers, self-confidence and decision-making confidence. We intend to validate this tool in real population.

When routine becomes stressful: A qualitative study into resuscitation team members' perception of stress and performance

Interprofessional teamwork is of high importance during stressful situations such as CPR. Stress can potentially influence team performance. This study explores the perception of stress and its stressors during performance under pressure, to be able to further adjust or develop training. Healthcare professionals, who are part of the resuscitation team in a large Dutch university medical center, discussed their experiences in homogeneous focus groups. Nine focus groups and one individual interview were conducted and analyzed thematically, in order to deepen our understanding of their experiences. Thematic analysis resulted in two scenarios, routine and stress and an analysis of accompanying team processes. Routine refers to a setting perceived as straightforward. Stress develops in the presence of a combination of stressors such as a lack of clarity in roles and a lack of knowledge on fellow team members. Participants reported that stress affects the team, specifically through an altering of communication, a decrease in situational awareness, and formation of subgroups. This may lead to a further increase in stress, and potentially result in a vicious cycle. Team processes in a stressful situation like CPR can be disrupted by different stressors, and might affect the team and their performance. Improved knowledge about the stressors and their effects might be used to design a training environment representative for the performance setting healthcare professionals work in. Further research on the impact of representative training with team-level stressors and the development of a "team brain" might be worthwhile.

The Impact of the Patient Role on Medical Student Learning During Peer Simulation: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study

INTRODUCTION

Simulation-based learning is an effective approach to teaching and assessing medical students. However, there is a lack of research regarding how playing the patient role during peer simulation impacts medical student learning. This study, therefore, examines the experiences of first-year medical students in the patient role during a high-fidelity, multiday peer simulation.

METHODS

Using a phenomenological approach to qualitative data analysis, we analyzed 175 student reflection papers assigned to the students at the conclusion of the peer simulation. Our research team individually coded each paper and then came to a consensus on themes and patterns within the data.

RESULTS

We discovered the following 4 themes within the data: (1) communication, (2) empathy, (3) stress, and (4) professional identity. Through observation and peer simulation students learned the importance of team, patient, and nonverbal communication, especially during transitions of care. Next, the students recognized the importance of quality patient care and prioritizing the humanity of their future patients. The students also connected stress and mistakes, teaching them the importance of stress management. Finally, inspired by their peers and looking to their future selves, the students expressed a commitment to continued professional development.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient role during peer simulation is an impactful learning experience for first-year medical students. Our study holds important implications for ways in which medical educators can maximize the benefits of simulation-based education for junior medical student learning.

Does Organizational Commitment to Mental Health Affect Team Processes? A Longitudinal Study

Purpose

Team processes, such as reflexivity and participation, are critical for organizational sustainability, especially in high-reliability professions such as healthcare. However, little is known about health-related predictors of team processes. Basing our hypotheses on the Input-Process-Output (IPO) model, this study investigates the influence of perceived organizational commitment to mental health (OCMH) on healthcare workers' team reflexivity and participation via mental health-specific leadership (MHsL) and team autonomy.

Patients and Methods

The study involved 82 participants (ie, physicians, nurses, healthcare assistants, healthcare technicians, and physiotherapists) working in the Medicine, Emergency, and Neurological Departments at a large public healthcare organization in Italy. Data was gathered at 2-time points, 14 months apart.

Results

The results suggest that healthcare workers' perception of their organization's support for mental health at T1 significantly impacts team participation at T2 through MHsL and team autonomy. Likewise, the indirect effect of OCMH through MHsL and team autonomy was also significant in the model predicting team reflexivity. However, in both models, no direct relationship of OCMH on the dependent variables was found.

Conclusion

The findings highlight the importance of a mental health-supportive environment and leadership to foster team autonomy and, subsequentially, team processes, which are fundamental for performance and patient care.

Exploring participant experience to optimize the design and delivery of stress exposure simulations in emergency medicine

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) teams frequently perform under conditions of high stress. Stress exposure simulation (SES) is specifically designed to train recognition and management of stress responses under these conditions. Current approaches to design and delivery of SES in emergency medicine are based on principles derived from other contexts and from anecdotal experience. However, the optimal design and delivery of SES in emergency medicine are not known. We aimed to explore participant experience to inform our approach.

METHODS

We performed an exploratory study in our Australian ED with doctors and nurses participating in SES sessions. We used a three-part framework-sources of stress, the impacts of that stress, and the strategies to mitigate-to inform our SES design and delivery and to guide our exploration of participant experience. Data were collected through a narrative survey and participant interviews and analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

There were 23 total participants (doctors n = 12, nurses n = 11) across the three sessions. Sixteen survey responses and eight interview transcripts were analyzed, each with equal numbers of doctors and nurses. Five themes were identified in data analysis: (1) experience of stress, (2) managing stress, (3) design and delivery of SES, (4) learning conversations, and (5) transfer to practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that design and delivery of SES should follow health care simulation best practice, with stress adequately induced by authentic clinical scenarios and to avoid trickery or adding extraneous cognitive load. Facilitators leading learning conversations in SES sessions should develop a deep understanding of stress and emotional activation and focus on team-based strategies to mitigate harmful impacts of stress on performance.